On 07/03/2011 03:05, Adrian Chadd wrote:
The obvious question - can you bisect kernel versions to find out when it broke?
Sorry, I thought the answer to that was obvious from my message. I have
no idea how far back the breakage goes since I don't use the cards often.
Doug
--
On 05/11/2011 04:33, Alexander Motin wrote:
On 11.05.2011 08:17, Doug Barton wrote:
I had an interesting result doing nothing but switching from HPET to
LAPIC ... no crash. Still on the same version of -current (r221566) the
only thing I've done is to add kern.eventtimer.timer=LAPIC to
/boot
On 06/28/2011 08:58, Marius Strobl wrote:
Uhm, we once fixed a problem in the MD atomic implementation which
still seems to present in the ISC copy. Could you please test whether
the following patch makes a difference?
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff
I haven't seen
On 07/07/2011 14:20, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, July 03, 2011 1:39:18 am Doug Barton wrote:
I have 2 ath-based pc-card adapters. If I put either one of them in the
slot while the system is up, or if I try booting with them in the slot,
I get an instant panic. The cards previously worked
On 07/08/2011 06:19, John Baldwin wrote:
Hmm, well that's odd. It didn't grow it enough it seems.
Also, can you boot your machine, then do 'sysctl debug.bootverbose=1',
insert
the card and record the messages in dmesg when it does? (You can likely
get
those out of kgdb.)
I tried
On 07/12/2011 07:22, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2011 9:29:19 pm Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/08/2011 06:19, John Baldwin wrote:
Hmm, well that's odd. It didn't grow it enough it seems.
Also, can you boot your machine, then do 'sysctl debug.bootverbose=1',
insert
the card
On 07/12/2011 07:22, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 11, 2011 9:29:19 pm Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/08/2011 06:19, John Baldwin wrote:
Hmm, well that's odd. It didn't grow it enough it seems.
Also, can you boot your machine, then do 'sysctl debug.bootverbose=1',
insert
the card
On 07/14/2011 11:39, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:27:20 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
Don't forget if_ath_pci.
Which I think is a bug for this very reason if it turns out to be the cause.
I have
MODULES_OVERRIDE=ath ...
in src.conf and I have an if_ath module, but no if_ath_pci
On 07/14/2011 12:55, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/14/2011 11:39, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, July 14, 2011 6:27:20 am Adrian Chadd wrote:
Don't forget if_ath_pci.
Which I think is a bug for this very reason if it turns out to be the cause.
I have
MODULES_OVERRIDE=ath ...
in src.conf
On 07/14/2011 16:21, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 09:53:42AM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote:
2011/7/11 KOT MATPOCKuH matpoc...@gmail.com:
Oops, sorry, I forgot to revert the previous patch when test-compiling.
Please re-fetch sparc64_isc_atomic.h.diff2 and try again.
I started
Howdy,
I wanted to let everyone know that BIND 9.8.0-P4 has just been imported
to 9-current, and will be part of the 9.0-RELEASE. The 9.8 branch has
many nice new features vs. 9.6.x, especially in the area of DNSSEC. You
can read more about the new features in the README file included in
On 07/15/2011 01:40, Marius Strobl wrote:
The generated config.h and platform.h for sparc64 are these:
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bind96_config.h
http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/bind96_platform.h
Marius,
Thanks again for all your help on this. During the work to upgrade to
BIND 9.8
Howdy,
Trying to build r224125 with clang, and got this (using no -j):
=== boot2 (all)
objcopy -S -O binary boot1.out boot1
dd if=/dev/zero of=boot2.ldr bs=512 count=1
1+0 records in
1+0 records out
512 bytes transferred in 0.40 secs (12782641 bytes/sec)
clang -Os
I have DEBUG_FLAGS+= -g in my /etc/make.conf. Commenting that out
allows this to work.
Doug
On 07/17/2011 03:11, Doug Barton wrote:
Howdy,
Trying to build r224125 with clang, and got this (using no -j):
=== boot2 (all)
objcopy -S -O binary boot1.out boot1
dd if=/dev/zero of=boot2
On 07/17/2011 07:03, Dimitry Andric wrote:
In any case, I have committed a fix in r224131, let me know how that
works out for you.
