Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk

2001-02-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:14:57PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: At 20 Feb 2001 07:54:22 GMT, Kris Kennaway wrote: No, MACHINE_CPU is optional. If you don't have it set, you get the vanilla C code. So if you don't have it set at all, you'll get C code in OpenSSL as it's always been, then the

Re: Do we need a 3. level between stable and cuurent?

2001-02-20 Thread Crist J. Clark
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 10:30:17AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Leif Neland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010219 08:54] wrote: We all know: -current is bleeding edge, expect it to break at random. Don't run it if you don't know how to fix it. -stable is for production, it works all the time.

Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk

2001-02-20 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:14:57PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: I don't know this is local problem on my environment, but "make buildworld" with old make(1) failed if I did not set MACHINE_CPU in /etc/make.conf. So it seems invoked make(1) in

Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk sys.mk

2001-02-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 07:48:31PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 05:14:57PM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote: I don't know this is local problem on my environment, but "make buildworld" with old make(1) failed if I did not set

make buildkernel failed

2001-02-20 Thread Jean Louis Ntakpe
Hi, I could make buildworld and installworld sucessfully but "make buildkernel" fails. (kernel is built but no modules could be compiled). CVSUP a few minutes ago. === 3dfx make: don't know how to make machine/lock.h. Stop *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop

Building procedure of krb5 is broken

2001-02-20 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
Sorry if you have seen before. I've found that current 5-current is broken, since krb5 cannot compile. Here is a typical compiler message: In file included from /usr/src/kerberos5/lib/libgssapi/../../../crypto/heimdal/lib/krb5/krb5_locl.h:142, from

Re: make buildkernel failed

2001-02-20 Thread Peter Wemm
Give it about an hour and re-cvsup. Once you have rev 1.94 of src/sys/conf/kmod.mk, you should be set. Or you can grab the delta by cvsweb if you are in a hurry. Jean Louis Ntakpe wrote: Hi, I could make buildworld and installworld sucessfully but "make buildkernel" fails. (kernel is

Re: proper kernel config procedure ...

2001-02-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This doesn't work 100%. In particular if you have a sys that's not part of /usr/src/sys it doesn't always work. Yes, it does, if your sys tree is complete. There used to be a problem building modules, but it was fixed a month or two ago. DES --

TI-RPC and NFS6 status (100% done)

2001-02-20 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I have finished now my work here with TI-RPC, and I'm only doing bug-fixing now before this gets comitted. I'd like that many people test these changes and send me bugreports back. This is a port from NetBSD, and as in NetBSD, it uses Unix Domain Sockets instead of TLI/XLI stuff. I'v taken

Re: name resolution problems

2001-02-20 Thread Alexander Leidinger
On 19 Feb, Wesley Morgan wrote: Since the big shake-up with -current, I find that mozilla and galeon can no longer function (both up to date), but lynx has no problems. Mozilla [...] Is anyone else seeing this? Yes (galeon-0.9b3 + mozilla-0.7). Netscape 4.76 works. Bye, Alexander. --

as segfaulting during world-build

2001-02-20 Thread Mikhail Teterin
No, I don't think it is hardware. It died on the same spot for the third time in a row: tail -15 /var/tmp/w.log* == /var/tmp/w.log == cd /opt/src/lib/csu/i386-elf; make _EXTRADEPEND cc -O -pipe -march=i686 -elf -Wall -fkeep-inline-functions -I/opt/src/lib/csu/i386-elf/../common

Re: as segfaulting during world-build

2001-02-20 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 11:27:17AM -0500, Mikhail Teterin wrote: No, I don't think it is hardware. It died on the same spot for the third time in a row: ... What date is the -CURRENT you are attempting the build on from? There were problems with as failing for a while not long ago. Check your

Re: Kernel panic in irq14: ata0

2001-02-20 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Maxim Sobolev wrote: [Charset koi8-r unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] Hi, I'm not sure whether it's related to ata driver, but starting from several days ago (my previous kernel was from 30 January) my kernel panices on

Re: Kernel panic in irq14: ata0

2001-02-20 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Maxim Sobolev wrote: Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Maxim Sobolev wrote: [Charset koi8-r unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] Hi, I'm not sure whether it's related to ata driver, but starting from several days ago (my previous kernel was from 30 January) my kernel

