Martin Nilsson wrote:
I tried to install our CD/FDD-less servers from a CD-RW drive connected
on the USB port,
I'll try with a fresh 5.2-BETA later today and see what happens with it.
in the meantime I just want to ask:
The 5.2-BETA CDROM hangs, it prints something like found /BOOT/LOADER
...
TB --- /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/lock: flock(): Resource temporarily
unavailable
TB --- ERROR: unable to lock sandbox
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail
Just in case anyone didnt know already ;)
Jeffrey Katcher wrote:
You have to set:
hw.pci.allow_unsupported_io_range="1"
at startup initially and then in /boot/loader.conf for subsequent boots
I had the same problem, now I'm happily running 5.1-Current/5.2-Beta.
Finnur Guðmundsson wrote:
Hi th
Has anyone looked into pr i386/54781? It sounds very similar, and it
doesn't happen only on intel laptops. It also happens on my athlon laptop.
--
Russell A. Jackson ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
The irony is, if you're willing to kill a perpetrator, you probably won't have
to. -- Massad Ayoob
___
Could you try this simple patch and see if that helps?
Index: ata-lowlevel.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -r1.23 ata-lowlevel.c
--- ata-lowlevel.c 2 Nov 2003 22:04:53
It seems Chris Faulhaber wrote:
> I have been seeing the same issue since August with a different,
> but similiar, set of drives:
>
> ad0: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
> ad1: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA100
>
> Under -CURRENT only the first drive is seen; RELENG_4
> Hello All,
> Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
> classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> recently). I believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer
> errors.
I can confirm th
> > Hello All,
> > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
> > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> > recently). I believe this to be a good strategy as it masks fewer
> > errors.
>
> I
Hi all,
I'm running CURRENT and set up a jail where I want to install SUN JDK
1.4.2. In the process, linux emulation needs to be installed. While
installing emulators/linux_base, I get the following:
===> Installing for linux_base-7.1_5
Un-mounting linprocfs...
umount: retrying using path instead
Hello All,
I have the same problem. See also PR58680.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58680
Guys who work on RCNG please consider the proposed solution.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean McNeil
Sent: Monday, December 01,
Daniel Eischen wrote:
If I use libkse I get:
kernel: Warning: pid 25341 used static ldt allocation.
kernel: See the i386_set_ldt man page for more info
in my messages.
When I use libc_r I do not get this messages.
I'm sorry. Messages seems to be independent from library. I get messages
with both l
Hello
What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running
FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I am not running FreeBSD right now, but I am
considering going back to it but I need to figure out how to prevent
this issue from happening again. My system has 2 harddrives, a 16 GB
Seagate that
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:22:16AM +0100, Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount wrote:
+> I'm running CURRENT and set up a jail where I want to install SUN JDK
+> 1.4.2. In the process, linux emulation needs to be installed. While
+> installing emulators/linux_base, I get the following:
+>
+> ===> Insta
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Ganbaa wrote:
> I'm trying to install FreeBSD-5.1 on the PC with PIII,512MB SDRAM, 30GB
> Barracuda II Model ST330630A. But following error has occured.
We're in the throes of preparing FreeBSD 5.2 for release, which includes a
large number of bug fixes (although potentially
Ran into this on a box with -CURRENT from yesterday, running with MAC
(although in this case I suspect it doesn't make a difference, I'm not
using the multilabel/extattr code in UFS2). I have a core on disk, so
please let me know what further information would be useful. This machine
spends a lo
On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 04:48:27PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Bob Willcox wrote:
> >
> >What impact, if any, will this have on those of us that use NIS and
> >still want a statically linked root? I have been using NIS for years ...
>
> First, let me clarify that I'm advocating moving NIS out of
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >
> >>From which system is this? The nvidia or the ATI? We know nvidia
>
> I try to use same HDD on two systems. On system with ATI video I only
> disable nvidia kernel module loading and change X driver.