A clean /usr/obj got me all the way through buildworld to the point
where it was building the 32-bit compat libs, and got this:
clang -m32 -march=i686 -mmmx -msse
I'm getting this with recent HEAD:
isab0: found ICH7 or equivalent chipset: Intel ICH7M watchdog timer
ichwd0: Intel ICH7M watchdog timer at port 0x1030-0x1037,0x1060-0x107f
on isa0
isab0: found ICH7 or equivalent chipset: Intel ICH7M watchdog timer
pcib0: allocated type 4 (0x1030-0x1037) for rid
On 07/18/2011 13:11, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On 2011-07-18 09:42, Doug Barton wrote:
..
A clean /usr/obj got me all the way through buildworld to the point
where it was building the 32-bit compat libs, and got this:
...
/tmp/.root/cc-ysEysz.s:31589: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.cfi_sections
On 07/18/2011 10:08, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2011 4:26:49 am Doug Barton wrote:
I'm getting this with recent HEAD:
isab0: found ICH7 or equivalent chipset: Intel ICH7M watchdog timer
ichwd0: Intel ICH7M watchdog timer at port 0x1030-0x1037,0x1060-0x107f
on isa0
isab0: found
On 07/30/2011 05:34, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 02:49:52 AM Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/07/2011 18:16 John Baldwin said the following:
Hmm, can you get devinfo -r output from a working kernel with ichwd
loaded? You might be able to just build the kernel with 'nooptions
On 07/30/2011 19:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On 7/30/11 7:55 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On 07/30/2011 05:34, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 02:49:52 AM Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/07/2011 18:16 John Baldwin said the following:
Hmm, can you get devinfo -r output from a working kernel
On 08/02/2011 15:06, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, July 30, 2011 2:49:52 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 19/07/2011 18:16 John Baldwin said the following:
Hmm, can you get devinfo -r output from a working kernel with ichwd loaded?
You might be able to just build the kernel with 'nooptions
On 08/04/2011 22:59, Mattia Rossi wrote:
Hi all,
I've finally patched my 8.2 IPv6 gateway with the RDNSS/DNSSL patches
and I'm distributing DNS servers that way now. Works fine, my box
running CURRENT picks up the DNS servers and search domains and writes
them into /etc/resolv.conf using
Ed,
First off, thanks for taking a look at this. I've always been
uncomfortable with our default nsswitch.conf file because most users do
not use nis, and although everything works with our (previous) default
it produces errors in the logs that are very non-obvious.
That said, I think the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/05/2011 23:07, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hi Doug,
* Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org, 20110806 02:07:
However, I would much rather see us actually change the default
file. Users who are going to enable nis will already know that this
file needs
On 08/06/2011 07:52, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
This is, to some extent, a deliberate design decision. The idea is that
if you are installing onto an existing partition with the right type,
then you really do just want to use it without newfs.
Actually, if I am reinstalling I really do want to
On 08/06/2011 23:08, deeptec...@gmail.com wrote:
i'd note that the hard drive is kind of old (7 years), and i recently
had the power cut during port build operations twice, although the
(UFS) filesystem is fsck-clean.
Have you actually booted single user and run 'fsck -y'? That should
probably
The proper way to do this atm is 'man ./foo.1'. I had the same set of
commands under the fingers as well, but doing it the new way has many
benefits. Not the least of which is that you will see the page the same
way man will render it when it's installed.
Doug (change is hard)
On 8/14/2011
I have the catman option enabled for periodic/weekly and get the
following errors:
Reformatting manual pages:
catman: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.4/man/cat3: mkdir: Permission denied
catman: /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.4/perl/man/cat3: mkdir: Permission denied
It seems that the cat3 directories are
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 12:23:43 +0800
Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
However, an installer is user-facing (here), as well as system-facing.
As much as I understand the logic behind it, it is still going to
surprise people to find that their partition tables are modified at
any point
On 08/22/2011 09:41, Andrej Zverev wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org
mailto:do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I have the catman option enabled for periodic/weekly and get the
following errors:
Reformatting manual pages:
catman: /usr/local
John was working on this, haven't seen an update recently though.
