It seems that with rev 1.72 of /src/sys/net/if_tun.c, if_ibytes and
if_ipackets are no long updated in tunread(). I don't know why this was
taken out, but these stats were nice for programs like wmnet. The
following patch restores this function and works for me, although I may
be missing someth
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 09:55:17AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mark Santcroos writes:
> : On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 12:43:59PM +0900, Katsushi Kobayashi wrote:
> : > I believe the name iLink is not popular in outside of Japan.
> :
> : AFAIK that is Sony's name for it.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 12:56:16PM +0100, Tomas Palfi wrote:
> i'm running stable4.3 on Dell poweredge 2500 with PERC 3/Di controller which
> is causing a problem. the support battery on the controller is being
> discharged on irregular basis and when fully discharged it freezes the
> system. Af
On Mon, Oct 01, 2001 at 10:50:17AM +0200, Georg-W. Koltermann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering how I should handle APM now that ACPI has basically
> taken over power management responsibility.
APM and ACPI are mutually exclusive from what I understand. You should
remove the apm device from your k
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 02:19:16PM +, Eric P Liedtke wrote:
> I own and MSI 694D Pro MoBo. It's a VIA 694x chip based dual P-III board.
> I recently installed a version of 5.0 from March, and it was running fine.
> I cvsup'd and rebuilt everything Friday night. When I tried to boot the new
>
On Tue, Oct 30, 2001 at 03:58:39PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin writes:
> :
> : On 30-Oct-01 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> : > In message <000801c1617c$9599ad00$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan
> : > Stocker
> : > writes:
> : >>Ive updated the first time my system
On Wed, Oct 31, 2001 at 12:10:14AM +, Nick Hibma wrote:
>
> Yes. I have no idea why phk has not done this.
>
> As this is a purposeful panicing of systems that worked fine before, I
> presume that someone is keeping track of the problems that are occurring
> and going to do something about i
On Sun, Nov 04, 2001 at 11:43:57PM +0100, Jan Stocker wrote:
> Is there any working thread for doing a SCSI-IDE translation like NetBSD and
> LINUX has? This is very useful to get proggys like cdrecord (and the GUIs
> [GnomeToaster]) running on IDE cd writers.
It would require that someone write
On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:44:06PM +, Brian Somers wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 06:35:49AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > I don't use -DNOCLEAN or anything like that, so it looks as if forcibly
^
> > > removing the /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.bi
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 11:55:58PM -0500, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> I'm not sure if I'm sending this to the correct place, but since it is a
> problem that will/could be fixed in -CURRENT, I'm assuming this is the right
> place.
>
> I tried to get the winex linux binary to run using the linux_ba
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:45:12PM -0600, Doug Swarin wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 02:53:32PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > * Maxim Sobolev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020124 13:44] wrote:
> > > Any ideas? This is a reasonably recent 5-CURRENT (last
> > > makeworld/makekernel 7 days ago).
> >
>
Fixed. See the commit message for the reason. It looks like only the
maestro and maestro3 drivers were affected by this.
Scott
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 10:28:52PM +0100, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:21:30AM -0800, Edwin Culp wrote:
> > My laptop sound seems to have quit
On Mar 11, 2010, at 6:14 PM, Scot Hetzel wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 10:36 AM, Mike Jakubik
> wrote:
>> On 3/11/2010 9:50 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>>>
>>> As a result of importing 32-bit compatibility support for non-x86 64-bit
>>> platforms, the kernel options COMPAT_IA32 has been rename
On Mar 20, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :All above I have successfully tested last months with MAXPHYS of 1MB on
> :i386 and amd64 platforms.
> :
> :So my questions are:
> :- does somebody know any issues denying increasing MAXPHYS in HEAD?
