Re: Boot messages

2001-04-24 Thread Garrett Wollman
[Followups to -questions, please.] On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:58:00 +0200 (CEST), Riccardo Torrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: unknown: PNP0303 can't assign resources Keyboard controller. unknown: PNP0f13 can't assign resources PS/2 mouse port. unknown: PNP0501 can't assign resources Serial

Re: Boot messages

2001-04-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:57:14 +0200 (CEST), Riccardo Torrini [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This means that I can remove this lines? Sure? device atkbdc 1 No, I said nothing of the sort. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the

Re: Boot messages

2001-04-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:57:56 -0600, Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Actually, it is a bug. The drivers in the tree should grok these pnp ids. Actually, no, it is not a bug. The FreeBSD drivers for these devices manage their resources differently from the way the Windows drivers do, and

Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm

2001-05-09 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 8 May 2001 23:31:51 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I followed everything here fine until you asserted that the debugger shouldn't need any locks. When the debugger is running, everything else should have been forcibly halted. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail

Re: pgm to kill 4.3 via vm

2001-05-14 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 10 May 2001 12:40:42 -0400 (EDT), Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The process and signal-related structures may be inconsistent if the debugger disregards existing locks held over those structures. It does not matter if code is currently still executing, it matters that

Re: compiler bug or source bug?

2001-06-04 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 03 Jun 2001 22:43:00 -0700, Peter Wemm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: We could make off_t a long long on the alpha. Otherwise the formats need: printf(%lld, (long long) pos); /* or %qd to shut up the ANSI warning */ They always need that, until printf learns about the `j' width specifier

Re: fts_open() (was: Re: Patch to restore WARNS feature)

2001-06-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 23:28:29 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: 3. Provide an alternative to qsort() that takes an comparison function that takes an additional function pointer arg (use this arg to avoid the global in (1)). Actually, doing this would solve a number of

Re: fts_open() (was: Re: Patch to restore WARNS feature)

2001-06-13 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 13 Jun 2001 11:55:30 -0400, Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Why not do something like the rpc code does? Check if threaded, if so cons up a thread specific key otherwise use a global. The Standard does not appear to say whether qsort() is reentrant, but I believe that it

Re: tcsh.cat

2001-06-15 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 23:33:07 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Here's an example of a complication: what is the semantics of /tmp/foo/bar where foo is a symlink to ? I think the pathname resolves to /tmp//bar and then to /tmp/bar, but this is surprising since foo doesn't

Re: tcsh.cat

2001-06-15 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 15 Jun 2001 22:57:56 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Maybe, but this doesn't seem to be permitted by POSIX.1-200x: The response I got to a similar question about symbolic links suggests that the definition of ``path name resolution'' is supposed to be the final word on

Re: tcsh.cat

2001-06-15 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 01:24:19 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: POSIX explicitly disallow filenames everywhere. I think it should be so for symlinks too. But it doesn't, and that's the end of it for at least another five years. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

The PR db is not for -current problems, right?

2001-06-16 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 16 Jun 2001 14:51:38 +0200, Jens Schweikhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: against problems on -current: my understanding is that -current users know what they are doing, especially that they're living on the bleeding edge and that they must be subscribed to current@ where they shall

Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat])

2001-06-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 15:40:23 +1000 (EST), Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: NetBSD committed essentially this patch 4 years ago (as part of rev.1.23). I like it, except it seems to be incompatible with POSIX.1-200x. I think I agree with your interpretation. Quoting from XBDd7, page 101,

Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat])

2001-06-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 21:35:17 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: ./foo/ .// ./foo/bar .//bar No, because the ``resulting filename'' begins with a slash. It seems resulting filename (pathname?) begins with ./ (not a slash). No, it doesn't. The

Re: Ok, try this patch. (was Re: symlink(2) [Was: Re: tcsh.cat])

2001-06-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001 10:46:27 -0700 (PDT), Matt Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In anycase, I can't imagine that POSIX actually intended null symlinks to act in any particular way The standard specifies precisely how pathname resolution is supposed to behave. FreeBSD should conform to the

Re: convert libgmp to a port?

