Peter Wemm wrote:
> I hope we haven't changed the server default to stop forwarding.. the
> security risk is to the client, not the remote sshd server, therefore it is
> the client that should decide on whether to forward or not.
I seem to recall the server default being changed, then di
On Apr 21, 8:36am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] ("Andrey A. Chernov") wrote:
-- Subject: tcsh history and month bugfix: tc.prompt.c v3.38
thanks, I am redoing the code for tc.prompt.c anyway because it is wrong!
christos
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i
--- tc.prompt.c.bak Thu Apr 20 11:47:23 2000
+++ tc.prompt.c Fri Apr 21 08:31:17 2000
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@
fmthist('R', info, (char *) (cz = cbuff), sizeof(cbuff));
else
cz = (unsigned char *) str;
- if (str != NULL)
+
"Andrew Reilly" wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 07:23:00PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Chris Piazza wrote:
> >
> > > It's working from my 5.0 box to my 4.0-R box across town, too.
> > >
> > > -Chris
> >
> > Thanks. There's one data point. Now it's evident
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 07:23:00PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Chris Piazza wrote:
>
> > It's working from my 5.0 box to my 4.0-R box across town, too.
> >
> > -Chris
>
> Thanks. There's one data point. Now it's evidently nothing in the
> code, as it fails e
Kris Kennaway writes:
> > $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs.
>announced 1024.
> > Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
> > Warning: identity keysize mismatch: actual 1023, announced 1024
> > A
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Chris Piazza wrote:
> It's working from my 5.0 box to my 4.0-R box across town, too.
>
> -Chris
Okay, give me some more info, please:
You're going from the 5.0 box to the 4.0 box. What's the /etc/hosts
look like on the 5.0 box? What's xauth list show (you don't have to
s
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs.
>announced 1024.
> Warning: This may be due to an old implementation of ssh.
> Warning: identity keysize mismatch: actual 1023, announced
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Chris Piazza wrote:
> It's working from my 5.0 box to my 4.0-R box across town, too.
>
> -Chris
Thanks. There's one data point. Now it's evidently nothing in the
code, as it fails exactly the same way with 4.0-STABLE OpenSSH,
-CURRENT OpenSSH, and my latest port update Op
Using loader.old worked! Thanks to all who suggested it, I was fearing
actual damage. Now time to figure out if its really fixed yet, or why not
:)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Adam
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Last night around midnight EST I cvsupped and did make buildworld, config
> -r'ed my kernel, compiled it, installed the kernel and did make
> installworld. I rebooted expecting the system to come up fine but it
> failed with "Invalid partit
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 06:10:18PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Brooks Davis wrote:
>
> > It works for me. I just tested it from my laptop (current as of
> > yesterday) to a 4.0-S machine, a 3.3-RC running ssh 1.2.26, and Solaris
> > 2.6 system also running 1.2.
Archie Cobbs writes:
> When I ssh from a 4.0-stable machine, everything works as before.
^^
Oops- sorry, that should be a "3.4-RELEASE" machine.
-Archie
___
Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communicati
Harold Gutch writes:
> > Just updated to -current.. previously, when ssh'ing to freefall,
> > no password was required at all -- it just worked. Now I get this:
> >
> > $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs.
>announced 10
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Brooks Davis wrote:
> It works for me. I just tested it from my laptop (current as of
> yesterday) to a 4.0-S machine, a 3.3-RC running ssh 1.2.26, and Solaris
> 2.6 system also running 1.2.26. I seem to recall that we were shipping
> with the server disabling forwarding wh
Hi. I am new to freeBSD. I installed this week. There was a problem
between ftp and libftp that caught me. I have made a simple patch.
I was told that after making a PR that I should also send something to a
list, just to give people a heads up. If that was incorrect, I
apologize, in advanc
Hi all,
I'm trying to build a "stable" release CD for my laptop on my
"current" desktop. The "chroot" make world completes, but when the
"dorelease" runs, the machine resets. There was no panic message nor
entry in /var/log/messages.
