Re: Wide-char support and libc

2000-05-17 Thread Chris Piazza
On Wed, May 17, 2000 at 02:41:59AM -0400, Thimble Smith wrote: On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:52:32PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote: Anyone like the idea of adding wide char support to our libc? Maybe we could port it over from {Net,Open}BSD or BSDi. This would add the header file wctype.h, etc.

Re: OpenSSH 2.1

2000-05-17 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
But I'm suddenly confused what you're actually talking about here: OpenSSH, OpenSSL, or RSAREF. OpenSSH has never included crypto code, but it's useless without OpenSSL which quite certainly does. OpenSSH no longer requires RSAREF to operate (if you've got clients/servers willing to do DSA

Re: OpenSSH 2.1

2000-05-17 Thread Mark Blackman
speaking of which, I presume that OpenSSH 2.1 is being merged into Internat by kindly overworked developer types at the moment? On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:06:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: Even so, moving SSH into the bindist would be one less thing that has to be merged into Internat all

Re: OpenSSH 2.1

2000-05-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: OK, if OpenSSL still contains crypto then "never mind"; I thought OpenSSL used *only* RSA and it used it through the RSAstubs code, making it "OK." OpenSSL is a general-purpose cryptography toolkit which includes such goodies as Blowfish, CAST,

Re: OpenSSH 2.1

2000-05-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Mark Blackman wrote: speaking of which, I presume that OpenSSH 2.1 is being merged into Internat by kindly overworked developer types at the moment? I think Peter Wemm has already finished. Kris In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.

Re: Wide-char support and libc

2000-05-17 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 2:41 AM -0400 5/17/00, Thimble Smith wrote: On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 11:52:32PM -0400, Donn Miller wrote: Anyone like the idea of adding wide char support to our libc? Maybe we could port it over from {Net,Open}BSD or BSDi. This would add the header file wctype.h, etc. There's a

Re: Motif is now Open Source 8)

2000-05-17 Thread Nate Williams
It requires two downloads to get a working JDK system. No other OS requires multiple packages to work. People shouldn't have to compile Motif up just to get a non-source version of the JDK to work. Versioning problems that can be caused by folks using different include files and/or

-current buildworld breakage

2000-05-17 Thread Shigeyuki Fukushima
My system is 4.0-CURRENT at Jan 31. I try to upgrade it to -current (5-current), but I get the following breakage. Is my system environment broken? Thanks! -- stage 2: build tools

modules

2000-05-17 Thread Brian Somers
Hi, Sorry to whinge, but wWhat's the state of play with modules at the moment ? 1. To update things, I was under the impression that ``make buildworld buildkernel'' then ``make installworld installkernel'' was the idea. This doesn't build modules, but building from

Re: -current buildworld breakage

2000-05-17 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, May 18, 2000 at 12:51:42AM +0900, Shigeyuki Fukushima wrote: My system is 4.0-CURRENT at Jan 31. I try to upgrade it to -current (5-current), but I get the following breakage. Is my system environment broken? I think so. -- -- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Disclaimer: Not

Re: modules

2000-05-17 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 17 May 2000 18:41:29 +0100, Brian Somers wrote: 1. To update things, I was under the impression that ``make buildworld buildkernel'' then ``make installworld installkernel'' was the idea. This doesn't build modules, but building from sys/compile/whatever builds another