Right, it's not onl
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:22:16AM +0100, Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm running CURRENT and set up a jail where I want to install SUN JDK
> 1.4.2. In the process, linux emulation needs to be installed. While
> installing emulators/linux_base, I get the following:
>
> ==
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 07:44:16AM -0600, Bob Willcox wrote:
> Nothing specific. I suppose it's just a space-time tradeoff from my
> point of view. With disk sizes what they are today (most of my systems
> have a system disk size of 40 GB or more), in my environment reducing
> the root filesystem
Niklas Saers Mailinglistaccount <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> ===> Installing for linux_base-7.1_5
> Un-mounting linprocfs...
> umount: retrying using path instead of file system ID
> ===> Generating temporary packing list
> ===> Checking if emulators/linux_base already installed
> mknod: /compat/
Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to
> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still
> causes sometimes a page fault in propogate_priority().
> I have core dump and can send debug output.
Go ahead and load up kernel.debu
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 01:43:57PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Hello
>
> What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running
> FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. I am not running FreeBSD right now, but I am
> considering going back to it but I need to figure out how to prevent
> this issue
Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
>
>> At Mon, 1 Dec 2003 09:23:21 -0500 (EST),
>> Robert Watson wrote:
>> > This could be a sign of a VM or VFS lock leak or deadlock. I'd advise
>> > hooking up a serial console, dropping to DDB over serial line,
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 09:55:56AM +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Chris Faulhaber wrote:
> > I have been seeing the same issue since August with a different,
> > but similiar, set of drives:
> >
> > ad0: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100
> > ad1: 57241MB [116301/16/63] at ata
On 02-Dec-2003 Brooks Davis wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 05:50:27PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 25-Nov-2003 Brooks Davis wrote:
>> > Since the interrupt changes, my dual Xeons based on the SE7500WV2 board
>> > don't work with ACPI. Specificly, the onboard nics (em0 and em1)
>> > appe
On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to
>> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still
>> causes sometimes a page fault in propogate_priority().
>> I have core dump and can send d
In a message written on Tue, Dec 02, 2003 at 06:05:40PM -0200, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
> And if you are using FreeBSD on desktop you should use bash or some
> other ports-shell, instead of slowing down _the_ shell for shell
> scripts. But that's IMHO, so I didn't pipe this in until now. But it's
Kris Kennaway wrote
You get that error from what command(s)? Have you tried with 5.2,
which has a new ATA driver?
Kris
I usually "discover" that I am having data corruption when trying to
update ports. A file that has a "Bad File Descriptor" refuses to let
cvsup overwrite and/or remove itsel
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to
> >> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still
> >> causes sometimes a page fault in propog
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to
> > 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still
> > causes sometimes a page fault in propogate_priority().
> > I have core dump and c
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to
> >> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still
> >> causes sometimes a page fault in propog
Just discovered a nice added leetness feature that makes the boot
beastie be drawn in full color (loader_color="YES" in loader.conf) ...
ok seems leet ... but wouldn't it be even more leet when it would be
drawn with the fork moving? One second with the fork 1 char space to
left and then after
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to
>> >> 2003.11.28.00.00.00 with the turnstile support and it can still
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Olev writes:
>Just discovered a nice added leetness feature that makes the boot
>beastie be drawn in full color (loader_color="YES" in loader.conf) ...
>ok seems leet ... but wouldn't it be even more leet when it would be
>drawn with the fork moving? One second wi
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Olev writes:
Just do not make it the default or people installing on serial consoles
will hate you more than you imagine...
Ofcourse, just like you need to set loader_color="YES" in loader.conf
for colors, off by default.
Olev
___
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> >> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT from 2003.11.04.02.02.00 up to
> >> >> 2003.11.
