Running `make clean patch' in a loop is randomly failing for me on an SMP
machine:
bash$ uname -a
FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #273: Thu Aug 8 21:33:19 PDT 2002
bash$ cd /usr/ports/editors/vim
bash$ PATCH_DEBUG=1 make clean patch
===> Applying distribution patch 6.1.012
patch:
I see that SOS has just committed to -current..
a Joyous day..
now to get a working SACk implementation :-)
On Tue, 13 Aug 2002, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to Julian Elischer:
> > Sonn has come an gone... if anyone can get me -current patches to do this
> > I'll commit them now and the
According to Julian Elischer:
> Sonn has come an gone... if anyone can get me -current patches to do this
> I'll commit them now and they can be cleaned up later.
> that'll at least get them started on the path to 4.7...
The path to 4.7 will be very easy as Thomas has been maintaining patches for
I get this all the time, and have for months now. On two different
systems (both updated to -current about 2 times per month), both
PCs (but with greatly differing HW).
What would be my first step to resolve this? I sent in a PR, with
lots of notes, things I tried, and stack dumps. I'm willin
CC: -current since that's what I'm using, but keeping -stable as this
was just MFC'd.
On Mon, 2002-08-12 at 19:13, Bryan Liesner wrote:
>
> I would like to try the uvisor/ucom stuff just comitted, but don't have
> a clue how to use it... Can you point me in the right direction?
Has anyone ma
> You'll be happy to tell them sys/dev/ata/atapi-cam.c:
>
> Revision 1.1
> Fri Aug 9 20:51:53 2002 UTC (3 days, 3 hours ago) by sos
> Branch: MAIN
Well, golly...
And with improvements too! In good time for an MFC for 4.7! Awesome, no,
outstanding!
Thanks to all concerned, I really am very h
YIPE!!!
I missed this message...
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Andy Sparrow wrote:
> > Some time later (what it is now, 6 months?), it's not in the tree, and I
> > suspect that the happy ATAPI/CAM users are either applying patches
> > locally to keep using
As I mentionned recently.. I think having it in the tree far outweighs
having it NOT in the tree. THe first time this was brought up
over a year ago it was said that the patches were not quite correct.
It was also said they would be corrected "soon" or something..
Sonn has come an gone... if anyo
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Andy Sparrow wrote:
> Some time later (what it is now, 6 months?), it's not in the tree, and I
> suspect that the happy ATAPI/CAM users are either applying patches
> locally to keep using this useful functionality, or bemoaning the fact
> that FreeBSD doesn't let them use c
Hi,
What's the status of the CAM/ATAPI integration? Is anyone thinking of
working on it?
When last mentioned, it was mooted that some work needed to be done to
tidy things up. Since then, it's gone very quiet - specifically, I don't
seem to recall seeing any specifics about what needed to be
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> > UGH!
> >
> > #1License on patch is GPL
>
> Why not Microsoft?
I don't unserstand the question. Why not the same license that's
areleady on the source code for "su"?
> > #2I guess now that this irritant is gone, the signals code
> > will remain scre
>Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2002 21:41:19 +0200
>From: Szilveszter Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>First off, sorry for the lot of snippage but this mail was really
>long...
Yeah, it was; sorry. That's what I get for trying to be complete. :-)
I was able to re-do the steps, and evtually get to a point:
fre
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 04:58:17 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> Explanation of this patch:
Thanx. Could you please commit this explanation, or some re-phrasing of it
into su.c?
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-cur
Bruce Evans wrote:
> > >From my experience/use with amanda I know that it _always_ kills the
> > dumps that it starts when doing its estimates at the beginning (often
> > several per file system, one for each dump level it's interested in). I
> > don't think it deliberately kills the dumps when ac
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:55:03PM -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
>
> Would FreeBSD (-current or -stable) work (in SMP mode) on a pair of
> Athlons, or is our SMP only for Intel chips? Thanks!
Dual Athlons work. They use the same programming interface as the Intel
chips.
-- Brooks
--
Any stat
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:19:00PM +0200, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:
> Aug 12 18:20:02 current : [dlerror: /usr/lib/pam_lastlog.so: Undefined
> symbol "_openpam_log"]
> Aug 12 18:20:02 current : adding faulty module: /usr/lib/pam_lastlog.so
>
> 'Known behaviour' or r
Hi!
Would FreeBSD (-current or -stable) work (in SMP mode) on a pair of
Athlons, or is our SMP only for Intel chips? Thanks!
