> Geoff Rehmet writes:
> > After the discussions regarding the "log_in_vain"
> > sysctls, I was thinking about a feature I would
> > like to implement:
> >
> > Instead of sending a RST (for TCP) or Port Unreachable
> > (for UDP) where the box is not listening on a socket,
> > I would like to impl
> Brian W. Buchanan writes:
> > > > Can anyone think of any reason why this feature should
> > > > not be implemented?
> > >
> > > I like that idea... net.inet.{tcp,udp}.drop_in_vain ?
> >
> > Why do we need a sysctl knob for this when it can be easily accomplished
> > with IPFW?
>
> Not that e
> The 200-220 periodic files under daily expect that the directory
> /var/backups exist when they run to back up various files. If you
> delete this directory, the "cp" commands will error.
>
> There seems to be two ways to fix the files.
>
> 1. Add a "if [ ! -d $bak ] ; then exit fi" to t
>
> On 17-Aug-99 Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > I kinda like the idea of this, but can't that really just
> > be done easily with a few ipfw rules, the last two being
> > the important ones:
> >
> > for port in "22 53" ; do
>
> Rodney W. Grimes writes :
> > >
> >
> > Now what would a box with so much security concern such that
> > it needed this knob be doing running an ftp session though
> > your point is valid and acceptable for low security boxes. And
> > I can see
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archie Cobbs writes:
> : Not that easily.. how are you going to make ipfw dynamically know
> : which ports have listeners and which don't?
>
> By filtering all RST packets?
That would be closer than my set of rules, but has the undesired effect
of filtering what
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
>
>
> >
> > This is an ACK. I like those names, the idea is okay given that
> > the documentation for it reflects what has been discussed here in
> > this thread so folks can understand this is a very simple security
> > measure.
> Hmm, d
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I have a diff for src/etc/rc that I'd like to have had used on a few
> machines before I commit it. I'm pretty sure I haven't made any mistakes
> with my changes, but you can never be too careful, right?
Right...
>
> The diff homogenizes the manner in which variables are tes
> On Sun, 22 Aug 1999, Ollivier Robert wrote:
>
> > According to Narvi:
> > > "Falling letters like in the movie with red bills"
> >
> > Pill :)
> >
> > That very important... The screensaver triggered me to see the movie
> > again. A. I love it.
>
> Yeah, it's gotta be the perfect hacke
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> >On Sat, Jan 01, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Karl Denninger writes:
> >>
> >> >This is not a port, its part of the RELEASE!
> >> >
> >> >Its several YEARS old, and doesn't work r
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Rodney W. Grimes" writes
> :
>
> >Does it help in the 3.4-stable version to set the second value in ntpdrift
> >to 1?
>
> Yes, although I have never checked all the boundary conditions
> to make sure the kernel-pl
> Where do I look for new man pages? I would like to read those for the
> new ata driver and for ntpd. They were not created during a build
> world some 5 days ago. And I cannot find them in
> /usr/src/share/man/man4, where I would expect man ata/ad in any case.
Sos already answered about ata/ad,
...
>
> I strongly suggest to not release 4.0 till the IPv6 import has been finished.
> Beside the need for IPv6 it would be wrong to ship a release with a half-
> complete implementation.
I expect every person that has made similiar statements here and bore
all the developers with the additiona
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Hi Luigi,
>
>
> > i am looking at (minor) optimizations of the ipfw code in order to reduce
> > the running time in the common cases.
> >
> > I have a few ideas (mostly along the lines of optimizing for the
> > most commonly-used rules).
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Luigi Rizzo writes:
> >> One of the things I would do to optimize ipfw is:
> >> - instead of keeping one list with all the rules, split the list (the
> >> internal one) by interface and by direction (one list for ed1 incoming,
> >> one list for ed1 outgoing, e
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Hi,
>
> > > One of the things I would do to optimize ipfw is:
> > > - instead of keeping one list with all the rules, split the list (the
> > > internal one) by interface and by direction (one list for ed1
> incoming,
> > > one list fo
...
>
>
> Yes I agree, I love ipfw functionality. You were asking for ideas on how to
> optimize ipfw. What I suggested is that in its INTERNAL representation of
> the rules, ipfw could split the rules on a per interface/direction basis.