2001-06-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On 18 Jun 2001 03:32:10 +0200, Assar Westerlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: But telnet in historic BSD didn't have sra or any other authentication mechanism that uses libmp. Or are you saying that we cannot change `historical BSD software'? No, I'm saying that the author of the SRA patches did

Re: cannot print to remote printer

2001-07-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
On 12 Jul 2001 22:40:12 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I might be wrong in many ways, but... is it then mandatory that you `reset' SIGCHLD to SIG_DFL ? Possibly. In the general case (as specified by standards), what happens to SIGCHLD if it was set to SIG_IGN before exec()

Re: cannot print to remote printer

2001-07-14 Thread Garrett Wollman
I wrote: The new POSIX draft, at least, sanctions the automatic reset of SIGCHLD to SIG_DFL upon exec(). Terry Lambert appears to have written: How does the NOHUP program continue to function in light of this reset demand? There is no ``demand'' involved. The behavior of the system when

Re: picking a DB (Re: nvi maintainer?)

2001-07-10 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 17:24:37 +0200, Sheldon Hearn [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The next step is for someone to see how hard it is to provide libc hooks for the DB 3.x functionality that nvi requires, without removing the existing DB 1.x functionality that other subsystems require. It's actually

Use of M_WAITOK in if_addmulti().

2001-07-15 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:13:14 +0900 (JST), Hajimu UMEMOTO [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Current if_addmulti() calls MALLOC() with M_WAITOK. However, if_addmulti() can be called from in[6]_addmulti() with splnet(). It may lead kernel panic. This is not a problem (or should not be). It is

Re: libedit replacement for libreadline

2001-07-16 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 03:19:32 -0700, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Personally, I think it's worth it to get rid of a GNU dependency in the base system, as well as reducing the overall amount of functional code duplication. I don't, particularly since the two programs which use it are

ntpd 4.1

2001-08-03 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 2 Aug 2001 12:25:13 +0200, Ollivier Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The question I have is the following: authentication was done with md5 code builtin and I disabled DES support (not supported anymore). Now, with 4.1, it can be linked to openssl but it is still an optional component.

RE: Lock order reversals that aren't problematic

2001-07-30 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001 09:28:03 -0700 (PDT), John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: However, the networking stack is being redone, By whom? I haven't seen anything about this posted to -net. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body

RE: Random Lockups

2001-08-09 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 08 Aug 2001 07:53:57 -0700 (PDT), John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Usually it involves an NMI switch. :( Can you cvs (or cvsup) by dates on the kernel sources to narrow down exactly what day (and possibly what commit) causes these lockups? I.e., does it work fine on August 4th,

Re: Copyright Contradiction in libalias

2001-08-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 20:04:46 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I mean common part of international copyright law. There is no such thing as ``international copyright law''. There is only national copyright law. Parties to the various international copyright conventions agree

Re: Copyright Contradiction in libalias

2001-08-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 22 Aug 2001 10:35:11 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: No, author part of copyright can't be deattached, unless fraud happens. Only if you live in a country whose legal system recognizes ``moral rights''. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: ZFS: Invalid SEND/RECV stream still

2013-10-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article c0a42b456769e22f908e689a1de56...@webmail.lerctr.org, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote: Error Message: received 320KB stream in 1 seconds (320KB/sec) receiving incremental stream of vault/var@2013-10-25 into zroot/backups/TBH/var@2013-10-25 cannot receive incremental stream:

Re: PACKAGESITE spam

2013-12-21 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 20131221230448.ga61...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, Steve Kargl writes: Other than the noise in /var/log/message, what does this provide that 'pkg info' doesn't! A record of when packages were installed and removed. -GAWollman ___

Re: New installation script

2011-08-06 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 4e3d55fd.7090...@freebsd.org, nwhiteh...@freebsd.org writes: I'm not entirely sure what you're referring to. Whenever you add a / partition on a partitioning scheme that requires a boot partition (APM, GPT on some platforms), the installer asks you if you want to add a boot

Re: mbstowcs(3) may not return -1

2012-06-21 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 4fe340ff.80...@gmail.com, demelier.da...@gmail.com writes: On 21/06/2012 14:55, Sergey Kandaurov wrote: It returns (size_t)(-1). I don't know how is it correct, but this conforms to C spec. Mm, if I understand well, since it is cast to size_t, I think the return value will be

