Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> Well guys, I tried upgrading one of my older machines today to the
> latest 4.0. It was running an older 4.0 kernel (Nov 29 1999).
>
..
> HELP! Whats happening!!! :-( :-( :-(
>
> At the moment I am stymied. I switched to a GENERIC kernel
Hi folks,
I am currently having problems with my new Dual Celeron testsystem,
when trying to use UDMA66.
Hardware:
ABIT BP6
2x Celeron 466 (NOT overclocked)
128 Mbyte RAM
Matrox G400 16 MByte
3Com 905B
2x Maxtor 92041U4 20 GByte
Aopen CDROM 48x
One of the disks is master on the first "standard
Ashley Penney wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 05:31:47PM +0100, Hans Ottevanger spoketh:
> : Hi folks,
> :
> : I am currently having problems with my new Dual Celeron testsystem,
> : when trying to use UDMA66.
>
> Hans,
>
> Have you tried updating to the l
Marius Strom wrote:
>
> Hans and others,
> I have the same situation - happy to get a new motherboard and processor,
> unhappy to hang FreeBSD. My situation is different, however - I'm running
> single processor currently and it still hangs. I've also experienced this
> issue with and without s
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
[...]
>
> If you are using the newest code, then the problem might be that
> your disks doesn't work proberly with UDMA66. I've seen several
> newer disks that has problems here, and frankly Maxtor is not
> known for their quality in this respect.
I cvsupped this morning.
Hi folks,
I am having problems again with the ata drivers on my old Pentium 66
system.
With a kernel built from sources cvsupped today, I get he following
messages when booting:
...
pcib0: on motherboard
pci0: on pcib0
atapci0: port 0
x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 1.0 on pci0
atapci0: Bus
Hi folks,
I just tried to boot the RC3 install floppies on my Pentium 66 testbox.
It gets through the config stage without trouble, but then panics
immediately with:
...
pcib0: on motherboard
pci0: on pcib0
atapci0: port 0
x3f4-0x3f7,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 1.0 on pci0
atapci0: Busmastering DMA
Soren Schmidt wrote:
>
[...]
> Hmm, seems to be a resource conflict problem, question is what is
> causing this. Could you do a verbose boot both with the old
> working kernel, and the new failing one ?
>
Attached are two files. Both kernels used are built from the same config
file, which is m
erified) that in the "good old days" (FreeBSD
2.2.8) static linking took place automatically when profiling was
requested, so the issues at hand might not even be new 8-)
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
PS. Thanks for the link to your tutorial, George. I am very interested
in hwpmc, and si
rly in the boot process. This has
happened before on several occasions with FreeBSD 10.x. The board is
probably too rare to worry about too much, though it still runs OpenBSD
5.7 perfectly.
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
Eindhoven, Netherlands
www.beastielabs.net
On 12/02/11 19:39, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
Isn't this about user choice, and making sensible defaults?
There are two or three "users" out of thousands complaining about the
default. If the extra build time bugs you that much, I'll contribute
towards buying you better build hardware, too.
Well
g a real AutoFS, integrated with NFSv4 and fully
inter operable with Linux and Solaris (and Mac OS-X ?) would be really
nice to have, especially for scientific and engineering environments.
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org
ow) readily
available. And there is also the IPC Tutorial.
This may not all be documents that are immediately needed for
operational purposes, but they do offer much needed background
information, also of historical character, i.e. how and why things
became as th
On 02/10/13 12:46, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2013, at 22:14, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>>> I've used it in 7.x to read install.cfg for a semi automated install
>>> process.
>>>
>>> I didn't see any panics, but then again install.cfg is a pretty small file.
>>
>> On 7.x I got consistent
On 02/10/13 15:55, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> In message <5117a0cd.6060...@beastielabs.net>, Hans Ottevanger writes:
>> On 02/10/13 12:46, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
>> But I just did an experiment on an o
in lost hours "on the road".
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 10/08/13 04:31, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
> Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base?
>
> The proponents wanting to remove RCS need to speak up and make their
> technical case.
>
Technically it is quite simple: I need RCS to start versioning config
files, even bef
On 10/09/13 15:47, Julian Elischer wrote:
> On 10/9/13 3:20 PM, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
>> On 10/08/13 04:31, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>>> Okay folks, can we make a call about keeping the RCS tools in the base?
>>>
>>> The proponents wanting to remove
On 02/24/14 17:16, Lucius Rizzo wrote:
> * Bryan Drewery [2014-02-24 09:40]:
>
>> Remembering the time I spent trying to configure sendmail to not accept
>> inbound mail, and trying to get it to behave how I want, I fully support
>> this. Of all the years I've messed with sendmail, I still have
On 07/30/14 09:19, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
At the link below you will find a patch that adds the new automounter.
The patch is against yesterdays 11.0-CURRENT.
http://people.freebsd.org/~trasz/autofs-head-20140729.diff
Slides that explain the project scope and deliverables are here:
htt
On 08/17/14 16:50, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
On 0817T1244, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
[...]
Hi!
Great to see a real autofs finally coming to FreeBSD.
I already did some very cursory testing on a recent 11-CURRENT system
that I still happened to have and things with at least the /net map
On 09/04/14 09:15, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hi Hans!
On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:59 PM, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
Good to see that autofa has been MFC'd during my vacation 8-)
But I found a little problem...
...
Do I miss something, or is this a bug?
Can you please provide the outp
On 09/04/14 14:43, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
On 0904T0759, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
On 08/17/14 16:50, Edward Tomasz Napierała wrote:
On 0817T1244, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
[...]
Hi!
Great to see a real autofs finally coming to FreeBSD.
I already did some very cursory testing on a
which is as it should be.
The problem also does not occur with journaling enabled when I revert
to r222723.
Is anybody else seeing these weird phenomena?
Could this be related to the recent changes to UFS?
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
___
freebsd-current
, though
the addresses differ.
My amd64 9.0-CURRENT system, just updated to r225055, has the same issue,
but since I do not have WITNESS in the kernel config there, the console
output is missing.
BTW, this issue also makes dump(9) hang the system when the -L option
is used.
Kind regards,
H
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 12:04:26PM +0200, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 09:35:01AM +0100, Hugo Silva wrote:
> >
> >
> > Le Thu, 18 Aug 2011 10:22:31 +0100,
> > Hugo Silva a ?crit :
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > > I'm wo
ent/2014-September/051969.html
--
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
Eindhoven, Netherlands
h...@beastielabs.net
www.beastielabs.net
-a active da0" before
it would boot, so this is certainly an improvement.
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
www.beastielabs.net
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe
ation, but
the astonishment would be a positive one.
--
Kind regards,
Hans Ottevanger
Eindhoven, Netherlands.
h...@beastielabs.net
www.beastielabs.net
29 matches
Mail list logo
