Re: Another KSE problem?

2002-07-11 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Bill Huey wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:58:56PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > it may be in "NEW" state if it has just been forked. > > if so then the "NEW" state is hanging around too long. > > it should be fixed tomorrow after testing. > > What do you mean by ju

Re: Another KSE problem?

2002-07-11 Thread Bill Huey
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:58:56PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > it may be in "NEW" state if it has just been forked. > if so then the "NEW" state is hanging around too long. > it should be fixed tomorrow after testing. What do you mean by just forked ? This is a running process that's block on

Re: Another KSE problem?

2002-07-11 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Bill Huey wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:55:51AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > > I have no idea what xmms is, but it seems doubtlfu that this is a KSE > > problem. > > Hey, > > xmms is a very popular audio media player. > > BTW, I'm getting a lot of orphaned proc

Re: Another KSE problem?

2002-07-11 Thread Julian Elischer
it may be in "NEW" state if it has just been forked. if so then the "NEW" state is hanging around too long. it should be fixed tomorrow after testing. On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Bill Huey wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:39:27PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > > BTW, I'm getting a lot of orphaned proces

Re: php4 -DWITH_APACHE2 breaks on -current

2002-07-11 Thread Wesley Morgan
The standalone php cgi is a little borked too. It won't work with squirrelmail unless you remove a configure option. I cant remember which one right now, but I figured it out before :) On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Edwin Culp wrote: > Simon, > > Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> submitted mod_php-dev with >

Re: Timeout and SMP race

2002-07-11 Thread David Xu
--- "Justin T. Gibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I believe I had this conversation with Justin Gibbs earlier; he told > >me that the callout consumers (network, cam) had to be aware of the > >race and handle this if it matters. I don't particularly like complicating > >the callout handlers

Re: php4 -DWITH_APACHE2 breaks on -current

2002-07-11 Thread Edwin Culp
Simon, Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> submitted mod_php-dev with PR ports/39623 on July 7 that I have been using and works great There is/was a copy of the port at: http://www.gufi.org/~alex/php-dev.tar.gz Alex has done a several updates on this and I think it has never been committed. I hav

Re: Timeout and SMP race

2002-07-11 Thread Justin T. Gibbs
>I believe I had this conversation with Justin Gibbs earlier; he told >me that the callout consumers (network, cam) had to be aware of the >race and handle this if it matters. I don't particularly like complicating >the callout handlers as illustrated above, though, so if a better scheme >is po

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The setting of NO_WERROR belongs in [BTX]MAKE if anywhere. This is > > already done for [BX]MAKE but not for TMAKE. However, I don't like > > turning off warnings for any of these. Warnings for these stages

php4 -DWITH_APACHE2 breaks on -current

2002-07-11 Thread Simon 'corecode' Schubert
hello, just wanted to note that php4 breaks with -DWITH_APACHE2 on latest -CURRENT: [...] Making all in apache2filter /bin/sh /usr/obj/k7/usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.2.1/libtool --silent --mode=compile cc -I. -I/usr/obj/k7/usr/ports/www/mod_php4/work/php-4.2.1/sapi/apache2filter -I/usr

Re: Thread state

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Wemm
John Baldwin wrote: > Currently, sparc64 SMP panics before getting out of single user mode > because there is an optimization case in cpu_switch() (if we are > switching back to the same thread, we just return right away) that > doesn't set td_state to TDS_RUNNING. Also, according to Peter, the >

Re: Another KSE problem?

2002-07-11 Thread Bill Huey
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 06:39:27PM -0700, Bill Huey wrote: > BTW, I'm getting a lot of orphaned processes when I run a program in gdb > and you deliver a SIGQUIT that seem to be stuck in poll(). It's 100 percent > repeatable. Here's a ps axl: = 1001 312 1 0 96 0 116264 5767 -

Re: Another KSE problem?