> :- are there any specific opinions abou
On Mar 21, 2010, at 8:05 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Ivan Voras wrote:
>> Julian Elischer wrote:
>>> You can get better throughput by using TSC for timing because the geom
>>> and devstat code does a bit of timing.. Geom can be told to turn off
>>> it's timing but devstat can't. The 170 ktps is
m
On Mar 21, 2010, at 8:56 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 21/03/2010 16:05 Alexander Motin said the following:
>> Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> Hmm, it looks like it could be easy to spawn more g_* threads (and,
>>> barring specific class behaviour, it has a fair chance of working out of
>>> the box) but th
On Mar 20, 2010, at 1:26 PM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Scott Long wrote:
>> On Mar 20, 2010, at 11:53 AM, Matthew Dillon wrote:
>>> Diminishing returns get hit pretty quickly with larger MAXPHYS values.
>>> As long as the I/O can be pipelined the reduced transact
On Mar 21, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> On Sat, 20.03.2010 at 12:17:33 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> Windows has a MAXPHYS equivalent of 1M. Linux has an equivalent of an
>> odd number less than 512k. For the purpose of benchmarking against these
>> OS
On Mar 21, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
> [CC trimmed]
> On Sun, 21.03.2010 at 10:39:10 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>> On Mar 21, 2010, at 10:30 AM, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>>> On Sat, 20.03.2010 at 12:17:33 -0600, Scott Long wrote:
>>>> Windows has a MAX
On Mar 22, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Alexander Sack wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 8:39 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday 22 March 2010 7:40:18 am Gary Jennejohn wrote:
>>> On Sun, 21 Mar 2010 19:03:56 +0200
>>> Alexander Motin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Scott
On Mar 22, 2010, at 5:36 PM, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 08:23:43AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <4ba633a0.2090...@icyb.net.ua>, Andriy Gapon writes:
>>> on 21/03/2010 16:05 Alexander Motin said the following:
Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hmm, it looks li
On Apr 23, 2010, at 8:00 AM, Jaakko Heinonen wrote:
> On 2010-04-23, Alexander Best wrote:
>> has anybody thought about adding scsi support to burncd(8)? i've been using
>> ATA CAM for quite a while now and really love it. however i miss burncd(8).
>
> I have thought about it. The mail I posted
On Apr 23, 2010, at 7:50 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday 22 April 2010 11:31:37 am Alexander Motin wrote:
>> If ataraid(4) should be reimplemented in GEOM, then how exactly? One
>> more separate RAID infrastructure in GEOM (third?) looks excessive.
>> Reuse gmirror, gstripe,... code would b
On Apr 25, 2010, at 4:23 AM, Alexander Best wrote:
> Jaakko Heinonen schrieb am 2010-04-23:
>> On 2010-04-23, Alexander Best wrote:
>>> has anybody thought about adding scsi support to burncd(8)? i've
>>> been using
>>> ATA CAM for quite a while now and really love it. however i miss
>>> burncd(8).
On Apr 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Apr 2010, Alex Keda wrote:
>
>> try in single user mode:
>>
>> tunefs -j enable /
>> tunefs: Insuffient free space for the journal
>> tunefs: soft updates journaling can not be enabled
>>
>> tunefs -j enable /dev/ad0s2a
>> tunefs: In
On Apr 25, 2010, at 7:58 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 04/25/10 03:23, Alexander Best wrote:
>> another option would be to have a ata(4)->cam(4)->ata(4) emulation.
>
> What would be the value of doing all of that work as opposed to just
> using one of the available options that already work with ca
On Apr 26, 2010, at 6:51 AM, Alexander Motin wrote:
> Marius Strobl wrote:
>> As noted earlier, pc98 and sparc64 need ada(4)/CAM ATA to perform
>> geometry translation as done by ad_firmware_geom_adjust() for ad(4),
>> which the following patch hooks up to both:
>> http://people.freebsd.org/~marius
On Apr 27, 2010, at 7:34 AM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Maxim Sobolev writes:
>> Richard Tector writes:
>>> Could I also add that the removal of ataraid would affect those
>>> users who dual-boot with Windows and rely on the psuedo-raid
>>> provided by most Intel chipsets to be able to share th
On Apr 26, 2010, at 11:39 PM, Luke Dean wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Alexander Motin wrote:
>
>> So what is the public opinion: Is the lack of ataraid(4) fatal or we can
>> live without it?