> This means that you will not look at the rules that are
> > No, this is completly reasonable now that I understand what it is your
> > proposing. Even the memory footprint is minimal if pointers to the
> > actual rules is all we store in the per interface list, my largest set
> > duplicated over 8 interfaces would only be 3200 rules. Stored as
>
> I
> > clnsrv "allow" tcp "" 43 "${tcp_nicname_c}""${tcp_nicname_s}"
> > clnsrv "allow" tcp "" 53 "${tcp_domain_c}" "${tcp_domain_s}"
> ...
> > ... on and on up to the 1024 and then a few splattered after that.
>
> looks like the search path can become extremely long!.
Yes,
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> james <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > It's interesting though how i had no ipf rules whatsoever, yet it
> > introduced so much latency, as Alexander has pointed out in another email.
> > Why is ipf so slow? I was planning on switching from ipfw/natd to
> >
> I'm currently dealing with an increasing set of *very* large files,
> most of them in the order of gigabytes. It becomes impossible to
> figure the size of a file with ls -l with 9 or more digits displayed.
> I would propose a new flag to ls which will together with option -l
> change the unit t
[Charset windows-1252 unsupported, skipping...]
Arghh... windblows...
> >> I'm currently dealing with an increasing set of *very* large files,
> >> most of them in the order of gigabytes. It becomes impossible to
> >> figure the size of a file with ls -l with 9 or more digits displayed.
> >> I
> At 2:49 PM -0800 1/11/00, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > >Another thing that ``works for me''. Only make it ki, mi, and gi
> > > >to fit with the new binary mode international appreviation standards,
> > > >unless of cource you use base 10
>
> Hi,
>
> I think we should move portmap(8) to /sbin for the following reason:
>
> portmap(8) and therefore mountd(8) should be started before
> the nfs filesystems get mounted. But because portmap(8) is in
> /usr/sbin , users with a nfs mounted /usr filesystem or with
> diskless filesystems
>
> > > portmap(8) and therefore mountd(8) should be started before
> > > the nfs filesystems get mounted. But because portmap(8) is in
> > > /usr/sbin , users with a nfs mounted /usr filesystem or with
> > > diskless filesystems will have big problems.
>
> I mean, that if I do the change of sta
>
> Hi,
>
> > should not have to run either, *even* for diskless boot.
> >
> > What's all this about loopback mounts in fstab about? What does
> > that have to do with diskless startup?
>
> Ok. I just rethought everything. It seems that a move is
> unnecessary because:
>
> - Shar
> On Wed, Jan 12, 2000 at 01:23:14AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
>
> > Also moving them to pass1 would bring up nfs exports before we
> > brought up nfs mounts. syslogd would not be running to catch
>
> Shouldn't nfs exports happen before nfs mounts, so t
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> [..]
> > So no disk, so just what is it that you are exporting???
>
> Just a comment:
>
> I've seen scenarios where a local disk is attached holding a kernel,
> bootblocks loader etc, but otherwise booting from a server ove
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> I'm sorry but I would find it non-obvious and more confusing. When ls or a
> similar disk/memory utility tells me xxxK or xxxM, I would expect it to be
> in 2^10 or 2^20 units. To appear otherwise would surprise me.
I guess you get supri
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> ...
> >
> > Independent of order of export/mounting the dead lock occurs. Cross
> > mounting via NFS is a verbotten thing in the sysadmin world of production
> > systems. :-) I have had to fix it at several sites admin
Sorry, I will slow down my reading and stop flipping 2^10 into 10^3.
> From: Rodney W. Grimes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2000 9:53 PM
>
>
> [in regards to a previous post preferring base-10 for K and M units...]
> >> I'm sorry but I
> :> Sometimes we just want to nfs-mount things on the same
> :> machine.
> :
> :Sick, poor in performance and the wrong tool for the job.
> :See mount_null(8) for more details on how to do it right.
> :
> :>
> :> One more example: I don't like /var/news so I mount locally
> :> /var/news
> :> t
> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
> %> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
> %> %>
> %> %> I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now:
...
