Sorry for double posting.. this email addresses two separate groups of
people.
Some time ago I wrote the following.
http://p4web.freebsd.org/@md=d&cd=//depot/projects/vimage/&cdf=//depot/projects/vimage/porting_to_vimage.txt&c=s0G@//depot/projects/vimage/porting_to_vimage.txt?ac=64&rev1=18
It
the following change is sitting out at github, to add kqueue support
for more file operations:
https://github.com/dmatveev/libinotify-kqueue/blob/master/patches
does anyone have reasons why we shouldn't import this change.
libinotify is now a port and could use these.
___
On 20/04/2016 2:25 PM, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2016, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2016-04-20 01:12, Daniel Eischen wrote:
For one of our Solaris 11 boxes, which also serves as a VNC
thin client server and NFS server, we have:
[sol11] $ pkg list | wc -l
968
That server includes t
On 20/04/2016 11:41 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 04/19/16 20:15, Warner Losh wrote:
On Apr 19, 2016, at 4:12 PM, Matthew Grooms
wrote:
On 4/19/2016 3:09 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
As far as I know, nobody is taking the source code or the Makefiles
away, so if somebody doesn't like the
On 19/04/2016 5:29 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Guys please stop arguing about the number of packages. The high
granularity is VERY useful!
it's going to make us a laughing stock
"look FreeBSD just split into 1.43 million packages" (effectively the
same number.. it's bigger than 10)
Managi
On 19/04/2016 3:14 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:01:46PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
I understand, that maybe it is too late, but ARE YOU KIDDING?! 755
packages?! WHY?! What are reasons and goals to split base in such
enormo
On 23/02/2016 7:09 AM, Franco Fichtner wrote:
Hi all,
I'm working on FreeBSD-based configuration code dating back more
than 5 years. Although this code uses NETGRAPH compiled into the
kernel, it also makes use of NGM_ETHER_DETACH and a self-rolled
NGM_ETHER_ATTACH to avoid having netgraph-attac
On 22/01/2016 10:31 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
The HPN and None cipher patches have been removed from FreeBSD-CURRENT.
I intend to remove them from FreeBSD-STABLE this weekend.
The HPN patches were of limited usefulness and required a great deal of
effort to maintain in our tree. The None c
On 22/01/2016 2:08 AM, Mathieu Prevot wrote:
2016-01-21 17:38 GMT+01:00 NGie Cooper :
On Jan 21, 2016, at 08:34, Jan Bramkamp wrote:
On 21/01/16 17:19, Mathieu Prevot wrote:
Dear all,
I would like to connect several connected object (with homogeneous or
heterogenous hardare: intel edison,
On 28/12/2015 1:48 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote:
Hello,
I have on a Dell M5500 my poudriere jails for amd64; the host system
is at the moment r276659 (January 2015) and the jails are:
r276659 (January 2015) + ports r392920 (July 2015)
r276659 (January 2015) + ports r403255 (December 2015)
I'm righ
So was there ever a result as to whether HPN still plays a useful role
in the current openSSH?
I haven't seen any note in the openssh docs about adding bigger window
support and that is a definite requirement when you are on the end of
a 500mSec RTT like I am,
but the last time we discussed it,
On 11/12/2015 3:56 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
I think it is fair to
say that most people don't understand how any of this works.
[...]
- No one really was trying to improve it head-on and focused on
FreeBSD's general audience needs.
The maintenance problems come down to expertise. Most develo
On 1/12/2015 3:23 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 09:29:44PM +0100, Aaron Zauner wrote:
Hi,
Please forgive my ignorance but what's the reason FreeBSD ships
OpenSSH patched with HPN by default? Besides my passion for
security, I've been working in the HPC sector for a while and
b
On 11/16/15 7:36 AM, Don Lewis wrote:
On 15 Nov, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-11-15 13:06, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Nov 15, 2015, at 09:51, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On 15.11.2015 20:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 15 November 2015 at 09:10, Dan Partelly wrote:
Meaning, is that simple to push things i
On 11/16/15 1:51 AM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On 15.11.2015 20:37, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 15 November 2015 at 09:10, Dan Partelly wrote:
Meaning, is that simple to push things in head , if somone does the work, even
with with no proper review of the problem at hand , and the proposed solutions ?
On 11/15/15 8:54 PM, Dan Partelly wrote:
Hi all,
I was looking at the new facility of dumping JSON,XML from many utils in base
and after some funny minutes, I couldn't stop ask myself “ Ok, this is funny ,
but why ? “ And I couldn't find a real answer. Ill outline what I think:
1. Undoubtedl
On 11/12/15 5:32 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 11/10/2015 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
I would also like to remove the NONE cipher
patch, which is also available in the port (off by default, just like in
base).
