On Thursday, 27 November 2003 at 0:13:09 -0600, Cosmin Stroe wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, 26 November 2003 at 12:04:52 -0600, Cosmin Stroe wrote:
>>>
>>> I am using vinum atm, and I am having serious problems with it. After
>>> about 16 hrs of writin
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 26 November 2003 at 12:04:52 -0600, Cosmin Stroe wrote:
> >
> > I am using vinum atm, and I am having serious problems with it. After
> > about 16 hrs of writing data to a vinum volume via NFS at a constant data
> > stream of 200k/se
In the last episode (Nov 27), Bruce Evans said:
> [Resending due to no response after 2 weeks.]
>
> Rev.1.23 of ata-lowlevel.c broke atapicam on my BP6 system as shown
> by the enclosed boot -v messages (the system just hangs, apparently
> waiting for a disk interrupt that never arrives; there see
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:00:49 +0100, Manfred Lotz wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Last time (around middle of October) when I tried out a new current kernel
> > it was hanging at boot time at acd1
> >
> > ata1 is:
> > acd1: DVD-ROM at ata1-slave UDMA33
> >
Ryan Sommers wrote:
I'll also note in my FreeBSD current debugging of some drivers it was
about a 50/50 shot as to if this would happen. Having to fsck every
other reboot was only made less painful by the background fsck thing.
Don't some BIOS' protect the superblocks as a kind of "virus
prot
I'll also note in my FreeBSD current debugging of some drivers it was
about a 50/50 shot as to if this would happen. Having to fsck every
other reboot was only made less painful by the background fsck thing.
Don't some BIOS' protect the superblocks as a kind of "virus protection"?
Could this b
To follow up to myself, there likely will not be a package-filled disc1
for the BETA due to it overflowing with the present package list. We
will have that resolved for the first RC. Also, attached is the
PGP-signed MD5 sums for the i386 and alpha ISOs.
Scott
Scott Long wrote:
All,
It's my plea
I did a binary update from 5.1-current, created with a mid October
snapshot, to 5.2 beta. The installer had trouble, at one point reporting
negative disk space available when of course there is plenty of
space. This server has a single SATA drive with three slices for FreeBSD,
a 5 GB /, and 4
I just installed 5.1-release on a sparc64, and then cvsup'ed
to the latest snapshot of -current. Since that update is such
a large jump in time, I was going from a system which had no
/rescue or /libexec to one which builds everything dynamically.
This gets one into a mess in the middle of install
Hi All,
Just grabbed the 5.2Beta mini iso. Sadly the machine I tried it on
caused a panic during kernel boot.
A boot -v shows the last lines as (hand transcribed):
PNP0700: ading dma mask 0x4
pnpbios: handle 10 device ID PNP0700 (0007d041)
Fatal trap 9: general protection falut while in kern
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003, Florian C. Smeets wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > If I build attached kmod and kldload/-unload it on a GENERIC kernel w/
> > SMP & apic it'll error out:
> > "Zone was not empty (xx items). Lost X pages of memory."
> >
> > This is on a p4 HTT, but seems reproducible on "proper"
Martin wrote:
It looks like this:
panic()
destroy_dev()
ugen_destroy_devnodes()
ugen_set_config()
Yes, that's the one, and I think I can see why. The existing code fixed devfs
problems for normal ugen_set_config calls, but doesn't account for what
happens when an error occurs (which is presumab
Max Laier wrote:
If I build attached kmod and kldload/-unload it on a GENERIC kernel w/
SMP & apic it'll error out:
"Zone was not empty (xx items). Lost X pages of memory."
This is on a p4 HTT, but seems reproducible on "proper" SMP systems as
well. UP systems don't show it however.
Can somebody p
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 20:44, Jay Cornwall wrote:
> Can you (or someone) provide a backtrace to help trace the cause?
OK. Here is what I found out, I didn't write down any register contents
and stuff, sorry.
It looks like this:
WARNING: Driver mistake: destroy_dev on 114/1
panic: don't do that
d
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:40 pm, Sean Chittenden wrote:
> > > Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current
> > > 5.2-BETA kernel?
> >
> > You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this.
