> ] WWW: http://www.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/
So, just to clarify for the sake of the archives, the two NSS have not a
lot in common. The NSS thing allegedly needed for Samba is only in
-CURRENT AFAIK and has no ports. Some people already said earlier that
FreeBSD's NSS implementatio
Max Khon wrote:
> > > According to the pam_smb webpage, it states that it works cleanly
> > > with FreeBSD 3.x onwards, so I will have to try it out anyway. BTW,
> > > what is NSS?
> >
> > Network Security Services; supposedly it's required, according
>
> Name Service Switch
Uh... This is not wh
hi, there!
On Sat, Feb 16, 2002 at 01:14:11AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > According to the pam_smb webpage, it states that it works cleanly
> > with FreeBSD 3.x onwards, so I will have to try it out anyway. BTW,
> > what is NSS?
>
> Network Security Services; supposedly it's required, accor
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> According to the pam_smb webpage, it states that it works cleanly
> with FreeBSD 3.x onwards, so I will have to try it out anyway. BTW,
> what is NSS?
Network Security Services; supposedly it's required, according
to the web page where you grab pam_smb from, but that
could j
--- Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Works fine in FreeBSD, but to have a FreeBSD with the NSS,
> which is required for pam_smb, you have to run -current,
> since NSS is not supported in -stable or -release.
Hi Terry,
According to the pam_smb webpage, it states that it works cleanly
wi
Hiten Pandya wrote:
> I was wondering, after seeing that Linux has pam_smb, why can't
> FreeBSD have it too. I can get the pam_smb compiling under FreeBSD,
> from http://www.samba.org, so I was wondering why it isn't in our
> CVS tree.
Works fine in FreeBSD, but to have a FreeBSD with the NSS,
w
--- Chris Faulhaber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See ports/security/pam_smb
--- Joseph Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This probably belongs to -questions more than -current. At any
> rate, we do have one in the ports collection: security/pam_smb
Hi,
Thanks for that. :)
Regards,
-- Hiten
On Fri, Feb 15, 2002 at 04:26:20PM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> hi all,
>
> I was wondering, after seeing that Linux has pam_smb, why can't
> FreeBSD have it too. I can get the pam_smb compiling under FreeBSD,
> from http://www.samba.org, so I was wondering why it isn't in our
> CVS tree.
>
Se
On Fri, 15 Feb 2002, Hiten Pandya wrote:
# hi all,
#
# I was wondering, after seeing that Linux has pam_smb, why can't
# FreeBSD have it too. I can get the pam_smb compiling under FreeBSD,
# from http://www.samba.org, so I was wondering why it isn't in our
# CVS tree.
This probably be
hi all,
I was wondering, after seeing that Linux has pam_smb, why can't
FreeBSD have it too. I can get the pam_smb compiling under FreeBSD,
from http://www.samba.org, so I was wondering why it isn't in our
CVS tree.
Thanks,
Regards,
-- Hiten Pandya
-- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_
10 matches
Mail list logo