Re: [HEADSUP CFT] pkg 1.0rc1 and schedule

2012-07-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 20120712100110.ga34...@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net, b...@freebsd.org writes: - puppet support: (https://github.com/xaque208/puppet-pkgng) I've actually already written one of these; it may be good to merge. Would whoever is working on this please raise your hand? -GAWollman -- Garrett

Re: CURRENT: CLANG 3.3 and -stad=c++11 and -stdlib=libc++: isnan()/isninf() oddity

2013-07-10 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 10 Jul 2013 22:12:59 +0200, Tijl Coosemans t...@freebsd.org said: I think isnan(double) and isinf(double) in math.h should only be visible if (_BSD_VISIBLE || _XSI_VISIBLE) __ISO_C_VISIBLE 1999. For C99 and higher there should only be the isnan/isinf macros. I believe you are

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-14 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 20130714054840$7...@grapevine.csail.mit.edu, dte...@freebsd.org writes: How about rquery? What protocol does that use? and what does it talk to? It accesses the sqlite database in /var/db/pkg that was previously retrieved from the remote repository. Question: Where can I learn more

Re: [HEADSUP] No more pkg_install on HEAD by default

2013-07-14 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 20130714064601$3...@grapevine.csail.mit.edu, dte...@freebsd.org writes: [I wrote:] It accesses the sqlite database in /var/db/pkg that was previously retrieved from the remote repository. Now from what you explained of pkg, I'm worried that for bsdconfig: 1. Browse packages

Re: Ports with daemons on uninstall...

2013-07-14 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 20130714191725.ga30...@stack.nl, jil...@stack.nl writes: Apart from the annoyance of the restarts, automatic stopping and starting is probably the best policy for having things just work. Some daemons will crash or otherwise stop being useful when their files have been deleted or

Re: firebox build fails post clang-3.4 merge

2014-02-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 530ea5cd.2070...@protected-networks.net, i...@protected-networks.net writes: sigh .. way back in the late 70's or maybe early 80's when I was actually doing some work on compilers, we had a saying: produce correct code even if it's not optimal or exit and tell the user why. Producing

Re: Leaving the Desktop Market

2014-04-01 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 533b3903.7030...@rancid.berkeley.edu, mich...@rancid.berkeley.edu writes: I have been using FreeBSD on the desktop since 1997, Hmmm. I'm a bit biased here, but I've been using FreeBSD on the desktop since, well, before it was called FreeBSD. It's still my primary platform for nearly

Re: login.conf -- UTF-8

2014-04-02 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 1396457629.2280.2.ca...@powernoodle.corp.yahoo.com, sbr...@freebsd.org writes: I'd like to make this change to login.conf for default installs. This removes some amount of hackery in the ports system that is working around our lack of UTF-8 in the base. I'm not sure what the

Re: HOWTO articles for migrating from Linux to FreeBSD, especially for pkg?

2014-07-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article alpine.bsf.2.11.1407251459370.72...@wonkity.com you write: Writing an article is hard. Writing a small section on how deleting packages is different between pkg and, say, apt, is much easier. The scope is known. Indeed, it's pretty trivial. I think the sort of article Craig was

Re: Importing OpenSSL

1999-12-04 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 4 Dec 1999 00:57:04 -0800, "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: NO. There are not patent problems until you *USE* the code. That's not clear. See also ``contributory infringement''. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same

Re: Sv: mount(2) broken?

1999-12-05 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 05 Dec 1999 21:14:12 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In message 003001bf3f5d$1ff01780$[EMAIL PROTECTED], "Leif Neland" writes: Why isn't MAKEDEV installed by make (install)world? I'm actually starting to wonder about that too... Um, the correct question would have

Re: disklabel -W now seems to not work(?)

1999-12-05 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 5 Dec 1999 10:15:07 -0800 (PST), Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: So, what's the answer about what to do? exec 3/dev/xx0 dislabel -W xx0 spam /dev/xx0 exec 3- -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same [EMAIL PROTECTED] | O

Intel 810?

1999-12-06 Thread Garrett Wollman
I recently got a quote from a hardware vendor which made the following claim: All Socket 370PGA Motherboards use either the 810 or [the] 810c chip set which does not support FreeBSD because 16MB of the motherboard memory is used for the display controller. There is no way to tell the

Re: Intel 810?

