ok...its crashing here, now.I've deleted the /usr/src/gnu directory
and re-cvsuped it, but it still_crashes:
/usr/src/contrib/gcc/config/i386/freebsd.h:208:1: warning: this is the
location of the previous definition
In file included from
/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/
Bokyung Wang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I installed FreeBSD-Current5.2002.06.20, but it failed "make installworld."
> The error message is install:
> /usr/share/locale/ja_JP.SJIP/LC_TIME: Too many levels of symbolic
> links.
The only time I've seen that error is when a symbolic link is pointing
to i
well, it's running now...
I deleted the /usr/src/share/mk directory, and re-cvsup'ed it...it
downloaded new files and she is going now...
maybe we'll get this puppy up and running the way I want it now...
-karl
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current"
At 08:56 PM 8/2/2002 -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
>On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:17:19PM -0700, karl agee wrote:
> > the crash occurs right after the process starts..here's the entire
> > output:
> >
> > su-2.05a# make buildworld
> >
>
>I just built world with sources cvsup'd 2 hours ago.
about the sa
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 08:17:19PM -0700, karl agee wrote:
> the crash occurs right after the process starts..here's the entire
> output:
>
> su-2.05a# make buildworld
>
I just built world with sources cvsup'd 2 hours ago.
--
Steve
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
the crash occurs right after the process starts..here's the entire
output:
su-2.05a# make buildworld
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
rm -rf /usr/obj/usr/src/i386
Quoting Manfred Antar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Manfred,
! ! IT WORKS ! ! for the first time is several weeks:-)
! THANKS !
I followed your steps and added a couple of my own below just in case someone
else is having problems.
|
| Ed
| I think i did this
| Build and install the gcc32 port
Quoting Manfred Antar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| At 08:54 AM 8/2/2002 -0700, Edwin Culp wrote:
| >This doesn't make much sense and is probably not related but I've had the
| >problem for about a month and thought it was going to go away but it
| hasn't.
| >I really don't know where to start loo
I get this all the time, and have for months now. On two different
systems (both updated to -current about 2 times per month), both
PCs (but with greatly differing HW).
What would be my first step to resolve this? I sent in a PR, with
lots of notes, things I tried, and stack dumps. I'm willin
Hello,
I installed FreeBSD-Current5.2002.06.20, but it failed "make installworld."
The error message is
install: /usr/share/locale/ja_JP.SJIP/LC_TIME: Too many levels of symbolic
links.
Does anybody know how to fix it?
Thanks in advance.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "u
Let me try my luck here with a bigger crowd. I just upgraded two
laptops from DP1 and July 18th to a July 30th kernel, both of them
with NetGear MA401 wireless cards. The short and skinny: the
network/wireless used to work and now they don't.
*) TCP, UDP, and ICMP are affected so I assume all o
I said:
> my guess is John Gilmore originally created gnu tar from
> reading of the man page. If so, that would explain the
> difference. I don't have the V7 sources so can't check but
> given that companies with the Unix licence (and the orig.
> sources) all do the same I believe the V7 man pag
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002 10:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> there are several possibilities:
> 1/ do a ktrace on teh spinning process for a couple of seconds and see
> what syscalls it is doing.
stopped jikes with ctrl-c looks always like:
90998 sh RET read 65
Quoting Manfred Antar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| The same thing happend to me a few weeks ago when I did an upgrade from
| 3.23.49 ==> 3.23.51
| I think what I ended up doing was to use the gcc3.2 from ports, and I built
| it staticlly.
| First i installed gcc3.2 the made sure /usr/local/bin
Quoting Edwin Culp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Update. I have two machines with this problem so I installed mysql-3.23.49
on one and it exhibited the same race condition so it would appear to have
to do with the KSE of GCC compiler changes but again, I'm way out of my
league here.
Thanks,
ed
| Th
there are several possibilities:
1/ do a ktrace on teh spinning process for a couple of seconds and see
what syscalls it is doing.
2/ if it's spinning in the kernel, you can drop into ddb
and do a
tr
to see where it is in the kernel...
c to continue..
do this several times to ge a sortof 'prof
Quoting Marc Recht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
| > I really don't know where to start looking. Just after the KSE changes at
| > the beginning of July I upgraded mysql. Since then I have had
| intermittent
| > problems with mysql hanging far too often. It takes 100% of the resources
| > and has
At 08:54 AM 8/2/2002 -0700, Edwin Culp wrote:
>This doesn't make much sense and is probably not related but I've had the
>problem for about a month and thought it was going to go away but it hasn't.
>I really don't know where to start looking. Just after the KSE changes at
>the beginning of July
> I really don't know where to start looking. Just after the KSE changes at
> the beginning of July I upgraded mysql. Since then I have had intermittent
> problems with mysql hanging far too often. It takes 100% of the resources
> and has to be killed. I get no errors in the mysql log nor in t
This doesn't make much sense and is probably not related but I've had the
problem for about a month and thought it was going to go away but it hasn't.
I really don't know where to start looking. Just after the KSE changes at
the beginning of July I upgraded mysql. Since then I have had intermit
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 05:07:58PM +0200, Samuel Tardieu wrote:
> On 2/08, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
>
> | you have to install the new kernel and then reboot with the new kernel
> | into single-user-mode, and do make installworld again,
>
> Sure, that's what I did (well, I ran the first in
On 2/08, Michael Bretterklieber wrote:
| you have to install the new kernel and then reboot with the new kernel
| into single-user-mode, and do make installworld again,
Sure, that's what I did (well, I ran the first installworld with -k to
install as much as possible the first time), but it wo
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:21:25AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:09:23AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > Huh?! Read the first posting in this thread. I suggest that you do
> > forced commits to contrib/gcc/config/i386/*.h (probably other arches
> > too) that were surg
Hi,
you have to install the new kernel and then reboot with the new kernel
into single-user-mode, and do make installworld again,
bye,
Samuel Tardieu schrieb:
> In case it is useful: the upgrade from STABLE to CURRENT was broken last
> week and is still probably, because chflags is used during
In case it is useful: the upgrade from STABLE to CURRENT was broken last
week and is still probably, because chflags is used during the installworld
step and it uses a system call not present in STABLE.
Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in t
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 11:09:23AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Huh?! Read the first posting in this thread. I suggest that you do
> forced commits to contrib/gcc/config/i386/*.h (probably other arches
> too) that were surgered.
I already did 2 forced committs. See some of Peter's email on t
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
David,
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 12:39:55AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> The rest of the GCC using world can use -O2 on their code. We are the
> only ones that have so much trouble with it. It is probably due to our
> bugs, not GCC's.
sorry, but some time ago I read here that gcc -O2 breaks our
On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 09:51:25AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 03:16:35PM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > I have stumbled to this too, and thought I'm getting crazy. After
> > some hours of investigation, I have found that O'Brien did some
> > repo-surgery there, remove
On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 04:20:53AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> I wouldn't trust -O2 for releases without lots of testing in -current
> (and not updating the compiler after testing).
The rest of the GCC using world can use -O2 on their code. We are the
only ones that have so much trouble with it.
31 matches
Mail list logo