Fun fact, it's been broken in the port for several months with no
complaints.
On 11/12/15 3:28 AM, Brooks Davis wrote:
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 04:40:42PM -0800, Bryan Drewery wrote:
On 11/10/15 1:42 AM, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Some of you may have noticed that OpenSSH in base is lagging far behind
the upstream code.
The main reason for this is the burden of maintain
On 11/11/15 7:56 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Julian Elischer writes:
The inclusion of the HPN patches meant that we could drop a custom
unsupported HPN enabled ssh from our build process. It makes ssh
actually usable.
Define "usable". Does it actually make a measurable diffe
On 11/10/15 7:16 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Bob Bishop writes:
Is removing HPN going to impact the performance of tunnelled X
connexions?
yes if your rtt is greater than about 85 mSec
I don't know he details but I noticed a big difference.
I had thought X wouldn't show much difference but
On 11/10/15 5:42 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Some of you may have noticed that OpenSSH in base is lagging far behind
the upstream code.
The main reason for this is the burden of maintaining the HPN patches.
They are extensive, very intrusive, and touch parts of the OpenSSH code
that change si
Can you put the MK_FOO column at the end so it doesn't push everything
else off the Right hand side of the screen?
On 11/4/15 12:37 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
phk had asked me to run a build options survey again. It took about two weeks
to go through all of them. The results are here:
h
On 11/1/15 2:50 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
I'm at r290228 on amd64. I'm not sure which revision I was on last when it
last worked, but it seems VNET jails aren't working anymore.
I've got a bridge, bridge1, with an IP of 192.168.7.1. The VNET jails set
their default route to 192.168.7.1. The host sim
On 9/15/15 5:31 PM, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
Hi all,
I created a nanoBSD image for my gsoc project (ptnetmap on bhyve).
I would like to boot this image on USB stick or in the hypervisor as a HD.
I have some problem because if I set NANO_DRIVE="da0" (for USB boot)
in the nanoBSD configuration fi
On 8/28/15 9:54 AM, Chris H wrote:
I've been attempting to run jails on an 11-CURRENT
for the purpose of building world/kernel && ports
for all of our 9-STABLE production servers. I'm using
standard/classic jail setup(s) -- not using any
of the "convenience" ports/applications that abstract
the p
I just enjoyed the following video.
http://nextbsd.org/jordan-hubbard-visits-bafug/
The talk itself is fun to listen to (in a nerdy way) but the final 3
minutes are, I think, the most important..
We need to look harder at bringing in features from people's various
science
experiments. On th
On 8/25/15 4:02 PM, Petr Chocholáč wrote:
Hello ,
ignore my previous email, you have answered my questions here.
the firewall set you show is pretty horrible. It really needs a rewrite.
do you want to block the two LANs from each other or block any
machines on the LANs from reaching the fire
On 8/24/15 9:05 PM, Petr Chocholáč wrote:
Hello,
I would like to ask you for advice. I can not connect to
imap.gmail.com on port 993 from my local network. My LAN is behind
freeBSD server with IPFW. Server has two network cards rl0=Internet
and re0=LAN(10.0.0.0/16). Tcpdump on re0 shows three
On 8/22/15 12:23 AM, Ian Lepore wrote:
On Fri, 2015-08-21 at 23:30 +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/21/15 11:25 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Ah, cool. I'll give it a whirl.
I'm a little worried about having all of the other cores spinning in
this case (mostly thermal; the machines get
On 8/21/15 11:25 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Ah, cool. I'll give it a whirl.
I'm a little worried about having all of the other cores spinning in
this case (mostly thermal; the machines get VERY LOUD when the CPUs
are spinning..)
make each spin with the pause instruction.. and for N seconds (N bein
On 8/20/15 6:56 AM, Oliver Pinter wrote:
Hi All!
I got this error, when I try to build recent 11-CURRENT with gcc on amd64 box:
I thought that the switch do only allow clang had already been thrown...
--- delay.o ---
cc -O2 -pipe -fPIC -mno-red-zone
-I/usr/data/source/git/opBSD/opBSD.gi
On 8/17/15 5:46 AM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 10:26:21PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/15/15 1:39 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 14, 2015 10:46:10 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
I would like to implement this call. but would like input as to it's
nature
On 8/15/15 1:39 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, August 14, 2015 10:46:10 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
I would like to implement this call. but would like input as to it's
nature.