>
> )(*&$#%$# stupid magazine benchmarkers never actually test
> things like IO... gr
We in the computer hardware business have a bet
> Hi David,
>
> John can implement a ping echo packet protocol for cvsup whose
> response can have "cool" information on the server. Steven's
> book on Networking already has the code for doing network latency
> calculations . It is more like if John has the time to implement
> such scheme
> > > Hi David,
> > >
> > > John can implement a ping echo packet protocol for cvsup whose
> > > response can have "cool" information on the server. Steven's
> > > book on Networking already has the code for doing network latency
> > > calculations . It is more like if John has the time to implem
> On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, David O'Brien wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 21, 2000 at 07:03:51PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> > > I don't know ... I think it might be a good idea for the cvsup client to
> > > make a connection to a cvsup master, get redirected from that master to
> > > the actual handler of t
> In article ,
> Alex Zepeda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'm looking at /usr/{src,}/share/examples/cvsup/gnats-supfile, and as
> > "equipped" it's not working (well it goes through the motions but checks
> > out no files). Hmm.
>
> It w
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2000 at 02:17:54PM +0100, Brad Knowles wrote:
> > At 11:34 PM +1300 2000/1/22, Joe Abley wrote:
> >
> > > This should give you a relative performance metric between the servers
> > > you measured, hopefully with local network performance variations
> > > cancelled out by the
> %> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
> %> %> %It seems Russell L. Carter wrote:
> %> %> %>
> %> %> %> I swapped out my motherboard and am seeing this now:
> %...
> %
> %>
> %> )(*&$#%$# stupid magazine benchmarkers never actually test
> %> things like IO... gr
> %
> %We in the comp
>
>
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 00:23:23 PST, "David O'Brien" wrote:
>
> > I think what you really want is:
> >
> > sed 's/^\([^:#@+-]*\):[^:]*:/\1:(password):/'
>
> Eeek, I don't know why I sent you that. It should have been:
>
> sed 's/^\([ +-][^+-][^:]*\):[^:]*:/\1:(password)
> < said:
>
> >> 3. On the first reboot after installing, the keyboard was in a funny
> >> state.
>
> > Urk, can't reproduce it. I need a reproducible sequence of operations
> > before we'll have any hope of tackling this one.
>
> >> Control-alt-del definitely didn't work, so I had to power of
>
> On 27-Jan-00 David O'Brien wrote:
> > I would appreciate it if those that want things changed would please try
> > Sheldon's `sed' expression below and report back how it worked for you.
>
> That will expose passwords of users whose entries are commented out,
My awk script does not have tha
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" writes:
> : > BTW, I'm getting numbers that are 2x bigger than before :-(.I had
> : > makebuildworld down to around 1:20 at one point, but now it is 2:40.
> :
> : Which compilers for both times?
>
> What ever was on -current as of 2.5 years ag
...
>
> Starting an 'fsck' results in:
>
> cage:[/] # fsck /scratch
> ** /dev/da1s1g
> ** Last Mounted on /scratch
> ** Phase 1 - Check Blocks and Sizes
> PARTIALLY TRUNCATED INODE I=16
> SALVAGE? [yn] ^C
> * FILE SYSTEM MARKED DIRTY *
Next step is run the `
Good analysis deleted...
> src/usr.bin/xinstall could probably have been named src/usr.bin/install,
> but PROG has to be xinstall regardless. I guess they kept the two as
> xinstall for consistancy and in case there were other gotcha's like this.
But you forgot what happens if you have a ``file
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> > Good analysis deleted...
> >
> > > src/usr.bin/xinstall could probably have been named src/usr.bin/install,
> > > but PROG has to be xinstall regardless. I guess they kept the two as
> > > xinstall for consist
> Giorgos Keramidas writes:
> > Is there some way to ifconfig up a dummy ethernet interface, one that
> > will work like the loopback one (lo0) on FreeBSD?
>
> If you want an interface that loops back, you can have more than
> one loopback interface (lo0, lo1, lo2, ...).
>
> If you want an inter
> < said:
>
>
> > The theoretical maximum for 100BaseT-FDX (which is 200Mbps) is 25MB/s
> > (megabytes per second), 100BaseT-TX is 12MB/s [FYI: Mbps->MB/s you divide
> > by 8] I realize my punctuation may be off, but there you are.
>
> Assuming you mean ``100BASE-T (half duplex)'' here... This
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2000 at 02:07:40PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> > < said:
> > Assuming you mean ``100BASE-T (half duplex)'' here... This is not
> > quite right. In a CSMA/CD medium access protocol, like that used by
> > Ethernet, the actual capacity of the link is always(*) somewhat less tha
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2000 at 01:25:59AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >
> > There was a patch of DC21143 chips it seems that has a very strange
> > thermal problem. Can you tell me what your hub link lite is doing
> > when you see this major slow down?
