I'm currently giving 4.0 a thrashing in the best way I know. I run way too
much stuff and let it page madly all day. Here's how I killed it:
1) pick a 32MB box
2) make -j20 buildworld
3) lean on ^T and let autorepeat go for it
Soon it dies in calcru() called from ttyinfo(). The stack trace sh
Well, I'm having problems with SoftUpdates. I've disabled it for now.
Here's the backtrace for the crash; more info from the crashdump is
available upon request, but I think this is a general problem, and
easily reproduced.
GNU gdb 4.18
Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
GDB is free s
Jun Kuriyama wrote:
>
> New pcm driver found my NeoMagic 256AV's sound device. Great! But in
> my configuration, pcm0 complains many "pcm0: 1000 bad intrs" on console.
This is a bug in neomagic.c and is probably due to you having a shared
interrupt..
Suggested fix:
Index: neomagic.c
===
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 09:26:45PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> [[ Moved to just current ]]
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
> : That may be the answer for Darren's problem. It's definitely not the
> : case for the ones we have been discussing on -mobile.
>
> There are defin
New pcm driver found my NeoMagic 256AV's sound device. Great! But in
my configuration, pcm0 complains many "pcm0: 1000 bad intrs" on console.
Are there some hints to configure this driver? My machine is SONY
VAIO PCG-Z505D (Japanese Version). Probed message is here:
vga-pci0: mem
0xfed00
From: Bosko Milekic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can you look at kern/10872 and see if your hardware matches Bob's?
> (e.g. The infamous fxp and ncr combo.) and regardless, attempt executing
> the script that is provided and note whether or not you can reproduce the
> panic in sbdrop()? If so
Cameron Grant wrote:
> i have just committed a driver for the neomagic chips. please test and post
> results.
Okay. I have a Dell Inspiron 3500, with a NeoMagic 256AV chipset in it.
It hangs on boot, in nm_rd() line 146. Here's the backtrace:
(kgdb) bt
#0 nm_rd (sc=0xc0d83100, regno=1536, si
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, John Polstra wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > You apparently
> > clobbered -O in CFLAGS by setting CFLAGS=-g. -g normally needs to be
> > added to CC to avoid breaking CFLAGS (CC='cc -g').
>
> Better yet: DEBUG_FLAGS
[[ Moved to just current ]]
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Greg Lehey writes:
: That may be the answer for Darren's problem. It's definitely not the
: case for the ones we have been discussing on -mobile.
There are definitely known issues with the ep0 driver. Right now it
doesn't interrupt qui
On Friday, 7 January 2000 at 23:46:49 +1100, Darren Reed wrote:
> In some email I received from Warner Losh, sie wrote:
>>
>> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Josef Karthauser writes:
>> : My 3c589d works just fine now, along with suspend/resume :) (under 4.0).
>>
>> The issue with the 3c589d is w
On Thursday, 6 January 2000 at 20:05:21 -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> Also, I can now add that cdda2wav does work (hurrah), but it does yelp
> that it can't read the CD TOC.
>
> Of course, the mystery is that tosha no longer works yet was not
> changed, nor was the ripit script I call tosha f
On Wednesday, 5 January 2000 at 10:02:53 +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>> The disk probably has problems with DMA mode (lots of older WD disks
>>> has that). You only get WDMA2 mode since you controller is an older
>>>
On Friday, 7 January 2000 at 23:33:20 +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 5:10 PM -0500 2000/1/7, Brad Chisholm wrote:
>
>> The Adaptec card looks like it might provide a superior solution. What's
>> best way to proceed when trying to get documentation support from vendors?
>
> Look long and
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 04:48:08AM +0100, Christian Carstensen wrote:
> i'm using a ahc 7895 onboard on a tyan thunder 100. i've seen my cdrom
> occasionally not coming up until power cycling. is this a known bug with
> that controller?
Mine is an AIC 7860 (i.e. 2940UA). I see my hard disk failin
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 04:10:37AM +0100, Christian Carstensen wrote:
> this runs stable for 3 hours now...
> try a current kernel (checked out 4 hours ago), using a version of the
> file /usr/src/sys/pci/ahc_pci.c from 2000/01/06. ok, maybe it's not by any
> means stable, but works better than ev
> > this runs stable for 3 hours now...
> > try a current kernel (checked out 4 hours ago), using a version of the
> > file /usr/src/sys/pci/ahc_pci.c from 2000/01/06. ok, maybe it's not by any
> > means stable, but works better than everything else within the last 24
> > hours.
grrr, after 10
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2000 at 08:32:19AM +, Brian Somers wrote:
> > Anyone know what's changed with `calendar' ? I suspect it's the
> > recent cpp changes.
>
> Please test this patch.
[.]
Yep, this works. Of course I expect it'll only really work for gnu's
cpp... I'd say go for it thoug
ok,
this runs stable for 3 hours now...
try a current kernel (checked out 4 hours ago), using a version of the
file /usr/src/sys/pci/ahc_pci.c from 2000/01/06. ok, maybe it's not by any
means stable, but works better than everything else within the last 24
hours.