>
>^^^
>not
>
> > Are you on a multi-homed
On Wednesday, 26 November 2003 at 12:04:52 -0600, Cosmin Stroe wrote:
>
> I am using vinum atm, and I am having serious problems with it. After
> about 16 hrs of writing data to a vinum volume via NFS at a constant data
> stream of 200k/sec and reading at 400k/sec at the same time, the whole
> mac
If I build attached kmod and kldload/-unload it on a GENERIC kernel w/
SMP & apic it'll error out:
"Zone was not empty (xx items). Lost X pages of memory."
w/o SMP & apic the problem disappears.
This is on a p4 HTT, but seems reproducible on "proper" SMP systems as
well. UP systems don't show it
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > It's possible the fan is under BIOS control so make sure you have an
> > > up-to-date bios. If not, you should get a console printout when acpi
> > > switches the fan
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > It's possible the fan is under BIOS control so make sure you have an
> > up-to-date bios. If not, you should get a console printout when acpi
> > switches the fan on. sysctl hw.acpi.thermal
>
> Nope, no ACPI mess
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> It's possible the fan is under BIOS control so make sure you have an
> up-to-date bios. If not, you should get a console printout when acpi
> switches the fan on. sysctl hw.acpi.thermal
Nope, no ACPI messages, and I can't find a FAN device in my ASL. (A
On 2003.11.26 22:53:26 +0100, Claus Guttesen wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > Will ISO images be released for 5.2-BETA i386?
> > Or is that strictly an -RC thing?
>
> Ftp'ed to ftp.freebsd.org using a freebsd-ftp-client
> but couldn't find the ISO-image for 5.2 beta. Using OS
> X's finder found the folder and
Hi.
> Will ISO images be released for 5.2-BETA i386?
> Or is that strictly an -RC thing?
Ftp'ed to ftp.freebsd.org using a freebsd-ftp-client
but couldn't find the ISO-image for 5.2 beta. Using OS
X's finder found the folder and files. Peculiar.
Permissions?
regards
Claus
Yahoo! Mail (http://
> > Is my expectation wrong or is there a pertinent IPFW2 bug in a current
> > 5.2-BETA kernel?
>
> You're alone in this, though cjc hasn't been able to reproduce this.
^^^
not
> Are you on a multi-homed system? -sc
Ack! If ever there was a missing word to change the meaning of a
The availability of ISO images was announced to this mailing list this
morning. Please check your local mirror; i386, alpha, and amd64 should be
available on most mirrors now.
Scott
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Jesse Guardiani wrote:
> Will ISO images be released for 5.2-BETA i386?
> Or is that strict
MD> Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 11:50:25 -0800 (PST)
MD> From: Matthew Dillon
MD> (B) the authentication code access an IPC service which *ONLY* allows
MD> challenge/response, does *NOT* give you direct access to the
MD> encrypted contents of the password file, and which limits the challeng
Will ISO images be released for 5.2-BETA i386?
Or is that strictly an -RC thing?
Thanks.
--
Jesse Guardiani, Systems Administrator
WingNET Internet Services,
P.O. Box 2605 // Cleveland, TN 37320-2605
423-559-LINK (v) 423-559-5145 (f)
http://www.wingnet.net
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> I don't know what Matt is planning on delivering, but...
>
> http://developer.apple.com/darwin/projects/opendirectory/
>
> [...]
> lookupd is included with the Darwin project and is
> documented online in Apple's Support database and
>
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 14:51]:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : They were on a single CPU Athlon 500 with 320MB of RAM.
>
> 320MB is not enough RAM not to swap.
>
> However, having said that, I think everybody
It seems Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > There are some early issues of the SiI3112 chips that has problems that
> > can cause datacorruption etc etc..
> > You can try the following patch (which btw re@ has for approval),
> > otherwise I'd try another controller as there seem to be no end of the
> >
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Lukas Ertl wrote:
> > > > > I'm gonna try some "buildkernelstones" with the different settings. If
> > > > > you have some special benchmarks in mind I'd be happy to run them.
> > > >
> >
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2003 19:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:24, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > > pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe43f,0xe000-0xe0ff mem
> > > > 0xe0102000-0xe0102
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 19:14, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> > On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:24, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> > > pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe43f,0xe000-0xe0ff mem
> > > 0xe0102000-0xe01020ff,0xe0101000-0xe01011ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on
> >
: > That seems to have the most impact. We can also expend our efforts
: > to improve dynamic linking performance, since that will improve the
: > performance of the other 99.9% of the universe.
: >
:
:What happened to mdodd's prebinding efforts?
