In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nate Lawson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I am using dev-si_drv1 to store my softc (as are other drivers). What
: guarantees do I have about multiple opens/closes not stepping on each
: other's toes? How does -stable compare to -current in this regard?
A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations.
After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely.
I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up to highlight the problem):
pmap_mapdev()
...
for (tmpva = va; size 0; ) {
pte =
Mon Jul 8 07:00:00 GMT 2002
cvs [update aborted]: /home/ncvs/CVSROOT: Interrupted system call
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 03:28:51PM -0700, Mike Makonnen wrote:
MALLOC(copy, struct plimit *, sizeof(struct plimit),
M_SUBPROC, M_WAITOK);
- bcopy(lim-pl_rlimit, copy-pl_rlimit, sizeof(struct plimit));
+ bcopy(lim-pl_rlimit, copy-pl_rlimit, sizeof(struct rlimit));
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David Xu wrote:
sorry for a bit OT, but why are pmap_mapdev and pmap_unmapdev still using
old C language parameter style? I saw other functions in pmap using ANSI
C style.
because until recently it was not 'kosher' to change them, but thank god
we have now got past
Would it be possible to get better granularity on when things like this
are sent to the list? Maybe some flag to set that says, Hey, I started an
actual buildworld, so from here on out any errors get mailed to the list.
Doug
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Mon Jul 8 07:00:00
After re-compiling XFree86-Server-4.2.0_3 on current, my mousewheel
(Logitech usb wheel mouse, connected via sysmouse) produces only
downward, or button-5, events on scrolling either up or down.
The problem appears to be the compilation of line 1508 in
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:47:52AM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote:
obrien 2002/07/07 11:47:52 PDT
Modified files:
share/mk bsd.sys.mk
Log:
Be more strict with WARNS now -- the GCC 3.1 turmoil is behind us.
Revision ChangesPath
1.10 +6 -0
Could you clarify the problem ?
I believe the problem appears when you _do_ use punch_fw,
otherwise the modified code is never called.
cheers
luigi
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 09:20:38AM -0500, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 06:04:36PM -0700, Joel M. Baldwin
I started out without punch_fw. natd was core dumping on me. I
eventually figured out that if I added punch_fw in, natd no longer core
dumped. I've left it in, things seem to work better
anyway with it in.
I've put a core dump file at http://outel.org/natd.core
Here is my original
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:28:30PM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
is that machine dead? Is it still the source of current snaps? I need to
re-install (having booting problems between old version of FreeBSD and new
one, easiest fix is just to re-install) and I want to know where to go
Yes, I see that as well. Another symptom is that fsck -p now always
announces unexpected inconsistencies and drops back to singleuser when
it indeed was able to fix the problems, i.e. it marks the filesystem
clean and a manual fsck does not report anything unusual.
My last cvsup was with
you have turned on nat enable yes in ppp.conf,
and but you havn't turned ip_foward on in sysctl,
so core dumped.
David Xu
- Original Message -
From: Richard Seaman, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Luigi Rizzo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Joel M. Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:08:58AM -0700, David Xu wrote:
you have turned on nat enable yes in ppp.conf,
and but you havn't turned ip_foward on in sysctl,
so core dumped.
David Xu
Well, I'm not running ppp, and never indicated I was. I'm running
natd.
# sysctl -a | grep forward
On 7 Jul, Jeff Roberson wrote:
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote:
Log:
- Use 'options DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS' instead of the DEBUG_ALL_VFS_LOCKS
environment variable to enable the lock verifiction code.
If you have a crash test box I would appreciate it if you would enable
this
CVSup started at 0347 hrs. Pacfic Daylight (7 hrs. west of GMT/UTC)
from cvsup14.freebsd.org. Build/install/mergemaster was uneventful.
Reboot after mergemaster proceeded as if nothing strange was about
to happen, then (cut/pasted from serial console):
...
SMP: enabled INTs: 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, 9,
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David Wolfskill wrote:
[his panic]
from sources 8 hours ld, but cvsup didn;t bring anything relevant up..
my panic:
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s4a
panic: free: address 0xc18d85dc(0xc18d8000) has not been allocated.
syncing disks... panic: bdwrite: buffer is not busy
--On Monday, July 08, 2002 9:18 AM -0500 Richard Seaman, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:08:58AM -0700, David Xu wrote:
you have turned on nat enable yes in ppp.conf,
and but you havn't turned ip_foward on in sysctl,
so core dumped.
David Xu
Well, I'm not running
--
Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
Ignore: Pilot error
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 09:07:39AM -0700, Joel M. Baldwin wrote:
I'll have to ditto that.
no ppp, just natd, and sysctl stuff is set as listed below.
Without the punch-fw directive in /etc/natd.conf, natd will core dump.
I just verified that without the directive it core dumps. The
ok, there is a good PR on this one with a reasonable fix:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=40331
I am going to commit this and a few other fixes tonight.
cheers
luigi
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 11:28:15AM -0500, Richard Seaman, Jr. wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002
Hello,
You were not, by any chance, using the -nat option with ppp? If you
were, and have a recent -CURRENT with the new ipfw code, then *that*
will make ppp dump core with a sig10 just fine. (Same behaviour as with
natd)
--
Regards:
Szilveszter ADAM
Szombathely Hungary
To Unsubscribe: send
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:41:14PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
It seems to be aborting the 'process all file systems' loop when it modifies
a file system. eg:
...