1999-12-06 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 6 Dec 1999 19:41:15 -0500, "Douglas Kuntz" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: As others have stated, Socket370 boards arent all 810/810c...my 4.0-Current The important issue to me is: will FreeBSD work on an 810 motherboard? The reason I care is because I need the form-factor (a 1U-high server);

Re: why 'The legacy aout build' was removed from current ?

1999-12-11 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 11 Dec 1999 13:09:02 -0800, "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [Attribution lost.] So producing a.out libraries for CURRENT is silly. :-) Nope. You really need to think about the ISV's. Why do you think Netscape is still a.out? ISV's want to produce one binary that runs

Re: Modules and sysctl tree

1999-12-11 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 11 Dec 1999 14:00:03 -0800, "Jordan K. Hubbard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Which raises an important issue - other than walking the sysctl tree regularly looking for changes, how does such an application become aware that the sysctl space has changed? It's listening on a kernel

Kernel config utility

1999-12-15 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 15 Dec 1999 07:49:27 -0500, Donn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: thing that was divided into two panes. On the left would be LINT. Here, we would have icons representing the various devices. This is actually a really cool idea, although it needs a bit of refinement, and we would

Re: Serious server-side NFS problem

1999-12-17 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 00:55:26 -0800, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: the IP and UDP checksum guessing, but more that I think you'll find that a considerable amount of the inbound NFS traffic handling is actually performed in the interrupt context If it is, then there is a serious bug.

rlogin receiving sig 11 (randomly)

1999-12-20 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 20 Dec 1999 11:05:30 -0500 (EST), "John W. DeBoskey" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This happens very randomly - 1 out of 50. But, when it fails, it typically fails multiple times as shown above. I've seen this over the last 5 weeks or so. `rlogin -x' has consistently failed for me

Odd TCP glitches in new currents

1999-12-21 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 12:50:50 -0800 (PST), Matthew Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I have NOT tested this fix yet, so I don't know if it works, but I believe the problem is that on high speed networks the milliscond round trip delay is short enough that you can get 1-tick timeouts.

Re: Odd TCP glitches in new currents

1999-12-21 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999 22:13:51 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Hmmm. I thought we agreed that 200 msec was the minimum reasonable RTO. That code doesn't seem to have made it in. I assume you mean 20 msec (= 2 tick @ 100 Hz ) ? 200 msec is enough to get halfway around the

Re: General ata grousing

1999-12-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 22 Dec 1999 21:59:30 +0100 (CET), Soren Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: If you looked at the code, you would see that the ata driver only uses this ugly method when we are dealing with the standard primary secondary controller which are bound to specific addresses and interrupts.

RE: 4.0 slower than 3.4?

2000-01-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 15:17:11 +0100, "Alexander Sanda" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: First, plain (no module loaded): You should also try it with `options COMPAT_IPFW=0' in your config file. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same [EMAIL

Re: performance of FreeBSD-current as SMP

2000-01-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
[Not network-related; moved to -current.] On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 10:02:25 -0600 (CST), Mohit Aron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Good Lord! This is the second time now. I even SAID in my last two mails that there is only ONE processor. Theortically then, FreeBSD configured with/without SMP support

Re: performance of FreeBSD-current as SMP

2000-01-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 12:34:24 -0600 (CST), Mohit Aron [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Well, some difference is to be expected. But 22% Flaws in the Intel SMP design make it more expensive than it ought to be. Things like atomic RMW cycles are very, very expensive. (We had a discussion about six

Re: PAM'ized su(1)

2000-01-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 08 Jan 2000 12:42:58 -0800, "Kurt D. Zeilenga" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: can go away. WHEELSU can (and should) be provided by pam_wheel. wollman@khavrinen(2996)$ ls /usr/lib/pam_*.so /usr/lib/pam_cleartext_pass_ok.so /usr/lib/pam_radius.so /usr/lib/pam_deny.so

RE: 4.0 slower than 3.4?

