Re: HEADS UP: I broke swapping

2001-05-23 Thread Bruce Evans
On Tue, 22 May 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: John Baldwin wrote: If I have swap (i.e. I've run swapon on a swap partition) the program is kill ed by the system fine. If I don't have swap, then both the memkill process adn the swapper process (proc0) are stuck in the vmwait wait channel

Re: What's causing troubles with pcm?

2001-05-23 Thread Vallo Kallaste
On Tue, May 22, 2001 at 04:29:39PM -0700, Alex Zepeda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Playing mp3's with mpg123 has been quite satistfactory until now. Today I've discovered that every execution of sync(8) distorts music by means of stretching musical phrase. The obvious answer would be to

** HEADS UP **: sys/miscfs file systems moved

2001-05-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Dear -CURRENT users, Please note that: - FDESC, FIFO, NULL, PORTAL, PROC, UMAP and UNION file systems were repo-copied from sys/miscfs to sys/fs. - Renamed the following file systems and their modules: fdesc - fdescfs, portal - portalfs, union - unionfs. - Renamed corresponding kernel

rm -rf question

2001-05-23 Thread Storms of Perfection
gary@trouble:~$ rm -rf /home/gary/public_html/mrtg/david/ Display all 2275 possibilities? (y or n) gary@trouble:~$ rm -rf /home/gary/public_html/mrtg/david/* bash: /bin/rm: Argument list too long Is this a bug with rm? I've never come accross this on -CURRENT or -STABLE for that matter.. To

Re: rm -rf question

2001-05-23 Thread David Malone
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:51:40AM -0500, Storms of Perfection wrote: gary@trouble:~$ rm -rf /home/gary/public_html/mrtg/david/ Display all 2275 possibilities? (y or n) gary@trouble:~$ rm -rf /home/gary/public_html/mrtg/david/* bash: /bin/rm: Argument list too long Is this a bug with rm?

Re: rm -rf question

2001-05-23 Thread Will Andrews
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 05:51:40AM -0500, Storms of Perfection wrote: gary@trouble:~$ rm -rf /home/gary/public_html/mrtg/david/ Display all 2275 possibilities? (y or n) gary@trouble:~$ rm -rf /home/gary/public_html/mrtg/david/* bash: /bin/rm: Argument list too long Is this a bug with rm?

Re: rm -rf question

2001-05-23 Thread Alexander Langer
Thus spake Will Andrews ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): No. It's a safety feature to prevent your shell from using too much memory to do the globbing you asked for (the *). This has nothing whatsoever to do with rm(1). It's xargs job to workaround that: ls | xargs rm -rf Alex -- cat:

RE: New strategy of locking a process group

2001-05-23 Thread Seigo Tanimura
On Tue, 22 May 2001 07:56:52 -0700 (PDT), John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: John On 22-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote: On Tue, 22 May 2001 04:48:38 -0700 (PDT), John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: John On 22-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote: For now, p_mtx protects p_pgrp in struct proc. This

Re: ** HEADS UP **: sys/miscfs file systems moved

2001-05-23 Thread Brian Somers
Dear -CURRENT users, Please note that: - FDESC, FIFO, NULL, PORTAL, PROC, UMAP and UNION file systems were repo-copied from sys/miscfs to sys/fs. - Renamed the following file systems and their modules: fdesc - fdescfs, portal - portalfs, union - unionfs. - Renamed corresponding

Re: ** HEADS UP **: sys/miscfs file systems moved

2001-05-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:52:40PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: Dear -CURRENT users, Please note that: - FDESC, FIFO, NULL, PORTAL, PROC, UMAP and UNION file systems were repo-copied from sys/miscfs to sys/fs. - Renamed the following file systems and their modules: fdesc -

Re: ** HEADS UP **: sys/miscfs file systems moved

2001-05-23 Thread Brian Somers
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 12:52:40PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote: Dear -CURRENT users, Please note that: - FDESC, FIFO, NULL, PORTAL, PROC, UMAP and UNION file systems were repo-copied from sys/miscfs to sys/fs. - Renamed the following file systems and their modules:

harddisk faillure or kernel problem ?

2001-05-23 Thread Stephan van Beerschoten
For a while now I keep having the following logentries in my messages file: May 23 13:59:40 enigma /kernel: ad0s1a: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 1704031 of 720912-720913 (ad0s1 bn 17040 31; cn 1803 tn 3 sn 7) retrying May 23 13:59:40 enigma /kernel: ad0s1a: UDMA ICRC error reading fsbn 2857979

downgrade

2001-05-23 Thread Norbert Koch
Hi! Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable? Thanks, norbert. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

sbin/vinum broken

2001-05-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
Hi! src/sbin/vinum is broken at the moment. It doesn't build without -DVINUMDEBUG. A quick workaround: Index: Makefile === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/vinum/Makefile,v retrieving revision 1.20 diff -u -r1.20 Makefile ---

Re: sbin/vinum broken

2001-05-23 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:56:39 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] src/sbin/vinum is broken at the moment. It doesn't build without -DVINUMDEBUG. A quick workaround: [Workaround -- adding CFLAGS+= -DVINUMDEBUG to src/sbin/vinum/Makefile -- elided] OK; I verified that I

