On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:24:23AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
[Darwin pre-binding]
>presumably applies to other processor architectures. The one thing that
>turns me off to this scheme is that I'd like it if we could find a way to
>represent this using solely existing BSD/UNIX kernel primitives (
On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 02:10:22PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> I'm wondering if anybody is using, or even able to use, the gpib
> driver. It uses the old ISA shims, and is one of the drivers that no
> one has acked working in when I ask about the old isa shim drivers.
I always wanted to use i
hi
I have current from last friday and it takes ages for dhclient to get
configuration
its NOT problem of respodning server cause other computers get their IPs
instantly... 5.1R didn show such behaviour
in my log is
Sending on BPF/mac-adress
Sending on Socket/fallback
whats this? this happens i
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 01:02, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 08:33, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> The problem is that selrecord() wants to lock a MTX_DEF mutex, which can
> >> cause a context switch if the mutex is already locked by another thread.
> >> This is
Hello.
I'm reaching assertion from /sys/net/if_loop.c:270.
This is very easy to reproduce:
First you need to put loopback into promiscuous mode:
# tcpdump -i lo0
Then try to connect to loopback, for example:
# telnet 127.0.0.1 22
Enjoy!:)
--
Pawel Jakub Dawidek
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Gerrit Kühn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > but it certainly won't be based on this driver!
:
: Oops, is it /that/ bad?
I can't convince myself that it would have any chance of working.
That's why I asked.
: > The questions here are only 'does this dri
>> It looks very similar to
>> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59576. You can revert to
>> version 1.28 of net/bpf.h if you need tcpdump on lo, tun, ic, plip,
>> disc or gif interface right now.
> just to note: I ran tcpdump on tunN (which was a pppoe interface) w/o
> problems two days
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote:
> >> It looks very similar to
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59576. You can revert to
> >> version 1.28 of net/bpf.h if you need tcpdump on lo, tun, ic, plip,
> >> disc or gif interface right now.
>
> > just to note: I ran tcpdump on tunN
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 01:02, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 08:33, Don Lewis wrote:
> >> The problem is that selrecord() wants to lock a MTX_DEF mutex, which can
> >> cause a context switch if the mutex is already locked by another thread.
> >> This is
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 10:31, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 01:02, Don Lewis wrote:
> > On 27 Nov, Stefan Ehmann wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 08:33, Don Lewis wrote:
> > >> The problem is that selrecord() wants to lock a MTX_DEF mutex, which can
> > >> cause a context switch if
Andre Oppermann wrote:
Hello all,
I've found what probably is going wrong in tcp_hostcache. The problem is me
cutting corners (what goes around comes around...) in tcp_hc_insert when the
bucket limit is reached. I made the #if 0 too big and the bucket was not
removed from the tailqueue when we h
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 07:59, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 11:24:23AM -0500, Robert Watson wrote:
> [Darwin pre-binding]
> >presumably applies to other processor architectures. The one thing that
> >turns me off to this scheme is that I'd like it if we could find a way to
> >repres
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 08:49, Yuriy Tsibizov wrote:
> >> It looks very similar to
> >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=59576. You can revert to
> >> version 1.28 of net/bpf.h if you need tcpdump on lo, tun, ic, plip,
> >> disc or gif interface right now.
>
> > just to note: I ran tcpdump
Hello.
On 2003/11/27 00:37:36, Martin Blapp wrote:
> mbr 2003/11/27 00:37:36 PST
>
> FreeBSD src repository
>
> Modified files:
> sys/dev/ips ips.c ips.h ips_commands.c
> Log:
> ServeRaid (at least 5i) didn't initialize correctly. To get
> them working (cache, aut
David Rhodus wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> >FWIW, even though I support the idea of dynamically linking
> >everything, the flipping of the switch there followed this
> >same pattern.
First, a disclaimer: this is me speaking for me; I do not speak
for Apple.