>
> Nope
> Perhaps this would be of interest in CURRENT issues:
>
>
> We have several servers that we plan on deploying across the US. Their
> purpose in life is network status and monitoring. The hardware profiles
> are exactly the same...
>
> Currently, we're using DD to mirror a disk image onto
> <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> [I wrote:]
> >> quite right. In a CSMA/CD medium access protocol, like that used by
> >> Ethernet, the actual capacity of the link is always(*) somewhat less than
> >> 100%; the exact value depends on the precise parameters of the
> >> transmissions at both en
> <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > I specifically excluded P(coll) by stating point to point or effectively
> > point to point via switching.
>
> Rod, please bother to READ what people write before spewing nonsense.
I did read it, and did not spew nonsense. P(coll) is non-sense when
talking ab
> <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> I answered SPECIFICALLY about half-duplex.
>
> > The duplex does not in any way effect the maximal link layer transmission
> > data rate. You seem to keep forgetting the maximal part...
>
> The maximum for full-duplex is utterly irrelevant, since the bounds
> <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> >> The maximum for full-duplex is utterly irrelevant, since the bounds on
> >> performance for half-duplex Ethernet networks come from CSMA/CD.
>
> > I will say it one last time, duplex falls out of the equations when you
> > solve for ``maximal''.
>
> Nonsense.
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rodney W. Grimes
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > A much faster way to do this is to just dd the first few megabytes
> > of the disk (dd if=foo of=/dev/rXXd bs=32768 count=1024). Then use
> > dump | restore to populate
> Hello,
>
> I'm purchasing a server to run 4.0 on. It won't be in production
> immediately, but I need to get a quote ASAP.
>
> What SCSI card would people recommend? It doesn't need RAID.
> Any particular SCSI tape drive?
We are partial to the TekRAM 390-F symbios 53C875 based controller.
>
> Hmmm. I'm beginning to wonder if openssl shouldn't just be backed-out
> at this point. The situation with RSA makes this far more problematic
> than I think anyone first thought, and I've seen a lot of breakage so
> far for what appears to be comparatively little gain over what we had
> before
> <<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > IBM Hard drives...
>
> If you can actually get them Last time I bought a drive we
> weren't able to get IBM in any reasonable timeframe and ended up with
> a Seagate instead. (And that Cheetah 18LP's not a bad drive, either.)
Should you run into that pro
Ahhh.. did we just experience a major time warp some place? I just
received about 15 messages I know I have read before, all dated
18 Aug 1999.
> < said:
>
> > Or if there is a system call or modification to open such that I can issue :
> > open("pci0:10:0", .)
>
> Don't be silly.
>
>
> On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Richard Tobin wrote:
>
> > > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0
> >
> > > You have one of the first K6-2s off the line. There were definite problems
> > > with these, and as such, they were specially distinguished by having 66
> > > printed on top.
> >
>
> As Rodney W. Grimes wrote ...
> > > On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Richard Tobin wrote:
> > >
> > > > > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0
>
> > The original K6-2's off the line where all 100MHz parts, it was later wh
> On Wed, 25 Aug 1999, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> > The USA... your prices tend to be a lot better than ours. I could can the
> > T2P4 but that would also mean I had to can the SIMMs (everything is DIMMs
> > now), get an AGP videocard and can the perfectly fine Millenium II (I need
> > the extra PCI
> John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > The tags are expanding just fine up here in Seattle. :-)
> >
> > I wish you would have included the rest of the output from your cvs
> > status command. It sounds a lot like your source tree was checked
> > out with "-ko". That would show up in
> Rodney W. Grimes writes:
>
> >What verion of the cvs binary are you running (cvs -v)?
>
> Concurrent Versions System (CVS) 1.10 `Halibut' (client/server)
>
> >Are you getting a copy of CVSROOT?
>
> yes...as part of src-all, but it's not used
> I've just committed the revised TCP timer code. There are some
> user visible changes:
>
> User visible TCP timers are now in units of the system clock
> (10ms for the i386), not those of the slowtimeout (500ms). So
> if you have customized one of these values, (e.g.: net.inet.tcp.ke
> < said:
>
> > The enumerator should assign these resources to a placeholder; I was
> > thinking the nexus was as good an owner as any. If there's an
> > "unknown" device that's probably even better.
