Re: config(8) weirdness

2000-10-01 Thread Peter Wemm
EEK! I will take a look at this right now... Motomichi Matsuzaki wrote: Hi. At Sun, 27 Aug 2000 15:16:01 +0200 (CEST), Alexander Leidinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone success compiling kernel with the following config? # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 12:20:04AM -0500, Tony Johnson wrote: Run 4.0 or piss off... Tony, I suggest you apologise to Mr Choi for this extremely insulting message. Kris -- In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate. -- Charles Forsythe [EMAIL PROTECTED] To

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Run 4.0 or piss off... That's totally inappropriate. He's reporting a BUILD ERROR which is an occasional fact of life in -current and should be reported so that whomever broke AMD can go fix the build. He's also a developer of FreeBSD and simply reporting this to the other developers. I'm

Re: setting device permissions for DEVFS

2000-10-01 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Poul-Henning Kamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): You guys are overlooking something about DEVFS: devices may appear post-boot. Ah, yes. BTW: Devices don't disappear if you unload devices. This happens for example with bktr.ko. When I then reload bktr.ko, I get the following: WARNING:

Re: setting device permissions for DEVFS

2000-10-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Alexander Langer write s: Thus spake Poul-Henning Kamp ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): You guys are overlooking something about DEVFS: devices may appear post-boot. Ah, yes. BTW: Devices don't disappear if you unload devices. This happens for example with bktr.ko. That is

Re: ACPI megapatch

2000-10-01 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Cool. On some machine, thermal management requires Embedded Controller I/O. Anybody working on this? Yeah. I just discovered that I need this. I haven't look at how operation regions are handled, so I'm not sure how hard it's going to be to implement the hooks necessary for

Oddity after SMPNG kernel

2000-10-01 Thread Khetan Gajjar
Hi. I've upgraded my -current box from a pre-SMPNG kernel (an August vintage) to a post-SMPNG kernel (built today), and have noticed behaviour I haven't seen discussed in -current. I followed the instructions in UPDATING as well as discussed on the -current list, and the system boots with

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At 1 Oct 2000 04:24:14 GMT, CHOI Junho [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have cvsup'ed today, build stopped with the following error: I got same one, reported by my nightly buildworld failure. I think this happened between 9/30 00:00 JST and 10/1 00:00 JST... -- Jun Kuriyama [EMAIL PROTECTED] //

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Tony Johnson" writes: : Run 4.0 or piss off... Tony, this is an *UN*acceptible attitude. CHOI-san is reporting a problem. He didn't rail against anything, nor did he demand a fix. This is 100% acceptible. Your message, however, was rude and inappropriate.

Re: ACPI megapatch

2000-10-01 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mitsuru IWASAKI writes: : Thanks Shiozaki-san, I think `reg' is short for registers of the : target chip, correct? Yes. Traditionally fooreg.h has "hardware" definitions on it. Device registers, flag masks and other such things. Both OLDCARD and NEWCARD do this.

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Michael Harnois
On Sun, 01 Oct 2000 11:35:32 -0600, Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Tony, this is an *UN*acceptible attitude. CHOI-san is reporting a problem. He didn't rail against anything, nor did he demand a fix. This is 100% acceptible. Your message, however, was rude and

Re: setting device permissions for DEVFS

2000-10-01 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alexander Langer writes: : No - instead we should add something like devfs_permission{0,1,2,etc} : (and maybe ownership) to rc.conf, which can be modified there and : then rc.devfs sets them - similar to the ifconfig stuff. : : Opinions? devd? We need it for other

Re: setting device permissions for DEVFS

2000-10-01 Thread Warner Losh
In message 11056.970344237@critter Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : We need a generic "devd" which finds out that devices have appeared, : set their perms (if needed/wanted) and executes any commands needed : (getty, mount, etc etc) by the device. ifconfig and dhclient are likely the most often

Re: kthread_create()

2000-10-01 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Alan Cox writes: : Does anyone know if it's by design or by accident that kthread_create : specifies RFFDG to fork1? It seems odd to ask for the file descriptor : table to be copied and not shared. I think that I did that, or Peter didn't change it. I copied it

Re: setting device permissions for DEVFS

2000-10-01 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Warner Losh writes: In message 11056.970344237@critter Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : We need a generic "devd" which finds out that devices have appeared, : set their perms (if needed/wanted) and executes any commands needed : (getty, mount, etc etc) by the device.