> Terry, what are some of the chang
Just FYI for people who run FreeBSD on VMware 4:
Several days before, VMware releases new beta version of VMware
Workstation 4 (actually 4.1 beta), bulid-6568, to alpha testers
including myself.
I've fetched Windows host version, runs on my PC, start my FreeBSD
5-current guest, and found that fi
Robert Watson wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, David Rhodus wrote:
> > what are some of the changes that Apple made to have everything
> > dynamically linked in darwin ? Has anyone done timed runs lately on
> > dynamically vers. static linking on darwin ? Or did they find just
> > cleaning up the dlop
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 21:03:24 +0900
Makoto Matsushita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is enabled, etc. Moreover, it seems that long standing "random/slower/
> faster clock-time bug" is resolved!
Wow! I want new one:-).
> Please note that this is about FreeBSD as VMware's *guest* OS, not
> a
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 03:41:14AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > If you can get gcc and binutils to add the necessary support, then
> > > we can talk further. Until then it's academic.
> >
> > I think there are political reasons for not doing this. The
> > number one
Peter Wemm wrote:
> What this shows is that vfork() is 3 times faster than fork() on static
> binaries, and 9 times faster on dynamic binaries. If people are
> worried about a 40% slowdown, then perhaps they'd like to investigate
> a speedup that works no matter whether its static or dynamic? The
"M. Warner Losh" wrote:
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Please try the attached patch which should fix it.
>
> I've been having crashes all the time since the hostcache went into
> the tree. I've been running a few hours with this
Hi,
> After seeing this commit message, I've upgraded -CURRENT installed on
> NetFinity 6000R(with ServeRAID 4H) to catch up with the recent changes.
> However, LOR or panic still persists. You can panic your -CURRENT machine
> by creating a log of files in a directory. You can do it with a simpl
> On Thursday 27 November 2003 06:35 pm, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> > Since applying your patch I'd have IPv4 stop working 4 times. No panic,
> > no console errors, just IPv4 traffic no longer does anything. Can't
> > forward through the box. Can't ping the box, can't do anything.
> > Logging in on c
Martin wrote:
Could you try the attached patch, to see if it fixes the panic on the second
run of your program?
No success. Still same panic.
Oops, my bad. I misread your backtrace, and fixed a similar bug in
ugen_set_interface rather than ugen_set_config.
Could you try the attached patch (rm
On Thursday 27 November 2003 06:04, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:00:49 +0100, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> > >
> > > Last time (around middle of October) when I tried out a new current
> > > kernel it was hanging at boot time at a
This is on a machine running 5.2-BETA, compiled with last night's
sources
I get the following LOR when starting pptpclient:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc27d6164 rtentry (rtentry) @ /usr/build/current/usr/src/sys/net/rtsock.c:387
2nd 0xc24e9c7c radix node head (radix node head) @
/usr/build/curr
At Thu, 27 Nov 2003 13:56:03 -0400,
Bremner David wrote:
>
> /dev/pass0: flushing cache
> /dev/pass0: closing track
> - [unable to TEST UNIT READY]: Input/output error
>
Following up to myself again; are we annoyed yet?
Anyway, I remember reading about someone trying "burncd fixate" in a
simila
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:48:59AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : Oops, is it /that/ bad?
> I can't convince myself that it would have any chance of working.
> That's why I asked.
Hm, doesn't sound very promising then. :)
> : Well, as I said above: I'm not using it so far, but given some time
Michael Edenfield wrote:
* Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031127 17:50]:
On Thursday 27 November 2003 12:31 pm, Bill Moran wrote:
walt wrote:
To all of you who celebrate Thanksgiving today, I wish you a happy one!
And speaking of turkeys, does anyone know how Microsoft handles the
performanc
Things are actually looking pretty good at this point; I'm probably going
to move from 4.9-STABLE to 5.2-RELEASE on my main home server, but I'm
seeing the following with 5.2-BETA at this point:
I'm running 5.2-BETA cvsup'd at about 9 PM 11/25 on two systems; one is
a Supermicro P6DGH, dual PIII/8
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gerrit =?iso-8859-1?Q?
