On Wed, 08 Apr 2015 00:19:45 -0700
Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch adds support for newer touchpad features and implements
> two finger scrolling. This is such a common feature these days that I think
> we should enable it by default and disable edge scrolling. I've implemented
... why's stuff have to be complicated?
Win95 has minimal if any boot sector protection. Just go look at what
boot0cfg does, figure out which sector you have to read/modify/write,
and do that.
Of course, I'd also check first to ensure it's updating a freebsd
bootblock, or you may render a non-dua
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Ryan Stone wrote:
>
> We're looking at dual-booting FreeBSD and Win95. We're thinking of booting
>
Wow, I like your problem. It's really weird, and I like weird problems. :)
Since you are looking at automating a complicated process,
here is a crazy idea which
On Wednesday 08 April 2015 22:38:33 Jakob Alvermark wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Tested on my Acer E3-112 with a TouchPad.
>
> It works, thank you!
>
> I have been missing two-finger scrolling, it was quite awkward using edge
> scrolling IMHO.
>
> It does feel like it sometimes gets stuck in scrolling mode
On Wed, April 8, 2015 09:19, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> The attached patch adds support for newer touchpad features and
> implements two finger scrolling. This is such a common feature these days
> that I think we should enable it by default and disable edge scrolling.
> I've implemented some
>
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 08:09:42PM +, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:30:41PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
> > 4. (optional) create windows95 boot.ini for fail back load FreeBSD
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/15799
On Apr 8, 2015 4:27 PM, "Lars Engels" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 01:32:06PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 09:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > > On Wednesday 08 April 2015 09:13:51 Shawn Webb wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 00:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 01:32:06PM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 09:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > On Wednesday 08 April 2015 09:13:51 Shawn Webb wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 00:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > The attached patch adds support for newe
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:30:41PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
> 4. (optional) create windows95 boot.ini for fail back load FreeBSD
http://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/157992
I think boot.ini comes with ntldr, and Win95/98 started DOS-like..
//Marc
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 03:30:41PM -0400, Ryan Stone wrote:
> No, this isn't a late April Fools joke. :(
>
> I find myself in a situation where I need to integrate my employer's
> manufacturing process with a third-party OEM's process. My employer's
> hardware tests are all FreeBSD-based while t
As dirty hack, try to save two state of MBR, one when FreeBSD selected
(MBR.FBSD) , and one when Win95 selected (MBR.W95).
When the windows booted up properly, then write the MBR.FBSD to the
disc, on the same schema do the reverse on freebsd with dd.
http://www.fccps.cz/download/adv/frr/wipembr.ht
> On 08 Apr 2015, at 21:30, Ryan Stone wrote:
>
> No, this isn't a late April Fools joke. :(
>
> I find myself in a situation where I need to integrate my employer's
> manufacturing process with a third-party OEM's process. My employer's
> hardware tests are all FreeBSD-based while the OEM i
Hi,
You can just write a little command line win32 program that writes to
the boot blocks. it's win95; unless your BIOS somehow is blocking
things you should be able to set the same area that boot0cfg does to
tell the bootloader about what to do.
-adrian
On 8 April 2015 at 12:30, Ryan Stone
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015, Ryan Stone wrote:
> No, this isn't a late April Fools joke. :(
>
>
> We've discussed just switching hard drives, but we really want to shoot for
> a 100% automated process. Anybody have any ideas?
I guess due to hardware interfacing virtualization is not an option?
I've see
No, this isn't a late April Fools joke. :(
I find myself in a situation where I need to integrate my employer's
manufacturing process with a third-party OEM's process. My employer's
hardware tests are all FreeBSD-based while the OEM is Windows 95 based. I
need to come up with a way to integrate
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 8:18 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 16:55 -0700, Devin Teske wrote:
>>
>>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Shawn Webb
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 13:59 -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 12:07 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On Apr
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 09:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> On Wednesday 08 April 2015 09:13:51 Shawn Webb wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 00:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > The attached patch adds support for newer touchpad features and implements
> > > two finger scrolling. This is
On Wednesday 08 April 2015 17:04:41 Oliver Pinter wrote:
> Is there any special settings / requirements for xorg.conf to enable
> the palm detection and similar features?
No, it's done in the kernel. See sysctl hw.psm.
--
Rui Paulo
___
freebsd-current
On Wednesday 08 April 2015 09:13:51 Shawn Webb wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 00:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The attached patch adds support for newer touchpad features and implements
> > two finger scrolling. This is such a common feature these days that I
> > think we should enab
On Monday, April 06, 2015 09:11:21 PM Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> In message <2033248.eu3rhs8...@ralph.baldwin.cx>, John Baldwin writes:
>
> >I think phk@ broke this back in 70239. Before that the log() function did
> >this:
> >
> >log()
> >{
> >
> > /* log to the msg buffer */
> >
On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 16:55 -0700, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> > On Apr 6, 2015, at 1:35 PM, Shawn Webb
> > wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2015-04-06 at 13:59 -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 12:07 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> > > > On Apr 5, 2015, at 09:11, Shawn Webb
> > > > wrote:
> > >
Is there any special settings / requirements for xorg.conf to enable
the palm detection and similar features?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 00:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The attached patch adds support for newer touchpad features and implem
On Wed, 2015-04-08 at 00:19 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch adds support for newer touchpad features and implements
> two
> finger scrolling. This is such a common feature these days that I think we
> should enable it by default and disable edge scrolling. I've implemente
Hi,
The attached patch adds support for newer touchpad features and implements two
finger scrolling. This is such a common feature these days that I think we
should enable it by default and disable edge scrolling. I've implemented some
detection code to keep edge scrolling enabled when the to
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 1:08 AM, Garrett Cooper
wrote:
> On Apr 8, 2015, at 0:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>
> > On Apr 7, 2015, at 19:35, Konstantin Belousov
> wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:04:44PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>> I just tried to upgrade my system from
On Apr 8, 2015, at 0:49, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2015, at 19:35, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:04:44PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I just tried to upgrade my system from a Nehalem style era
>>> CPU/motherboard (a W series Xeon/P6T-WS) to
On Apr 7, 2015, at 19:35, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 07, 2015 at 12:04:44PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I just tried to upgrade my system from a Nehalem style era
>> CPU/motherboard (a W series Xeon/P6T-WS) to a Haswell style CPU/motherboard
>> (an E-series Haswell
On Apr 7, 2015, at 12:04, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> Hi,
> I just tried to upgrade my system from a Nehalem style era
> CPU/motherboard (a W series Xeon/P6T-WS) to a Haswell style CPU/motherboard
> (an E-series Haswell/Z97 motherboard), and I’ve run into some fun issues with
> my LSI 9240-4
28 matches
Mail list logo