Re: setting device permissions for DEVFS

2000-10-01 Thread Warner Losh
In message 14852.970422933@critter Poul-Henning Kamp writes: : Not right now, but it could. Right now you can tell something happened : by examining the sysctl vfs.devfs.generation OK. As soon as I get NEWCARD attaching devices, I'll revisit this as it is needed for pccard stuff. If things go

Re: setting device permissions for DEVFS

2000-10-01 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Warner Losh ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Don't you mean pccard.conf? You can do the mounting now. I think that umount -f would work for dismounting on eject, but haven't tested it. No, I meant /etc/pccard_ether :) It works just fine. I don't unmount, though. Alex -- cat:

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Jordan Hubbard
I hate to spoil the moment ... but does anyone have an idea what the fix is? g Nothing in the amd directory seems to have changed in the past couple of weeks, so it must be somewhere else, and I'm not bright enough to figure out where. Yeah, somebody forgot that typedefs and structure names

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Mike Smith
I hate to spoil the moment ... but does anyone have an idea what the fix is? g Nothing in the amd directory seems to have changed in the past couple of weeks, so it must be somewhere else, and I'm not bright enough to figure out where. Yeah, somebody forgot that typedefs and structure

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Brian F. Feldman
Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hate to spoil the moment ... but does anyone have an idea what the fix is? g Nothing in the amd directory seems to have changed in the past couple of weeks, so it must be somewhere else, and I'm not bright enough to figure out where. Yeah,

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Jordan Hubbard
Er, this is probably the wrong fix. It sounds like the kernel 'callout' structure is ending up visible in userland, which it shouldn't. It wasn't clear to me if it was clashing with the internal typedef or something else - the namespace issues with gcc are a little unclear to me here (at

No Subject

2000-10-01 Thread Janusz Orowski
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 12:14:25PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: I hate to spoil the moment ... but does anyone have an idea what the fix is? g Nothing in the amd directory seems to have changed in the past couple of weeks, so it must be somewhere else, and I'm not bright enough to figure

Re: ACPI megapatch

2000-10-01 Thread Mike Smith
PowerResource code keeps pointers to the PowerResource objects, then finds a pointer to methods of the object dynamically. Can we do it in similar way for thermal management? Well, yes, but you have to go back and re-parse the actual AML. I'm not even sure if it's safe to

Interesting AML bug... recommended workaround?

2000-10-01 Thread Mike Smith
Here's what seems to be an interesting AML or AML parser bug. OperationRegion(PSRG, SystemMemory, 0x0410, 0x1) Field(PSRG, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { , 2, PS2E, 1 } The field is marked for 32-bit access, but the region is only

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread Michael Harnois
This is better than watching the soaps. I'll be waiting anxiously for the next installment. ;) On Sun, 1 Oct 2000 12:47:16 -0700, "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: On Sun, Oct 01, 2000 at 12:14:25PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote: I hate to spoil the moment ... but does anyone have

No Subject

2000-10-01 Thread krister johansson
subscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] __ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free! http://photos.yahoo.com/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Today -current broken on build

2000-10-01 Thread CHOI Junho
"WL" == Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: WL this is an *UN*acceptible attitude. CHOI-san is reporting a -san is Japanese word, and I am Korean. Due to historical reason, most Korean do not want to be treated as Japanese and most of them will be angry. Please don't call me 'CHOI-san'.

Re: [CFR] ncv, nsp, stg SCSI drivers

2000-10-01 Thread non
Sorry, the files colud not fetch. I think you can now fetch them. // Noriaki Mitsunaga From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 30 Sep 2000 15:20:07 +0900 From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 15:25:42 +0200 Use a normal timeout ? I changed to use timeout() and now

Re: sendmail related changes

2000-10-01 Thread Archie Cobbs
Gregory Neil Shapiro writes: sendmail's version of vacation is completely backwards compatible with the existing version. It also contains new features and bug fixes that are not in the current FreeBSD version. This will take care of PR bin/15227. 2. Copy cf config building tree into

adv0 - panic

2000-10-01 Thread Leif Neland
I get a "Panic: Page fault while in supervisor mode" just after adv0 is displayed during boot. If I just remove the card, I can boot. Current current. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

ATA disk support broken for PC-CARD in 5.0-CURRENT??

2000-10-01 Thread Chain Lee
Hi, PC-CARD IDE hard disk and compact flash card support is broken in recent 5.0-CURRENT. Does anyone have an idea what the problem is? Please copy reply to me. I don't subscribe to the 'current' mailing list. Thanks, -chain I have been using compact flash card and ATA disks on my Toshiba

Re: ACPI megapatch

2000-10-01 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Yes, we can have large benefit by migrating to ACPICA. I suggest that we make ACPICA version of AML interpreter run in userland as a debugger for the first evaluation. By doing this work we can make sure it works actually on FreeBSD and estimate the work volume of kernel porting.

Re: Interesting AML bug... recommended workaround?

2000-10-01 Thread Mitsuru IWASAKI
Here's what seems to be an interesting AML or AML parser bug. OperationRegion(PSRG, SystemMemory, 0x0410, 0x1) Field(PSRG, DWordAcc, NoLock, Preserve) { , 2, PS2E, 1 } The field is marked for 32-bit access, but the region is only 1