K=FChn?= writes:
>BTW: Are there more people around (except for you and me :-) who would like
>to see decent gpib-support in FreeBSD?
Yes, me.
I'm currently running on a hacked up "GPIB from userland" I did myself,
unfortunately it works we
"Michael L. Squires" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On both systems I'm running postgreSQL7 from ports. In both cases the
> pgctl (the startup script) is called twice, and obviously it fails the
> second time. It is called both by /etc/rc.d/localdaemons and by
> /etc/rc.d/localpkg. I haven't lo
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:53:29AM -0500, Michael L. Squires wrote:
> On both systems I'm running postgreSQL7 from ports. In both cases the
> pgctl (the startup script) is called twice, and obviously it fails the
> second time. It is called both by /etc/rc.d/localdaemons and by
> /etc/rc.d/localp
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:43:12PM +0100, Gerrit K?hn wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 01:48:59AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > : Oops, is it /that/ bad?
>
> > I can't convince myself that it would have any chance of working.
> > That's why I asked.
>
> Hm, doesn't sound very promising then
This is the committed fix for the lockup problems a couple of you
have experienced. If you don't have this fix already please re-
cvsup and remake the kernel.
--
Andre--- Begin Message ---
andre 2003/11/28 08:33:03 PST
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
sys/netinet
Hello,
some days ago I tried to update my system. As usual I typed in make
buildworld, went into single user mode and gave the command make
installworld. This command never succeded, because of:
install -o root -g wheel -m 444 test.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1
ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:50:21PM +0100, Oliver Fischer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> some days ago I tried to update my system. As usual I typed in make
> buildworld, went into single user mode and gave the command make
> installworld.
Did you do "make buildkernel", "make installkernel" ,
and "mergemas
Gerrit Kühn wrote:
> BTW: Are there more people around (except for you and me :-) who would like
> to see decent gpib-support in FreeBSD?
Me! :-) I have a PCI gpib card lying around that I just haven't had time
to play with. If there were a working driver, though, it would be very
useful.
--
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:50:21PM +0100, Oliver Fischer wrote:
> install -o root -g wheel -m 444 test.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1
> ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found
Was /libexec a symlink to /usr/libexec by any chance? I upgraded a
system yesterday with /libexec as a symlink to /usr/l
Steve Kargl wrote:
Did you do "make buildkernel", "make installkernel" ,
and "mergemaster" in the order specified in src/UPDATING.
:0 Until now I have been doing it always in the wrong order...
Thanks, now I will try it in the right order.
Regards,
Oliver Fischer
--
Dummheit is ooch 'ne Jabe
Re John Galbraith's driver, I did a quick Google search and the "latest"
version (dated 9/22/98) is available on Thomas Gellekum's FreeBSD page:
http://people.freebsd.org/~tg/gpib.Sep22b.tar.gz
(Galbraith's old site is dead.)
Just FYI, so that others can avoid the inconvenience of doing t
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:03:22PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >BTW: Are there more people around (except for you and me :-) who would like
> >to see decent gpib-support in FreeBSD?
> Yes, me.
I might have guessed it.
Is there anything around FreeBSD you're not working with or on? ;-)
>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:17:54AM -0800, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~tg/gpib.Sep22b.tar.gz
>
> (Galbraith's old site is dead.)
>
> Just FYI, so that others can avoid the inconvenience of doing the same
> search.
Thanks!
cu
Gerrit
--
_
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gerrit =?iso-8859-1?Q?
K=FChn?= writes:
>On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 05:03:22PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> >BTW: Are there more people around (except for you and me :-) who would like
>> >to see decent gpib-support in FreeBSD?
>
>> Yes, me.
>
>I might have gue
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Oliver Fischer wrote:
> Steve Kargl wrote:
> > Did you do "make buildkernel", "make installkernel" ,
> > and "mergemaster" in the order specified in src/UPDATING.
