disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread Chad David
I posted a bug report and patch in kern/29104 and Dima Dorfman also mentioned this in July/August, but it still has not been resolved. The method of triggering it that I detailed in my bug report no longer seems to work, but I've managed to create another one. # mdconfig -a -t swap -s 32m -u 10

Re: Fix for pam_nologin.so runtime error

2001-10-19 Thread Mark Murray
Forgot to mention, I had to make kcheckpass setuid root to make kcheckpass itself work (just verified this on -stable). Yes - this is documented. :-) M -- o Mark Murray \_ FreeBSD Services Limited O.\_Warning: this .sig is umop ap!sdn To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

SEXWEB NO.1 .. MEGAWEB-SEX !

2001-10-19 Thread HOTBABES
Dear Ladies Gentlemen, Welcome to the GREATEST SEX SHOW on the ENTIRE NET ! We now offer you to ENTER the World´s No.1 voted SEX-SERVER on the WEB ! By far the largest and most incredible content of LIVE SEX is now served to users WORLDWIDE! EVERYTHING is offered 100% ANONOMOUSLY you

Re: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Sounds like the bug is the md driver cloning md10ec which it shouldn't do. This bug must naturally be in md_clone(), but I don't have the minutes right now to hunt it down. Should be quite simple to nail, it's just some string handling code. Poul-Henning In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Chad

RE: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Oct-01 Chad David wrote: I posted a bug report and patch in kern/29104 and Dima Dorfman also mentioned this in July/August, but it still has not been resolved. The method of triggering it that I detailed in my bug report no longer seems to work, but I've managed to create another one.

Re: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread Chad David
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 08:24:57AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: On 19-Oct-01 Chad David wrote: I posted a bug report and patch in kern/29104 and Dima Dorfman also mentioned this in July/August, but it still has not been resolved. The method of triggering it that I detailed in my bug

lock order reversal on Alpha

2001-10-19 Thread Wilko Bulte
Fresh -current kernel on an DS10 Alpha box: System shutdown time has arrived Writing entropy file:. lock order reversal 1st 0xfc7574b0 clk @ ../../../alpha/alpha/clock.c:702 2nd 0xfc7526b0 callout @ ../../../kern/kern_timeout.c:225 witness_lock Stopped at Debugger+0x34:

Re: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread Chad David
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:00:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: Sounds like the bug is the md driver cloning md10ec which it shouldn't do. This bug must naturally be in md_clone(), but I don't have the minutes right now to hunt it down. Should be quite simple to nail, it's just some

Re: ACPI: problem with fdc resource allocation

2001-10-19 Thread Maxim Sobolev
Maxim Sobolev wrote: Mike Smith wrote: This just isn't going to work. The _CRS data stream stops at byte 0x17, and these extra items are simply mis-aimed. The 0x19 should really be 0x11, and the 0x1c should really be 0x14, ie. this is a BIOS bug, and should be reported to the

vmware on current: Could not get addres for /dev/vmnet1

2001-10-19 Thread Mathias . Picker
This is -current from yesterday, with the recent patches to ansi.h to get it to compile, and vmware2 with kse patches build today. I did a rm /compat/linux/dev/vmnet1;ln -s /dev/vmnet1 /compat/linux/dev (see kse-patches announcement) and this seems to be working. I tried bridged

Re: arp: some ether addr is using my IP address 0.0.0.0! ??!?!?

2001-10-19 Thread Harti Brandt
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Terry Lambert wrote: TLTo expand a little... TL TL That said, it's probably a good idea to never ARP for 0.0.0.0, TL since a who has in that case is a really dumb idea, since, TL as weas pointed out, it's intended to mean this host, in the TL absence of an IP address (i.e.

Re: arp: some ether addr is using my IP address 0.0.0.0! ??!?!?