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> >
> > On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> > >
> > >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> > >> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5
On Dec 03, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
> > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> > > recently). I believe this to be a good stra
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 12:08:52PM +0600, Boris Popov wrote:
> Probably it is not a good idea to allow users to load kernel iconv
> tables because one can waste a lot of memory by loading of all possible
> conversion schemes. The better solution is to add some kind of preload
> ability which
Hi,
Here comes more helpful ServeRAID related warnings:
Bad malloc flags: 0
Stack backtrace:
malloc() of "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
exclusive sleep mutex g_xdown r = 0 (0xe1f31cbc) locked @
/usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:355
Bad uma_zalloc flags: 0
Stack backtrace:
malloc
On Dec 03, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > Hello All,
> > > Please test this PCM patch. It creates seperate locking
> > > classes for PCM channels and should prevent the warning where
> > > multiple mutexes from the same class are held (as reported
> > > recently). I believe this to be a good stra
Hi,
> "jail where I trust users not to try to take over my system" = "chroot".
Thank you and Pawel Jakub Dawidek for pointing that out that possibility.
Been living with jail-only thoughts for a little too long. ;) This solves
my problem, although I don't totally agree as jail in addtion has an i
Has anyone got a working loader.rc for PXE booting Current
with the Beastie menu etc. included? The one on freebsd.org
is for 4.x machines, which works, but doesn't give you the
ACPI options etc.
Lawrence Farr
EPC Direct Limited
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clive Lin wrote:
Hi,
Here comes more helpful ServeRAID related warnings:
Bad malloc flags: 0
Stack backtrace:
malloc() of "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
exclusive sleep mutex g_xdown r = 0 (0xe1f31cbc) locked @
/usr/src/sys/geom/geom_io.c:355
Bad uma_zalloc flags: 0
Stack
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:43:13PM +0300, Igor Sysoev wrote:
> panic: page fault
> panic messages:
> ---
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> cpuid = 2; apic id = 02
> fault virtual address = 0xe5
> fault code = supervisor read, page not present
> instruction pointer
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>>
>> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
>> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >
>> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>> >> > Igor Sysoev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> I'd cvsup'ed 5.1-CURRENT f
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 10:29:19AM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
> Clive Lin wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >Here comes more helpful ServeRAID related warnings:
> >
> >Bad malloc flags: 0
> >Stack backtrace:
> >malloc() of "16" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
> >exclusive sleep mutex g_xdown r = 0
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> >> >> > Igor Sysoev <[EM
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 05:55:29PM +0200, Dan Naumov wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote
>
> >You get that error from what command(s)? Have you tried with 5.2,
> >which has a new ATA driver?
> >
> >Kris
> >
> >
> I usually "discover" that I am having data corruption when trying to
> update ports. A fi
Hi there,
since I installed 5.2-BETA, I've got a very strange problem. Always
when I'm listening to some music and start a network transfer, both
the music and the transfer stop after some time. Nothing is being
received or sent any more, and the following message appears a few
times:
bfe0: watchd
On Dec 02, "Jamie Bowden" wrote:
> I have a new machine that I've just installed 5.1-R on, and cvsup'd to -C.
> I'm attempting to build X, and am getting a core dump from rman during the
> process.
I had this happen too. I did something really hack-ish to get around it
(like delete that document
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote:
> Tom wrote:
>
> > Just to be complete, there are already a whole bunch of machines that
> >will not boot 5.x, irregardless of the ACPI issues. I've never been able
> >to boot 5.x with ACPI on or off, on any of the 5 Dell PowerEdge 6350
> >servers I have
In the last episode (Dec 03), Mike Hunter said:
> On Dec 02, "Jamie Bowden" wrote:
> > I have a new machine that I've just installed 5.1-R on, and cvsup'd
> > to -C. I'm attempting to build X, and am getting a core dump from
> > rman during the process.
>
> I had this happen too. I did something
Tom wrote:
On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote:
Tom wrote:
Just to be complete, there are already a whole bunch of machines that
will not boot 5.x, irregardless of the ACPI issues. I've never been able
to boot 5.x with ACPI on or off, on any of the 5 Dell PowerEdge 6350
servers I ha
Peter,
I'm afraid I haven't a clue why this happens to you but please
see my notes below.