>
> :0 Until now I have been doing it always in the wrong order...
>
> Thanks, now I will try it in the right
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: "M. Warner Losh" wrote:
: >
: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > : Please try the attached patch which should fix it.
: >
: > I've been having c
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> This is on a machine running 5.2-BETA, compiled with last night's
> sources
...
> Also, a repeatable panic when I run tcpdump on a gif interface.
> Without tcpdump, the tunnel is working as expected, but when tcpdump
> is listening on the gif0 interface
David O'Brien wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:37:48AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
and [/usr/bin/ftp] doesn't support HTTP.
$ /usr/bin/ftp http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/32524.html
Requesting http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/32524.html
100% |*
On Friday 28 November 2003 21:03, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:37:48AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >>and [/usr/bin/ftp] doesn't support HTTP.
> >
> > $ /usr/bin/ftp http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/32524.html
> > Requesting http://www.theregis
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Kientzle writes:
>David O'Brien wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:37:48AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
>>>and [/usr/bin/ftp] doesn't support HTTP.
>>
>> $ /usr/bin/ftp http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/32524.html
>> Requesting http://www.theregister.co
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >I might have guessed it.
> >Is there anything around FreeBSD you're not working with or on? ;-)
> sound cards :-)
Hey, you can quite easily make oscilloscopes from them... :)
> >Perhaps I'll be able to have a look at it nex
Hi there.
I have got running a PCI atheros wireless card on b/g in hostap
mode and connecting 33 clients. for some razon all the customers lost
the traffic, (the wireless cards has connection but dosen't send and
recive any thing). When I login on the Freebsd hostap all looks happy
but
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Gerrit =?iso-8859-1?Q?
K=FChn?= writes:
>On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>> >I might have guessed it.
>> >Is there anything around FreeBSD you're not working with or on? ;-)
>
>> sound cards :-)
>
>Hey, you can quite easily make
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 03:25:02PM +0100, Ruben de Groot wrote:
>
> This is on a machine running 5.2-BETA, compiled with last night's
> sources
Both problems are known and have been reported a number of times..the
second one should be fixed now.
Kris
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 28 November 2003 21:03, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> David O'Brien wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:37:48AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >>and [/usr/bin/ftp] doesn't support HTTP.
> >
> > $ /usr/bin/ftp http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/32524.html
> > Requesting http://www.theregis
Checked the archive and didn't see this one listed yet:
lock order reversal
1st 0xc4047134 filedesc structure (filedesc structure)[EMAIL
PROTECTED]/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_
generic.c:896
2nd 0xc0956a80 Giant (Giant)[EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/src/sys/fs/specfs/spec_vnops.c:377
Stack backtrace:
backtrace
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 04:37:49PM -0500, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Checked the archive and didn't see this one listed yet:
>
> lock order reversal
> ?1st?0xc4047134?filedesc?structure?(filedesc?structure)[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_
> generic.c:896
> ?2nd?0xc0956a80?Giant?(Giant)[EMA
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Johny Mattsson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering if there's any possibility in getting USB detach events
> working in time for the 5.2 release?
>
> The PR in question is kern/46488, and I submitted patches for this issue
> quite a while ago (Oct 24). Unfortunately jmg appea
I just updated my src and the GENERIC kernel I build from -CURRENT locks up
with my hdd light on solid. Does anyone else have this issue?
-nth
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, s
I'm getting a repeatable panic when try to access my cdrom drive. -CURRENT as
of yesterday. I seem to get this when I try to mount my cdrom drive a second
time.
I seem to get these error sometimes when trying to mount a cd for the first
time and it doesn't end up work, and the second time I ge
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> NSS and PAM do not overlap. They are complimentary and one cannot do
> the job of the other.
That is a bug in NSS, PAM or both.