-mi
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>
> > Bruce Evans wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > > > BTW, i see "silo overflow" messages when i run ppp via null-modem
> > > > cable. in this configuration i'm using serial port
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> Xircom card is a Bluetooth card with UART interface. Bluetooth link
> speed is about 700KB/s. I do not think that standard 16550A UART with
> 16 bytes FIFO can handle such speed. I also can not believe that Xircom
> would sell such low speed Bluetoot
hi, there!
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:36:51PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> > > Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
> > > to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
> > > it would speed up updates.
> >
> > http://people.F
Hi,
I set up xdm on my -current machine last Saturday and have the same
problems still with todays (12.Aug) -current:
When I try to login with 'xdm', the following errors come up:
Aug 12 18:20:02 current : unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_nologin.so)
Aug 12 18:20:02 current : [dlerror: /usr/lib/p
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 12:41:19PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:41:19PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> > This is known problem, straight updates by simply "make world" do not
> > work from -STABLE. Therefore, one has to very carefully follow the
> > procedure describe
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Bob Willcox wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:16:56PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I just saw a reply from the original (?) author of the PR. Apparently
> > dump gets killed by amanda. Does amanda actually kill its children
> > enough to matter?
>
> >From m
My buddies and I were average
people, just like you...Then we had our great idea...find
young hot girls and proposition them to fool
around on video tape.Armed with a camera, a smooth tongue, and a couple
of bucks we have made quite a few interesting videos!BEST OF ALL... MY SITE IS 100% FREE
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 09:41:19PM +0200, Szilveszter Adam wrote:
> This is known problem, straight updates by simply "make world" do not
> work from -STABLE. Therefore, one has to very carefully follow the
> procedure described in the UPDATING file even though normally not so
> many steps would b
My buddies and I were average
people, just like you...Then we had our great idea...find
young hot girls and proposition them to fool
around on video tape.Armed with a camera, a smooth tongue, and a couple
of bucks we have made quite a few interesting videos!BEST OF ALL... MY SITE IS 100% FREE
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 12:23:19PM -0700, Eric Melville wrote:
> > Since pkg-comment contains only a single line, wouldn't it be more subtile
> > to put it in a COMMENT field as does NetBSD, instead of using a file? I think
> > it would speed up updates.
>
> http://people.FreeBSD.org/~eric/ports-
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 09:21:31PM +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 03:15:02 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, it has one blatant style bug (not 1TBS) and no explanation of
> > the bug, so it should not have been committed verbatim. See another
> > reply for an a
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> [...]
>
> > > BTW, i see "silo overflow" messages when i run ppp via null-modem
> > > cable. in this configuration i'm using serial port 0 which is on
> > > board and hase irq
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 03:15:02 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> >
> > Anyway, it has one blatant style bug (not 1TBS) and no explanation of
> > the bug, so it should not have been committed verbatim. See another
> > reply for an analysis of the patch.
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, David Xu wrote:
> following is patch for su, I can type "suspend" and stop $$ without the
> problem you described, I have tested it under tcsh and bash, all works
> for me.
>
> --- su.c Mon Aug 12 13:08:01 2002
> +++ su.c.new Mon Aug 12 13:16:14 2002
> @@ -329,10 +329,1
--
>>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree
--
>>> stage 1: bootstrap tools
--
>>> stage 2: cleaning up the object tree
Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> >
[...]
> > BTW, i see "silo overflow" messages when i run ppp via null-modem
> > cable. in this configuration i'm using serial port 0 which is on
> > board and hase irq 4 wi
"M. Warner Losh" wrote:
>
> [[ I've read the rest of this thread ]]
>
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maksim Yevmenkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : My tests are very simple. I plug USB dongle and one PC-CARD
> : and try to pump data between them as fast as possible. The
> : da
On Tue, Aug 13, 2002 at 03:15:02 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> Anyway, it has one blatant style bug (not 1TBS) and no explanation of
> the bug, so it should not have been committed verbatim. See another
> reply for an analysis of the patch.
According to commit guide, explanations are not commit
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:03:31 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 22:53:15 -0700, David Xu wrote:
> > > > following is patch for su, I can type "suspend" and stop $$ without the
> > > > problem
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> On 03:37+0700, Aug 12, 2002, Semen A. Ustimenko wrote:
> > David reviewed the patch and I have committed it few minutes ago.
>
> Looks like a hack BDE is speaking about: passing a storage for residue
> but never check it.