>
> Hardware mirroring is very important to me. It's the only solution I'm aware
> of for realtime
On Apr 27, 2010, at 5:33 AM, Gavin Atkinson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-04-26 at 10:33 -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>> My opinion for the path forward:
>> (1) Send a big heads up about the future of ataraid(5). It will be
>>shot in the head soon, to be replaced be a bunch of geom classes
>>for
On Apr 29, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Tom Evans wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:53 PM, Ollivier Robert
> wrote:
>> According to James R. Van Artsdalen:
>>> system is a Core i7 975 (3.33 GHz x 4 cores 3x threads per core) with 12
>>> GB of RAM, a 2x2TB ZFS boot pool and a second (idle) pool of 16x2TB.
>>
All,
FreeBSD 5.0-RC2 has been uploaded to ftp-master and is showing up on
most of the primary mirrors. ia32, ia64, pc98, and alpha images are
available now; sparc64 will be pushed out once it becomes available.
I'd like to thank Marcel Moolenaar for providing the ia64 bits and
Takahashi Yoshi
Scott Long wrote:
All,
FreeBSD 5.0-RC2 has been uploaded to ftp-master and is showing up on
most of the primary mirrors. ia32, ia64, pc98, and alpha images are
available now; sparc64 will be pushed out once it becomes available. I'd
like to thank Marcel Moolenaar for providing the ia64
Vladimir Kushnir wrote:
I'm not sure for how long but at least last couple of weeks any attempt to
mount CD with UDF gives
panic: lockmgr: locking against myself
plus quiet reboot (no dump, no break to DDB - nothing) on my -CURRENT box.
uname -a output:
FreeBSD kushnir1.kiev.ua 5.0-CURRENT Fre
Vladimir Kushnir wrote:
On Mon, 23 Dec 2002, Scott Long wrote:
>Vladimir Kushnir wrote:
>
>
>>I'm not sure for how long but at least last couple of weeks any
attempt to
>>mount CD with UDF gives
>>
>>panic: lockmgr: locking against myself
>>
&
All,
Thanks to help from Jake Burkholder and Anders Norby, FreeBSD
5.0-RC2/sparc64 was finally finished and should be available from most
of the ftp sites now in both ISO and ftp formats.
There is about a week to go until RC3 is scheduled to be cut, so please
test this and the other arch's if
It looks like sys/filedesc.h needs to be included in nv-freebsd.h
Kenneth Culver wrote:
Only one, that driver wasn't meant to compile on -CURRENT. It's not even
supported there.
Ken
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Nuzrin Yaapar wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>With the latest CURRENT cvsupped today, NVIDIA driver fai
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Christian Brueffer :
|
| Hi,
|
| I'm seeing the same on two boxen here. The errors seem to have been
| introduced during the latest pcm locking changes in mid-december.
|
| A src/dev/sound from the beginning of december works fine.
Christian,
Thanks.
Christian Brueffer wrote:
Well, it's not only maestro hardware:
pcm0: port 0x18c0-0x18ff,0x1c00-0x1cff irq 11 at
device 3
1.5 on pci0
The same with a CMI8738.
I don't have any boards with these chips, but if it helps, I can give
you full root access on one of the machines.
- Christian
M
leafy wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2003 at 10:50:40AM +0100, Karl-Petter Åkesson wrote:
>
> >Yes modified floppies would be great.
> >
> >I dont really get this. When I read the installation intructions I
> >understood it as that all hardware listed in HARDWARE.txt is supported
> >not only by FreeBSD
All,
Once again it's my pleasure to announce Release Cadidate 3 of
FreeBSD 5.0. i386, pc98, alpha, ia64, and sparc64 releases are
available on most mirrors now. Thanks to Marcel Moolenaar
for providing the ia64 bits, Takahashi Yoshihiro for proving the
pc98 bits, and David Obrien for the sparc64
Vincent Poy wrote:
Greetings:
Is anyone running FreeBSD on a Dell Inspiron 8200 notebook? I'm
trying to figure out if there is a way to prevent the notebook from
suspending when the lid is closed. Thanks.