Re: Kernel panic in irq14: ata0

2001-02-20 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Maxim Sobolev wrote: Soren Schmidt wrote: It seems Maxim Sobolev wrote: [Charset koi8-r unsupported, filtering to ASCII...] Hi, I'm not sure whether it's related to ata driver, but starting from several days ago (my previous kernel

Re: Kernel panic in irq14: ata0

2001-02-20 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Maxim Sobolev wrote: Well, I cant reproduce this problem and I havn't heard from others with this problem It's not an ata specific problem, but rather a problem of all ISA devices (I have an ISA based ata controller). Well, seems -current is broken in yet another way

Re: Kernel panic in irq14: ata0

2001-02-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It's not an ata specific problem, but rather a problem of all ISA devices (I have an ISA based ata controller). I don't think it has anything to do with ISA. I've had similar problems on a PCI-only system (actually, PCI+EISA motherboard with no EISA

Re: TI-RPC and NFS6 status (100% done)

2001-02-20 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, I've found some inconsistency in my CVS tree, and sbin/mountd/mountd.c was not the version it should have been. That's fixed now and world just finished on my box sucessfully. Thanks to Ruslan (new man-pages are included in second patch today). Location is still the same, I've just updated

Re: make buildkernel failed

2001-02-20 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Wemm writes: : Give it about an hour and re-cvsup. Once you have rev 1.94 of : src/sys/conf/kmod.mk, you should be set. Or you can grab the delta by : cvsweb if you are in a hurry. find . -name .depend -delete also works. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: -stable build of kernel fails

2001-02-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Sorry, my bad. I forgot an #include. In sys/netinet/ip_fw.c add this #include: @@ -48,6 +47,7 @@ #include net/route.h #include netinet/in.h #include netinet/in_systm.h +#include netinet/in_var.h #include netinet/in_pcb.h #include netinet/ip.h #include netinet/ip_var.h I have committed

Re: updating from 12/25/1999 -current?

2001-02-20 Thread Herman Tan
--- Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 01:19:13AM -0800, Herman Tan wrote: Greetings everyone: Will I run into any problems doing a make world from a 12/25/1999 version of -CURRENT to the latest -current? I noticed on -RELEASE machines when I went from

vinum fix take 2

2001-02-20 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Now that I've broken all you non-devfs users of vinum, I have a patch that may get it working again. Please let me know if: http://people.freebsd.org/~alfred/vinum2.diff (you'll need to be -current as of today) works, otherwise I'll be committing tonight or tomorrow as this patch _still_ works

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Akinori MUSHA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010220 11:19] wrote: Hi, I have implemented -regex and -iregex options for find(1): Sounds good, just make sure the regex engine matches the one that the other find(1)'s use. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [[EMAIL PROTECTED]|[EMAIL PROTECTED]] "I have the heart

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:42:19 +1300, Craig Carey wrote: What about the -iname option?. I recently installed GNU 'find' just to get that -iname problem fixed. Can you do -iname too?. Thanks for the info. It's added now. I'm ashamed to say that I couldn't resist implementing -E option to

Re: proper kernel config procedure ...

2001-02-20 Thread Matthew Jacob
On 20 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This doesn't work 100%. In particular if you have a sys that's not part of /usr/src/sys it doesn't always work. Yes, it does, if your sys tree is complete. There used to be a problem building modules,

Slightly OT: XMMS on -CURRENT?

2001-02-20 Thread Vladimir Kushnir
Hi all, Does anybody run xmms on -CURRENT? For some reason it hungs here on "poll". Any other (multithread included) program runs flawlessly. The only possibility I can see right now is plugin system (i.e. dl* functions) but there haven't been eny changes in ld-elf.so.1 as of lately. I'm really

Re: What goes at the boot prompt

2001-02-20 Thread Edwin Culp
I have a kernel that hangs at boot, so when I try to boot kernel.old, I have a problem. At the Default: F1 prompt, I give it an F1 and then the space key give me FreeBSD/i386 BOOT Default: 0:wd(o,a)/boot/loader boot: _ What do I put at the boot prompt. I think the changes of the

find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Akinori MUSHA
Hi, I have implemented -regex and -iregex options for find(1): http://people.FreeBSD.org/~knu/misc/find_regex.diff They are meant to be compatible with those of GNU's and NetBSD's: -regex pattern: True if the whole path of the file matches pattern using basic regular

