On 11/20/2015 11:28 AM, Dan Partelly wrote:
A template for blackmailing is usually in the form:
"I will do this (usually involving saving the world and/or your
evidently miserable life) but first you will have to do this
(unrelated) thing to see that you are worthy.”
It is interesting how mu
> A template for blackmailing is usually in the form:
>
> "I will do this (usually involving saving the world and/or your
> evidently miserable life) but first you will have to do this
> (unrelated) thing to see that you are worthy.”
It is interesting how much you dwell on this. I just told you
On 11/20/15 08:54, Dan Partelly wrote:
Hi Pedro,
I think you confuse blackmailing with something much simpler and pragmatic.
One needs to asses how things work in your project for real before investing
too much time.
A template for blackmailing is usually in the form:
"I will do this (usua
Nov 2015, at 11:17, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello;
>>>
>>>> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly
>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>> Hey Pedro,
>>>>
>>>> some times ago yo
[snip snip snippety snip]
Hi Dan!
Yeah, turns out trying to get a bunch of burnt out, time-poor
developers with commit bits to commit stuff will typically end up with
(a) things getting neglected, or (b) getting you a commit bit. :)
Please grab the patch from pedro (which I reviewed, and it look
ary code reuse.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> [qute from libxo thread ]
>>>>>>> It's all fine and good making technical decisions based on
>>>>>>> drawings and handwaving and philosophizing, but at some point
>>>>>
which doesn’t necessarily mean it will stay.
> - You are expected to maintain it.
>
> Libxo already went through this process.
>
> We are particularly NOT interested in code where the original
contributor
> will walk
> away as soon as he/she receives criticism or has plans
where the original contributor will
walk
away as soon as he/she receives criticism or has plans that do not match ours.
If this is not your ideal workflow … fork your own BSD, a lot of intelligent
people do just that.
Pedro.
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>> On 19 Nov 2015, at 11:17, P
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Dan Partelly wrote:
>> Unlike what you suggest here, I see lots of issues in Bugzilla which
>> exactly what you describe: enhancements on already available tools.
>> I've even submitted a few myself.
>
> Thats great Willem.
>
> But no matter what you find odd or no
waving and philosophizing, but at some point
>>>>>> someone has to do the code. The reason is simple - someone
>>>>>> offered to do the work and push it through. This isn't a
>>>>>> commercial thing where we get to make project >>decis
ion
>>>>> that
>>>
>>> Once I see how things work around here once someone wrote the code,
>>> and get this done one way or another , we could proceed to the
>>> libification of ifconfig, should you so desire, and you believe we
>>> can a
olk came up with a solution
>>>> that
>>
>> Once I see how things work around here once someone wrote the code,
>> and get this done one way or another , we could proceed to the
>> libification of ifconfig, should you so desire, and you believe we
>> can all benefit from
gs work around here once someone wrote the code,
> and get this done one way or another , we could proceed to the
> libification of ifconfig, should you so desire, and you believe we
> can all benefit from it.
>
>
> Dan
>
>
>
>> On 19 Nov 2015, at 11:17, Pedro
this done one way or another , we could proceed to the libification of
ifconfig, should you so desire, and you believe we can all benefit from it.
Dan
> On 19 Nov 2015, at 11:17, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
> Hello;
>
>> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly
Hello;
> Il giorno 19/nov/2015, alle ore 02:34, Dan Partelly
> ha scritto:
>
> Hey Pedro,
>
> some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in which I added relational
> ops support from it. The patch was a bit clobbered,
> but last I know you cleaned it up
Hey Pedro,
some times ago you got some DDB patches from me in which I added relational ops
support from it. The patch was a bit clobbered,
but last I know you cleaned it up and put it somewhere on freebsd.org (prolly
your page) up for review.
Could you or Adrian review the patch set , and
16 matches
Mail list logo