2001-10-19 Thread Jose M. Alcaide
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 11:12:48AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote: I have run tcpdump all night to find out what happens. The host receives an ARP request with a source address of 0.0.0.0: 18:33:51.222688 arp who-has hydra tell 0.0.0.0 0001 0800 0604 0001 0030 65c6 a174

RE: lock order reversal on Alpha

2001-10-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Oct-01 Wilko Bulte wrote: Fresh -current kernel on an DS10 Alpha box: I have untested patches to fix this. Unfortunately they involve fixing the locking in teh clock code and I've only done i386 and alpha so far, but the same changes need to be replicated into all the otehr arch's.

probe attach error

2001-10-19 Thread Beech Rintoul
I'm trying to upgrade -current on one of our machines. This box is a Compaq Presario 900 Mhz Athlon. It errors on the NIC. I can't disable PnP in the bios, that feature doesn't exist in the compaq bios. I have tried several NIC's and pci slots with the same results. Also, I tried both unset

Re: probe attach error

2001-10-19 Thread Mike Smith
I'm trying to upgrade -current on one of our machines. This box is a Compaq Presario 900 Mhz Athlon. It errors on the NIC. I can't disable PnP in the bios, that feature doesn't exist in the compaq bios. I have tried several NIC's and pci slots with the same results. Also, I tried both

Re: arp: some ether addr is using my IP address 0.0.0.0! ??!?!?

2001-10-19 Thread Jonathan Lemon
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:58:21PM -0700, Mark Peek wrote: At 11:23 AM +0200 10/18/01, Harti Brandt wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Max Khon wrote: MKhi, there! MK MKOn Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:00:52AM +0200, Jose M. Alcaide wrote: MK MK On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:11:45PM -0700, Julian

Re: XFree86-4 required?

2001-10-19 Thread David O'Brien
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 09:33:09PM +0200, Riccardo Torrini wrote: Is a real need for ports under -CURRENT to require (from a week or two, I don't remember) XFree86-libraries? Yes. To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-current in the body of the message

Re: applix 5.0 and current

2001-10-19 Thread Terry Lambert
Warner Losh wrote: Yup. I've done things like creating a chroot area and mounting a 3.5 or 2.2.8 cdrom and then mounting another fs in that chroot area to access the sources and then building it there. But as you go back in time in FreeBSD it gets much harder to have ports be supported...

Re: vmware on current: Could not get addres for /dev/vmnet1

2001-10-19 Thread Mathias . Picker
On 19 Oct, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The error Could not get address for /dev/vmnet1: argument is invalid Failed to configure ethernet0 is all I get... (this is the host-only case, for bridged it says something like could not get bridgin status of

Re: Multiple NFS server problems with Solaris 8 clients

2001-10-19 Thread Thomas Quinot
Le 2001-10-14, Paul van der Zwan écrivait : I am using -current box as a homedir server for my Solaris clients and have noticed a wierd problem. Other problems here, with Solaris 2.[68] as clients, and -CURRENT of yesterday as server. ls works, but ls -l issues a 'NFS getacl failed' message

Re: vmware on current: Could not get addres for /dev/vmnet1

2001-10-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Has anyone seen similar problem on recent -current or has someone an idea why vmware is issuing a SIOCGIFCONF ioctl without providing an interface name? Oct 19 18:04:53 mp /boot/kernel/kernel: linux_ioctl_socket(): ioctl 35093 on To clarify, this is from debugging

Re: arp: some ether addr is using my IP address 0.0.0.0! ??!?!?

2001-10-19 Thread Mark Peek
At 9:14 PM -0500 10/19/01, Jonathan Lemon wrote: Below is the patch that I've sent to the people who reported the problem, I'm waiting to hear back from them that it works. Thanks for the real patch. It appears to work fine on my system. No log messages and arps look good so far. Mark To

Erm, who broke nice?

2001-10-19 Thread John Baldwin
I know that some people are complaining about the performance of current and all, but breaking nice so that we can't make processes run slower is just going too far. :) nice -20 buildworld setpriority: Permission denied. Any ideas? -- John Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

RE: Erm, who broke nice?

2001-10-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Oct-01 John Baldwin wrote: I know that some people are complaining about the performance of current and all, but breaking nice so that we can't make processes run slower is just going too far. :) nice -20 buildworld setpriority: Permission denied. Any ideas? Idea #1: PEBKAC due

Re: arp: some ether addr is using my IP address 0.0.0.0! ??!?!?

2001-10-19 Thread Mark Peek
At 11:23 AM +0200 10/18/01, Harti Brandt wrote: On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Max Khon wrote: MKhi, there! MK MKOn Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 12:00:52AM +0200, Jose M. Alcaide wrote: MK MK On Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 12:11:45PM -0700, Julian Elischer wrote: MK I've seen this when DHCP fails to allocate an