> On Sun, May 9, 1999, Brian Somers wrote:
> > [.]
> > >I'm using the 3.1R PPP right now, until the problem is
> > > resolved. I'm sending a problem report, as well.
> >
> > It should be resolved now. A NULL mbuf value is valid - it just
> > means that there's nothing in it. I changed
Chuck Robey wrote:
>
> Garrett's points are why I sugggested that it would not be a useable
> approach for -questions, newbies, and mabye hackers, 'cause they all get
> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn
I sent a patch for this about 8 hours ago. No one seems
to read -current.
oZZ!!! wrote:
>
> Hello!
> Makeworld failed at isdnmonitor:
>
> ===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor
> cc -Os -pipe -mpentium -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdn
> monitor/main.c
> /usr/s
In a new kernel, I can no longer unload the Vinum kld: I get a panic
in module_release:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0xc014460e in module_release (mod=0xc0f5a600) at ../../kern/kern_module.c:163
163 TAILQ_REMOVE(&mod->file->modules, mod, flink);
(kgdb) bt
#0
On Tue, 11 May 1999, oZZ!!! wrote:
>
> Hello!
> Makeworld failed at isdnmonitor:
>
> ===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor
> cc -Os -pipe -mpentium -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdn
> monitor/main.c
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c:103: `major' rede
Hello!
Makeworld failed at isdnmonitor:
===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor
cc -Os -pipe -mpentium -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
/usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdn
monitor/main.c
/usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c:103: `major' redeclared as
different kind of symbol
/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/
> > Is anyone planning on upgrading the binutils gas to a later version
> > so that we can get 3DNow! support? I'd like to use it, but I can't
> > seem to get binutils to work right manually.
> I will update binutils when/if 2.9.2 comes out.
I've seen some post-2.9.1 patches from the Debian folks
> I was thinking of doing this, the same as alpm and intpm:
>
> case 0x:
> #if NUHCI > 0
> return NULL;
> #else
> return "VIA blah USB controller";
> #endif
It depends on old-config, so poor mechanism. newconfig already
implimented best match probe/attach.
--
NAKAGAWA, Yoshihisa
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Chuck Robey wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
> > A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> > if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
>
> The could, but most wouldn't, wouldn't even know how.
<
said:
> a fair amount of posts like what Garrett describes. Current and
> committers do NOT get such an audience, and the argument doesn't hold
> for those lists,
Yes they do.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of t
Chuck Robey scribbled this message on May 10:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>
> > A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> > if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
>
> The could, but most wouldn't, wouldn't even know ho
I am running 4.0-current SMP as of Apr 29.
I cvsup'ed this morning and at about 0950, started
'make -j12 world > log.file'.
I returned to find the machine frozen and the console blank. Pressing
a key resulted in a high-pitched squeal and no other response. Could
not ping the machine. Power
> Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 13:49:45 -0700 (PDT)
> From: "Steven P. Donegan"
>
> I have received more email today related to SPAM than I have actual SPAM
> in the last month+ What has triggered this solution looking for a problem?
>
that is an eloquent statement of the situat
To Unsu
>
> < said:
>
> > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> Yes, there are.
>
i forgot to mention that such a policy creates a single
"allowed" address per user...not good.
jmb
> -GAWollman
>
>
To Un
> Delivered-To: j...@hub.freebsd.org
> Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
> References: <19990510173115.0aaf815...@hub.freebsd.org>
> Date: Mon, 10 May 1999 22:14:56 +0200
> From: Mark Murray
>
> "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> > would be
Wilko Bulte wrote...
> As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
> > Eric Hodel wrote...
> > > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > > > So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
> > > >
> > > > camcontrol devlist
> > >
> > > camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl fo
Peter, Poul,
cvsup from cvsup2 at 1215 pst 10 may 99.
make buildworld yields (wrapped to <80 char lines)
===> usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor
cc -O2 -pipe -DDEBUG -I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c \
/usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/main.c
gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.sbin/i4b/isdnmonitor/isdnmonitor.8
As Kenneth D. Merry wrote ...
> Eric Hodel wrote...
> > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > > So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
> > >
> > > camcontrol devlist
> >
> > camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for
> > device
> >
> > > camcontrol tu
On Sun, 9 May 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> > On Sun, 9 May 1999, Khaled Daham wrote:
> >
> > > Hello folks
> > >
> > > I cvsupped,made world, built a kernel today and from now on the de
> > > interfaces only comes up in 100BaseTX, what causes it not to negotiate ?