On Dec 03, Peter Hofer wrote:
> since I installed 5.2-BETA, I've got a very strange problem. Always
> when I'm listening to some music and start a network transfer, both
> the music and the tr
I am guessing that some of the recent locking changes are causing
the problem. Unfortunately I am on the road now through Jan 4th,
so will not be in a position to look at it. Hopefully one of the
folks working on getting the SMP pushed down through the filesystem
(Jeff Roberson, John Baldwin, or A
TB --- /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386/lock: flock(): Resource temporarily
unavailable
TB --- ERROR: unable to lock sandbox
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail
This error happens if things are not properly locked. As per my
previous message, I am not able to look at it now, but am hoping
that resolving some of the other races will solve this as well.
Kirk McKusick
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
Hi Kelley.
The lasts update made a big different on the driver but still with
problems, I have incoming errors and Oerrs and encaptulation erros and
that make me loss connection with the clients, Im testing with 34 linux
clients, but when I change the wireless card on the AP for a simple
p
On Dec 02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : However, having a general mechanism for disabling newbus devices would be
> : really nice.
>
> Agreed. But today and 5.2 you lose. However, it isn't easy. What
> does disa
Hello all,
I have installed the MIT krb5 port. I installed this port and left
KRB5_HOME=/usr/local (this is where I installed the port) in make.conf. I
assumed that building the world would use this variable and link the world
(ssh[d], telnet[d], login, ...) against the libraries installed by th
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:52:27AM -0800, Galen Sampson wrote:
> Hello all,
[Note: I'm not sure that this should be in current@ rather than [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 1) Are the worlds daemons written to link against kerberos (as apposed to the
>heimdal replacements replacing their traditional coun
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
>> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Bri
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
>> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> On 03-Dec-2003 Bri
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
> > With a patch from http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/turnstile.patch
> > I can not even rebuild kernel. Can I add MPASS to sources from
> > 2003.11.28.00.00.00 ?
>
> Ok, I've just updated turnstile.patch again. I was testing a bogus
> condition in my
Hi Nate,
On Tuesday 02 December 2003 23:34, Nate Lawson wrote:
> Try other states (acpiconf -s 1, 2, 4). If one works, use it. If not,
> try disabling acpi and using apm(4) to suspend and resume.
Normally that would be grand, but now that I've not compiled acpi into the
kernel, I have no /dev
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 December 2003 23:34, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > Try other states (acpiconf -s 1, 2, 4). If one works, use it. If not,
> > try disabling acpi and using apm(4) to suspend and resume.
>
> Normally that would be grand, but now that I've not compil
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 03), Mike Hunter said:
> > On Dec 02, "Jamie Bowden" wrote:
> > > I have a new machine that I've just installed 5.1-R on, and cvsup'd
> > > to -C. I'm attempting to build X, and am getting a core dump from
> > > rman during the proce
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 21:57, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > On Tuesday 02 December 2003 23:34, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > Try other states (acpiconf -s 1, 2, 4). If one works, use it. If not,
> > > try disabling acpi and using apm(4) to suspend and resume
A quick tought; perhaps you need to remove irq 5 from pccard.conf
But...
> The problem also persists when I'm using my rl nic instead of the
> onboard bfe chip.
..maybe not.
Try it.
Dylan
On 3 Dec 2003 at 20:04, Peter Hofer wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> since I installed 5.2-BETA, I've got a very st
Mathew Kanner wrote:
I notice that your network cards, sound card and sio use IRQ
4, I also note that your aren't using acpi, what happens when you
enable it?
You're right, it was because of ACPI ;)
I just compiled a GENERIC kernel and booted it with ACPI ENABLED.
The problem didn't occur
On Dec 03, Peter Hofer wrote:
> Mathew Kanner wrote:
>
> > I notice that your network cards, sound card and sio use IRQ
> >4, I also note that your aren't using acpi, what happens when you
> >enable it?