>
> Some of them should be claimed by real devices -- for example, the
> pseudo-i8237 ISA DM
> Nick Hibma wrote:
> >
> > > > Please review the following patch to get all the log files in one place.
> > > > The commit will be accompanied by a HEADS UP. If no one objects I will
> > > > commit this in a couple of days.
> > >
> > > The only thing I don't like about this is that it intr
> Hi,
>
>The following patch to /usr/src/release/Makefile allows the
> specification of the variable FASTCLEAN, which instead of doing
> a recursive rm on CHROOTDIR, simply umounts/newfs/mounts. Of
> course, this is only useful if your CHROOTDIR location is a
> separate mount point (which min
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Matthew Thyer wrote in list.freebsd-current:
> > YES please fix this ridiculous inefficiency pointed out by Rod!
>
> There's nothing broken, so there's nothing to fix (IMO).
>
> > The current method of cleaning the build tree is to chfl
> * Tim Vanderhoek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [990912 17:50]:
> >On Sun, Sep 12, 1999 at 03:20:02PM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai wrote:
> >>
> >> On this CURRENT of 3-4 weeks old I can do /blah and then use / to find
> >> the next occurance of blah in the same file.
> >>
> >> With the `new' more this
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [POLLEXTEND, POLLATTRIB, POLLNLINK, POLLWRITE]
>
> > It is probably undocumented. I was a bit reluctant to document it
> > since I know that the interface is not correct. One of these days,
> > I (or more likel
> :> I/O, and then closing it.
> :
> :4.0-CURRENT (SMP on an ASUS P2B-DS with two CPU's installed; BIOS revision
> :1008.A, running `systat -vm 1' gives the normal display but without any
> :numbers filled in, then switches over to an empty screen that says:
> :...
>
> Whenever systat or
> <
>said:
>
> > I've been getting this too on 4.0-C, just rebuild last night, still there.
> > top displays:
> > CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 0.0%
> > idle
>
> On my dual-PPro Intel BB440FX system I am not seeing this.
Do you have apm compiled in or not?
> OK, Upgraded my Asus P2B-D machien from BIOS version 1008 to 1010, the
> problem disappeared. Popped back to my old 1008 BIOS, problem came back.
So far about alls I have confirmed is that the problem does not exists
with BIOS 1009 when the apm code is not compiled into the kernel. I'll
have
...
> > One question comes to mind: is there a way that the TSCs could become
> > desynchronized somehow? Even though all CPUs run at the same frequency,
> > isn't there a strong possibility for slight frequency deviation since
> > we use crystal oscillation instead of a more accurate atomic brea
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> I administer a number of remote FreeBSD boxes and starting with 3.x
> they have been unreliable at rebooting. We all know FreeBSD wants to
> keep running forever, however it seems to be at the expense of
> reboot stability. I have found the
> > How much mail does the use of the MAPS DUL reject?
I think they meant to ask ``how much SPAM mail does ...''
>
> Virtually none. The idea is that dial-up users use their own ISP's
> smarthosts, in which case the ISP can nail them if they are spammers,
> and I don't get their spam if they g
> >From: "Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 03:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
>
> >Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
> >this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
> >just log th
> > > would immediately unsubscribe to any isp that decided this was acceptable
> > > behavior on their part.
>
> I agree.
>
> > Your work also has a serious security concern if it allows this you to
> > directly attatch to it's port 25.
>
> No it doesn't, but you do bring up another good poin
> [This thread is off topic, but ... ]
> On 24 September 1999 at 3:00, "Rodney W. Grimes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
> > this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
> >
> At 03:00 AM 9/24/1999 -0700, you wrote:
> >Another thing that ISP coulds start doing (we are in process with
> >this now, but on a monitoring only basis, instead of a deny we
> >just log them) is to block all outbound from AS tcp 25 setup packets.
>
> Hmm, maybe I'm interpreting this wrong (I h
> > > I agree.
> > >
> > > > Your work also has a serious security concern if it allows this you to
> > > > directly attatch to it's port 25.
> > >
> > > No it doesn't, but you do bring up another good point why not to use the
> > > ISP's mail server. Security. I don't want email to bounce on
> yes, Dynamic dialups are the real problems. I have a static dialup, and
> its essentially mine to do with what I want. its not counted among my
> ISP's dialup pools.