Re: latest alpha breakage

2001-02-20 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Matthew Jacob writes: === libcrypto ( echo "#ifndef MK1MF_BUILD"; echo " /* auto-generated by crypto/Makefile.ssl for crypto/cversion.c */"; echo " #define CFLAGS \"cc\""; echo " #define PLATFORM \"`uname -s`-`uname -m`\""; echo " #define DATE \"`LC_TIME=C date`\""; echo

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Akinori MUSHA wrote: Hi, I have implemented -regex and -iregex options for find(1): http://people.FreeBSD.org/~knu/misc/find_regex.diff I'm not familiar with find sources, but it seems to me you execute regcomp() for each file name to be compared? If so... change that! :-) Regcomp()

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Akinori MUSHA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010220 11:19] wrote: Hi, I have implemented -regex and -iregex options for find(1): Sounds good, just make sure the regex engine matches the one that the other find(1)'s use. It won't. GNU find certainly uses GNU regexp

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Akinori MUSHA wrote: I would object if it is a new variant of regexp. I'd say it ought be between egrep and perl, in its functionality. ... - Perl's regexp is known to be a unique variant that is different from the "basic regexp" nor the "extended regexp" ;P For that matter, anyone

Re: What goes at the boot prompt

2001-02-20 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Edwin Culp wrote: I have a kernel that hangs at boot, so when I try to boot kernel.old, I have a problem. At the Default: F1 prompt, I give it an F1 and then the space key give me FreeBSD/i386 BOOT Default: 0:wd(o,a)/boot/loader boot: _ What do I put at the boot prompt. I

-stable build of kernel fails

2001-02-20 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
With the recent commits to -STABLE (I'm assuming these are MFC that's why I sent to both freebsd-current and freebsd-stable) having to do with the ipfw code, I have had a problem compiling the kernel. These are the errors. cc -c -O -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:35:09 +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: I'm not familiar with find sources, but it seems to me you execute regcomp() for each file name to be compared? If so... change that! :-) Regcomp() does expensive setup so that regexec() can be run inexpensively many times over.

Re: What goes at the boot prompt

2001-02-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Feb 20, 2001 at 04:14:02PM -0800, Edwin Culp wrote: I still don't get it. Should you really be running -current? This kind of support question isn't appropriate for this list, IMO. Kris PGP signature

latest alpha breakage

2001-02-20 Thread Matthew Jacob
=== libcrypto ( echo "#ifndef MK1MF_BUILD"; echo " /* auto-generated by crypto/Makefile.ssl for crypto/cversion.c */"; echo " #define CFLAGS \"cc\""; echo " #define PLATFORM \"`uname -s`-`uname -m`\""; echo " #define DATE \"`LC_TIME=C date`\""; echo "#endif" ) buildinf.h make: don't

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Wed, 21 Feb 2001 14:12:51 +0900, I wrote: At Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:35:09 +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: I'm not familiar with find sources, but it seems to me you execute regcomp() for each file name to be compared? If so... change that! :-) Regcomp() does expensive setup so that

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Craig Carey
Can an -iname option be provided. Then the FreeBSD find would be more like GNU find, and lines like this could be written: find /msdos-disk -iname "*txt" | xargs -n 1 ls -l I am doubtful that the -regexp needs to be inferior to the the -egrep option. What software would break: it was said

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Akinori MUSHA wrote: I'm not familiar with find sources, but it seems to me you execute regcomp() for each file name to be compared? If so... change that! :-) Regcomp() does expensive setup so that regexec() can be run inexpensively many times over. Indeed. I'll do it soon,

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Wed, 21 Feb 2001 18:53:26 +1300, Craig Carey wrote: Can an -iname option be provided. Then the FreeBSD find would be more like GNU find, and lines like this could be written: Yes, it's already implemented as I wrote in the previous mail. I am doubtful that the -regexp needs to be

Re: find(1) -regex/-iregex

2001-02-20 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Wed, 21 Feb 2001 15:06:22 +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~knu/misc/find_regex.diff You might have done it, but the version above is not it. :-) Oh, would you please reload it? When you see a function named do_c_regex(), that's it. :) --