2000-01-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 9 Jan 2000 02:11:49 +0100, "Alexander Sanda" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [I wrote:] You should also try it with `options COMPAT_IPFW=0' in your config file. Hm, what's this option for? Well, somebody may have broken it (perhaps even me). But it was put there to provide those people

RE: load spike strangeness

2000-01-08 Thread Garrett Wollman
[Multiple irrelevant mailing-lists snipped.] On Sat, 8 Jan 2000 18:31:19 -0800, "FreeBSD" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Since when does an E-mail address require a "realname"? As Sherlock Holmes once said: ``It is always unpleasant dealing with an alias.'' plonk -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman

Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files

2000-01-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 16:21:05 -0500, Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: In 'ls' we are not talking about a block count, we are talking about a byte-count. ls -s -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: Additional option to ls -l for large files

2000-01-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:45:51 -0500, Garance A Drosihn [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Yes, it may be "more pure" to use 1024 when comparing 'ls' listings to block counts, but it is less confusing WITHIN a single 'ls -l' listing if all the numbers are decimal, and not some combination of base-10 and

Re: PNPBIOS + Dell PowerEdge = panic()

2000-01-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 17 Jan 2000 17:12:14 -0800, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: This is definitely a bad idea; IMHO we should only do this when the resource is actually activated (and obviously free it when deactivated). Absolutely! As I keep trying to explain to people, that's why there *is* a

Re: Mandating USA_RESIDENT

2000-01-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On 18 Jan 2000 03:03:09 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) said: Won't people get into legal trouble (technically) if they build the wrong version? Depends on who they work for. Some people may work for organizations which have licensing agreements in place to permit

Re: Mandating USA_RESIDENT

2000-01-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 18 Jan 2000 18:15:35 -0800 (PST), Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Is this the same Garrett who persuaded me not to include the RSA code at all in the freefall repository so that people wouldn't get in trouble for simply posessing it? :) No, this is the same Garrett who

sigisempty?

2000-01-19 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 07:03:04 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Satoshi Asami) said: How do I test if sigset_t is empty in -current? The xview sources have this macro: #define sigisempty(s) (!(*(s))) which is ok for the old sigset_t (unsigned int) but obviously won't work for the new one

Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzip2support for distribution patches)

2000-01-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
If I may inject some possibly-irrelevant fact into this discussion... gzip (or rather, the ``deflate'' compression algorithm and the libz file format) has been adopted into a number of formal standards. It's likely that it will remain with us for a long time. For those of us who eschew

Re: With feature freeze being in place

2000-01-23 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 11:11:12 +1100, Peter Jeremy [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Comparing LINT and GENERIC is made more difficult by the significantly different ordering. Is there some good reason for this, or would an offer of GENERIC re-written into the same order as LINT be accepted? Speaking

Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Add bzip2 support for distribution patches)

2000-01-24 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000 19:46:47 -0800, "David O'Brien" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Am I the only one that uses UNIX as a multitasking OS? nice the bzip2 process by 20 and background it. Geez. Perhaps you're the only one who compresses files just for the hell of it. Most people normally compress

Re: bzip2 in src tree (Was Re: ports/16252: bsd.port.mk: Addbzi

2000-01-24 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 24 Jan 2000 21:42:45 +0100, Brad Knowles [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm curious as to how a choice like this gets made. Could you elaborate? Other people have answered with the why but not the how. Choices (like this one about archive formats) get made when people sit down and actually

Folks, please try to spread out your cvsups a bit better....

2000-01-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
I suspect I'm not the only mirror operator who sees a huge load spike early in the morning: --- start of forwarded message (RFC 934 encapsulation) --- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apparently-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: xyz.lcs.mit.edu daily run output Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2000 01:59:01 -0500

Re: With feature freeze being in place

2000-01-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 11:03:28 -0800, Bill Fenner [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Is there a quick primer on getting IPv6 up and running? I built a kernel with INET6 and the ipsec stuff, and my interfaces now have IPv6 addresses, but no userland apps seem to be able to parse IPv6 addresses, e.g.

Re: Problems installing FreeBSD 4.0 20000125-CURRENT

2000-01-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 16:06:31 -0800, "Jordan K. Hubbard" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: citizen" these days without a resolvable hostname that also matches your primary IP address or, among other things, you won't be able to send mail directly to anyone who practices traditional spam filtering

Re: Problems installing FreeBSD 4.0 20000125-CURRENT

2000-01-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:11:52 -0800, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: That's not correct; your DHCP configuration should reflect the hostname. No, it shouldn't. As I keep on trying to explain, the DHCP addresses are: 1) Temporary. 2) Meaningless. 3) Temporary.

Re: Problems installing FreeBSD 4.0 20000125-CURRENT

2000-01-28 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 18:53:51 -0800, Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Since the hostname is simply a plain-text token for the IP address Wrong. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

pstat(8) depends on loader(8)???