:
:Drew
Prebinding was put into DFly but the
On Mon, 24 Nov 2003 08:00:49 +0100, Manfred Lotz wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Last time (around middle of October) when I tried out a new current kernel
> it was hanging at boot time at acd1
>
> ata1 is:
> acd1: DVD-ROM at ata1-slave UDMA33
>
>
> I tried it again yesterday. Now acd1 seems to be fi
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Please help us make 5.2 the best FreeBSD release ever!
Well Done! Thanks for all your (both personally and the whole re@
team) efforts in making this happen!
Warner
__
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: time make -j 4 buildworld
Hmmm, more jobs.
: They were on a single CPU Athlon 500 with 320MB of RAM.
320MB is not enough RAM not to swap.
I did some preliminary testing last night (which I lost due to a
:At 00:23 26/11/2003 -0500, Michael Edenfield wrote:
:>Static /bin/sh:
:> real385m29.977s
:> user111m58.508s
:> sys 93m14.450s
:>
:>Dynamic /bin/sh:
:> real455m44.852s
:> user113m17.807s
:> sys 103m16.509s
:
: Given that user+sys << real in both cases, it look
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 13:28, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > atapci1: port
> > 0x14b0-0x14bf,0x14c0-0x14c3,0x14c8-0x14cf,0x14c4-0x14c7,0x14d0-0x14d7
> > mem 0xe800a000-0xe800a1ff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0
> > GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=0xc5246460
> > ad4: 78167MB [15
Martin wrote:
Run it once, you'll get an error. The second run
will cause a panic.
Additional info:
5.1-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #1: Tue Nov 18 00:30:15 CET 2003 i386
usb0: on uhci0
ugen0: WINBOND W9967CF, rev 1.10/1.10, addr 3
This sounds similar to a bug which (I thought) I fixed earlier in
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 04:00 am, Дейтер Александр Валериевич wrote:
> i got a panic on recent -CURRENT:
>
> # tcpdump -i lo0 port 23 &
> [1] 507
> listening on lo0
>
> # telnet localhost
> Trying ::1...
>
> Wed Nov 26 14:51:23 MSK 2003
> Debugger+0x55: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0
> db> tr
>
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 19:54, Mathew Kanner wrote:
> Hello All,
> Please test a pcm patch that releases the channel lock around
> calls to uio move. This is a more complete patch than the previous
> one as it also does the _read routine. I will ask the RE to commit
> this if I hear a
I'm still getting this with fresh sources. Has anyone else done 4->5
in the last few days? Is it worth filing a PR?
Lawrence Farr
EPC Direct Limited
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lawrence Farr
> Sent: 25 November 2003 16:27
> T
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 19:37, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Hi,
>
> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>
> I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive, one ext2
> file system on another ATA drive and one ext2 file s
This should be completely resolved by the commit I just made. Please
test.
-Nate
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 13:28, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > atapci1: port
> > 0x14b0-0x14bf,0x14c0-0x14c3,0x14c8-0x14cf,0x14c4-0x14c7,0x14d0-0x14d7
> > mem 0xe800a000-0xe800a1ff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0
> > GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=0xc5246460
> > ad4: 78167MB [15
Hi,
I'm still trying to write a webcam application for my
"Creative Videoblaster Webcam Go". I have not much luck, but
I accidently discovered how to cause panic with few lines
of code while using ugen.
Here is the code:
>--<
#include
#include
#include
I believe this completes the changes to acpi_cpu for 5.2. Please test on
SMP boxes and laptops and if you were disabling it before, please
re-enable it to test. (To do that, remove debug.acpi.disable from
loader.conf).
Thanks,
Nate
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003
In a message written on Thu, Nov 27, 2003 at 04:52:04AM +1000, Andy Farkas wrote:
> Matthias Andree wrote:
>
> > when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> > flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>
> This is easy to reproduce, but apparently uninteresting to the developers:
>
>
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 19:52, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> * Melvyn Sopacua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 13:23]:
> > /dev/ad0s2e ? 989M ? 947M -36.4M ? 104% ? ?/var
>
> This is normal. Each filesystem has a chunk of reserved space for
> root-only,
Yes, sorry I wasn't too clear (I thought the
"Kevin Oberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:37:45 +0100
>> From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
>> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>>
>> I had three UFS
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Kevin Oberman" writes:
>> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:37:45 +0100
>> From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
>> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>>
>> I ha
Hello All,
Please test a pcm patch that releases the channel lock around
calls to uio move. This is a more complete patch than the previous
one as it also does the _read routine. I will ask the RE to commit
this if I hear a couple of "it works".