> > >
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 10:29:16PM +0200, Mark Murray wrote:
> Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > < said:
> >
> > > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > > there difficulties that make this impossible?
> >
> > Yes, there are.
>
> Content-free answer. Please elaborate?
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
> > addresses off the web page.
>
> It also stops perfectly legitimate users who are subscribed to a local
> mailing-list exploder, read the lists through Usenet, or for
Dmitrij Tejblum wrote:
>
> > > "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > > > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail
> > > > transfer would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s)
> > > > to approve each piece of email. if we use more than one
> > > > moderator per list, the time-seq
< said:
> Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
> addresses off the web page.
It also stops perfectly legitimate users who are subscribed to a local
mailing-list exploder, read the lists through Usenet, or for other
reasons are subscribed with a different address from
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
I think most won't bother. Probably a good number of them are
mailing automatically to a list of mailing li
> > "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> > > would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece
> > > of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the
> > > time-sequence of email would be lostwe would
I have received more email today related to SPAM than I have actual SPAM
in the last month+ What has triggered this solution looking for a problem?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
The first item is of interest to FreeBSD. Somebody should suggest to
Mindcraft to include FreeBSD in the "Death Match". The last item is about
Ken Thompson thrashing Linux.
--Carlos
Linux Watch: Mindcraft Proposes Linux-NT Death Match; Microsoft Accepts the
Challenge
Mindcraft, in an attempt to s
As Chuck Robey wrote ...
> I was thinking about Peter Wemm's recent change to the kernel Makefile,
> making a way to install multiple kernels without fragging your last
> known good kernel, and it got me to thinking, scragging kernel.old, now
> that we have good kld's, isn't the only way to find yo
As Doug Rabson wrote ...
> On Sun, 9 May 1999, Khaled Daham wrote:
>
> > Hello folks
> >
> > I cvsupped,made world, built a kernel today and from now on the de
> > interfaces only comes up in 100BaseTX, what causes it not to negotiate ?
> > My Apr_29 kernel doesnt behave like this.
> >
> > The l
Chuck Robey wrote:
> > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> There might be some resistance to this for all lists, but how about
> just, say, current and committers? Hackers == maybe?
I can imagine that there cou
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
The could, but most wouldn't, wouldn't even know how. It wouldn't be
a sure cure, but it would sure help. D
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Mark Murray wrote:
> "Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> > with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> > would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece
> > of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the
> > time-sequence of
Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> > there difficulties that make this impossible?
>
> Yes, there are.
Content-free answer. Please elaborate?
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubsc
"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
> A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
> if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
Yes, but is stops the scrape 'n spammers who get the easy-to-reach
addresses off the web page. The subscribed spammers at least h
< said:
> Have you ever considered only allowing list members to post, or are
> there difficulties that make this impossible?
Yes, there are.
-GAWollman
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
A spammer could simply become a list member and then SPAM. They won't care
if they are removed once they have perpetrated their abuse.
Tom Veldhouse
ve...@visi.com
-Original Message-
From: Mark Murray
To: Jonathan M. Bresler
Cc: curr...@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, May 10, 1999 3:17 PM
S
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
>
> Eric Hodel wrote...
> > "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > > So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
> > >
> > > camcontrol devlist
> >
> > camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for
> > device
> >
> > > camcontrol tur -n
"Jonathan M. Bresler" wrote:
> with volunteers, we could moderate the list(s). mail transfer
> would be slower as we wait for the moderator(s) to approve each piece
> of email. if we use more than one moderator per list, the
> time-sequence of email would be lostwe would get some very
>
Eric Hodel wrote...
> "Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> > So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
> >
> > camcontrol devlist
>
> camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for
> device
>
> > camcontrol tur -n da -u 0 -v
>
> camcontrol: cam_lookup_pass:
"Kenneth D. Merry" wrote:
> So I'm a little confused here. Does camcontrol work? Try this:
>
> camcontrol devlist
camcontrol: error sending CAMIOCOMMAND ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for
device
> camcontrol tur -n da -u 0 -v
camcontrol: cam_lookup_pass: CAMGETPASSTHRU ioctl failed
cam_lookup_pas
On Sun, May 9, 1999, Brian Somers wrote:
> [.]
> >I'm using the 3.1R PPP right now, until the problem is
> > resolved. I'm sending a problem report, as well.