And if you signed the additional clauses to our AUP that basically places
you at legal and financial risk for violation of the ot
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> It seems Cejka Rudolf wrote:
> > I think internal bad block remapping is long time here. But
> > in the middle of 1996 I have bought a new Western Digital disk
> > with some bad sectors and it runs without any problems till today
> > (and
> > > If _we_ don't start to do something about it, big brother _is_ going
> > > to do something about it. Trust me on this one, being a member of the
> > > USPA I know that we are far better off implementing our own (as ISP's)
> > > set of safe gaurds that help eliminate certain undesirable beha
> > I'm just suggesting here that it would be nice if the authors of
> > this code would make it _equally functional_ to what was removed.
> > It's not nice to remove functionality unconditionally and then
> > provide no replacement at all...
>
> That work is underway, and something to understand
> On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:11:31AM +1000, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > Good software shouldn't panic.
> I wish _I_ could convince some people of this :-(.
>
> > > Most certainly is. Could use the functionality to add to a plex's size for
> > > striped or RAID5, but a bit of planning cures that. 8-)
[Reinsertion of original answer by jkh]
> > > That work is underway, and something to understand about -current
> > > is that it doesn't have to actually work at all times during the
> > > interim periods between releases. Now, should 4.0 be on the horizon
> > > and the situation still be one wh
> As Rodney W. Grimes wrote ...
> > > On Tue, Sep 28, 1999 at 09:11:31AM +1000, Greg Lehey wrote:
> > > > Good software shouldn't panic.
> > > I wish _I_ could convince some people of this :-(.
>
> > > rather than having to recover each logical
> On Thu, 30 Sep 1999, Harold Gutch wrote:
>
> > Uhm, that's the way I see it being _right now_ as well. What I
> > was thinking of, was that things would go smoother if you
> > wouldn't upgrade _right now_, but in [insert some time in the
> > near future here], as things would perhaps be "fixed"
> Hi,
>
> In the recent discussion about the breakage of the upgrade path from
> -stable to -current numerous suggestions and other kinds of remarks have
> been made. In this light I have the following proposal. Please share
> your thoughts...
>
> NOTE: This proposal only discusses upgrading fro
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
>
> > IMHO, the only ``correct'' fix for the latest incarnation of the
> > problem is to finally once and for all fix the cross compilation
> > environment instead of using a half cooked tools: target to deal
> > with
> "Rodney W. Grimes" wrote:
> >
> > > 1. A compiler C running on machine 1 and capable of generating code
> > >for machine 2 (the compiler includes headers and libraries),
> > > 2. Source code compatible with compiler C, but also with machine
> > Why are the tools being built using new syscalls? What causes this?
>
> Mainly historical bugs. Includes are installed too early and they only
> match the new syscalls. Tools are built using the new includes, so they
> need new libraries to be consistent. Therefore the new libraries are
>
> On Thu, Sep 30, 1999 at 06:25:56AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > Cons
> > >
> > > o Upgrading from 3.3 and before to -current is only possible after
> > >an upgrade to post 3.3.
> >
> > Not good.
>
> We recommend th
[CC: trimmed to -current]
> > > > But this still doesn't entirely solve the problem. You still have
> > > > to build and install a new kernel before installing the world.
> > > > While this is typically what most -current folks do anyways, it
> > > > still prevents backing up to a previous kerne
> :Hi again,
> :
> : Whoops: a few hours after downgrading to 3.1-STABLE I had a double fault
> :error (strange, it didn't look like a normal panic screen, just the
> :message and the content of three registers, then the syncing disks
> :message). It seems that I might be wrong about hardware not
> >On Thu, Oct 07, 1999 at 10:09:23AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> >
> >> Intel's ECC implementation is not perfect (1), but it's good enough to
> >> catch these sorts of problems.
> >
> >Just as an interesting side note, we had a motherboard which
> >supported ECC ram and had ECC ram i
> >
> > "Accidental" removals from the lists are so common that I give up. I no
> > longer even try to get back on them -- it's been happening for _years_ now,
> > and I have made multiple complaints about it, and if it's not a problem for
> > whoever runs the mailing lists, then I just don't ca
1 - 100 of 481 matches
Mail list logo