Doug
On 08/26/2011 14:24, Mike Tancsa wrote:
Got a newish Intel board in and decided to give it a spin. Trying to
load the watchdog, I get this error below on CURRENT. Anyone able to
get ichwd working on such a motherboard ?
On 8/23/2011 7:48 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 4:29 AM, Holger Kipp holger.k...@alogis.com wrote:
Maybe already seen...
This is within Parallels 6.0 VM on a Mac with OS 10.6.8
...
This is a well known LOR.
There are a lot of well-known LORs in HEAD. This is a bug.
On 09/06/2011 10:05, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:30 AM, Alex Kozlov s...@rm-rf.kiev.ua wrote:
Hi, current
I see an unusually high LA for more than 10 hours without slightest load.
Any ideas?
What is LA?
Load Average.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but
First, this should be on freebsd-po...@freebsd.org. If you still have
problems later please start a new thread there.
On 09/13/2011 02:45, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I quote my /etc/make.conf from BETA2:
WRKDIR=workb2
That's guaranteed to break things. What you want is to remove that and set:
On 09/26/2011 15:38, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
This perception that ZFS is most of the future probably contributed to
the lack of strong opinions regarding the default UFS partition scheme.
Can we please stop saying that there were no contrary opinions stated? I
personally expressed a preference
On 09/26/2011 16:02, crsnet.pl wrote:
2. Kadu/Gnu Gadu.
I dont know why, but when i run kadu / gnu gadu and try to connect to
Gadu-Gadu network software segments ;/
Kadu with signal 6, GnuGadu with signal 11.
I try to use old gadulib, or recompie it. But this doesn't help ;/
I run
On 09/26/2011 17:59, Fbsd8 wrote:
Your solution is very un-professional.
Good thing we're all volunteers. :)
What your solution purposes to do
is do nothing. I think your judgment is flawed and a larger group of
your peers need to review your judgment in this case.
Ok, done. Eitan is
On 09/26/2011 18:43, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
burncd has been part of the system utilities included in the basic
release since release 4.0 and cdrecord is a port. The professional
solution is to remove burncd from the 9.0
On 09/27/2011 14:24, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2011-Sep-26 21:29:18 -0700, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote:
MBR allows 4 slices (which Windows and most of the world call
partitions). Windows also
allows the creation of Extended Partitions, but FreeBSD does not
support these. They result
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils and even gettext and libiconv, I guess they
got broken. Last I saw was a successful installation
On 09/28/2011 13:45, Beech Rintoul wrote:
On Wednesday 28 September 2011 12:18:47 Doug Barton wrote:
On 09/28/2011 12:39, Hartmann, O. wrote:
The mess started to happen when I tried to repair a non CLANG
compiling port math/gotoblas with portmaster -vf amth/gotoblas.
Since this build binutils
On 10/04/2011 03:32, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Not sure which list would be best for this
Given that it's a ports issue, freebsd-ports@ comes to mind ...
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth
On 10/06/2011 01:41, Thomas Mueller wrote:
Anyway, from what I read, csup is better, and I think I can use the same
supfile and same server that I would use for cvsup?
Yes.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth
On 10/06/2011 03:34, Andre Oppermann wrote:
On a newly installed development machine I installed subversion-freebsd
from ports and ended up with a huge dependency chain.
If you're just using it for FreeBSD you can un-check all the OPTIONS. If
you might want to use the http:// protocol to
On 10/06/2011 12:58, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
Hello, Doug.
You wrote 6 октября 2011 г., 23:37:26:
On a newly installed development machine I installed subversion-freebsd
from ports and ended up with a huge dependency chain.
If you're just using it for FreeBSD you can un-check all the OPTIONS.
In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on 10.0
because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
there wasn't a solution obvious enough for me. :)
Doug
On 10/07/2011 09:15, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
ume 2011-10-07 16:15:47 UTC
FreeBSD ports
On 10/08/2011 14:53, Warren Block wrote:
nspluginwrapper needs to be run as the end user.
