Seen this lock order reversal?

2001-09-18 Thread Garrett Wollman
lock order reversal 1st 0xd3a5c11c process lock @ ../../../vm/vm_glue.c:469 2nd 0xc0e3fe30 lockmgr interlock @ ../../../kern/kern_lock.c:239 This is on relatively old (~ three months) sources. The first lock is from swapout_procs(); I assume the second lock actually refers to the call to lockm

Re: GENERIC broken on alpha?

2001-09-18 Thread Wilko Bulte
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 04:21:28PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 17-Sep-01 Wilko Bulte wrote: > > Is it me or.. ? ... > > ../../../kern/imgact_elf.c:945: warning: passing arg 1 of `fill_fpregs' from > > incompatible pointer type > > ../../../kern/imgact_elf.c:963: warning: passing arg 10 of

3Com HomeConnect ADSL Modem Dual Link

2001-09-18 Thread John Indra
Hi... One simple question. Can -CURRENT work with 3Com HomeConnect ADSL Modem Dual Link? tq /john Live Free OR Die To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: 3Com HomeConnect ADSL Modem Dual Link

2001-09-18 Thread Julian Elischer
John Indra wrote: > > Hi... > > One simple question. > Can -CURRENT work with 3Com HomeConnect ADSL Modem Dual Link? depends how it connects to the system. > > tq > > /john > Live Free OR Die > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body

Re: 3Com HomeConnect ADSL Modem Dual Link

2001-09-18 Thread Nelson Murilo
John Indra wrote: > > Hi... > > One simple question. > Can -CURRENT work with 3Com HomeConnect ADSL Modem Dual Link? If you configure you 3Com HomeConnect as router, you can run any system. > /john > Live Free OR Die > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freeb

Re: 3Com HomeConnect ADSL Modem Dual Link

2001-09-18 Thread John Indra
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 09:50:19PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >> Can -CURRENT work with 3Com HomeConnect ADSL Modem Dual Link? >depends how it connects to the system. I wanna connect it to an NIC, then use it as a media to connect to the Internet. I see in the handbook that there is a sysctl

Re: [PORT] mozilla-0.9.3.1 compile error in xpidl.c

2001-09-18 Thread David W. Chapman Jr.
You should contact the maintainer, not me, [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "attila!" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "David W.Chapman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 18, 2001 8:46 AM Subject: [PORT] mozilla-0.9.3.1 compile error in xpidl.c

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker task: improve vnode->v_tag

2001-09-18 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Chris Costello wrote: > On Saturday, September 08, 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > I don't like idea to hardcode the same string ("procfs"), with the > > same meaning in several places across kernel. As for your proposition > > to use f_fstypename to set v_tag, it is even more bogus because > > va

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker task: improve vnode->v_tag

2001-09-18 Thread Chris Costello
On Tuesday, September 18, 2001, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Oh, yes, you are correct obviously (don't know what I was thinking about). In this > case, it looks like v_tag is redundant, because f_fstypename could be used instead > in a few places where v_tag is abused (the same applies to the statfs.f_t

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker task: improve vnode->v_tag

2001-09-18 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Maxim Sobolev writes: >>How do you figure? The contents if `f_fstypename' must match >> a configured file system exactly, so it could _not_ be anything. >> To quote sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c:mount(): > >Oh, yes, you are correct obviously (don't know what I was t

Firewire driver is updated

2001-09-18 Thread Vladimir B. Grebenschikov
tp://ftp.uec.ac.jp/pub/firewire/beta/firewire-freebsd-5.0-20010918 Can't build fresh -CURRENT kernel with this patch: vbook#/usr/src.local/sys/i386/compile/VBOOK 168_> make kernel cc -c -O -pipe -Wall -Wredundant-decls -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-

[PORT] mozilla-0.9.3.1 compile error in xpidl.c

2001-09-18 Thread attila!
port: Mozilla operating system built from 5.0 CURRENT cvsup: 28 Aug 01 1600 GMT ===> Extracting for mozilla-0.9.3,1 >> Checksum OK for mozilla-source-0.9.3.tar.bz2. ... gmake[3]: Entering directory \ `/us0r/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/xpcom/typelib/xpidl'

[PORT] mozilla-0.9.3.1 compile error in xpidl.c

2001-09-18 Thread attila!
port: Mozilla operating system built from 5.0 CURRENT cvsup: 28 Aug 01 1600 GMT ===> Extracting for mozilla-0.9.3,1 >> Checksum OK for mozilla-source-0.9.3.tar.bz2. ... gmake[3]: Entering directory \ `/us0r/ports/www/mozilla/work/mozilla/xpcom/typelib/xpidl'

Forth and bzip2 support in loader(8) [was: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/loader Makefile conf.c]

2001-09-18 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: > sobomax 2001/09/18 07:52:36 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/boot/i386/loader Makefile conf.c > Log: > Add support for loading bzip2-compressed kernels and modules. This support > is turned off by default and could be enabled by defining LOADER_BZIP2_SUPPORT >

Re: gdb(1) broken?

