if_ef module broken in -current

===> if_ef @ -> /usr/src/sys machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include echo "#define IPX 1" > opt_ipx.h echo "#define INET 1" > opt_inet.h echo " echo " echo " echo " rm -f .depend mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/dev -I@/../include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr

Re: if_ef module broken in -current

> ===> if_ef > @ -> /usr/src/sys > machine -> /usr/src/sys/i386/include > echo "#define IPX 1" > opt_ipx.h > echo "#define INET 1" > opt_inet.h > echo " > > echo " > > echo " > > echo " > > rm -f .depend > mkdep -f .depend -a -nostdinc -D_KERNEL -DKLD_MODULE -I- -I. -I@ -I@/dev >-I@/../incl

Re: if_ef module broken in -current

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 12:15:24PM +0200, John Hay wrote: > Maybe somebody broke make? The if_ef Makefile is .for and .if statements. You're right. I've backed this out until I can figure out how to properly fix the bug "fixed" in rev 1.27 of parse.c. Thanks. -- wca PGP signature

Re: random reboots...

On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 03:48:03PM +0600, Boris Popov wrote: > You need options LIBMCHAIN as well. We don't have mechanism for > specifying dependancies between options as of yet. (sorry, should put a > note in the NOTES). OOps, okay. Thanks :) OTOH, it seems that suspending a program (hi

panic trying to mount_msdos

The kernel and modules compiled with INVARIANTS, INVARIANTS_SUPPORT, and WITNESS. I tried to mount this silly floppy and boom... The details are at http://aldan.algebra.com:8015/~mi/mount_msdos-crash/ :-( -mi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe fre

HEADS UP!! changes to the ATA system..

Well, finally atacontrol is born (yes it is still infantile). That means some things has changed, to name a few: 1. The sysctl hw.atamodes does no longer exist. 2. The options ATA_ENABLE_ATAPI_DMA, ATA_ENABLE_WC, ATA_ENABLE_TAGS no longer exists. 3. There are new tunables to set the boot b

Latest version of mega header file POSIX update

I have finally produced another version of the big header file patch for people to look at. I'm still running an older (January) kernel and world based on these changes. I have verified that these still build on i386-architecture systems. I'm looking for some people to do the following: 1) Loo

Re: status of KSE?

In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application >server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread >because pthread does not work with kqueue at present. That's news to me. kqueue + libc_r should work fine in -stable, AF

Re: ** HEADS UP **

On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > I committed a miibus'ified fxp driver to the tree today, and made > it the default. If you compile fxp into your kernel statically, > you will also need "device miibus" as well, if it isn't there already. > > If you notice any pro

Re: ** HEADS UP **

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 11:13:09AM -0600, Peter Schultz wrote: > On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 05:52:00PM -0600, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > I committed a miibus'ified fxp driver to the tree today, and made > > it the default. If you compile fxp into your kernel statically, > > you will also need "device

No Subject

Title: subscribe freebsd-stable

Re: Panic and filesystem corruption

Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How old a kernel are you running? Maybe five days old. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: FWD: tcsh 6.10.00 echo;echo;echo; bug with fix

All implementations of csh and tcsh do this. I've tested this on Solaris csh, Tru64-UNIX csh, and DG/UX csh. Their implementations of csh behave the same as tcsh does, so does 44bsd-csh in the FreeBSD ports collection. This is not a bug, or if it is a bug it's been there since the beginning

-current broken, or am I?

Is it just me? ... ===> usr.bin/join cc -O -pipe-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/usr.bin/join/join .c cc -O -pipe-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -o join join.o gzip -cn /usr/src/usr.bin/join/join.1 > join.1.gz ===> usr.bin/jot cc -O -pipe -Wall -W -I/usr/obj/usr

Re: -current broken, or am I?

>Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:52:45 -0500 >From: Michael Lucas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Is it just me? >[breakage elided -- dhw] >Stop in /usr/src/usr.bin/kdump. >*** Error code 1 > Didn't happen for me; CVSup started at 23:47 yesterday, completed at Thu Mar 15 01:09:38 PST 2001. Built just fi

RE: Latest version of mega header file POSIX update

On 15-Mar-01 Garrett Wollman wrote: > The patch has now gotten too large for some e-mail systems, so I'm > making it available via the Web at > . I don't think the sys/conf/Makefile.i386 change is needed. :) Nothing else jumped out at me while I glan

Re: -current broken, or am I?

On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 03:52:45PM -0500, Michael Lucas wrote: > Is it just me? NO. Exactly the same problem here. -a To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

aic(4) driver patch

Attached is a patch for the aic(4) driver to do the following: - enable 10MHz (fast SCSI) operation on boards that support it. (only aic6360 boards with fast SCSI enabled can do it) - bounds check sync periods and offsets passed in from the transport layer - tell the user which resource a

Re: Panic and filesystem corruption

:Matt Dillon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: :> How old a kernel are you running? : :Maybe five days old. : :DES :-- :Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] That has all of our fixes to date. It fits the M.O. of the problem I've been trying to track down, but I have yet to be able to

Re: -current broken, or am I?

On Thu, 15 Mar 2001 23:53:29 +0100, Andrzej Toboła <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > NO. Exactly the same problem here. Make that me too ... -- Michael D. Harnois, Redeemer Lutheran Church, Washburn, IA [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] I do not feel obliged to believe

Re: -current broken, or am I?

> Make that me too ... I diagnosed problem - sys/sys/ata.h commited by sos is probably the culprit: % make world ... ===> usr.bin/kdump cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../ktrace -I/usr/src/usr.bin/kdump/../.. +-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c ioctl.c In file included from i

Re: status of KSE?

David Xu wrote: > >I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application > server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread > because pthread does not work with kqueue at present. > > -- > Best regards, > David Xu KSE is not into coding yet. we have a basic design an

Re: cp MAKEDEV /dev - on a system with devfs

Garrett Wollman wrote: > > < said: > > > There's one real oddity in FreeBSD: > > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 13 Jan 28 13:42 rmt -> /usr/sbin/rmt* > > The pathname of the `rmt' program is a fundamental part of the `rmt' > ``protocol'' such as it is. We've been over this one many

Re: cp MAKEDEV /dev - on a system with devfs

On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 04:25:16AM +, Paul Richards wrote: > Garrett Wollman wrote: >> >> < said: >> >>> There's one real oddity in FreeBSD: >> >>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root wheel 13 Jan 28 13:42 rmt -> /usr/sbin/rmt* >> >> The pathname of the `rmt' program is a fundamental part of the `rm

Re[2]: status of KSE?

Hello Julian, Friday, March 16, 2001, 12:18:15 PM, you wrote: JE> David Xu wrote: >> >>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application >> server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread >> because pthread does not work with kqueue at present. >> >> -- >> Best

Re: -current broken, or am I?

It seems Andrzej Tobola wrote: > > > Make that me too ... > > I diagnosed problem - sys/sys/ata.h commited by sos is probably the culprit: Its fixed, sorry, too many source trees here... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of th