The pkg-message tells them to do that.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in
Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
tools to work with:
http://dougbarton.us/bam.patch
You need to do the equivalent of
On 10/10/2011 15:00, Nali Toja wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Until the pointy-haireds come up with a better solution, here is a patch
that incorporates work that others have done into a manageable form so
that those interested in working with ports on 10-current have some
On 10/09/2011 09:29, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 07 Oct 2011 16:48:52 -0700
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org said:
dougb In case anyone wants to take this on, this port fails to install on
10.0
dougb because it uses its own version of libtool. I took a quick look but
dougb
On 10/12/2011 06:47, Ken Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 14:39 +0100, Bruce Cran wrote:
On 29/09/2011 02:42, Ken Smith wrote:
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-bootonly.iso) =
2ce7b93d28fd7ff37965893f1af3f7fc
MD5 (FreeBSD-9.0-BETA3-amd64-dvd1.iso) = 4affc701f2052edc548274f090e49235
MD5
On 10/12/2011 08:20, Michael Butler wrote:
SVN r226302 solves the ichwd failure to attach issue ..
Still failing for me:
ichwd0: Intel ICH10DO watchdog timer on isa0
ichwd0: unable to reserve GCS registers
device_attach: ichwd0 attach returned 6
r226340, smp, amd64
--
Nothin' ever
On 10/14/2011 10:35, Xin LI wrote:
On 10/14/11 04:35, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, October 13, 2011 6:26:26 pm Doug Barton wrote:
On 10/12/2011 08:20, Michael Butler wrote:
SVN r226302 solves the ichwd failure to attach issue ..
Still failing for me:
ichwd0: Intel ICH10DO watchdog
On 10/14/2011 12:03, Xin LI wrote:
Hmm, is your isab device behind a PCI-PCI bridge?
Me either:
isab0: PCI-ISA bridge at device 31.0 on pci0
isa0: ISA bus on isab0
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT
On 10/14/2011 10:38, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
AFAIK, recent Firefox implements Happy Eyeballs. So, I suspect it
doesn't obey RFC 3484, anymore.
My understanding is that they added it, then turned it off because it
didn't work as expected.
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin'
On 10/21/2011 17:51, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Can you come up with a patch which invoke svn info . (if the svn
binary exists)?
This is slightly faster than svnversion.
If svn info . doesn't error out, you can assume that the directory
is under SVN control.
Doesn't svnversion error out pretty
On 10/19/2011 00:29, Hiroki Sato wrote:
Mattia Rossi mro...@swin.edu.au wrote
in 4e9dfe11.2070...@swin.edu.au:
mr So the _ipv6 bit doesn't take care of passing inet6 to ifconfig
mr automatically?
No. You always need to add the inet6 keyword wherever needed.
That seems redundant, and
On 10/21/2011 22:42, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I tried following:
(1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
return status == 0
Return status isn't everything. :)
prints out exported
In my case (1.7) it says Unversioned directory
But my point (which perhaps I should have made
On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
$(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running
svnversion.
Anyone else want to propose a more complex solution when a simple and
more effective one already exists? :)
--
On 10/22/2011 12:07, Boris Samorodov wrote:
22.10.2011 22:12, Doug Barton пишет:
On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
$(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running
svnversion.
Anyone else want to propose a more
On 10/24/2011 10:14, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/21/2011 22:42, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
Hi,
I tried following:
(1) Run svnversion in non-svn directory:
return status == 0
Return status isn't everything
On 10/25/2011 12:43, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
I know that Doug disagreed with me on this,
I didn't disagree with you. I pointed out that there is absolutely no
reason to run 2 separate commands. To put it more bluntly, I pointed out
why your suggestion is a bad idea.
I'm sorry to be so blunt but
On 10/25/2011 13:23, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
I didn't disagree with you. I pointed out that there is absolutely no
reason to run 2 separate commands. To put it more bluntly, I pointed out
why your suggestion is a bad idea
On 10/25/2011 14:45, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:54 PM, Doug Barton
Actually hex would still work since 0x would match. :)
Yes, but if in the future, a revision number format is ever chosen
that doesn't include
0x at the beginning, and is something like
On 10/27/2011 12:05, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
The attached implements that, and is almost certainly the right way to
go. It would be nice if someone could test it, and better if someone
else could commit it. I swore after
On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
How does one run mergemaster without running roughshod over existing
configuration?