The code inside the system would already appear to support handling
three elements, though it needs some scr
On 8/13/15 11:23 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, August 13, 2015 04:13:43 PM Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:00:06PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, July 26, 2015 03:26:22 AM Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi all,
I was botherd to not have the merge(1) utility avai
So, currently the method of setting birthtime on a file is an awkward
combination of tricks.
These break down in a number of situations, but the one I'm
specifically interested in is as follows:
windows robocopy running through samba, onto a ZFS filesystem. (may
happen for UFS2 as well.)
In
On 8/4/15 11:36 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 8/4/15 4:21 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Eric Badger
wrote:
Hi there,
Since r226435, output from kernel printf/log functions is not
appended to the message buffer when in ddb. The commit message
doesn't call
On 8/4/15 4:21 AM, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Aug 3, 2015, at 12:59 PM, Eric Badger wrote:
Hi there,
Since r226435, output from kernel printf/log functions is not appended to the message
buffer when in ddb. The commit message doesn't call this out specifically; instead it
appears to have bee
On 7/27/15 10:32 PM, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27/07/2015 16:25, Glen Barber wrote:
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 04:14:54PM +0200, Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
On 27/07/2015 04:39, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
* Separated email services (and single-point-of-failure cases) from
the machine that h
that an
incompatibility can be committed and not caught.
Please let me know.
well, what are you doing?
Thanks,
Venkat.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Julian Elischer <mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
On 7/22/15 2:56 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
I have this setup wher
On 7/22/15 2:56 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
I have this setup where FreeBSD 9.0 OCE driver is loaded on FreeBSD
9.3. The OCE module loads just fine but when the interface is
brought up, the system crashes. This happens everytime I bring the
interface up.
The backtraces are attached with this ema
elist makes sure that once the symbol is added into the
whitelist, it will never be changed during the major releases of that
kernel.
Thanks,
Venkat.
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 8:29 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-07-17 10:47, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 7/17/15 9:02 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
Hi,
Is
On 7/17/15 11:31 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 11:05:59PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 7/17/15 10:59 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 7/17/15 9:02 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
Hi,
Is there kABI (Kabi-whitelist
On 7/17/15 10:59 PM, Conrad Meyer wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 7/17/15 9:02 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
Hi,
Is there kABI (Kabi-whitelist) equivalent feature in FreeBSD?
well, yes and no.
Julian,
I believe Venkat is asking about a specific Linux package
On 7/17/15 9:02 PM, Venkat Duvvuru wrote:
Hi,
Is there kABI (Kabi-whitelist) equivalent feature in FreeBSD?
well, yes and no.
Firstly, FreeBSD maintains a backwards compatible kABI (with the
exception of programs that hunt around in kernel memory).
We also use symbol versioning on the libc. s
On 7/11/15 8:29 PM, Daniel Peyrolon wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to get FreeBSD-CURRENT up and running with anything different
than console-only on an Asus FM200. I created a wiki page for it: [1].
I've tried GhostBSD on it, and everything pretty much worked, except
suspend/resume, and audio.
On 6/29/15 4:43 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 04:33:31PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi all,
At $JOB we have a few extra syscalls that we have added to our kernel.
After generating the new sysent files in /sys/kern, libc fails to
compile with:
===> lib/libc (
On 6/29/15 4:33 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
Hi all,
At $JOB we have a few extra syscalls that we have added to our kernel.
After generating the new sysent files in /sys/kern, libc fails to
compile with:
===> lib/libc (obj,depend,all,install)
building shared library libc.so.7
[...]
/usr/
Hi all,
At $JOB we have a few extra syscalls that we have added to our kernel.
After generating the new sysent files in /sys/kern, libc fails to
compile with:
===> lib/libc (obj,depend,all,install)
building shared library libc.so.7
[...]
/usr/bin/ld: rlk_check_offline.So: relocation R_X86_64_
Working on -current as of about March 7.
I'm building some software that uses the standard FreeBSD Makefile
includes
but it's failing on its library linking (the linking of a library
which is part of the application)
with the following error
[...]
building shared library libcbc.so.1
FreeBSD
On 6/13/15 10:01 PM, O'Connor, Daniel wrote:
On 13 Jun 2015, at 09:17, Julian Elischer wrote:
could it be that more than one CPUs get the NMI at the same time?
i guess, its possible. is there an easy way to check for that?
hard code checks in the code so that all except the fir
On 6/13/15 2:49 AM, Maksim Yevmenkin wrote:
Andriy,
i have a question about obtaining minidump as result of panic() being
called from nmi handler. basically, i have a way to trigger nmi, and,
i would like to panic() system and obtain a minidump.