Pointed out by: Artur Poplawski
Explained
Matthias Andree wrote:
> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
This is easy to reproduce, but apparently uninteresting to the developers:
Reboot to single user, run full fsck, halt.
--
:{ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Andy Farkas
Sy
* Melvyn Sopacua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 13:23]:
> /dev/ad0s2e ? 989M ? 947M -36.4M ? 104% ? ?/var
This is normal. Each filesystem has a chunk of reserved space for
root-only, for disaster recovery and such. Your /var filesystem is
full, and has begun overflowing into that reserved space by
> Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2003 19:37:45 +0100
> From: Matthias Andree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Hi,
>
> when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
> flushing 4 dirty blocks.
>
> I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive, one ex
Has anyone else tried out the most basic IPv6 test: ndp -I and
then ping6 fe80:: extension>? I was
greeted by recursion on a non-recursive lock. After some sleuthing,
I tried to determine what conditions could be tested for that would
indicate "this must not call the nd6_is_addr_neighbor() call be
Gang:
The problem with measuring the dynamic slowdown is that
some of the overhead can be hidden by the kernel (e.g.
prezeroing.)
(Sorry for not directly replying -- my email filtering is
wierd.)
John
___
David O'Brien wrote:
... lets agree that the FTP client will be
the last thing added to /rescue that is outside the original charter.
I sincerely hope it will be. Mostly because I have a large chunk
of new code to contribute that's broken and sitting in pieces all over
my hard disk at the moment.
Hi,
when I rebooted my 5.2-BETA (kernel about 24 hours old), it gave up on
flushing 4 dirty blocks.
I had three UFS1 softdep file systems mounted on one ATA drive, one ext2
file system on another ATA drive and one ext2 file system on a SCSI
drive. Both ext2 file systems had been mounted read-onl
It seems Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> atapci1: port
> 0x14b0-0x14bf,0x14c0-0x14c3,0x14c8-0x14cf,0x14c4-0x14c7,0x14d0-0x14d7
> mem 0xe800a000-0xe800a1ff irq 9 at device 16.0 on pci0
> GEOM: create disk ad4 dp=0xc5246460
> ad4: 78167MB [158816/16/63] at ata2-master UDMA133
>
> Nothing else was chang
Hi,
cvs as of Sunday ~11:00am GMT.
Filesystem 1M-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s2a 484 70 374 16% /
devfs 0 0 0 100% /dev
/dev/md0 62 0 57 0% /tmp
/dev/ad0s2d 49
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 18:40, Justin Smith wrote:
> 1. Was the problem with the nvidia driver ever fixed? (I reported this
> more than a month ago --- the kernel nvidia driver only works with
> parameters set to lower the speed of the interface, and even then failed
> with some OpenGL progra
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:24, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe43f,0xe000-0xe0ff mem
> > 0xe0102000-0xe01020ff,0xe0101000-0xe01011ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on pci0
> > pcm0:
> >
> > and, from what I can tell, the proper devices
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Melvyn Sopacua wrote:
> On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:24, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe43f,0xe000-0xe0ff mem
> > 0xe0102000-0xe01020ff,0xe0101000-0xe01011ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on pci0
> > pcm0:
> >
> > and, from what I can tell, the proper devices
About a month ago, I bought a new SATA controller and a 160 GB Seagate
SATA drive for my -CURRENT machine. All was working fine until about a
week ago. Then, the drive started experiencing hard, unrecoverable DMA
errors. I RMA'd the drive, then bought a new Maxtor 80 GB SATA drive
(just yesterda
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:41:53PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Garance A Drosihn, and lo! it spake thus:
It is a bit more complicated than that, because programs may
include embedded references to other files. So, I think
some developer would *have* to do a little up-front
On Wed, 26 Nov 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Joel M. Baldwin" writes:
>
> >I was trying to use some restraint and not rant and rave in public like
> >I wanted to do. I'm rather miffed that nothing appeared in UPDATING.