--
Christian
To Unsubscrib
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Dave J. Boers wrote:
> Can any of you tell me wether you have SCSI in your system (the ahc
> driver, perhaps)? I too had one of these strange lockups today (see earlier
> post) and it seems SCSI related. The lockup occured during an I/O
> operation.
>
> Now I cvsupped and I
On Mon, Jan 10, 2000 at 12:43:49AM -, Joao Pedras wrote:
> it just... freezes!
Can any of you tell me wether you have SCSI in your system (the ahc
driver, perhaps)? I too had one of these strange lockups today (see earlier
post) and it seems SCSI related. The lockup occured during an I/O
oper
ok, last mail before going to bed,
> it just... freezes!
maybe, that's not interesting at all, but every time the error occured on
my system, there was much disk usage (buildworld, cron scripts, ...
netscape ;)).
--
Christian
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscrib
My latest kernel with a cvsup as of around 5 minutes ago seems to have a
problem: Whenever I start xmms, it panics. The xmms window doesn't even
appear, the computer just locks, and I press enter a few times, and the
computer then reboots. I'm not sure why this happens, and I can't switch
out of X
mine's a single processor system
PPro200 on Intel VS440FX w/64Mb RAM
it just... freezes!
my smp system is running -stable, yet!
Christian Carstensen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Joao Pedras wrote:
>
>> Just wanted to ask if anyone else experiences hangs when just compiling
>> something, whil
On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Joao Pedras wrote:
> Just wanted to ask if anyone else experiences hangs when just compiling
> something, while using X ?
>
> I know this is quite vague but I don't see any other pattern than this. I
> tested with different window managers, compiling different stuff and some
hi,
with the latest changes to src/sys/pci/pci_ahc.c (partity error handling),
i'm unable to boot a current kernel, because of panic during system boot.
i've attached dmesg from a working kernel version (2000/01/06) to this
mail. marked with (***) you'll find the line, where (with the new kerne
Hello all!
Just wanted to ask if anyone else experiences hangs when just compiling
something, while using X ?
I know this is quite vague but I don't see any other pattern than this. I
tested with different window managers, compiling different stuff and sometimes
this misteriously happens.
This
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 02:20:51PM -0800, William Woods wrote:
> Running 4.0 -current as of today.on a DEC Alphaststion 233 when I dial out
> I connect for about 30 seconds then it dies...here is a copy of the ppp.log
I got the same thing once in a while. I'm using PPPoE. I cannot quote the
4
Running 4.0 -current as of today.on a DEC Alphaststion 233 when I dial out
I connect for about 30 seconds then it dies...here is a copy of the ppp.log
Jan 9 22:00:27 alpha ppp[388]: Phase: Using interface: tun0
Jan 9 22:00:27 alpha ppp[388]: Phase: deflink: Created in closed state
Jan 9
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You apparently
> clobbered -O in CFLAGS by setting CFLAGS=-g. -g normally needs to be
> added to CC to avoid breaking CFLAGS (CC='cc -g').
Better yet: DEBUG_FLAGS=-g
John
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Jan 08, 2000 at 03:48:33PM -0800, Kurt D. Zeilenga wrote:
> Did you try the "use_uid" option?
Looks like you're dead right! I can't test it 'till tomorrow, but I'm
sure it works.
Oh, if only everything came with man pages, then I could RTFM.
David.
To Unsubscribe: send mail t
Yes! That is exactly the problem I have been having since the 1999/10/09 12:57:15 PDT
ATA commit. Here is the link to the email I sent earlier:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1326170+1331912+/usr/local/www/db/text/1999/freebsd-current/19991212.freebsd-current
Basically, on my Pen
Hi,
Before people start wondering about my name being mangled in the From:
field of my previous message: Sorry, it happens regularly when cutting
and pasting into the mailer of the Netscape Communicator 4.7. Maybe I
have to switch to another mailtool...
Cheers,
Hans
To Unsubscribe: send mail
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> Well guys, I tried upgrading one of my older machines today to the
> latest 4.0. It was running an older 4.0 kernel (Nov 29 1999).
>
[ Detailed description deleted ]
> HELP! Whats happening!!! :-( :-( :-(
>
> At the moment I am stymied. I s
> I fixed the bug and using the patched machine from remote. Now
> it seems to be working well.
> I also simplified the patch to nfs_socket.c.
> Updated patches are below. (patches to trpt is same as last version.)
>
> http://paradise.kame.net/v6proxy/diana2/shin/work/freebsd/kernel-tcp.210
:Hi all,
:
:This morning I had a very strange (at least I've never seen it before) SCSI
:related system hang. The system simply stopped responding at 9:30:03 am
:this morning. I found it in this state at 13:20. It had been hanging
:_hard_. No response to console, serial terminal or network. After
[ Moved to chat ]
> [Multiple irrelevant mailing-lists snipped.]
>
> < said:
>
> > Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"?
>
> As Sherlock Holmes once said: ``It is always unpleasant dealing with
> an alias.''
>
> >plonk<
Boo... Hisss
Nate
;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;) ;)
>
> While I do not agree with your idea of need of anonymity, I
> respect your need for it.
You don't have to agree and I appreciate your respect.