i have modified isa_nmi() to appropriately inspe
On 5/6/15 7:33 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
On 5/3/15 10:33 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:17:42PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:04:51PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
if you are interested in readdir(3), seekdir(3) and
On 5/5/15 8:42 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
On 5/3/15 10:33 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:17:42PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov
wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:04:51PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
if you are interested in readdir(3), seekdir(3) and
On 5/5/15 12:04 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 10:52:42PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 5/3/15 10:33 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:17:42PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:04:51PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
if
On 5/3/15 10:33 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:17:42PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:04:51PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
if you are interested in readdir(3), seekdir(3) and telldir(3) then
you should look at
https
On 5/3/15 10:33 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:17:42PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:04:51PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
if you are interested in readdir(3), seekdir(3) and telldir(3) then
you should look at
https
On 5/3/15 10:33 PM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 07:17:42PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:04:51PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
if you are interested in readdir(3), seekdir(3) and telldir(3) then
you should look at
https
On 5/2/15 12:17 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 03:04:51PM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
if you are interested in readdir(3), seekdir(3) and telldir(3) then
you should look at
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2410
this patches around a problem in seekdir() that breaks
if you are interested in readdir(3), seekdir(3) and telldir(3) then
you should look at
https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2410
this patches around a problem in seekdir() that breaks Samba.
Seekdir(3) will not work as expected when files prior to the point of
interest in directory have been deleted
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as advertised..
I have a patch for review at https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2410
which fixes this special case needed for samba, and im
On 4/25/15 5:52 AM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:28:12PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Yes, this isn't at all safe. There's no guarantee whatsoever that
the offset on the directory fd that isn't something returned by
getdirentries has any meaning. In particular, the size of t
On 4/28/15 4:03 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/25/15 4:28 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 02:36:24 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/25/15 1:30 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/24/15 10:59 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: head/lib/libc/gen/telldir.c
On 4/25/15 4:28 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 02:36:24 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/25/15 1:30 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/24/15 10:59 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
Index: head/lib/libc/gen/telldir.c
On 4/25/15 9:39 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:28:12PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Yes, this isn't at all safe. There's no guarantee whatsoever that
the offset on the directory fd that isn't something returned by
getdirentries has any meaning. In part
On 4/25/15 5:52 AM, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 04:28:12PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Yes, this isn't at all safe. There's no guarantee whatsoever that
the offset on the directory fd that isn't something returned by
getdirentries has any meaning. In particular, the size of t
On 4/25/15 4:28 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 02:36:24 AM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/25/15 1:30 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/24/15 10:59 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, April 24, 2015 01:02:39 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 9:54 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On
On 4/25/15 1:30 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/24/15 10:59 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, April 24, 2015 01:02:39 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 9:54 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:02:08 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote
On 4/24/15 10:59 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, April 24, 2015 01:02:39 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 9:54 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:02:08 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen
On 4/24/15 10:43 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, April 24, 2015 06:42:01 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/24/15 6:12 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:02:08 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugg
On 4/24/15 6:48 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Apr 24, 2015, at 3:42, Julian Elischer wrote:
here's an interesting datapoint. If the test program is run on kFreeBSD using
glibc, it runs without flaw.
OS-X (bsd derived libc) HFS+ fails
FreeBSD libc (UFS) fails
FreeBSD libc (ZFS)
On 4/24/15 6:12 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:02:08 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as
advert
On 4/24/15 5:50 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:02:08 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as
advert
On 4/23/15 9:54 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:02:08 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as advertised..
ok so it
On 4/24/15 6:12 AM, Rick Macklem wrote:
John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:02:08 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as
advert
On 4/23/15 9:54 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 05:02:08 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as advertised..
ok so it
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as advertised..
ok so it looks like readdir() (and friends) is totally broken in the face
of deletes unless you read the entire di
On 4/23/15 11:20 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as advertised..
On the intergooglewebs I see multiple previous reports of similar
problems, some going back 30 years, but
we supposedl
I'm debugging a problem being seen with samba 3.6.
basically telldir/seekdir/readdir don't seem to work as advertised..
here's a little test program
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#define CHUNKSIZE 5
#define TOTALFILES 40
s
On 4/2/15 6:28 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
I hope this is not one more of those April fools :-)
yep
--HPS
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"fr
On 3/28/15 5:44 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 01:49:03PM -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
On Mar 27, 2015, at 12:26, Eric van Gyzen wrote:
In a nutshell:
Clang emits SSE instructions on amd64 in the common path of
pthread_mutex_unlock. This reduces performance by a non-trivia
On 3/19/15 3:28 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
On 18 March 2015 at 08:23, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 11:19:21 AM Ryan Stone wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:24 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
I do think the normal zone callbacks passed to uma_zcreate() are too public
to change. Or
On 3/2/15 5:30 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Mar 2, 2015, at 4:22 PM, Andrey Chernov wrote:
On 02.03.2015 22:55, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/2/15 5:27 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 3/2/15 4:14 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/1/15 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy wrote:
Thanks!