I've done this a few times, and it always dies in the same pla
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 04:59:11PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> It still doesn't work at all, after multiple make worlds with the latest
> crypto sources all around. I'm going to update the port and then try that
> instead.
It works for me. I just tested it from my laptop (current
Just FYI:
It still doesn't work at all, after multiple make worlds with the latest
crypto sources all around. I'm going to update the port and then try that
instead.
--
Brian Fundakowski Feldman \ FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! /
[EMAIL PROTECTED]`---
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 12:58:42PM -0700, Archie Cobbs wrote:
> Just updated to -current.. previously, when ssh'ing to freefall,
> no password was required at all -- it just worked. Now I get this:
>
> $ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size
At 03:55 PM 4/20/2000 -0400, Adam wrote:
>Last night around midnight EST I cvsupped and did make buildworld, config
>-r'ed my kernel, compiled it, installed the kernel and did make
>installworld. I rebooted expecting the system to come up fine but it
>failed with "Invalid partition table". This w
I was updating from a -current less than a week old and there is nothing
more recent than 2 weeks olf in UPDATING, but thanks for reminding me to
check.
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
>What did you update from? 3.4? Also, did you read /usr/src/UPDATING. If
>you didn't, you ha
< said:
> Looks like *really* nice idea. This would allow to solve "stale
> modules" problem at minimal cost.
Long ago, in a galaxy far, far away... (well, OK, seven years ago, in
FreeBSD 1.0) I was working on developing a loadable-module system for
FreeBSD (which I eventually threw out when Ter
Just updated to -current.. previously, when ssh'ing to freefall,
no password was required at all -- it just worked. Now I get this:
$ ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Warning: Server lies about size of server host key: actual size is 1023 bits vs.
announced 1024.
Warning: This may be due to an old i
Last night around midnight EST I cvsupped and did make buildworld, config
-r'ed my kernel, compiled it, installed the kernel and did make
installworld. I rebooted expecting the system to come up fine but it
failed with "Invalid partition table". This was just after removing 2 of
3 of my dimm's be
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Alexander N. Kabaev wrote:
> make -j8 buildworld fails with these messages for a second day in a row:
>
> cd /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl; make _EXTRADEPEND
> ===> librsausa
> mkdir: openssl: File exists
There is a dependency problem which is only biting some people here..for
On Thu, 20 Apr 2000, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> > Then, we could add an option
> > "make modules" and "make install_modules" so that they could be
> > built/installed with the kernel.
> >
> > After all, modules ARE a part of the kernel...
>
> Looks like *really* nice idea. This would allow to solve "s
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 11:24:49AM +0200, Stijn Hoop wrote:
> \begin{newbie question}
> So why aren't the modules built with the kernel instead of with the world?
> \end{newbie question}
I bitched about this on committers the other day and marcel told me it was being
worked on.
--
Bill Fumerol
Donn Miller wrote:
> Stijn Hoop wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:15:55PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> > > make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a kernel doesn't build
> > > modules. This bit me again the other day when updating, as well - panic at
> > > boot when loading a stale l
-On [2420 08:49], attila! ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
>> ../../pci/if_dc.c:151: miibus_if.h: No such file or directory
>> mkdep: compile failed
>
>'find' on entire sys subsystem fails to show it, and I
>pulled cvsups on 19th and 20th to see if it was
solved. thanx!
LINT added an explanation of the miibus driver requirement.
I did the basic configuration from the 17 Apr LINT file and
missed the change when I updated, even though I diff LINT
when it updates. see diff below.
As they say: RTFS...caref
Stijn Hoop wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:15:55PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > make world doesn't build a kernel. Making a kernel doesn't build
> > modules. This bit me again the other day when updating, as well - panic at
> > boot when loading a stale linux.ko.
