Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

kris> We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this -- kris> expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp kris> is lame. Here is just an example script (CAUTION: not well-tested) to create a filesystem/swap with mdconfig(8). This script support not only '/tmp

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > As long as someone that is familiar with all the "cool" and more esoteric > uses of `md' was consulted to ensure the framework is sufficiently > capable. If everyone (well, I guess mostly everyone) can agree on a suitable format for this md.conf, I'll

Re: Latest with 'swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one'

> That looks like regular softupdates behaviour to me ? Huh. I didn't know that there was this big of a delay. At any rate, thanks! I'll do some more testing and see if I can break it but I sure am happier to have something back! To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscrib

Re: Latest with 'swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one '

That looks like regular softupdates behaviour to me ? In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: > >It doesn't panic, yet. Good! Much improved! > >All is good, ahem, except that when I ran this tmp filesystem out of space, it >takes a while before the space comes back if you remove f

Latest with 'swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one '

It doesn't panic, yet. Good! Much improved! All is good, ahem, except that when I ran this tmp filesystem out of space, it takes a while before the space comes back if you remove files :-) farrago.feral.com > lmdd of=/tmp/file /tmp: write failed, file system is full 117.19 MB in 9.07 secon

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

> > The last month has been pretty rough on me, so bear with me, please. Okay. That's a very reasonable response. > Can you resend the email please ? I'll just retry it now. Thank you for the above- I totally understand. My previous mail was just a "check-in" on it- not a demand. -matt

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: > > >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew >> Jacob writes: >> > >> >Speaking of md, and such, since MFS got nuked, and I died horribly every time >> >I tried to use md as a tmpfs, have the panics been fixed so I can use it now >> >as a r

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew > Jacob writes: > > > >Speaking of md, and such, since MFS got nuked, and I died horribly every time > >I tried to use md as a tmpfs, have the panics been fixed so I can use it now > >as a replacement for MFS? > > Uhm, I'm drawing a blank here. When d

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes: >On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 08:27:54PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck, >> >> Sorry David, but it there is nothing duck-like about at all... > >>From a user's stand point,

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

>Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:29:50 -0800 (PST) >From: Matthew Jacob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Speaking of md, and such, since MFS got nuked, and I died horribly every time >I tried to use md as a tmpfs, have the panics been fixed so I can use it now >as a replacement for MFS? Well, it appears to work O

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 08:27:54PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, quacks like a duck, > > Sorry David, but it there is nothing duck-like about at all... >From a user's stand point, it acts just like the old MFS when used to create a swap backe

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Matthew Jacob writes: > >Speaking of md, and such, since MFS got nuked, and I died horribly every time >I tried to use md as a tmpfs, have the panics been fixed so I can use it now >as a replacement for MFS? Uhm, I'm drawing a blank here. When did you have panics

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

Speaking of md, and such, since MFS got nuked, and I died horribly every time I tried to use md as a tmpfs, have the panics been fixed so I can use it now as a replacement for MFS? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "David O'Brien" writes: >On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:12:35AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: >> A while ago someone suggested a /etc/md.conf and an mdon(1) similar to >> swapon(1). > >Putting it in terms of this analogy make this approach sound quite >reasonable. I c

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

On Tue, Mar 13, 2001 at 12:12:35AM +0900, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: > A while ago someone suggested a /etc/md.conf and an mdon(1) similar to > swapon(1). Putting it in terms of this analogy make this approach sound quite reasonable. > This solution is much more flexible than simple /tmp fs on md d

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

David Wolfskill wrote: > > >Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:11:09 -0800 > >From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this -- > >expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp is > >

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:11:09 PST, Kris Kennaway wrote: > We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this -- > expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp is > lame. Hello? Anybody there? Am I alone in this universe? Throw the goddamned ball! [Apo

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:15:27PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > > It should be a wrapper called mount_mdfs or mount_mfs so people upgrading > > can keep their /etc/fstab [mostly] the same. > > The latter would be best, IMO. I wrote a program to do thi

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

>Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 15:11:09 -0800 >From: Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: Hajimu UMEMOTO <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this -- >expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp is >lame. I appreciate the validation that

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:15:27PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:11:09PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this -- > > expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp is > > lame. > > It should be

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

On Sun, Mar 11, 2001 at 03:11:09PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this -- > expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp is > lame. It should be a wrapper called mount_mdfs or mount_mfs so people upgrading can keep their

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

We really need to provide a better rc.conf hook for doing this -- expecting people to write their own script just to create a /tmp is lame. Kris PGP signature

Re: swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

> On Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:17:58 -0800 (PST) > David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: david> Accordingly, I created the following shell script to accomplish a david> similar objective, based upon the above-mentioned example in the david> mdconfig man page. At present, I have it sitting

swap-backed md-based /tmp to replace mfs-based one

During the past week, I've been tracking -STABLE (daily) & -CURRENT (about 2 days out of 3) on a new laptop. (More stuff about that in the recent -mobile archives, for folks who might have an interest.) Although I realize that there are significant differences between the FreeBSD mfs vs. the Sun