Carefully? :) Seriously ... always use the -P option, and/or add
PRESERVE_FILES in your mergemaster rc file. Watch the changes carefully.
If you have to, do the
On 10/28/2011 07:57, kama wrote:
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, October 27, 2011 7:14:51 am Ed Schouten wrote:
* Tom Evans tevans...@googlemail.com, 20111027 13:06:
I have had this happen before, the PEBKAC. When running mergemaster,
it will prompt you to install
On 10/28/2011 20:09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
How does one run mergemaster without running roughshod over existing
configuration?
Carefully? :) Seriously ... always use the -P
On 10/28/2011 20:44, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/28/2011 20:09, Kevin Oberman wrote:
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 10/28/2011 01:43, Thomas Mueller wrote:
How does one run
On 10/31/2011 14:17, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to merge the if_ath_tx code into -HEAD so it gets some wider
testing. This includes a couple of net80211 changes but it
overwhelmingly is if_ath driver changes.
The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd
On 10/31/2011 17:22, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 31 October 2011 14:52, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
The code is a bit messy and it's still a work in progress but I'd
rather tidy it up in -HEAD. Otherwise I'm stuck in the unfortunate
situation of having to keep merging between
On 11/08/2011 09:33, Scott Long wrote:
On Nov 8, 2011, at 7:52 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
Am 11/08/11 14:31, schrieb Chuck Burns:
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 02:12:58 PM Niclas Zeising wrote:
From my understanding of things, the DEFAULTS kernel configuration file
is automatically included
If you want to start a new thread please don't reply to an old one and
change the subject line, please create a whole new message instead. That
way those of us who read our mail threaded won't miss your new topic
because it is hidden under an old one.
--
We could put the whole
Adrian,
This has been going on for a while. Are you subscribed to -current? Any
plans to fix this?
Doug
On 11/09/2011 23:05, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2011-11-10 02:10:00 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-11-10 02:10:00 - starting HEAD tinderbox run
On 11/11/2011 04:29, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
pkg_add -r *
is giving error about directory not found .
This is preventing testing and / or using efforts .
I see your perspective on this, but package support for HEAD (N-current)
is always done on a best effort basis, and is
On 11/11/2011 14:23, George Kontostanos wrote:
BTW I follow both stable and current lists. I have noticed that people
still ask questions in current regarding 9-RC(*) problems.
Maybe if it was clear that current is now 10 this would not happen.
Actually up until the actual release we encourage
On 11/18/2011 09:54, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
One more thing (i am mentioning it here for archival purposes,
as i keep forgetting to test it). Is entropy harvesting expensive ?
No. It was designed to be inexpensive on purpose. :)
--
We could put the whole Internet into a book.
Looping Hiroki Sato in since he's the architect of the most recent
changes here.
Doug
On 11/21/2011 12:11, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 21.11.2011 um 20:25 schrieb Dan The Man:
I notice we have changed way IPV6 is done in rc.conf now.
I assume someone will update:
On 11/21/2011 17:39, Dan The Man wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Stefan Bethke wrote:
Am 21.11.2011 um 20:25 schrieb Dan The Man:
I notice we have changed way IPV6 is done in rc.conf now.
I assume someone will update:
On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
default?
Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I install a new
system for at least a decade.
Ideally we could do this for 9.0.
Doug
--
We could
On 11/28/2011 16:33, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message 4ed4222e.5010...@freebsd.org, Doug Barton writes:
On 11/28/2011 02:38, Max Khon wrote:
Are there any compelling reasons for having profiled libs to be built by
default?
Nope. It's been one of the first things I disable after I
On 11/29/2011 13:07, John Baldwin wrote:
Any objections to this?
Nope. I wondered why it was there myself, but didn't care enough to ask. :)
It removes a weird line during 'make -s buildworld'
output and I think it was debugging accidentally left in in 213077 by Warner:
Index: newvers.sh
What does dtrace have to do with profiled libs?
On 11/29/2011 17:14, Paul Ambrose wrote:
I think dtrace for freebsd userland is close to complete( after
r227290, at least no more kernel panic). but is not suitable for a
daily use now.