2002-07-11 Thread Bill Huey
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 09:55:51AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: > I have no idea what xmms is, but it seems doubtlfu that this is a KSE > problem. Hey, xmms is a very popular audio media player. BTW, I'm getting a lot of orphaned processes when I run a program in gdb and you deliver a SIGQUIT

ssh: login-like patch for review

2002-07-11 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
Problems addressed: 1) options.print_lastlog was not honored. 2) "Last login: ..." was printed twice. 3) "copyright" was not printed 4) No newline was before motd. --- session.c.old Sat Jun 29 17:22:56 2002 +++ session.c Fri Jul 12 05:02:50 2002 @@ -752,14 +752,14 @@ retu

Re: Thread state

2002-07-11 Thread Benno Rice
On Fri, 2002-07-12 at 08:47, John Baldwin wrote: > Currently, sparc64 SMP panics before getting out of single user mode > because there is an optimization case in cpu_switch() (if we are > switching back to the same thread, we just return right away) that > doesn't set td_state to TDS_RUNNING. Al

Re: mysql build error

2002-07-11 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Thursday 11 July 2002 11:47 am, Mark Trettin wrote: > Ben, Beech- > > Here is how I got mysql323-server to build on current. > > --- Makefile.orig Wed Jul 10 09:06:02 2002 > +++ Makefile Thu Jul 11 14:44:06 2002 > @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ > --without-readline \ > --wit

Re: Thread state

2002-07-11 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Currently, sparc64 SMP panics before getting out of single user mode > because there is an optimization case in cpu_switch() (if we are > switching back to the same thread, we just return right away) that > doesn't set td_state to TDS_RUNNING. Also, a

Re: Proposed fix for SMP vm_zeroidle.c

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On 11-Jul-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > Here is my proposed fix for the page-zeroing problem w/ SMP. It > > > is untested (I'm about to test it)... I'm looking for comments on > > > the concept. If the comments are positive and my t

Re: Proposed fix for SMP vm_zeroidle.c

2002-07-11 Thread Matthew Dillon
:ARRGH!! N!!! : :I've almost completely replaced this code! : :I suggested a function for activation a few days ago too, but was going :to leave it till after this commit, which I hoped to get done today. :This reactivates PG_G for SMP and avoids global invltlb's when we can :do finer grained

Re: openoffice is compiling again!...but won't run.

2002-07-11 Thread Martin Blapp
Hi, Make sure you use the ports gcc31 for compiling. The c++ from CURRENT has broken exception handling. In the next few days a patch will be committed to address this. And we have a special mailinglist for openoffice now :-) Please mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You could also get one of the pack

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Jul, Don Lewis wrote: > On 10 Jul, Alex Zepeda wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:34:50PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >> >>> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "inp" locked from >../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:935 >>> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "tcp" locked fro

Re: Proposed fix for SMP vm_zeroidle.c

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Wemm
John Baldwin wrote: > > On 11-Jul-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote: > > Here is my proposed fix for the page-zeroing problem w/ SMP. It > > is untested (I'm about to test it)... I'm looking for comments on > > the concept. If the comments are positive and my testing succeeds I > > will

Re: mysql build error

2002-07-11 Thread Ben Cox
Mark Trettin wrote: >Ben, Beech- > >Here is how I got mysql323-server to build on current. > >--- Makefile.orig Wed Jul 10 09:06:02 2002 >+++ Makefile Thu Jul 11 14:44:06 2002 >@@ -30,7 +30,6 @@ > --without-readline \ > --without-bench \ > --with-m

Re: openoffice is compiling again!...but won't run.

2002-07-11 Thread walt
Matthew Dillon wrote: > :On 11 Jul, walt wrote: > :> Unfortunately, the 'setup' program segfaults just like it did > :> two months ago. This was fixed in -stable with Matt's patch for > :> rtld-elf, but that patch won't apply in -current. > > I had committed the alloca()->mmap() change to bo

Re: openoffice is compiling again!...but won't run.

2002-07-11 Thread walt
Don Lewis wrote: > On 11 Jul, walt wrote: > >>I just finished compiling and installing openoffice on yesterday's >>-current, thanks to the stat.h patch from Bruce.[but it won't run] > > > It even runs properly for me if I access my previously setup home > directory NFS mounted from a stable box

Thread state

2002-07-11 Thread John Baldwin
Currently, sparc64 SMP panics before getting out of single user mode because there is an optimization case in cpu_switch() (if we are switching back to the same thread, we just return right away) that doesn't set td_state to TDS_RUNNING. Also, according to Peter, the code in ia64's cpu_switch() d

Re: thread_sanity_check()