(BTW, I think you mean that they are complementary, not complimentary,
although it is certainly true that some implem
Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've ported Niels Provos's file descriptor allocation code to FreeBSD
> in case anyone wants to try it out & run some benchmarks. If the performance
> boost turns out to be worth the added complexity, I might clean it up a
> bit and commit it.
What exactly
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 01:02:18PM +0400, rihad wrote:
> > CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
> > I'll try to build it without -O2, thanks.
> *sigh*, I see we need more figlet in the documentation.
< -O2 is bad, mmkay? >
This is from 5.2-BETA-20031127-JPSNAP.iso on a P4/800FSB/HT system:
Note: this was manually transcribed because of the nature of the bug
(installation failure), was unable to obtain a crash dump to be saved.
It's completely reproducible on every installation attempt *IFF*
softupdates is enabled f
Zhang Shu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> When I install netbsd with the same floppy drive, it turns to be pretty
> fast. So I guess this is a FreeBSD problem but do not know where it is...
FreeBSD's boot code reads the disk sector by sector rather than track
by track. Last time I brought this up I
At 1:32 AM +0100 2003/11/29, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
What exactly would be the point? If this is the OpenBSD fdalloc code,
recent widely-publicized benchmarks have shown it to be inferior to
ours. Perhaps you should concentrate on improving vm_map_find() and
vm_map_findspace() performance
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unfortunately, that step can be a little hazy: sometimes buildworld is
> required to run mergemaster, but occasionally you have to run mergemaster
> first to add new users that are required for installworld :-).
It is not hazy at all: run 'mergemaster -p
is there still an ongoing problem with anoncvs?
anoncvs.freebsd.org(209.181.243.20):2401 failed: Connection refused
Matt Bell
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscri
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 01:32:01AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I've ported Niels Provos's file descriptor allocation code to FreeBSD
> > in case anyone wants to try it out & run some benchmarks. If the performance
> > boost turns out to be worth
[Threading intentionally broken.]
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 01:16:25AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > NSS and PAM do not overlap. They are complimentary and one cannot do
> > the job of the other.
>
> That is a bug in NSS, PAM or both.
Int
"Jacques A. Vidrine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Interesting. Explain, please. (Maybe privately or in another thread;
> hate to keep this'n going.) Perhaps you mean that it is a design flaw
> that two APIs are required. If so, I happen to disagree; I think that
> the separation of directory s
Tim Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's also the NetBSD fdalloc code. They started with code similar to ours,
> in that it did a linear search of the file descriptor array to find an
> empty slot and used hints to speed up some common allocation patterns,
> then recently switched over to usi
I searched the list archive, but I didn't see anything specific to this
question.
Dell Latitude C600, running 5.2-BETA from 11/24/2003...
I didn't notice until I started up KDE that I had no /dev/dsp of any kind in
my /dev directory. I mount_nfs'd /usr/src and /usr/obj from my adjacent
deskto
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:40:57PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> I searched the list archive, but I didn't see anything specific to this
> question.
>
> Dell Latitude C600, running 5.2-BETA from 11/24/2003...
>
> I didn't notice until I started up KDE that I had no /dev/dsp of any kind in
> my /dev
On Friday 28 November 2003 09:46 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:40:57PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> > I searched the list archive, but I didn't see anything specific to this
> > question.
> >
> > Dell Latitude C600, running 5.2-BETA from 11/24/2003...
> >
> > I didn't notice un
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:00:53PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 09:46 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:40:57PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> > > I searched the list archive, but I didn't see anything specific to this
> > > question.
> > >
> > > Dell Latitu
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:17:39PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Tim Kientzle writes:
> >David O'Brien wrote:
> >> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:37:48AM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> >>>and [/usr/bin/ftp] doesn't support HTTP.