2000-02-06 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Mon, 7 Feb 2000 00:25:51 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: If I boot with loader(8), everything is ok. Ideas? loader loads the kernel symbol table; boot2 does not. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of

FTP_INTERNAL_LS

2000-02-12 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 12 Feb 2000 10:52:22 +0100 (CET), "Patrick M. Hausen" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: BTW: if ls is internal why not get rid of the special setup for chrooted accounts altogether? Couldn't ftpd open /etc/pwd.db and /etc/group for reading before chrooting? You don't normally want to expose

Re: dc0 wierdness with Compex Freedomline

2000-02-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 01:13:51 -0800 (PST), "Rodney W. Grimes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: [I wrote:] quite right. In a CSMA/CD medium access protocol, like that used by Ethernet, the actual capacity of the link is always(*) somewhat less than 100%; the exact value depends on the precise

Re: dc0 wierdness with Compex Freedomline

2000-02-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:53:37 -0800 (PST), "Rodney W. Grimes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I specifically excluded P(coll) by stating point to point or effectively point to point via switching. Rod, please bother to READ what people write before spewing nonsense. The original question asked

Re: dc0 wierdness with Compex Freedomline

2000-02-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:28:15 -0800 (PST), "Rodney W. Grimes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I answered SPECIFICALLY about half-duplex. The duplex does not in any way effect the maximal link layer transmission data rate. You seem to keep forgetting the maximal part... The maximum for full-duplex

Re: dc0 wierdness with Compex Freedomline

2000-02-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:08:24 -0800 (PST), "Rodney W. Grimes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The maximum for full-duplex is utterly irrelevant, since the bounds on performance for half-duplex Ethernet networks come from CSMA/CD. I will say it one last time, duplex falls out of the equations when

Re: feedback on CD install of 4.0-RC2

2000-02-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 23:28:45 +0900, "Daniel C. Sobral" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Novice is ok, it's the other two that are problematic. Well, particularly "custom". "Custom" does not scare away anyone, and is actually actractive to Windows users. It should be called "death trap" or something

Re: Panic (TCP)

2000-02-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:23:27 +0900, Yoshinobu Inoue [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: If persist timer is working, and if it happen to timeout between callout_reset(tp-tt_rexmt, tp-t_rxtcur, tcp_timer_rexmt, tp); and

Re: dc0 wierdness with Compex Freedomline

2000-02-24 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:21:31 -0700, Chris Wasser [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: The theoretical maximum for 100BaseT-FDX (which is 200Mbps) is 25MB/s (megabytes per second), 100BaseT-TX is 12MB/s [FYI: Mbps-MB/s you divide by 8] I realize my punctuation may be off, but there you are. Assuming you

Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list)

2000-02-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:43:03 +0200, Mark Murray [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: o A username may only be checked $number times per $timeperiod; after that, _all_ answers are silently converted to "no". Easier: a username may only be checked by a process running as $uid or by root. ... etc. There

PCI irq setting

2000-02-15 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:28:07 +0100 (CET), Remy Nonnenmacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: As Net and SCSI are the main source of interrupts, how can i have all matroxes stacked on one Irq and SCSI and net on two separated ones, instead of having 'mux' receiving all Ints ? Depends on your BIOS and

Re: Crypto progress! (And a Biiiig TODO list)

2000-02-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:30:43 -0700, Lyndon Nerenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: You incorporate my patches to inetd that teach it to listen on named sockets, and then run the daemon from there in wait mode. If inetd dies you're pretty much hosed, anyway. Think ``single-user mode''. -GAWollman

Re: Hardware for 4.0

2000-02-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:06:07 -0800 (PST), "Rodney W. Grimes" [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: IBM Hard drives... If you can actually get them Last time I bought a drive we weren't able to get IBM in any reasonable timeframe and ended up with a Seagate instead. (And that Cheetah 18LP's not a bad

-current NO_OPENSSH NO_OPENSSL buildworld fails in src/usr.sbin/ppp/chap_ms.c

2000-02-28 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 27 Feb 2000 15:43:52 -0800, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm not ready to play with the openssl/ssh stuff yet, but I wanted to test Soren's latest ATA stuff so I cvsup'ed and started a buildworld with the following make.conf options: My buildworld failed here in the