[[[ Uhh, what? What about the rest of the file systems? ]]]
I saw this once yesterday night, (after getting an automagic reboot
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David Malone wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 03:28:51PM -0700, Mike Makonnen wrote:
MALLOC(copy, struct plimit *, sizeof(struct plimit),
M_SUBPROC, M_WAITOK);
- bcopy(lim-pl_rlimit, copy-pl_rlimit, sizeof(struct plimit));
+ bcopy(lim-pl_rlimit,
Hello,
Yes, I've seen the same thing on a pre-KSE kernel. The error
occurs in PunchFWHole in alias_db.c in libalias. Reverting
the following commit seems to fix it (I haven't had a chance
to investigate further):
...
sys/netinet ip_fw.h
Reverting only this file and
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 12:34:06PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Josef Karthauser [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
: I've absolutely no idea what's causing it, but I'm still having random reboots
: of current after some uptime with no dumps. I'll install a
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 08:43:45PM -0400, Andrew Lankford wrote:
Just thought I'd throw in some more bad news :-). ppp in current
core dumps on me. It starts up in ddial mode ok, does its job for a while,
and then dies. I tried starting it again, and it just sat there instead
of going
On 07-Jul-2002 Jonathan Lemon wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:59:50PM -0700, David Xu wrote:
Jonthan,
I just use DOS program as an example, for any program, if it wants to go
into VM86 mode, it is very easy, just calls i386_vm86() to initailize its
VM86 pcb extension, setups some
Hi,
I just got myself an IBM Thinkpad T30, most things work fine on -STABLE
(trying to get specs from IBM for the rest), but -CURRENT won't boot with
ACPI enabled. I'd be glad to track that down, but I have no clue where to
start, nor do I have any more than a passing knowledge of ACPI.
Hi,
I upgraded today (as of 30 min ago) to a current kernel from pre-KSE.
When trying to boot with APIC set in BIOS i get:
acpi0:ASUS A7V333 on motherboard
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address = 0x16
fault code= supervisor read, page
John Baldwin wrote:
On 08-Jul-2002 Peter Wemm wrote:
A few months ago, I had a bit of a disaster with some pmap optimizations.
After committing, all hell broke loose. It was backed out completely.
I finally found the problem (diff cleaned up to highlight the problem):
Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
Yes, I see that as well. Another symptom is that fsck -p now always
announces unexpected inconsistencies and drops back to singleuser when
it indeed was able to fix the problems, i.e. it marks the filesystem
clean and a manual fsck does not report anything unusual.
Similar things happen to me... Also when I do an 'fsck -y' fsck will
fsck each partition until it hits one with problems. It fixes the
problems, then exits (does not continue to the next partition). I
wind up having to run fsck five or six times to get it to fsck all
the
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Don Lewis wrote:
Building OpenOffice is broken in -current because of a problem in
sys/stat.h. If _POSIX_SOURCE is defined, sys/stat.h does not
#include sys/time.h to get the definition of struct timespec, and it
substitutes alternate structure members for the struct
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 09:32:55PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
Are the ftp paths equivalent? I seem to recall that current.freebsd.org
is referenced in sysinstall. Will just a CNAME work?
ENOCLUE. But does it matter? Either today or w/the CNAME sysinstall is
referenced. The delay in waiting
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 01:48:04PM +0900, Makoto Matsushita wrote:
snapshots.jp.FreeBSD.org is now becoming too busy ftp site, many
connections are rejected because of max connection limit. I'm now
seeking donors of network bandwidth and PCs (but I don't know I can
find or not). Anyway,
While running the piped command below on a recent pre-KSE/MIII -CURRENT,
I noticed that the pipe output is not getting buffered anymore, i.e
command displays the name of each package immediately after it is
processed. Both stable and earlier versions of -CURRENT used to buffer
the pkg_version
I brought the fsck_y_enable stuff in, I'll try to take a look at it this
week.
Doug
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Michael Nottebrock wrote:
Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
Yes, I see that as well. Another symptom is that fsck -p now always
announces unexpected inconsistencies and drops back to
Im not sure if this is a known problem, but I sent this to the maintainer
of the qt30 port, who suggested I post this here. I couldn't find anything
related in the archives about this problem.
I'm attempting to build qt30 (for kde3) under -CURRENT (ports and
kernel/userland from yesterday).
This is because of the rewrite of pkg_version into C (from perl) and
has nothing to do with pipes.
Regards,
-Jeremy
Oops! I forgot about the big perl rewrite. Apologies for false alarm.
--
Alexander Kabaev
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 11:47:52AM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote:
...
Log:
Be more strict with WARNS now -- the GCC 3.1 turmoil is behind us.
...