> >>
> >> $ /usr/bin/ftp http://www.t
On Friday 28 November 2003 10:19 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> You can't force the driver to detect your soundcard if the driver
> doesn't detect it :-)
>
> If you have a supported sound card and are loading the correct driver,
> then the device will be probed when you load the driver (at boot,
> a
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 10:36:00PM -0500, T Kellers wrote:
> On Friday 28 November 2003 10:19 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >
> > You can't force the driver to detect your soundcard if the driver
> > doesn't detect it :-)
> >
> > If you have a supported sound card and are loading the correct driver
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 01:36:03AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 01:02:18PM +0400, rihad wrote:
> > > CFLAGS= -O2 -pipe
> > > I'll try to build it without -O2, thanks.
> > *sigh*, I see we need more figlet in the documentat
Hot Diggety! David O'Brien was rumored to have written:
>
> It shouldn't be today. I'm convenced that all of our problems with
> 'gcc-3.3.3 -O2' are FreeBSD code bugs.
I'm certainly deferring to someone with greater expertise, especially given
a freebsd.org email address. :-)
Just out of curios
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, T Kellers wrote:
> I can't ssh to the laptop at this moment, but if the sound card is not
> detected by the kernel, can I force the detection by editing /boot/
> loader.conf with:
>
> userconfig_script_load="YES"
> snd_maestro3_load="YES"
> ?
>
> I have that in loader.conf
On Friday 28 November 2003 11:27 pm, Robert Watson wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, T Kellers wrote:
> > I can't ssh to the laptop at this moment, but if the sound card is not
> > detected by the kernel, can I force the detection by editing /boot/
> > loader.conf with:
> >
> > userconfig_script_load="
I've run some benchmarks of my own with and without the patch, and
it's a definite improvement... I expected it to go linear for large
number of open file descriptors, and it does, but the slope is much
less steep than I expected, which explains why it looked like O(1).
I have two objections to t
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
NSS itself doesn't make much sense to me; it's an elaborate hack
designed to drag all those nice shiny directory services down in the
mud where struct passwd has been wallowing for the past twenty years,
instead of allowing applications to take advantage of their superior
I can remember that somebody already reports somewhere, but this
bug(?) is still standing there, so here's again:
I failed to install recent 5-current (5.2-BETA as of Nov/29/2003) to VMware
Workstation 4.x (tested with 4.0.5 and 4.1 beta). I've observed that:
* It seems that FreeBSD misundersta
On Nov 28, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
> showing "odd results" (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
> Lane wrote a quick C program to test gettimeofday() (program attached) ...
> the results on a 4.9-PRERELEASE ke
In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
showing "odd results" (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
Lane wrote a quick C program to test gettimeofday() (program attached) ...
the results on a 4.9-PRERELEASE kernel of Sep 20 14:16:48 ADT 2003 shows:
nept
On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
> showing "odd results" (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
> Lane wrote a quick C program to test gettimeofday() (program attached) ...
> the
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2003 at 09:32:30PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >
> > In trying to isolate an issue where the PostgreSQL 'explain analyze' is
> > showing "odd results" (namely, negative time estimates on queries), Tom
> > Lane wrote a quick C program
Hello.
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:36:22AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > What hardware, kernel configuration, etc? Do you have a misconfigured
> > ntpd/timed that is manually flapping the time around?
>
> Hardware for the above is a Dual-Xeon, 4Gig of RAM, and about 421
> processes running o
"Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> as to ntpd/timed ... don't run either ... run ntpdate twice a day (11:59
> and 23:59)
Don't Do That. It will lead to all kinds of trouble that will take
you ages to figure out. Really, ntpd is so ridiculously easy to set
up (especially if you alre
On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 12:36:22AM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> Hardware for the above is a Dual-Xeon, 4Gig of RAM, and about 421
> processes running on it currently ... kernel config is at the bottom, but
> I don't think there is anything 'abnormal' about it ... and note that I've
> had other
On Saturday 29 November 2003 05:57, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > as to ntpd/timed ... don't run either ... run ntpdate twice a day (11:59
> > and 23:59)
>
> Don't Do That. It will lead to all kinds of trouble that will take
> you ages to figure ou
94 matches
Mail list logo