>
> \begin{newbie ques
$B!!BgJQ$*@$OC$K$J$C$F$*$j$^$9!#(B
$B!y!z!y!z!V%_%s%J%G%M%C%H!W!y!z!y!z$H?=$7$^$9!#(B
$B!!FMA3$N%a!<%k$GBgJQ62=L$G$9$,!"$3$N$?$SEv%5%$%H$N?75,%*!<%W%s(B
$B$K$"$?$j$^$7$F!"3+E95-G0%W%l%<%s%H%-%c%s%Z!<%s$re$2$^$9!#(B
$B!!!V%_%s%J%G%M%C%H!W$O!"=P2q$$$r;O$a$dL\E*JL7G<(HDM-$j!"EPO?5Z$S(B
$
Take a look at http://quake.nyct.net/~efutch/FreeBSD/ftpio.c.patch-3 and
let me know if this is what you want. Really it's such a stupid problem
that not patching it wouldn't make sense.
--
Eric Futch New York Connect.Net, Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Technical Support Staff
http:
rm -f /usr/include/openssl* and rebuild.
* Alexander N. Kabaev ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [000420 09:59]:
> make -j8 buildworld fails with these messages for a second day in a row:
>
> cd /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl; make _EXTRADEPEND
> ===> librsausa
> mkdir: openssl: File exists
> *** Error code 1
> c
On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Oliver Schonefeld wrote:
> i recently updated my -current system from -current as of about mid-march to
> lest sundays's -current (jep, from 4.0 to 5.0) due to the work done to the
> ida driver.
> well, the ida driver seems to work, but the network hast complety stopped
> wor
Will Andrews wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 11:56:08AM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
> > that rapid developer folks can disable it.
>
> ITYM "rabid". And I kinda resent that.. ;-)
I really did mean rapid, as in those that are installing kernels every
10 mins to test changes.
Though, these da
make -j8 buildworld fails with these messages for a second day in a row:
cd /usr/src/secure/lib/libssl; make _EXTRADEPEND
===> librsausa
mkdir: openssl: File exists
*** Error code 1
cp /usr/src/secure/lib/librsausa/../libcrypto/opensslconf-i386.h \
openssl/opensslconf.h
1 error
*** Error code 2
1
On Thu, Apr 20, 2000 at 11:56:08AM +0100, Paul Richards wrote:
> that rapid developer folks can disable it.
ITYM "rabid". And I kinda resent that.. ;-)
--
Will Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w---
?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5
Warner Losh wrote:
>
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alex Zepeda writes:
> : Perhaps it's time to implement some sort of versioning in the modules to
> : prevent them from being loaded into the incorrect kernel.
>
> In theory that sounds nice, but in -current the kernel ABI changes too
> quickl
I've tracked down what seems to be a bug in the new version of OpenSSL I
imported a week ago which affects the alpha platform. It *looks* like a
bug in OpenSSL's "bignum" library which might not have shown up for users
of the default openssl distribution, which uses assembly to implement
(parts of
On Wed, Apr 19, 2000 at 06:15:55PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
> > I cvsup'ed, built world and kernel. Hhmm, actually I see no reason why
> > there should be a problem since everything should be done by make world.
>
> make world doesn't build a
i use,
device pcmo0 at isa? port 0x220 irq 5 drq 1
for my ESS 1869 sound card
>From: "Otter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>CC: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: /dev/dsp device not configured
>Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 23:08:31 -0400
>
>- Original Message --
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Alex Zepeda writes:
: Perhaps it's time to implement some sort of versioning in the modules to
: prevent them from being loaded into the incorrect kernel.
In theory that sounds nice, but in -current the kernel ABI changes too
quickly for that to be effecitve. The
On Thursday, April 20 2000, 01:15:55, [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
>On Wed, 19 Apr 2000, Christoph Kukulies wrote:
>
>> I cvsup'ed, built world and kernel. Hhmm, actually I see no reason why
>> there should be a problem since everything should be done by make world.
>
>make world doesn't build a ker
45 matches
Mail list logo
