}jAÈçâΫÌiµ¦Mû̶ãA
·®ÉÐÌ}Vª®«o·VXeB
}U[yÑ}U[ÌLéX¾©çrfIEDVDð
·®ÉvµÜ·B
ܽA±±ÉÐîµÄ¢È¢^CgXgà¨èvµÜ·B
ÆÉ©²ÉÈÁÄP{©çÅà¨Cyɲ¶º³¢Ü·æ¤
Xµ¨è¢vµÜ·B
http:/
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Hello.
at making kernel on error pst device.
pst-raid.c : In function pst_attach
pst-raid.c : 177: structure has no member named d_fssectors
pst-raid.c : 178: structure has no member named d_fsheads
pst-raid.c : 186: request for member d_secperunit in something not a
structure or union
pst-raid.
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 19-Sep-2002 Vincent Poy wrote:
> > I think the first card is a LinkSys PCMP200 and not the PCMP100
> > since the 100 is a 16bit PCMCIA and runs as a ed1 adapter in 4.6.2-RELEASE
> > but doesn't get recognized at all under -current. I've tried
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 20-Sep-2002 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >: On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >: >
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, walt wrote:
> /usr/src/lib/libc/i386/gen/infinity.c:11: storage size of `__infinity' isn't known
Yeah, I can't do better than the compiler for that too. ;)
-Nate
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Hi all,
I just read the current mailinglist.
I think we would have to test all cases with all cards. What cards
do you have Stephen, with which clone Chipsets ? Can you make a list
of them ?
I've got somewhere another dc card which made problems. I guess
it was PNIC.
Martin
To Unsubscribe:
On Friday, 20th September 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>On 20-Sep-2002 Stephen McKay wrote:
>> Not quite. Davicom cards (and your card) fail to idle the receiver.
>> PNIC cards fail to idle the transmitter. So it makes just as much
>> sense as any other idea to check those bits only on cards that
On 20-Sep-2002 Stephen McKay wrote:
> On Friday, 20th September 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>On 20-Sep-2002 Stephen McKay wrote:
>>> Sadly this change is insufficient to satisfy all cards.
>>
>>Well. I think we can keep the check for TX going idle and just not do
>>the check for RX going idle.
On Friday, 20th September 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>On 20-Sep-2002 Stephen McKay wrote:
>> Sadly this change is insufficient to satisfy all cards.
>
>Well. I think we can keep the check for TX going idle and just not do
>the check for RX going idle. The original code basically did this until
>
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
attila! wrote:
> Sent: Mon, 16 Sep 2002 20:39:05 -0700 by David O'Brien
> +
> + On Tue, Sep 17, 2002 at 12:17:14AM +, attila! wrote:
> + >
> + > The price is right on the 395U[W]: $41/52 and it is
> + > their newer series which uses a "TekRam 1040" chip.
> + > Has anyone used it on
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:43:13AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 20-Sep-2002 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >: On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On 20-Sep-2002 Stephen McKay wrote:
> On Thursday, 19th September 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>--- if_dc.c 4 Sep 2002 18:14:17 - 1.77
>>+++ if_dc.c 19 Sep 2002 20:57:03 -
>>@@ -1366,7 +1370,8 @@
>>for (i = 0; i < DC_TIMEOUT; i++) {
>>
On Thursday, 19th September 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
>--- if_dc.c 4 Sep 2002 18:14:17 - 1.77
>+++ if_dc.c 19 Sep 2002 20:57:03 -
>@@ -1366,7 +1370,8 @@
>for (i = 0; i < DC_TIMEOUT; i++) {
>isr = CSR_READ_4(sc, DC_ISR);
>
On 20-Sep-2002 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>: On Thu, 2002-09-19 at 23:22, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>: > Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>: > : Is it s
On 19-Sep-2002 Vincent Poy wrote:
> I think the first card is a LinkSys PCMP200 and not the PCMP100
> since the 100 is a 16bit PCMCIA and runs as a ed1 adapter in 4.6.2-RELEASE
> but doesn't get recognized at all under -current. I've tried both the
> LinkSys PCMP200 v2.0/PCMPC200 v2.0 and
/usr/src/lib/libc/i386/gen/infinity.c:11: variable `__infinity' has initializer but
incomplete type
/usr/src/lib/libc/i386/gen/infinity.c:11: extra brace group at end of initializer
/usr/src/lib/libc/i386/gen/infinity.c:11: (near initialization for `__infinity')
/usr/src/lib/libc/i386/gen/infinit
> source went final I cvsuped ports and src, and recompiled and tried
> again. it compiles file, just won't run.
Recompile and reinstall src/lib/libc_r after cvsup. There was something
recently broken in there and all threaded apps failed (mozilla, Nautilus
and so on). See the "Thread issues" thr
Hello!
I'm using the D-Link DGE 500SX Gigabit Ethernet card which gives the
following (error) message during bootup:
lge0: Ethernet address: 00:50:ba:71:2d:c3
lge0: MII without any PHY!
device_probe_and_attach: lge0 attach returned 6
The correct Physical would be
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
I'm trying to understand why when accessing file to cdrom their
contents change every time (in case of big file, at least).
I usally backup some stuff (mail, sources, scanned images) and
add to cdrom a files.md5 with the md5 keys of all files.
(yes, I'm a bit paranoid :-)
With my last system (-C
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Boris Popov wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote:
>
> Well, haven't tested it with smbfs, but may point that patch for
> nwfs contains two vref()s instead of vgetref().
>
Ah, thanks very much. (un?)luckily it was in debug code so it would not
have been
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> This patch touches every filesystem. I have tested with several but I
> would appreciate more extensive testing especially if you use one of the
> lesser used filesystems (ie non ufs). Please test with WITNESS and
> DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS enabled. If you fi
26 matches
Mail list logo