2002-07-11 Thread Julian Elischer
all gone now.. On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, John Baldwin wrote: > Considering the incredible amount of complaining over having a > cred_free_thread() function conditionally compiled into the kernel > that only did a mutex lock, decrement, and mutex unlock in the common > case, why isn't thread_sanity_c

cvs commit: src/lib/libc/gen statvfs.c

2002-07-11 Thread Garrett Wollman
< said: > wollman 2002/07/11 15:54:12 PDT > Added files: > lib/libc/gen statvfs.c > Log: > A simple implementation of statvfs(3) (one step above the trivial one). > Not yet connected to the build (awaiting documentation). Would the people complaining about ports with b

Re: openoffice is compiling again!...but won't run.

2002-07-11 Thread Matthew Dillon
:On 11 Jul, walt wrote: :> I just finished compiling and installing openoffice on yesterday's :> -current, thanks to the stat.h patch from Bruce. : :It even runs properly for me if I access my previously setup home :directory NFS mounted from a stable box. Also, it successfully reads a :Word doc

Re: "pipe mutex" vs. "sigio lock" lock order reversal

2002-07-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Jul, Don Lewis wrote: > On 7 Jul, Don Lewis wrote: >> Jul 7 07:47:09 scratch kernel: lock order reversal >> Jul 7 07:47:09 scratch kernel: 1st 0xcabf7980 pipe mutex (pipe mutex) @ >/usr/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:451 >> Jul 7 07:47:09 scratch kernel: 2nd 0xc0474300 sigio lock (sigio lock)

RE: Proposed fix for SMP vm_zeroidle.c

2002-07-11 Thread John Baldwin
On 11-Jul-2002 Matthew Dillon wrote: > Here is my proposed fix for the page-zeroing problem w/ SMP. It > is untested (I'm about to test it)... I'm looking for comments on > the concept. If the comments are positive and my testing succeeds I > will commit it tonight. > > Bas

Proposed fix for SMP vm_zeroidle.c

2002-07-11 Thread Matthew Dillon
Here is my proposed fix for the page-zeroing problem w/ SMP. It is untested (I'm about to test it)... I'm looking for comments on the concept. If the comments are positive and my testing succeeds I will commit it tonight. Basically the idea is simple. Provide a function tha

Re: openoffice is compiling again!...but won't run.

2002-07-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Jul, walt wrote: > I just finished compiling and installing openoffice on yesterday's > -current, thanks to the stat.h patch from Bruce. It even runs properly for me if I access my previously setup home directory NFS mounted from a stable box. Also, it successfully reads a Word document th

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-11 Thread Mike Barcroft
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: > > Comments on the attached, untested patch? > > > Disable fatal warnings during bootstrap, build, and cross tools > > phase of world. > > The setting of NO_WERROR belongs in [BTX]MAKE if anywhere. This is > al

openoffice is compiling again!...but won't run.

2002-07-11 Thread walt
I just finished compiling and installing openoffice on yesterday's -current, thanks to the stat.h patch from Bruce. Unfortunately, the 'setup' program segfaults just like it did two months ago. This was fixed in -stable with Matt's patch for rtld-elf, but that patch won't apply in -current. So-

thread_sanity_check()

2002-07-11 Thread John Baldwin
Considering the incredible amount of complaining over having a cred_free_thread() function conditionally compiled into the kernel that only did a mutex lock, decrement, and mutex unlock in the common case, why isn't thread_sanity_check() (or it's body) conditionally compiled? It's a lot more expe

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.recen t-CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-11 Thread Eric Anholt
On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 11:34, Shizuka Kudo wrote: > --- "Thyer, Matthew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > make: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. Stop > > *** Error code 2 > > > > -- > > Try: > > build ports/lang/perl and set env PERL to /usr/local/bin/perl The X ports are faili

Re: Update to the DRM

2002-07-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Missed the N on my cvs diff -uN. New patch is uploaded, including not > stripping FreeBSD ID tags. > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020711.diff Looks good, I'll rebuild & reboot in a couple of minu

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecen t-CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-11 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 13:49, Eric Anholt wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/files/x420diff-1), I would be happy to Augh, why can't I type? http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/files/x420diff-1 -- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecen t-CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-11 Thread Eric Anholt
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 13:02, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 04:28:06PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~reg/x11.patch > > Would someone PLEASE commit these!?!?!?!?!?!! > Before I get totally sick and tired of the main in my inbox and do it > myself. > > I _

Re: sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-11 Thread Bruce Evans
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote: > Giorgos Keramidas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Whoever fixes this, and however we agree to fix it, > > should also remember to close the bin/40382 PR. > > Comments on the attached, untested patch? > Disable fatal warnings during bootstrap, build, an

Re: mozilla port?