>
> It should be resolved now. A NULL mbuf value is valid - it just
> means that there's nothing in it. I changed fsm_Input() wi
Hi,
It looks like most of the compilation problems from the last few
days have been cleaned up pretty well... The last one I'm seeing
now is:
cc -nostdinc -O -pipe -DKERNEL -DCOMPAT_SVR4 -DKERNEL -Wall -Wredundant-decls
-Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-ari
> From: Seamus Wassman
> Date: Sun, 9 May 1999 20:31:00 -0700
>
> I was quite surprised the First Time I got SPAM through this mailing list, I
> thought for sure there would be someone to moderate it so that no garbage gets
> through, I personally find it quite offensive to get SPAM on a help
On 10 May, Kenneth D. Merry wrote:
>> /usr/include/cam/scsi/scsi_pass.h:
>> $Id: scsi_pass.h,v 1.2 1999/05/06 20:16:07 ken Exp $
(137) r...@ttyp3 # ident /usr/include/cam/scsi/scsi_pass.h
/usr/include/cam/scsi/scsi_pass.h:
$Id: scsi_pass.h,v 1.2 1999/05/06 20:16:07 ken Exp $
>> > ls -l
Eric Hodel wrote...
> > Hmm, so you did a make world?
> >
> > I assume you mean "cdcontrol" above, and not "cdrecord". You can't pause,
> > play, etc., cds with cdrecord. cdcontrol uses the ioctl interface to the
> > cd driver, and so it shouldn't be affected.
>
> yes :(
>
> > Well, can you se
> Hmm, so you did a make world?
>
> I assume you mean "cdcontrol" above, and not "cdrecord". You can't pause,
> play, etc., cds with cdrecord. cdcontrol uses the ioctl interface to the
> cd driver, and so it shouldn't be affected.
yes :(
> Well, can you send me the output of the following comm
I lost that file due to fatfingering a cleanup :)
I can see that several people has downloaded it from my ftp-site
so does anybody still have it, and could mail/ftp me a copy ??
Thanks
-Søren
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of
Could someone give the attached patch a try in -current? It fixes the
file descriptor leak that the KKIS.05051999.003b exploit causes. This
fix seems to work fine in -stable. I'd like to commit it to the current
tree and merge it into -stable before the 3.2 code freeze.
Index: uipc_usrreq.c
=
On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 03:32:33PM +0200, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> m = m_get(M_WAIT, ...)
> m->m_len = something.
>
> looking at the code, it seems that m_get() _can_ return a NULL pointer
> even if one specifies M_WAIT.
>
> Could this be a potential weakness, and in this case, how shuld
Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> On the -CURRENT cvsup'ed two hours ago:
> cc -O2 -pipe -march=pentium -mpentium -DKERNEL -DCOMPAT_SVR4 -DKERNEL
> -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual
> -fformat-extensions -ansi -DKLD_MODULE
Mike Smith wrote:
> I engaged in part of a sweep of this sort with Andrzej a while back,
> but he never committed any of the changes. I'm not quite sure why.
I've stumbled across this some time ago.
See
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=569013+573412+/usr/local/www/db
/text/1998/fre
On the -CURRENT cvsup'ed two hours ago:
===> sys/modules/svr4
echo "#define COMPAT_43 1" > opt_compat.h
@ -> /usr/src/sys
machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include
touch opt_vmpage.h
sh /usr/src/sys/modules/svr4/../../kern/vnode_if.sh
/usr/src/sys/modules/svr4/../../kern/vnode_if.src
cc -c -O2 -pipe -m
On Sun, 9 May 1999, Seamus Wassman wrote:
> I was quite surprised the First Time I got SPAM through this mailing
> list, I thought for sure there would be someone to moderate it so
> that no garbage gets through, I personally find it quite offensive
> to get SPAM on a help based mailing list, I ha
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Doug Rabson wrote:
> On Mon, 10 May 1999, Brian Feldman wrote:
>
> > Is anyone planning on upgrading the binutils gas to a later version so that
> > we
> > can get 3DNow! support? I'd like to use it, but I can't seem to get binutils
> > to work right manually.
>
> I will up
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Brian Feldman wrote:
> Is anyone planning on upgrading the binutils gas to a later version so that we
> can get 3DNow! support? I'd like to use it, but I can't seem to get binutils
> to work right manually.
I will update binutils when/if 2.9.2 comes out.
--
Doug Rabson
On Mon, 10 May 1999, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Peter Wemm wrote:
> >If you had old "vector xxxintr", it will now cause a syntax error rather than
> >a warning.
>
> What is the new method of specifying a non-standard interrupt
> function? I have some code (currently on 2.x, but I was hoping to be
>
56 matches
Mail list logo