Re: kvm_getswapinfo() function added to libkvm. top, pstat, systat updated

1999-01-22 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 18:40:55 -0500 (EST), Brian Feldman gr...@unixhelp.org said: Where's struct kvm_swap and typedef struct kvm_swap *kvm_swap_t supposed to now be? Hopefully the latter isn't anywhere, since style(9) says very specifically that such typedefs are Not To Be Introduced.

kvm question

1999-01-24 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Fri, 22 Jan 1999 23:48:50 -0800 (PST), Archie Cobbs arc...@whistle.com said: I ran into an interesting problem in the process of modifying netstat to understand the PF_NETGRAPH protocol family. netstat uses kvm_read(), etc. to read kernel symbols. However, this doesn't Don't do that. Use

Re: kvm question

1999-01-24 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 23 Jan 1999 11:04:15 -0800 (PST), Archie Cobbs arc...@whistle.com said: Peter pointed out that having the sysctl's as symbols was a nice advantage of the current system. How important is this? I don't think it's important at all. (Then again, I liked the old system.) If we were

sysctl oids (was: Re: kvm question)

1999-01-24 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999 13:11:12 -0800, Mike Smith m...@smith.net.au said: Backwards compatibility is one thing, but new nodes should be named, not numbered. OID_AUTO is bogus because it perpetuates the numbering of nodes. Nonsense. There are plenty of contexts in which a number makes far

Re: sysctl oids (was: Re: kvm question)

1999-01-25 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sun, 24 Jan 1999 15:55:50 -0800 (PST), Matthew Dillon dil...@apollo.backplane.com said: Strings are a whole lot more portable then integer assignments. Nonsense. Strings are not portable at all -- they only exist in FreeBSD. The reference implementation (4.4BSD) and its other

Re: beginnings of a diskless boot sequence being committed

1999-01-26 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Tue, 26 Jan 1999 07:43:42 +0100 (MET), Luigi Rizzo lu...@labinfo.iet.unipi.it said: the problem is that i don't know how well unionfs works, and i don't have the ability to fix it. Please keep in mind that there are two *different* entiries being discussed here: 1) mount -o union 2)

Re: removing f2c from base distribution

1999-01-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 20:44:33 +0900, Daniel C. Sobral d...@newsguy.com said: A lot of people use a lot of things out of ports. Why should Fortran be different? Because Berkeley Unix has /always/ included a FORTRAN compiler. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O

Argument by Authority

1999-01-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 14:38:23 -0500, Mike O'Dell m...@servo.ccr.org said: i asked Dennis Ritchie his opinion of the right behavior The right behavior of what? -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same woll...@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires

Re: btokup() macro in sys/malloc.h

1999-01-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:00:54 -0800 (PST), Archie Cobbs arc...@whistle.com said: Please do go ahead and update it.. the experts agree! I haven't seen any experts involved in this discussion yet. It's probably after bedtime down there in oz. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We

Naming files in sys/kern

1999-01-27 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Wed, 27 Jan 1999 18:30:15 -0500 (EST), Robert Watson rob...@cyrus.watson.org said: It's not clear to me, when thinking of introducing a new file (say, for auditing support :), what I should name it. Would it be kern_audit.c or sys_audit.c? Depends on what it is auditing. If it only

Re: btokup() macro in sys/malloc.h

1999-01-28 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 19:56:37 +0900, Daniel C. Sobral d...@newsguy.com said: Peter Jeremy wrote: I'll support that. The example given in style(9): a = b-c[0] + ~d == (e || f) || g h ? i : j 1; should rate as an entry in the Obfuscated C competition rather than an example of

Re: Argument by Authority

1999-01-28 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Thu, 28 Jan 1999 05:48:31 +0200 (SAT), Robert Nordier rnord...@nordier.com said: | COMPATIBILITY | The rm utility differs from historical implementations in that | the -f option only masks attempts to remove non-existent | files instead of masking a large variety of errors.

Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd)

1999-01-29 Thread Garrett Wollman
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999 10:49:43 +1030, Greg Lehey g...@lemis.com said: Question: how many people still limit their editor windows to 80 characters? Probably almost anyone who uses the default settings. Many people like to be able to see more than one thing on the desktop at a time. Even with a

<    1   2   3   4   5   >