2002-07-11 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 08:35:27PM +0200, Martin Faxer wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:58:01AM -0700, Seth Hettich wrote: > > Is this building for anyone? > > > > I always get: > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/u1/src/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla' > > /usr/bin/sed -e "s;@PREFIX@;/usr/X11R6;

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 04:28:06PM +0200, Jeremy Lea wrote: > http://people.freebsd.org/~reg/x11.patch Would someone PLEASE commit these!?!?!?!?!?!! Before I get totally sick and tired of the main in my inbox and do it myself. I _truely_ fail to see what is so hard about fixing X to compile with

Re: mozilla port?

2002-07-11 Thread Martin Faxer
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 10:58:01AM -0700, Seth Hettich wrote: > Is this building for anyone? > > I always get: > gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/u1/src/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla' > /usr/bin/sed -e "s;@PREFIX@;/usr/X11R6;g" > /u1/src/ports/www/mozilla/files/mozilla.sh > >/u1/src/ports/www/mozil

Re: Update to the DRM

2002-07-11 Thread Eric Anholt
t.h > and nothing showed up. any ideas? Missed the N on my cvs diff -uN. New patch is uploaded, including not stripping FreeBSD ID tags. http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020711.diff -- Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/ To Unsu

mozilla port?

2002-07-11 Thread Seth Hettich
Is this building for anyone? I always get: gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/u1/src/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla' /usr/bin/sed -e "s;@PREFIX@;/usr/X11R6;g" /u1/src/ports/www/mozilla/files/mozilla.sh >/u1/src/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/mozilla (cd /u1/src/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/dist/bin;

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Kenneth Culver
> The cerr not found thing is one of two problems. gcc3 is pickier > about namespace issues than gcc2, so you need to say std::cerr or > using namespace std;. However, the more common case is people > thinking they can link c++ programs with 'cc' rather than 'c++' > > My C++ programs are large e

Re: Another KSE problem?

2002-07-11 Thread Julian Elischer
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Martin Faxer wrote: > Hi! > > This morning, when starting XMMS, I saw something weird: > > redpixel@lockdown:~ %> xmms& > [1] 603 > redpixel@lockdown:~ %> cat > cat: stdin: Resource temporarily unavailable > > This is on a 2 days old -CURRENT. > > (PS. If this has been

Re: mysql build error

2002-07-11 Thread Ben Cox
Beech Rintoul wrote: >Does anyone have a suggestion how to get around this? > >cc -DMYSQL_SERVER -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr/local\"" > - >DDATADIR="\"/var/db/mysql\"" >-DSHAREDIR="\"/usr/local/share/m >ysql\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : I don't think kde3 compiles on the latest -CURRENT though, I've been : trying to compile that for several days, and every time the linker says : that things like cout and other standard c++ things aren't found

Re: gcc-3.1 Mozilla Build Fails

2002-07-11 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Thu, 2002-07-11 at 03:13, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On (2002/07/10 19:15), Dirk Engling wrote: > > > Maybe this would be more interesting to > > the mozilla guys but mozilla compiles on > > 2.95.3, so I think, the problem is related > > to gcc-3.1 > > As far as I know, ports/lang/gcc31 is still

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Wemm
Kenneth Culver wrote: > > In any case, the more verbose error reports are highly appreciated. > > Could you please post the error messages you are getting (assuming your > > next try of installworld with clean /usr/include does not help). > > Yeah, I can do that, the only reason I didn't do it t

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Kenneth Culver
> In any case, the more verbose error reports are highly appreciated. > Could you please post the error messages you are getting (assuming your > next try of installworld with clean /usr/include does not help). Yeah, I can do that, the only reason I didn't do it this time is because my home pc i