> >Rather than an unproductive public RAN
1. Was the problem with the nvidia driver ever fixed? (I reported this
more than a month ago --- the kernel nvidia driver only works with
parameters set to lower the speed of the interface, and even then failed
with some OpenGL programs like OpenUniverse).
2. Can one upgrade to 5.2 beta by cvsu
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 10:16:37AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> The advantage of this method is it's simple, cheap, automatic, and lets
> us say "You can try setting ADDITIONAL_RESCUE=usr.sbin/foo in make.conf
> and it may work",
Please send a tested patch for this. :-)
If ADDITIONAL_RESCUE
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 04:16:06AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> >
> > Dynamic linking works because the kernel loads and runs the dynamic
> > linker when it sees that the executable defines an interpeter.
>
> Since I have patches to make dlopen work with static binaries, and
> it doesn't work th
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Joel M. Baldwin" writes:
>I was trying to use some restraint and not rant and rave in public like
>I wanted to do. I'm rather miffed that nothing appeared in UPDATING.
>Rather than an unproductive public RANT I thought I'd ask for private assistance.
>I can post a
Stefan Eßer wrote:
>
> Have you tried using /dev/unlpt0 instead of /dev/ulpt0 ?
>
> See man 4 ulpt ...
>
> Regards, STefan
Yes, the problem occurs with both. One just takes longer to start the
printjob than the other, but both will spew out a bad page prior to the
first page of the job. It is no
On Wednesday 26 November 2003 01:24, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> pcm0: port 0xe400-0xe43f,0xe000-0xe0ff mem
> 0xe0102000-0xe01020ff,0xe0101000-0xe01011ff irq 17 at device 31.5 on pci0
> pcm0:
>
> and, from what I can tell, the proper devices are being built in /dev, but
> try and play music using
Geeze! Not only aren't there any emails, but I've started a full blown thread!
--On Tuesday, November 25, 2003 8:39 AM -0800 "Joel M. Baldwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could a vinum guru please contact me via email?
I've lost 2 vinum volumes as a result of the latest fiasco and naturally
am ea
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 08:57:10AM -0800 I heard the voice of
Kevin Oberman, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> While UPDATING contain details on updating a system, the Makefile in
> /usr/src (actually Makefile.inc1) contains a target of 'world' and,
> through V3 of FreeBSD, this was considered the approp
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 02:17:02PM -0500 I heard the voice of
slave-mike, and lo! it spake thus:
> Would it be possible to get a copy of this script?
>
> Please! :)
Oh, it's pretty simplistic. It's actually on a box that's in the closet
right now, but I think this is an older working version:
--
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 01:41:53PM -0500 I heard the voice of
Garance A Drosihn, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> It is a bit more complicated than that, because programs may
> include embedded references to other files. So, I think
> some developer would *have* to do a little up-front work for
> any p
On 2003-11-26 08:54 -0600, "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have had the problem listed in the article below for years (4.x and 5.x).
> I have been unable to use my Lexmark Optra 312 (USB) with FreeBSD (w/cups)
> because there is so often a page of "trash" printed before a print
I observe UFS lockups under heavy I/O. To reproduce the problem run around
10 copies of cp -Rp /usr/some-random-dir. All cp's after some time are hanging
on getblk. du's running concurrently are hanging in ufs state. The filesystems
are UFS2. The Server is running 5.2-BETA on SMP Dell 2650. Filesys
All,
It's my pleasure to announce the availability of 5.2-BETA ISO images and
ftp install sets for i386 and alpha. Amd64, sparc64, ia64, and pc98
sets will be available shortly. Please test this as much as possible
and let us know of the problems that you find. Some known problems to
watch out
I have had the problem listed in the article below for years (4.x and 5.x).
I have been unable to use my Lexmark Optra 312 (USB) with FreeBSD (w/cups)
because there is so often a page of "trash" printed before a print job
begins. This ONLY happens on FreeBSD and not on Linux 2.4 (w/cups). I have
On my dual CPU P6DGH the 11/22 cvsup of 5.2-BETA and netatalk crashes
on boot. Stopping netatalk from starting stops the crash.
I wasn't able to catch any crash information, but am currently recompiling
with sources from last night to see if it's repeatable.