Re: downgrade

2001-05-23 Thread Richard J Kuhns
Norbert Koch writes: Hi! Is it possible to downgrade a machine from -current to -stable? Yes, it's possible, but if you've got much on your system I don't think it's worth it. I (almost) did it a couple of months ago. It's not for the faint of heart. One thing that you've got to

installworld broken (includes fix) [was: Re: sbin/vinum broken]

2001-05-23 Thread David Wolfskill
Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 09:08:31 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED] The make installworld dies, however: cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -C -o root -g wheel -m 444 dev/usb/*.h /usr/include/dev/usb cd /usr/src/include/../sys; install -C -C -o root -g wheel -m 444

Re: sbin/vinum broken

2001-05-23 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 09:08:31AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: Date: Wed, 23 May 2001 16:56:39 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] src/sbin/vinum is broken at the moment. It doesn't build without -DVINUMDEBUG. A quick workaround: [Workaround -- adding CFLAGS+=

RE: New strategy of locking a process group

2001-05-23 Thread John Baldwin
On 23-May-01 Seigo Tanimura wrote: The issue of both of the solutions briefed above is that the p_pgrp lock protects *excess* data. It might be another solution to introduce a new mutex (p_pgrpmtx) into struct proc to lock p_pgrp. Although memory size costs per process, contention for p_pgrp

RE: ** HEADS UP **: sys/miscfs file systems moved

2001-05-23 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 23-May-01 (09:53:13/GMT) Ruslan Ermilov wrote: - FDESC, FIFO, NULL, PORTAL, PROC, UMAP and UNION file systems were repo-copied from sys/miscfs to sys/fs. - Renamed the following file systems and their modules: fdesc - fdescfs, portal - portalfs, union - unionfs. - Renamed

RE: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_fault.c

2001-05-23 Thread John Baldwin
On 23-May-01 John Baldwin wrote: jhb 2001/05/23 15:09:18 PDT Modified files: sys/vm vm_fault.c Log: Take a more conservative approach and still lock Giant around VM faults for now. Hopefully swapping is working now. The changes I made are perhaps

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/vm vm_fault.c

2001-05-23 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010523 19:10] wrote: On 23-May-01 John Baldwin wrote: jhb 2001/05/23 15:09:18 PDT Modified files: sys/vm vm_fault.c Log: Take a more conservative approach and still lock Giant around VM faults for now.

Re: sbin/vinum broken

2001-05-23 Thread Greg Lehey
On Wednesday, 23 May 2001 at 16:56:39 +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: Hi! src/sbin/vinum is broken at the moment. It doesn't build without -DVINUMDEBUG. *sigh*. I could have sworn I tested this, but it seems I did it in a parallel universe. It's fixed now, I think. me-pointyhat++; A quick

Tonights panic: free_newdirblk+0x73: movl %eax,0x10(%edx)

2001-05-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
Just upgraded to latest sources, doesn't look like the swap issue ... was performing a 'make -j16 buildworld' when it panic'd ... Fataltrap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id = fault virtual address = 0x12 fault code = supervisor write, page not

Re: kernel broken in two places

2001-05-23 Thread Dima Dorfman
Michael Harnois [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Unless I missed a heads-up somewhere ... mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/dev -I @/../include /usr/src/sys/modules/if_sl/../../net/if_sl.c /usr/src/sys/modul es/if_sl/../../net/slcompress.c

RE: Tonights panic: free_newdirblk+0x73: movl %eax,0x10(%e

2001-05-23 Thread John Baldwin
On 24-May-01 The Hermit Hacker wrote: Just upgraded to latest sources, doesn't look like the swap issue ... was performing a 'make -j16 buildworld' when it panic'd ... Fataltrap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; lapic.id = fault virtual address = 0x12 fault

Re: kernel broken in two places

2001-05-23 Thread Michael Harnois
Dima Dorfman [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Are you compiling without options INET? No, that I could have figured out. -- Michael D. Harnois[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redeemer Lutheran Church Washburn, Iowa CYNIC, n. A blackguard whose

RE: Tonights panic: free_newdirblk+0x73: movl %eax,0x10(%e

2001-05-23 Thread The Hermit Hacker
Okay, running a new buildworld right now ... give it a half hour or so :) On Wed, 23 May 2001, John Baldwin wrote: Looks like %edx is 0x2 then. In other post, the faulting va was 0x11 with the same instruction, meaning that %edx is 0x1. So it looks like it isn't a NULL pointer

Re: kernel broken in two places

2001-05-23 Thread Michael Harnois
Well, I deleted /usr/src/sys/, cvsup'd again, and now make depend works. Who knows ... -- Michael D. Harnois[EMAIL PROTECTED] Redeemer Lutheran Church Washburn, Iowa Be radical, be as radical as you can ... because radicals

Date for a working -current?

2001-05-23 Thread Joseph Koshy
I'm in the processing of bring a 5-current system of Oct 2000 vintage more upto-date. The kernel built around May 23rd 2001, has been quite unstable, with numerous warning on lock order reversals, and alas, frequent panics, mostly on account of processes sleeping while holding mutexes. Its