> >
> You're right, it was because of ACPI ;)
>
> I just compiled a GENERIC kernel and boo
On 03-Dec-2003 Igor Sysoev wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> > With a patch from http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/patches/turnstile.patch
>> > I can not even rebuild kernel. Can I add MPASS to sources from
>> > 2003.11.28.00.00.00 ?
>>
>> Ok, I've just updated turnstile.patch agai
Brooks Davis wrote:
>> Since acpi0 failed to probe, ACPI isn't used to route interrupts. However,
>> the apic code expects ACPI to do that since it enumerated CPUs and I/O
>> APICs. You are just going to have to disable ACPI for now.
>>
>> > acpi0: on motherboard
>> > ACPI-1287: *** Error: M
On Wednesday 03 December 2003 09:55, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Could you try this simple patch and see if that helps?
Works for me. No problems so far during three reboots.
Log files available at
http://cheasy.dyndns.org/bootlogs/5.1-2003-11-30-patched/
Thanks for the good work!
-Christoph Sold
Dan Naumov wrote:
What follows is a description of a problem I used to have when running
FreeBSD 5.0 and 5.1. [...] After the installation of the OS (usually
about 8-12 days of running non-stop) I start getting "Bad File
Descriptor" errors on random files all around the Maxtor drive and I
have
V st, 03. 12. 2003 v 22:39, Christoph Sold píše:
> On Wednesday 03 December 2003 09:55, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > Could you try this simple patch and see if that helps?
>
> Works for me. No problems so far during three reboots.
"Me too!" My second Seagate drive is back and running.
--
Pav Lucis
>Good news, please supply a dmesg before and after.
I've attached them. Both are GENERIC kernels, one booted
with ACPI ENABLED [default] and the other with ACPI
DISABLED.
Thanks for your help,
Peter Hofer
Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988,
I have made some experiences on a Fujitsu-Siemens Primergy RX300
(Serverworks, Xeon with HyperThreading, MegaRAID) today. I was able to
boot the 5.2-BETA ISO from CD-RW after being unsuccessful with floppies
yesterday (not that I'd particularly trust floppies...)
Here's what I've found so far:
1.
Alastair G. Hogge wrote this message on Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 20:02 +1100:
> I've had an Olympus camera which I've been able to access under -CURRENT for
> some time until recently. I can mount_msdosfs the device (da0s1) OK, but when
> I try to copy or move files from the device to my hard disk dr
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Dan Naumov wrote:
> causing this bizarre behavior ? If this is of any help, the exact model
> number of the HD is "MAXTOR 4K040H2" and I was using UFS2 on both
> drives. Thanks in advance.
Maxtor has a diag tool that goes onto a floppy that you could run. I have
this exact dis
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Lawrence Farr wrote:
> Has anyone got a working loader.rc for PXE booting Current
> with the Beastie menu etc. included? The one on freebsd.org
> is for 4.x machines, which works, but doesn't give you the
> ACPI options etc.
eh? The beastie menu ships by default on 5.X.
--
D
On Wed, 3 Dec 2003, Tom wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2003, Eric Anderson wrote:
>
> > Tom wrote:
> >
> > > Just to be complete, there are already a whole bunch of machines that
> > >will not boot 5.x, irregardless of the ACPI issues. I've never been able
> > >to boot 5.x with ACPI on or off, on any
Doug White wrote:
Maxtor has a diag tool that goes onto a floppy that you could run. I have
this exact disk in my sparc64 here and the first time I used it, it kept
running over bad sectors and generally causing mayhem. Running the full
scan with the tool, it prompted to fix some problems, then th
I'm still able to reproduce this panic today. As well as general flakyness
on the CD drive on -CURRENT. Had my first bad burn with this drive today.
Can't mount some cds that I just burned with the drive, yet mounts fine in
my 4.9 system. Can't seem to burn multisession disks, etc. Anyone e
85 matches
Mail list logo
