On Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 08:21:14PM +0200, Jens Schweikhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 03:13:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> # On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> # > what was going on, and given that scp doesn't support -1, was a bit of a
> # > pain.
> #
> #
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 03:13:58PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
# On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
# > what was going on, and given that scp doesn't support -1, was a bit of a
# > pain.
#
# Brian, what about adding "-1" to SCP?
I'm late in this thread, so I don't kno
At 12:40 PM -0500 7/31/01, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010731 12:39] wrote:
> > My only real observation is that with Protocol using (2) by default,
> > my logins to RELENG_4 boxes using RSA key authentication are broken.
>
>The protocol 2,1 thing should not be
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 01:39:14PM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
> what was going on, and given that scp doesn't support -1, was a bit of a
> pain.
Brian, what about adding "-1" to SCP?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010731 12:39] wrote:
> My only real observation is that with Protocol using (2) by default, my
> logins to RELENG_4 boxes using RSA key authentication are broken. If I
> stick a Protocol 1 in, it works fine, but it took me a bit to figure out
> what was going
My only real observation is that with Protocol using (2) by default, my
logins to RELENG_4 boxes using RSA key authentication are broken. If I
stick a Protocol 1 in, it works fine, but it took me a bit to figure out
what was going on, and given that scp doesn't support -1, was a bit of a
pain. I
At 2:02 AM -0400 7/30/01, Garance A Drosihn wrote:
>I will do some tests at home tomorrow morning, and
>let you know how it works out.
In the following:
"gilead" refers to a MacOS 10 machine in my office at work which
is running MacOS 10.0.4 plus an update to OpenSSH that
On Mon, 30 Jul 2001, Brian F. Feldman wrote:
>For what it's worth, I tend to simply set "Protocol 1,2" in my .ssh/config
>and for the default case, it works fine (just like it used to). I don't
>want to make that policy decision, though, because we will be better off
>when everyone moves to the
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 09:53:09PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> > I need to know, if OpenSSH is ever going to get MFC'ed, are there any people
> > currently running OpenSSH 2.9 from -CURRENT's base and getting major
> > problems with it?
On Sun, Jul 29, 2001 at 09:53:09PM -0400, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
> I need to know, if OpenSSH is ever going to get MFC'ed, are there any people
> currently running OpenSSH 2.9 from -CURRENT's base and getting major
> problems with it? Or even minor ones that actually make things more
At 9:53 PM -0400 7/29/01, Brian Fundakowski Feldman wrote:
>I need to know, if OpenSSH is ever going to get MFC'ed, are there any
>people currently running OpenSSH 2.9 from -CURRENT's base and getting
>major problems with it? Or even minor ones that actually make things
>more difficult? [...]
I need to know, if OpenSSH is ever going to get MFC'ed, are there any people
currently running OpenSSH 2.9 from -CURRENT's base and getting major
problems with it? Or even minor ones that actually make things more
difficult? I want to have no real outstanding issues, except simple ones
like
12 matches
Mail list logo