See another reply about this
Hello, I sent a mail about this program with a source a couple of days ago, not really
pretty code, cleaned it up and gotten some help from #bsdcode@EFnet with some fixes.
So I send the source again so you could take another look at it and tell me if I am
missing something.
--
Eirik Nygaard
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
>
> > > OS: FreeBSD-current DP1 (dmesg attached)
> > > Laptop: Toshiba Tecra 8100 (docked)
> > > Hardware: 3Com Bluetooth USB dongle, 3Com Bluetooth PC-CARD
> > > Xircom CBT PC-CARD (with 16550A U
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 01:23:06PM +0100, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
>
> Hi,
> [bde cc'd - it seems to be sio related]
>
> I have an i386 toshiba laptop, running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #4: Sat Aug 10
> 13:27:55 BST 2002. I can get a 100% reproducible hang by doing the
> following:
>
> - Connect a seria
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 10:16:56PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
[snip]
>
> I just saw a reply from the original (?) author of the PR. Apparently
> dump gets killed by amanda. Does amanda actually kill its children
> enough to matter?
>From my experience/use with amanda I know that it _always_
Can someone help me, I want to build a picobsd floppy.
Command: release/picobsd/build/picobsd bridge
Error: suffix or operands invalid for 'shr'
I think the complain is about the fillkptphys(prot) macro
in sys/i386/i386/locore.s
I cvsuped current yesterday
I havent build picobsd in 5.0 before
Hi,
[bde cc'd - it seems to be sio related]
I have an i386 toshiba laptop, running FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #4: Sat Aug 10
13:27:55 BST 2002. I can get a 100% reproducible hang by doing the
following:
- Connect a serial cable between my laptop and a PC
- run "tip -9600 com1"
(where com1 in /etc/r
On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bruce Evans writes:
> >
> >I don't know how open() of a disk device can be interrupted by a signal
> >in practice. Most disk operations don't check for signals.
>
> Does the PCATCH tsleep in diskopen() that I mentioned seem
On Mon, Aug 12, 2002 at 04:03:31 -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 22:53:15 -0700, David Xu wrote:
> > > following is patch for su, I can type "suspend" and stop $$ without the
> > > problem you described, I have tested it under tcsh and bash, all
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 22:53:15 -0700, David Xu wrote:
> > following is patch for su, I can type "suspend" and stop $$ without the
> > problem you described, I have tested it under tcsh and bash, all works
> > for me.
>
> Thanx, committed.
UGH!
#1 License on p
Tim Robbins wrote:
> I compiled GNU sh-utils 1.16 with Redhat's PAM patch on -current. It works
> well and does not seem to have the bugs w/ csh's suspend or kill -STOP $$
> that I complained about earlier.
>
> This means that either our su is broken, or the different way Redhat
> has implemented
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 22:53:15 -0700, David Xu wrote:
> following is patch for su, I can type "suspend" and stop $$ without the
> problem you described, I have tested it under tcsh and bash, all works
> for me.
>
Thanx, committed.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
To Unsubscribe: se
make warning
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 2580: warning: duplicate script for
target "patch-message" ignored
breaks portupgrade of several ports
portupgrade says that Makefile broken on these ports
(I'm not subscribed to freebsd-ports so reply direct, please)
Sincerely, Maxim M. Kazac
On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 06:54:42PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote:
> I am forwarding this to -current as I think it needs more neurons on it..
> I am presently unable to spend any due to work commitments, and due to a sort-of
> personal confusion about tis stuff anyhow..
>
>
> David Xu wrote:
>
Hi
There is patch to teach rcNG do not try dhcp on not-connected ethernet.
simply put
ifconfig_fxp0="dhcp-if-carrier"
into rc.conf
It will be interested to somebody
Theoretically there are another solution for problem - add new key to
dhclient - check interface media before broadcasting.
--
On 03:37+0700, Aug 12, 2002, Semen A. Ustimenko wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Robert Watson wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 11 Aug 2002, Maxim Konovalov wrote:
> >
> > > This is sendfile(2) mis-behaviour arised after rev.1.109
> > > sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c but I think the real problem in vn_rdwr(),
On 14:06-0700, Aug 9, 2002, Brooks Davis wrote:
> I recently updated my laptop's kernel to an August 5th version from an
> July 23rd one and mozilla started getting connection refused from
> everything. Lynx worked fine as did other network services like cvsup
> and ssh. Upgrading mozilla from 1
53 matches
Mail list logo