在 2011年11月30日 上午5:42，Sevan / Venture37
On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static
and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their
code when someone changes a library and that change causes
a dramatic change in the performance of one's code.
And as Max pointed
On 12/01/2011 23:23, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 10:59:59PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
On 12/01/2011 22:41, Steve Kargl wrote:
Having a set of profiled libraries in-sync with the static
and shared libraries allows one to run the profiler on their
code when someone changes
On 12/02/2011 04:35, Adrian Chadd wrote:
I think you're missing the point a little.
The point is, you have to keep in mind how comfortable people feel
about things, and progress sometimes makes people uncomfortable. I
think you should leave these changes bake for a while and let people
get
On 12/3/2011 5:03 AM, sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
The fact that we have so many people who are radically
change-averse, no matter how rational the change; is a bug, not a
feature.
This particular bug is complicated dramatically by the fact that
the majority view seems to lean heavily towards
On 12/3/2011 1:21 AM, Roman Kurakin wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
[...] The fact that we have so many people who are radically
change-averse, no matter how rational the change; is a bug, not a
feature.
This particular bug is complicated dramatically by the fact that
the majority view seems
On 12/4/2011 12:19 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I propose we create a companion directory to src in SVN and cal it
sysports
it uses the ports infrastructure in organization (though may be more
hierarchical)
but is populated with items that have come out of the 'src' tree.
it is shipped along
Howdy,
This is an FYI to let people know about a really nice feature for those
that have ports installed which include kernel modules. You can place a
list in /etc/src.conf like this:
PORTS_MODULES= emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod sysutils/fusefs-kmod
x11/nvidia-driver
which will cause those
On 06/09/2012 16:51, Doug Barton wrote:
Ok, never mind the last one ... this patch I've actually tested. :)
Committed to HEAD and MFC'ed. Thanks everyone for the feedback and help.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
On 06/24/2012 16:07, Steven Hartland wrote:
We added some new mount points recently and on reboot they failed to
come up after investigating we found that mountd runs too early in
the boot process to be able export filesystems that are marked as
late in /etc/fstab.
Our fix was simply to
On 06/26/2012 11:04 PM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
Hi Folks,
as I announced before, the default sort in -CURRENT has been changed
to BSD sort.
Has this been performance tested vs. the old one? If so, where are the
results?
Since the import, the reported minor bugs have been
fixed and BSD sort
On 06/26/2012 11:48 PM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
-Original Message- From: Doug Barton
[mailto:do...@freebsd.org] Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 11:18 PM
To: Gabor Kovesdan Cc: FreeBSD Current; Oleg Moskalenko Subject:
Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT
On 06/26
On 06/27/2012 02:09 AM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
Doug, I'll post some performance figures, probably tomorrow.
That's great, thanks.
But I do not agree with you that we have to reproduce the old sort bugs.
It makes no sense and I am not going to do that. Absolutely not.
That isn't what I said.
On 06/27/2012 03:02 AM, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
On 27.06.2012 10:43, Doug Barton wrote:
On 06/27/2012 02:09 AM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
Doug, I'll post some performance figures, probably tomorrow.
That's great, thanks.
But I do not agree with you that we have to reproduce the old sort bugs
On 06/27/2012 07:30 AM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
--- Mer 27/6/12, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org ha scritto:
...
I believe we do not
make this kind of work with any vendor code that is
being updated in the
base;
Au contraire, we frequently avoid updating the old versions
of things we have
I officially withdraw from the discussion. I hope it all works out well.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 06/29/2012 01:50 PM, Oleg Moskalenko wrote:
5) NBSD adds several of its own new proprietary options:
--mergesort
--qsort
--heapsort
--radixsort
--nthreads=... (multi-threaded build only)
Oleg,
First, thank you very much for providing both the performance numbers,
and the
renaming, NBSD will support all
NGNU options.
Thank you for the suggestion.
Oleg
-Original Message-
From: Doug Barton [mailto:do...@freebsd.org]
Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 2:02 PM
To: Oleg Moskalenko
Cc: FreeBSD Current
Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] BSD sort is the default sort in -CURRENT
301 - 400 of 865 matches
Mail list logo