That does
On 3/2/15 5:27 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 3/2/15 4:14 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 3/1/15 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package, since processing XML in
base
is a pain
On 3/2/15 5:25 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On 3/2/15 4:25 AM, David Chisnall wrote:
On 2 Mar 2015, at 09:16, Julian Elischer wrote:
if we develop a suitable post processor with pluggable grammars,
we save a lot of work.
given enough examples you could almost have automatically
generated
On 3/1/15 11:10 AM, Allan Jude wrote:
On 2015-03-01 13:49, Harrison Grundy wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package, since processing XML in base
is a pain, and it can't serve up JSON or HTML without additional
u
On 3/1/15 10:49 AM, Harrison Grundy wrote:
Thanks!
That does seem useful, but I'm not sure I see the reasoning behind
putting into base, over a port or package, since processing XML in base
is a pain, and it can't serve up JSON or HTML without additional
utilities anyway.
(If I'm reviving a lon
On 2/27/15 7:32 AM, Benjamin Kaduk wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015, Julian Elischer wrote:
for example it caches information when it shouldn't, even from 'dynamic' file
systems
We had to change the code to disable it as our data is synthetic and might
change between reads.
fst
On 2/25/15 5:34 AM, Eggert, Lars wrote:
Hi,
this came up when trying to port tup (https://github.com/gittup/tup) to FreeBSD.
Even though we are opening the file read-only with cat, FUSE calls truncate()
on it, which modifies its mtime and this screws up tup. See
https://github.com/gittup/tup/
On 2/18/15 3:41 PM, Xin Li wrote:
The _only_ reason that I can think of is that more(1) does not clear
screen for certain terminals (done with 'ti' and 'te' sequences),
while less(1) when running as less does.
The less(1) behavior can be annoying to some people (sometimes even
myself when using
On 1/28/15 1:41 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
If I try the following:
bar: .USE
@echo @ = $(@)
all: bar
@echo here is all
oops
the failing example should be .USEBEFORE.. I pasted the wrong clip.
I always get "bar is up to date"
Does anyone know how this is suppos
If I try the following:
bar: .USE
@echo @ = $(@)
all: bar
@echo here is all
I always get "bar is up to date"
Does anyone know how this is supposed to work?
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
On 1/6/15 10:55 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On 1/3/15 1:43 PM, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 8:15 AM, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
Hi,
in order to do some kernel testing, I would like to run bhyve guests
using (through NFS, probably) the host's file system.
diskless(8) is probably one way t
On 12/3/14, 7:26 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
On 03/12/2014 04:33, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/3/14, 12:24 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/1/14, 11:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:08:35 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
Do we
On 12/3/14, 12:24 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/1/14, 11:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:08:35 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
Do we need to compile all modules with witness definitions when
linking with a kernel
On 12/3/14, 12:24 AM, Warner Losh wrote:
On Dec 1, 2014, at 10:08 PM, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 12/1/14, 11:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:08:35 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
Do we need to compile all modules with witness definitions when
linking with a kernel
On 12/1/14, 11:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Friday, November 28, 2014 11:08:35 PM Julian Elischer wrote:
Do we need to compile all modules with witness definitions when
linking with a kernel compiled with witness?
This was true at one stage but I remember some work was done to make
them
On 11/29/14, 4:59 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
You can easily fire up a mips32 / mips64 emulator build - cross-build
a world+kernel, build an image, then run qemu-devel to boot it.
https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/MipsEmulation
You should be able to get a 32 bit soft-float mips environment inside
th
On 11/28/14, 2:37 AM, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Nov 27, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 04:41:27PM -0800, Davide Italiano wrote:
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 12:37 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 11:00:14 AM Davide Italiano wrote:
One o
Do we need to compile all modules with witness definitions when
linking with a kernel compiled with witness?
This was true at one stage but I remember some work was done to make
them compatible.
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://li
ins_freebsd.o"
WINBIND_NSS="../nsswitch/nss_winbind.$SHLIBEXT"
WINBIND_WINS_NSS="../nsswitch/nss_wins.$SHLIBEXT"
;;
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Julian Elischer <mailto:jul...@freebsd.org>> wrote:
When I try use the libnss_w
101 - 200 of 1656 matches
Mail list logo
