Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-25 Thread Emiel Kollof
Szilveszter Adam heeft op zondag 24 februari 2002 om 19:04 het volgende geschreven: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:22:11AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >> It does work perfectly nice for me too, here. I've been building >> worlds >> without a single problem ever since Feb 7, 2002. Oh, and s

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 1:00 AM -0800 2/24/02, Julian Elischer wrote: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > It is working fairly well for me too, on a dual-pentium machine. >> I can't get vmware2 working, but most of everything else that I >> do is working, and I'm not running into any mysterious crash

Re: snapshots? WAS: Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread murray
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 03:08:27PM +0100, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > Since I changed my employer I made new subscriptions at bsdmall.com but > I couldn't find any snapshot subscription. Daemonnews has never sold snapshots, although that may be something they will do in the future. You can bu

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread Josef Karthauser
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 06:24:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Thumbs up and big cheers to all of you (well, us) guys working on > -CURRENT. It's pretty stable and has been for a while now - and even > on my poor old 350 MHz K6-2, it performs well enough to make a kickass > desktop & deve

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread Brian K. White
- Original Message - From: "Szilveszter Adam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 1:04 PM Subject: Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all > On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:22:11AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > &

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread Szilveszter Adam
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 06:22:11AM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > It does work perfectly nice for me too, here. I've been building worlds > without a single problem ever since Feb 7, 2002. Oh, and since I like > living in the edge, I erased my 4-STABLE installation on Feb 10, and > formatted

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-02-23 18:24, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Thumbs up and big cheers to all of you (well, us) guys working on > -CURRENT. It's pretty stable and has been for a while now - and even > on my poor old 350 MHz K6-2, it performs well enough to make a kickass > desktop & development platform. Le

snapshots? WAS: Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread Harald Schmalzbauer
Am Sa , 2002-02-23 um 18.24 schrieb Dag-Erling Smorgrav: > Thumbs up and big cheers to all of you (well, us) guys working on > -CURRENT. It's pretty stable and has been for a while now - and even > on my poor old 350 MHz K6-2, it performs well enough to make a kickass > desktop & development plat

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread Terry Lambert
SMP? -- Terry Julian Elischer wrote: > > h > > julian@jules:uname -a > FreeBSD jules.elischer.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #3: Thu Feb 21 > 00:32:02 PST 2002 > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NMDM i386 > julian@jules: > > I'm using vmware2 to run turbotax to do my taxe

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-24 Thread Julian Elischer
h julian@jules:uname -a FreeBSD jules.elischer.org 5.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT #3: Thu Feb 21 00:32:02 PST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NMDM i386 julian@jules: I'm using vmware2 to run turbotax to do my taxes and it seems fine On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Garance A Dro

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 6:24 PM +0100 2/23/02, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: >Thumbs up and big cheers to all of you (well, us) guys working on >-CURRENT. It's pretty stable and has been for a while now - and >even on my poor old 350 MHz K6-2, it performs well enough to make >a kickass desktop & development platform. L

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Riccardo Torrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 23-Feb-2002 (21:12:12/GMT) Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > # kldload atspeaker > This doesn't work. I'm missing something obvious? Not that I can see... works for me DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 23-Feb-2002 (21:12:12/GMT) Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Riccardo Torrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Anyway, any plan to fix build breakage? > Sure: [...] This works. Thanks. >> I really need build to (try to?) locate missing /dev/speaker :( ># kldload atspeaker This doesn't work.

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Riccardo Torrini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Anyway, any plan to fix build breakage? Sure: Index: file.h === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/sys/file.h,v retrieving revision 1.40 diff -u -r1.40 file.h --- file.h 23 Feb 2002 11:1

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 23-Feb-2002 (19:23:17/GMT) Julian Elischer wrote: > I forgot the :-) [...] >> On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:35:44AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: >> > that could change real soon! >> >> I certainly *hope* not. If you plan to break it, you plan to break it, >> but I hope you don't plan to ren

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Julian Elischer
I forgot the :-) On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:35:44AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > that could change real soon! > > I certainly *hope* not. If you plan to break it, you plan to break it, > but I hope you don't plan to render it unstable. There

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 10:35:44AM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > that could change real soon! I certainly *hope* not. If you plan to break it, you plan to break it, but I hope you don't plan to render it unstable. There is a difference between breaking the build, breaking -CURRENT because of

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Julian Elischer
that could change real soon! On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 06:24:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Thumbs up and big cheers to all of you (well, us) guys working on > > -CURRENT. It's pretty stable and has been for a while now - and even > > on

Re: -CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Bosko Milekic
On Sat, Feb 23, 2002 at 06:24:39PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Thumbs up and big cheers to all of you (well, us) guys working on > -CURRENT. It's pretty stable and has been for a while now - and even > on my poor old 350 MHz K6-2, it performs well enough to make a kickass > desktop & dev

-CURRENT in pretty good shape, after all

2002-02-23 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Thumbs up and big cheers to all of you (well, us) guys working on -CURRENT. It's pretty stable and has been for a while now - and even on my poor old 350 MHz K6-2, it performs well enough to make a kickass desktop & development platform. Let's hope it'll only get better from here on out :) DES