Neither power-off nor timeout message from "halt -p" today

2002-07-11 Thread David Wolfskill
This is by no means critical; possibly not even "important" -- but after using my SMP "build machine" to build today's -STBALE (on slice 1) and today's -CURRENT (on slice 4) -- where "today" varies per the calendar -- it is my usual practice to issue sudo boot0cfg -s 1 ad0 && sudo halt -p

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Alexander Kabaev
In any case, the more verbose error reports are highly appreciated. Could you please post the error messages you are getting (assuming your next try of installworld with clean /usr/include does not help). On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:51:34 -0400 (EDT) Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thi

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Kenneth Culver
> This is FAQ. Have you deleted obsolete g++ include files? Do mv > /usr/include /usr/include.old; mkdir /usr/inlcude before making > buildworld. I think I did that but I guess another try couldn't hurt... Ken To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" i

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Alexander Kabaev
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 10:43:29 -0400 (EDT) Kenneth Culver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think kde3 compiles on the latest -CURRENT though, I've been > trying to compile that for several days, and every time the linker > says that things like cout and other standard c++ things aren't found.

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Kenneth Culver
I don't think kde3 compiles on the latest -CURRENT though, I've been trying to compile that for several days, and every time the linker says that things like cout and other standard c++ things aren't found. Ken On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote: > I'm not sure what the deal with X is, b

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-11 Thread Jeremy Lea
Hi, On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:34:04PM +0200, Martin Faxer wrote: > Apply the patches Jeremy Lea ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) posted last week. http://people.freebsd.org/~reg/x11.patch They're not all from me. I snarfed them from a bunch of earlier postings... x11/gnome and x11/gnome-fifth-toe patches

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecen t -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-11 Thread Martin Faxer
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:27:02PM +0200, John Angelmo wrote: > I've got the same problem here but I found no Makefile for glxinfo just > an Imakefile but there were no LINKFORTARGET or LINKER there Apply the patches Jeremy Lea ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) posted last week. They might be incorrect but a

Re: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecent -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-11 Thread John Angelmo
I've got the same problem here but I found no Makefile for glxinfo just an Imakefile but there were no LINKFORTARGET or LINKER there /John Dirk Engling wrote: > > Dear Matthew > > That is because cc is used for linking instead of c++, > go to the Makefile in glxinfo and change the line,

Re: "pipe mutex" vs. "sigio lock" lock order reversal

2002-07-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 7 Jul, Don Lewis wrote: > This error showed up in my logs this morning while I was building some > ports on a uni-processor box. I'm running a version of -current from > July 7 about 1 AM PDT. > > Jul 7 07:47:09 scratch kernel: lock order reversal > Jul 7 07:47:09 scratch kernel: 1st 0xcabf

Another KSE problem?

2002-07-11 Thread Martin Faxer
Hi! This morning, when starting XMMS, I saw something weird: redpixel@lockdown:~ %> xmms& [1] 603 redpixel@lockdown:~ %> cat cat: stdin: Resource temporarily unavailable This is on a 2 days old -CURRENT. (PS. If this has been reported and/or fixed already, I apologise in advance. My mail has

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Jul, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 04:01:08AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: >> On 11 Jul, Josef Karthauser wrote: >> >> I get it whenever cron kicks of a cvsup also. >> The cvsup server may also be making ident queries. > > If it is, it is making lots and lots of them, at a

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-11 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 04:01:08AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > On 11 Jul, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:35:46AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > >> > >> > I tracked it down to tcp_getcred() calling SYSCTL_OUT(), which can > >> > potentially block, before releasing the locks

sparc64 tinderbox failure

2002-07-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
-- >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree -- >>> stage 1: bootstrap tools -- >>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 11 Jul, Josef Karthauser wrote: > On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:35:46AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: >> >> > I tracked it down to tcp_getcred() calling SYSCTL_OUT(), which can >> > potentially block, before releasing the locks tcp_getcred() is holding. >> > This routine is used by the net.inet.

