Hi.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 01:08:04AM -0400, Jeff Roberson wrote:
This patch has seriously reduced file system deadlocks for several people.
It also makes concurrent file system access much faster in certain cases.
Since I have only heard good reports and no bad reports I'm going to
enable
Just an update. I've tried three different 32 bit cards and every time the
card was inserted the laptop locked up. I recompiled the kernel without the
miibus and dc and then inserted the Xircom card the laptop would appear to
lock up, that is, everything that was running just stopped. When the
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 08:54:01PM +1000, Scott Penno wrote:
Hi,
Just an update. I've tried three different 32 bit cards and every time the
card was inserted the laptop locked up. I recompiled the kernel without the
miibus and dc and then inserted the Xircom card the laptop would appear to
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 5 May 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Yep, these modules don't exist in -STABLE. You should keep your old
/etc/pam.conf around for -STABLE programs.
I thought that pam ignored pam.conf if /etc/pam.d exists?
-CURRENT's PAM does, -STABLE's
I removed apm from the kernel which appeared to be playing having with acpi
and things are now working a treat. The card works fine, however I do
receive the following message, 'cardbus0: unknown card (vendor=0x115d,
dev=0x0103) at 0.1 irq 5'. I've had a look through various lists and
couldn't
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 03:53:27PM +0900, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been struggling upgrading kernel since beginning of April, and finally
found I have to add options LOOKUP_EXCLUSIVE to my kernel config file.
Without LOOKUP_EXCLUSIVE,
- some of the processes stall in inode state, and
This message is to confirm the addition of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list
at our website:
This message is to confirm the removal of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
We're sorry to see you go!
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing
This message is to confirm the addition of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list
at our website:
This message is to confirm the removal of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
We're sorry to see you go!
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing
This message is to confirm the addition of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list
at our website:
This message is to confirm the removal of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
We're sorry to see you go!
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing
This message is to confirm the addition of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list
at our website:
This message is to confirm the removal of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
We're sorry to see you go!
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing
This message is to confirm the addition of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list
at our website:
This message is to confirm the removal of your
email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED] from the
Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing list.
We're sorry to see you go!
If you feel you have received this notice in error,
please visit the Kane Marie Fine Arts Gallery
Subscribe Me mailing
Scott Penno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I removed apm from the kernel which appeared to be playing having with acpi
and things are now working a treat. The card works fine, however I do
receive the following message, 'cardbus0: unknown card (vendor=0x115d,
dev=0x0103) at 0.1 irq 5'. I've had a
I can't get dd if=/dev/acd0c of=/tmp/fbsd.raw to work. I'm sure that I've
done this before although it has been a long time. It was probably before
the devfs. I don't have a current or release box to test on.
Does anyone know why or what I am doing wrong?
Thanks,
ed
Please disregard my previous email. I had forgotten the error message.
I can't get dd if=/dev/acd0c of=/tmp/fbsd.raw to work.
I get: dd: /dev/acd0c: Invalid argument
I'm sure that I've done this before although it has been a long time.
It was probably before the devfs. I don't have a
On 11:57-0700, May 6, 2002, Edwin Culp wrote:
Please disregard my previous email. I had forgotten the error message.
I can't get dd if=/dev/acd0c of=/tmp/fbsd.raw to work.
I get: dd: /dev/acd0c: Invalid argument
dd if=/dev/acd0c of=/tmp/fbsd.raw bs=2048
works for me.
I'm sure that I've
It does for me to with 2048 as the block size. I won't say what
block size I was using.
Thanks, I wasn't even thinking block size.
ed
Quoting Maxim Konovalov [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
| On 11:57-0700, May 6, 2002, Edwin Culp wrote:
|
| Please disregard my previous email. I had forgotten the
It does for me to with 2048 as the block size. I won't say what
block size I was using.
Thanks, I wasn't even thinking block size.
Yes, the block size is checked by the driver, so that it knows whether to
rip the disk in raw 2352 byte sectors. dd defaults to 512 bytes, which
the driver
unsubscribe freebsd-current
__
D O T E A S Y - Join the web hosting revolution!
http://www.doteasy.com
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message
The 5.0-CURRENT installation and configuration (cvsup/buildworld this
evening) does not correctly support dhcp configuration, even when manually
placed in rc.conf.
The system comes up with the default name Amnesiac.
Is this a known bug.
_F
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 23:29:36 -0400
From: Forrest Aldrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 5.0-CURRENT installation and configuration (cvsup/buildworld this
evening) does not correctly support dhcp configuration, even when manually
placed in rc.conf.
The system comes up with the default name Amnesiac.
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:02:41AM -0500, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
rman on -current chokes and dies on gv.man from gv-3.5.8.
rman on -stable can take it with no problems at all.
It's an XFree86-4.x problem.
Kris
msg38092/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:07:53PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:02:41AM -0500, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
rman on -current chokes and dies on gv.man from gv-3.5.8.
rman on -stable can take it with no problems at all.
It's an XFree86-4.x problem.
I'm not sure
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:27:55AM -0500, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:07:53PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 12:02:41AM -0500, Krzysztof Parzyszek wrote:
rman on -current chokes and dies on gv.man from gv-3.5.8.
rman on -stable can take it
28 matches
Mail list logo
