On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 02:41:59AM -0400, Thimble Smith wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:52:32PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
Anyone like the idea of adding wide char support to our libc? Maybe
we could port it over from {Net,Open}BSD or BSDi. This would add the
header file wctype.h, etc.
But I'm suddenly confused what you're actually talking about
here: OpenSSH, OpenSSL, or RSAREF.
OpenSSH has never included crypto code, but it's useless without OpenSSL
which quite certainly does. OpenSSH no longer requires RSAREF to operate
(if you've got clients/servers willing to do DSA
speaking of which, I presume that OpenSSH 2.1 is being
merged into Internat by kindly overworked developer types
at the moment?
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:06:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Even so, moving SSH into the bindist would be one less thing that has to
be merged into Internat all
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
OK, if OpenSSL still contains crypto then "never mind"; I thought
OpenSSL used *only* RSA and it used it through the RSAstubs code,
making it "OK."
OpenSSL is a general-purpose cryptography toolkit which includes such
goodies as Blowfish, CAST,
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Mark Blackman wrote:
speaking of which, I presume that OpenSSH 2.1 is being
merged into Internat by kindly overworked developer types
at the moment?
I think Peter Wemm has already finished.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
At 2:41 AM -0400 5/17/00, Thimble Smith wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:52:32PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote:
Anyone like the idea of adding wide char support to our libc? Maybe
we could port it over from {Net,Open}BSD or BSDi. This would add the
header file wctype.h, etc.
There's a
It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS
requires multiple packages to work.
People shouldn't have to compile Motif up just to get a non-source
version of the JDK to work. Versioning problems that can be caused by
folks using different include files and/or
My system is 4.0-CURRENT at Jan 31.
I try to upgrade it to -current (5-current),
but I get the following breakage.
Is my system environment broken?
Thanks!
--
stage 2: build tools
Hi,
Sorry to whinge, but wWhat's the state of play with modules at the
moment ?
1. To update things, I was under the impression that ``make buildworld
buildkernel'' then ``make installworld installkernel'' was the idea.
This doesn't build modules, but building from
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 12:51:42AM +0900, Shigeyuki Fukushima wrote:
My system is 4.0-CURRENT at Jan 31.
I try to upgrade it to -current (5-current),
but I get the following breakage.
Is my system environment broken?
I think so.
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Disclaimer: Not
On Wed, 17 May 2000 18:41:29 +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
1. To update things, I was under the impression that ``make buildworld
buildkernel'' then ``make installworld installkernel'' was the idea.
This doesn't build modules, but building from sys/compile/whatever
builds another
11 matches
Mail list logo