2001-09-18 Thread Mark Peek
At 9:22 AM +0200 9/18/01, Mark Santcroos wrote: >Hi Peter, > >What is the state of this (for i386)? > >Mark > >On Sun, Sep 16, 2001 at 11:24:54AM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: >> Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> > >> > Gang, >> > >> > I don't know exactly what the gdb(1) problems on Alpha are, but

RE: latest -current breaks kernel compiling

2001-09-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Sep-01 Vincent Poy wrote: > With the latest -current sources today, the kernel fails to build > after a buildworld. Doh. Something is including sys/mutex.h or sys/sx.h w/o including sys/lock.h. I'll fix in a bit. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb

Re: testig request for your code..

2001-09-18 Thread David Taylor
On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > If you find a module that worked in a kernel from before September 11 > but does not work on -current, please let [EMAIL PROTECTED] know. > NTFS was working correctly in a kernel from sometime in August, it now fails with an easily reproducable p

Firewire driver is updated

2001-09-18 Thread Katsushi Kobayashi
effort to A/V functions of the firewire. So,I release the SBP-2 code for the start point of somebody who would loves storage on the firewire. The URL of the latest code is: ftp://ftp.uec.ac.jp/pub/firewire/beta/firewire-freebsd-5.0-20010918 To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with

Re: testig request for your code..

2001-09-18 Thread Julian Elischer
If you can try a kernel from JUST before the KSE integration.. that migh talso be a good test.. On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, David Taylor wrote: > On Mon, 17 Sep 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > If you find a module that worked in a kernel from before September 11 > > but does not work on -current

USB problem

2001-09-18 Thread Olexander Kunytsa
hiya, While attaching USB Flash card reader to FreeBSD box I am getting message: _ uhub0: device problem, disabling port 1 - To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-curre

problems with floppy

2001-09-18 Thread Olexander Kunytsa
My floppy fails to probe for about last 2 weeks. It worked early with my current-box, and it works on windoze. dmesg of my mashine: Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University

Re: ACPI: problem with fdc resource allocation

2001-09-18 Thread Maxim Sobolev
"Andrey A. Chernov" wrote: > On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 16:26:20 +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Finally decided to upgrade my current box to the post-ACPI/KSE and found > > that I'm having problem with resource allocation for floppy disk controller. > > I'm sure somebody already reporte

Re: testig request for your code..

2001-09-18 Thread David Taylor
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, Julian Elischer wrote: > If you can try a kernel from JUST before the KSE integration.. > > that migh talso be a good test.. > A kernel from cvs up -D2001-09-10 works perfectly, A kernel from after the KSE milestone 2 produces various panics like the following:

updating /stand on -current

2001-09-18 Thread Vincent Poy
Just a question, does /stand still exist in -current? If so, how does on update it? I remember the old method was make all install in /usr/src/release/sysinstall but this no longer works. Cheers, Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __ Unix Networking

RE: latest -current breaks kernel compiling

2001-09-18 Thread Vincent Poy
On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > On 18-Sep-01 Vincent Poy wrote: > > With the latest -current sources today, the kernel fails to build > > after a buildworld. > > Doh. Something is including sys/mutex.h or sys/sx.h w/o including sys/lock.h. > I'll fix in a bit. Just want

RE: Seen this lock order reversal?

2001-09-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Sep-01 Garrett Wollman wrote: > lock order reversal > 1st 0xd3a5c11c process lock @ ../../../vm/vm_glue.c:469 > 2nd 0xc0e3fe30 lockmgr interlock @ ../../../kern/kern_lock.c:239 > > This is on relatively old (~ three months) sources. The first lock is > from swapout_procs(); I assume the

Changes to vesa.c

2001-09-18 Thread John Baldwin
Perhaps this was something that accidentally snuck into the KSE commit? Index: sys/i386/isa/vesa.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/isa/vesa.c,v retrieving revision 1.34 retrieving revision 1.35 diff -u -r1.34 -r1.35 --- sys/i38

Re: Changes to vesa.c

2001-09-18 Thread Julian Elischer
yes.. exactly.. should I delete it or will you :-) (it was to allow a hacked X server to use strange resolution.) (not needed any more anyhow) On Tue, 18 Sep 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > Perhaps this was something that accidentally snuck into the KSE commit? > > Index: sys/i386/isa/vesa.c > ===

Re: Changes to vesa.c

2001-09-18 Thread John Baldwin
On 18-Sep-01 Julian Elischer wrote: > yes.. exactly.. > should I delete it or will you :-) > (it was to allow a hacked X server to use strange resolution.) > (not needed any more anyhow) You can. :) Just curious what it was doing there is all. -- John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://ww

HEADS UP: NFS megacommit has landed

2001-09-18 Thread Peter Wemm
Please take care. I've committed my functional work-in-progress that splits the nfs code into seperate client and server components. There was only a very very small amount of sharing between them. This is partly to enable a cleaner locking attempt. There were some really nasty domain crossove

Re: Junior Kernel Hacker task: improve vnode->v_tag

2001-09-18 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 03:09:33PM +0300, Maxim Sobolev wrote: The patch looks ok. There's a slight functional change that an ext2fs filesystem is now correctly returned as such. I don't expect Linux binaries to break, but it may be remotely possible that certain tools, now that they detect ext2f