Mike Squires
On Tue, 25 Nov 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Larry Rosenman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : sio2 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 11 flags 0x4 slot 0 on pccard0
> : sio2: type 16550A
> : sio2: unable to activate interrupt in fast mode - using normal mode
>
* Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 06:56]:
> At 12:23 AM -0500 11/26/03, Michael Edenfield wrote:
> >
> >Just to provide some real-world numbers, here's what I got
> >out of a buildworld:
>
> I have reformatted the numbers that Michael reported,
> into the following table:
>
> >Stati
* M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031126 00:43]:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Michael Edenfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : * M. Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [031125 12:07]:
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> : > "boyd, rounin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writ
Document of interest to you:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap/index.html
The schedule can be found at (when RELENG_5 is scheduled to be branched):
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap/schedule.html
Thomas T. Veldhouse writes:
Will 5.2-RELE
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 08:19:59AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Will 5.2-RELEASE mark the beginning of the new STABLE branch? If not, do we
> know approximately when this branch is planned?
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/5-roadmap/schedule.html
--
Rgdz,
Will 5.2-RELEASE mark the beginning of the new STABLE branch? If not, do we
know approximately when this branch is planned?
Thanks in advance,
Tom Veldhouse
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
T
Mathew Kanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 25, Don Lewis wrote:
> > On 25 Nov, Don Lewis wrote:
> > > On 25 Nov, Artur Poplawski wrote:
> > >> Artur Poplawski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> Hello,
> > >>>
Terry Lambert writes:
> Since I have patches to make dlopen work with static binaries, and
:
[ snip ]
:
> As to inevitable "where are the patches?", please check the -current
> list archives, you will find at least one set there.
I've looked without much success. Could you give a timeframe, a subj
If I am not wrong, it seems that the wi driver, when in monitor mode, will skip
8 bytes of data input (filling it in with random values).
We notice in if_wi.c:
case 7:
switch (rx_frame->wi_whdr.i_fc[0] & IEEE80211_FC0_TYPE_MASK) {
case IEEE80211_FC0_TYPE_DA
On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 02:00:08AM +0100, Matthias Andree wrote:
> Matthew Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > How much do you intend to use NSS for? I mean, what's the point of
> > adopting this cool infrastructure if all you are going to do with it
> > is make a better PAM out
Maxime Henrion wrote:
> Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > Wrong, counter-example: strtol().
> >
> > Wrong; the standard specifies that the errno shall only be
> > checked when the return value is -1. The exception in the
> > strtol() case is only for presetting errno to 0 before you
> > make the call, an
obrien wrote @ Tue, 25 Nov 2003 18:55:05 -0800:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 03:07:55PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > What about the newer version of gcc? That is considerably slower than
> > previous versions, but I don't see people screaming to have it removed.
>
> Uh... you must not know what
On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:35:29AM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote:
> With a recent -current, I've noticed double prints for the last few rc
> scripts, like this:
>
> Starting cron.
> Local package initialization:.
> Local package initialization:.
> Additional TCP options:.
> Additional TCP options:.
>
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 05:44:18PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > "E.B. Dreger" wrote:
> > > Dynamic linking works by the kernel running the dynamic linker,
> > > which loads shared objects and fixes the symbol tables, yes?
> >
> > No.
> >
> > Dynamic linking works becaus
i got a panic on recent -CURRENT:
# tcpdump -i lo0 port 23 &
[1] 507
listening on lo0
# telnet localhost
Trying ::1...
Wed Nov 26 14:51:23 MSK 2003
Debugger+0x55: xchgl %ebx,in_Debugger.0
db> tr
Debugger(c0898daf,0,c087197f,d629d8dc,100) at Debugger+0x55
panic(c087197f,c0854d72,c168bd00,c095c
Instruction pointer: 0x8:0c021B8C0
And then the box was frozen solid
The trap occured while compiling world over NFS V3/UDP.
FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10 #0: Tue Oct 28 22:09:12 CET 2003
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt2/obj/usr/src51/src/sys/FILES
Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc04b60
At 12:23 AM -0500 11/26/03, Michael Edenfield wrote:
Just to provide some real-world numbers, here's what I got
out of a buildworld:
I have reformatted the numbers that Michael reported,
into the following table:
Static /bin/sh: Dynamic /bin/sh:
real385m29.977s real455m44.852s
Brad Knowles wrote:
> At 2:48 PM -0800 2003/11/25, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> > What I am advocating is that FreeBSD-5 not marginalize and
> > restrict (make less flexible) basic infrastructure in order to get other
> > infrastructure working.
>
> If you've got working,
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