>
> Could you not, instead of using the handle "FreeBSD", which
> sortof already is taken :-), just assume a human name? The use of
> an obviously
Can we please end this discussion? End it now.
It's of no importance to me or, I venture to say, the postmaster
whether or not someone wishes to use an alias in these mailing lists
and it's certainly not a topic which follows the charter for the
FreeBSD-current mailing list. In fact, the only c
While I do not agree with your idea of need of anonymity, I respect your need for it.
Could you not, instead of using the handle "FreeBSD", which sortof already is taken
:-), just assume a human name? The use of an obviously not human name makes it
uncomfortable to communicate with you.
If you
> >
> > Indeed, I could adduser bknowels and use/be Brad Knowels (for
> all you know
> > my name could also be Brad Knowels) if he prefers. I'm not like
> that though.
> > Some people just aren't happy if they aren't complaining about
> something.
>
> At 4:48 AM -0800 2000/1/9, Amancio Hasty wrote:
>
> > For instance, just because someone has an email name which resembles
> > a real name lets say "Brad Knowles" does not necessarily mean that the
> > real "Brad Knowles is sending the mail assuming of course that there
> > is a Brad Know
>
> Indeed, I could adduser bknowels and use/be Brad Knowels (for all you know
> my name could also be Brad Knowels) if he prefers. I'm not like that though.
> Some people just aren't happy if they aren't complaining about something.
^^^
> > At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:
> >
> > > Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to
> private e-mail and
> > > let's leave the lists out of this.
> >
> > I don't think you get the point. If you continue to use an alias
> > (as opposed to your real name), then
> At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:
>
> > Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to
> private e-mail and
> > let's leave the lists out of this.
>
> I don't think you get the point. If you continue to use an alias
> (as opposed to your real name), then it looks lik
At 4:48 AM -0800 2000/1/9, Amancio Hasty wrote:
> For instance, just because someone has an email name which resembles
> a real name lets say "Brad Knowles" does not necessarily mean that the
> real "Brad Knowles is sending the mail assuming of course that there
> is a Brad Knowles.
> ===> libdes
Fixed - thanks!
M
--
Mark Murray
Join the anti-SPAM movement: http://www.cauce.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Ian West wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 06:16:30AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> > Everything seems to be working great for the ESS 1868 now, but I was
> > just wondering...
> >
>
> While it is much better than it was (sound happens, and the machine
> doesn't reboot :-), I am still seeing a r
> At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:
>
> > Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to private e-mail and
> > let's leave the lists out of this.
>
> I don't think you get the point. If you continue to use an alias
> (as opposed to your real name), then it looks like
===> libdes
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a-I/vol/vinum0/src/secure/lib/libdes/../../../crypto/libdes
-I/usr/obj/vol/vinum0/src/i386/usr/include
/vol/vinum0/src/secure/lib/libdes/../../../crypto/libdes/cbc_cksm.c
/vol/vinum0/src/secure/lib/libdes/../../../crypto/libdes/pcbc_enc.c
/vol/v
Hi all,
This morning I had a very strange (at least I've never seen it before) SCSI
related system hang. The system simply stopped responding at 9:30:03 am
this morning. I found it in this state at 13:20. It had been hanging
_hard_. No response to console, serial terminal or network. After a har
At 8:29 PM -0800 2000/1/8, FreeBSD wrote:
> Again, I ask, if all you want to do is flame, take it to private e-mail and
> let's leave the lists out of this.
I don't think you get the point. If you continue to use an alias
(as opposed to your real name), then it looks like everyone is
On Sun, Jan 09, 2000 at 06:16:30AM -0500, Donn Miller wrote:
> It looks like the ESS 1868 is working OK now with the DSP_BUFFSIZE set
> to 8192. Before, it wouldn't work unless I set this value to (65536 -
> 256), which was the original value, I believe. So, why does the ESS
> work OK now with a
> > The 1st thing I want to be tested is that, a kernel with
> > following additions to the config file
> >
> > options INET6 #IPv6 communications protocols
> > options IPSEC #IP security
> > options IPSEC_ESP #IP security (crypto; def
It looks like the ESS 1868 is working OK now with the DSP_BUFFSIZE set
to 8192. Before, it wouldn't work unless I set this value to (65536 -
256), which was the original value, I believe. So, why does the ESS
work OK now with a buffer size of 8192? And how is this buffersize an
advantage over (
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> james <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's interesting though how i had no ipf rules whatsoever, yet it
> > introduced so much latency, as Alexander has pointed out in another email.
> > Why is ipf so slow? I was planning on switching from ipfw/natd to
> >
On Thu, 6 Jan 2000, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> You should respect the blocksize when talking to a device with a
> fixed blocklength, dont write ! % blocksize blocks to the device..
>
By the way, I think I've redone this enough times that it's all correct.
It's 32-bit support _outside_ of the overr
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000, Leif Neland wrote:
> Kernel build stops with "Don't know how to make sha1.c".
> sha was removed a few days ago, a "heads up" said.
Different instance - that was just SHA1-format passwords.
Kris
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-curr
i have just committed a driver for the neomagic chips. please test and post
results.
- cameron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
58 matches
Mail list logo