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-11 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 11:35:46AM +0100, Josef Karthauser wrote: > > > I tracked it down to tcp_getcred() calling SYSCTL_OUT(), which can > > potentially block, before releasing the locks tcp_getcred() is holding. > > This routine is used by the net.inet.tcp.getcred sysctl, and the only > > user

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-11 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 03:12:34AM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > >> > >> I've never seen that one. I'll take a look at the code, though. > > > > I'm seeing the same (once at bootup tho). > > > > sm:blarf:~$uptime > > 8:48PM up 18:52, 4 users, load averages: 0.11, 0.06, 0.01 > > sm:blarf:~$ > >

Re: What to do with witness verbiage (is this new?)?

2002-07-11 Thread Don Lewis
On 10 Jul, Alex Zepeda wrote: > On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 01:34:50PM -0700, Don Lewis wrote: > >> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "inp" locked from >../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:935 >> > ../../../vm/uma_core.c:1332: could sleep with "tcp" locked from >../../../netinet/tcp_subr.c:92

RE: don't know how to make /usr/X11R6/bin/ucs2any.pl. on v.r ecent -CURRENT when trying to build ports/x11/XFree86-4

2002-07-11 Thread Dirk Engling
Dear Matthew That is because cc is used for linking instead of c++, go to the Makefile in glxinfo and change the line, with "LINKFORTARGET" or "LINKER" (don't have the makefile any more, so look for the actual line) from $CC to $CPP and there you go. Regards erdgeist On Thu, 11

Re: Update to the DRM

2002-07-11 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Eric Anholt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020709.diff You should put back the $FreeBSD$ tags, or you won't be able to commit. http://people.freebsd.org/~des/software/drm-20020711.diff should apply the same changes withou

Re: Update to the DRM

2002-07-11 Thread Stanislav Grozev
On Wed, Jul 10, 2002 at 05:23:25PM -0600, Eric Anholt wrote: > On Wed, 2002-07-10 at 17:17, Eric Anholt wrote: > > I've posted a diff to the DRM at > > http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/dri/files/currentdrm-20020709.ta > > Evolution's "send" button is way too big. > > http://people.freebsd.org/

Re: NEWCARD

2002-07-11 Thread Kurt Erik Lindqvist
--On Tuesday, July 09, 2002 23:47:09 -0700 Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the new code has been tweeked for gcc 3.1 > > in 3.1 you need foo[] > in 2.95 you needed foo[0] > > you can follow the instructions in /usr/src/Makefile > specifically the make buildkernel bit > to make bot

mysql build error

2002-07-11 Thread Beech Rintoul
Does anyone have a suggestion how to get around this? cc -DMYSQL_SERVER -DDEFAULT_MYSQL_HOME="\"/usr/local\"" - DDATADIR="\"/var/db/mysql\"" -DSHAREDIR="\"/usr/local/share/m ysql\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I../bdb/build_unix -I../innob

Re: -CURRENT trashes disk label

2002-07-11 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Schultz writes: > >I just made world on -CURRENT (cvsup a few hours ago), booted > >using a new GENERIC kernel and ran mergemaster. Before I > >installed world, I mounted the root partition for my more stable > >dev

Re: -CURRENT trashes disk label

2002-07-11 Thread Ian Dowse
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Schultz writes: >I just made world on -CURRENT (cvsup a few hours ago), booted >using a new GENERIC kernel and ran mergemaster. Before I >installed world, I mounted the root partition for my more stable >development environment (4.6-RELEASE) to copy my firewa

Panics during boot with recent sources

2002-07-11 Thread Rasmus Skaarup
Hello, For the last two days I haven't been able to boot unless I specify an older kernel. I've tried cvsup'ing a few times but now I thought I should post it here. I'm running 5.0-CURRENT as of 10 hours ago, on a Dell 4100 Inspiron. I've been running current on it for half a year or so. I've s

-CURRENT trashes disk label

2002-07-11 Thread David Schultz
I just made world on -CURRENT (cvsup a few hours ago), booted using a new GENERIC kernel and ran mergemaster. Before I installed world, I mounted the root partition for my more stable development environment (4.6-RELEASE) to copy my firewall rules over. In summary: # mount /dev/ad1s1a /mnt # mo

Re: Status of C++ in base system?

2002-07-11 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2002/07/11 11:01), Benjamin Close wrote: >I'm using current from just after the KSE & libc_r fix. However it > appears that XFree86-client c++ stuff is still broken. Is there a > planned time when this will be fixed or am I missing something else? > (XFree-libraries compiled and instal