I'm sure you know that it's now about the time for -DNO_WERRROR to
build -CURRENT:
===
On Monday 2002-July-08 14:08, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On a new kernel I appear to be getting dumps now (along with the crashes
;). Actually it's pretty stable, but there are random crashes occuring,
usually I come back to the machine when I've not used it for a new hours
and find it in
Doug Barton wrote:
I brought the fsck_y_enable stuff in, I'll try to take a look at it this
week.
Just to avoid misunderstandings: That all worked fine a few weeks ago...
that was the second to last time I needed it (because I accidentally
pulled the wrong plug).
Regards,
--
Michael
--- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07-Jul-2002 Jonathan Lemon wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:59:50PM -0700, David Xu wrote:
Jonthan,
I just use DOS program as an example, for any program, if it wants to go
into VM86 mode, it is very easy, just calls i386_vm86() to
Here, if I enable nat yes in /etc/ppp/ppp.conf and forget to turn
net.inet.ip.forwarding on, ppp will core dump in several minutes.
David Xu
--- Richard Seaman, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 07:08:58AM -0700, David Xu wrote:
you have turned on nat enable yes in
OK; implementing rev. 1.12 of src/sys/vm/vm_zeroidle.c allowed me to
boot my (SMP) build machine login:
freebeast(5.0-C)[1] uname -a
FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #9: Mon Jul 8
16:28:30 PDT 2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/common/S4/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBEAST
On 8 Jul, Anthony Jenkins wrote:
I've been looking at the pcm code and I can see where it locks, then allocates
memory with the M_WAITOK flag thing. I'm wondering if there's a standard
procedure for fixing these... would I just nail down the malloc to a
non-sleepable one?
Only if the
I want to set an flag bit CALLOUT_PROCESSING in callout.c_flags,
before softclock() releases callout_lock and start requesting
callout.c_func(), so callout_stop can find that callout is processing
by softclock and wait, after softclock processed the callout, it
resets the flag and wakeup
On Sun, 7 Jul 2002, Josef Karthauser wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 04:57:08PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
Well with various hints from here and there I have fixed
the ^Z/fg problem (at least it seems fixed to me and others that
have tested) This basically leaves only one outstanding
On 08-Jul-2002 David Xu wrote:
I want to set an flag bit CALLOUT_PROCESSING in callout.c_flags,
before softclock() releases callout_lock and start requesting
callout.c_func(), so callout_stop can find that callout is processing
by softclock and wait, after softclock processed the callout, it
On 08-Jul-2002 David Xu wrote:
--- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 07-Jul-2002 Jonathan Lemon wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2002 at 11:59:50PM -0700, David Xu wrote:
Jonthan,
I just use DOS program as an example, for any program, if it wants to go
into VM86 mode, it is very
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 16:44:20 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Wolfskill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK; implementing rev. 1.12 of src/sys/vm/vm_zeroidle.c allowed me to
boot my (SMP) build machine login:
freebeast(5.0-C)[1] uname -a
FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #9: Mon Jul
I'll work out a patch to see if my idea works.
David Xu
--- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 08-Jul-2002 David Xu wrote:
I want to set an flag bit CALLOUT_PROCESSING in callout.c_flags,
before softclock() releases callout_lock and start requesting
callout.c_func(), so
This may be a stupid question, but is gdbreplay currently broken? I just
cvsup'd today (2002-07-08, 18:42 CST (GMT-6))
cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdbreplay
-I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdbreplay/../libbfd/i386
Erik Greenwald [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This may be a stupid question, but is gdbreplay currently broken? I just
cvsup'd today (2002-07-08, 18:42 CST (GMT-6))
Yes (unless I missed the fix). Just use NO_WERROR=true for now.
Best regards,
Mike Barcroft
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
The system g++ 3.1 complains that stdlib.h typedefs wchar_t:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:57: redeclaration of C++ built-in type `wchar_t'
--
B.Walter COSMO-Project http://www.cosmo-project.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Usergroup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send
B.R.I.T.N.E.Y S.P.E.A.R N.A.K.E.D.
http://web.rol.ro/newmedia
You must be 18 years of age or older to take advantage of this offer.
If you do not wish to receive any further e-mail's from us you can send
a blank email to be removed from our list to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bernd Walter wrote:
The system g++ 3.1 complains that stdlib.h typedefs wchar_t:
/usr/include/stdlib.h:57: redeclaration of C++ built-in type `wchar_t'
I posted a patch for this already, based on Garrett Wollman's
point about where theings are defined (actually, it requires a
non-definition
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 12:32:21AM -0400, Chuck Robey wrote:
Ohhhkay. The .jp site I found stopped making snaps on 6/21. Seeing as
current only stabilized in the last day or so, I think first I'll write
them and ask if it's going to start back up
You were not, by any chance, using the -nat option with ppp?
A Sure was. Thanks.
Andrew Lankford
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 08:37:37PM -0500, Erik Greenwald wrote:
This may be a stupid question, but is gdbreplay currently broken? I just
cvsup'd today (2002-07-08, 18:42 CST (GMT-6))
*shrug* I can't reproduce this.
cc -O -pipe -D_GNU_SOURCE -I. -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/binutils/gdbreplay
62 matches
Mail list logo