Cheers,
Vince - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Vice President __
Uni
Andrzej Kwiatkowski wrote:
Hello..
I would like to install 4.7-Release on my Intel 1210 server.
I've got Adaptec 2120s iserted and two 72Gb disk
configured as Raid 1. When i start to install everything is ok,
but when system boots i've got :
**MONITOR** NormPrioCommand was received with Fib Str
Conrad Sabatier wrote:
Pardon me if I missed something, but what's become of the definition of
VM_METER? It is nowhere to be found under /usr/include. This breaks
a few
ports, kdebase3 being one of the most notable.
I've got to admit that this one slipped in under my radar. Would the
committ
Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
>Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consider this change
>gratuitous and it breaks standard compatability rules: deprecate
>for one major version and remove in the second. I haven't seen
>any reason w
Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words
in effect of:
>Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 10:26:10AM -0800, Will Andrews wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Of course, these things can be fixed. But I consi
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
On Sat, 2003-01-18 at 15:20, Scott Long wrote:
>Hiten Pandya wrote:
>
>
>>On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:39:42PM -0700, Scott Long wrote the words
>>in effect of:
>>
>>
>>>Craig Rodrigues wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
Mark Murray wrote:
[ Very large SNIP ]
Scott Long wrote:
>I'm fully aware of that. As I state in the previous email, I'd like
to see
>5.0->5.1 happen as smoothly as possible. For background, go re-read
>my email to developers@ when the RELENG_5_0 branch happened.
ing
The FreeBSD Mall, Compaq, Yahoo!, Sentex Communications, and
NTT/Verio.
The release engineering team for 5.0-RELEASE includes:
Scott Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Release Engineering and Building
Bruce A. Mah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Release Engineering, Documentation
k for certain there,
though I suspect that they will follow the same route.
Thanks, and go buy some 5.0 CD's =-)
Scott Long
The Release Engineering Team
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
we've reached our goals in this area, so hopefully we will get
there quickly. Meanwhile, preparations for the next release from the
4.x series, 4.8, will begin soon. Of course, the best way to get 5.x
to stabilize os to install and run it!
Thanks,
Sc
Josef Karthauser wrote:
Has anyone got any time to look at bus DMA for USB?
I've not got the time in the short-term to work out how bus DMA
works on FreeBSD as I'm finding that University work is taking most
of my time. If someone could look at usb_mem.c (posted earlier on
in this thread) a lot
Dimitry Andric wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I heard from several friends who did FTP installs of 5.0-RELEASE, that
the installer was unable to install the ports collection. So I checked
the various FTP sites, and to my amazement I couldn't find the
ports.tgz file on
David Syphers wrote:
I recently installed 5.0-R (and KDE 3.1, thus the cc:). Ogle now has
terrible
performance - very jerky. Last weekend, when this computer (an Athlon XP
1800+) had 4-stable and KDE 3.0.5, ogle perfomance on the same DVD was
perfectly smooth. Since ogle didn't change, I assume
What exactly are you pointing out that doesn't work? It looks like
you're using the default GENERIC uni-processor kernel from the 5.0
release. You'll need to recompile your kernel for SMP.
Scott
Victor Ponomarev wrote:
Hi All.
It's seems that smp kernel configuration doesn't work correctly
Rhett Monteg Hollander wrote:
Hello gentlemen,
several days ago I've installed 5.0-RELEASE onto one
of my machines, which already carried 4.7-RC1. To
avoid possible compatibility problems, I did a clean
install onto another hard drive, and later recompiled
everything. Here I have a couple of ann
All,
Thanks to the hard work of everyone, FreeBSD 5.0 became a reality and
is working better than most even hoped. However, there is still a
lot of work to be done before we can create the RELENG_5/5-STABLE
branch and declare success. Below is a document that I have drafted
with the input and re
Martin Blapp wrote:
This IBM X-Series 305 show these ACPI problems. And rebooting the box with
ACPI enabled hangs it (deadlock).
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: acpi0: on motherboard
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 kernel: ACPI-0625: *** Info: GPE Block0 defined
as GPE0
to GPE31
Feb 13 17:41:05 ibm-01 k
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:28:43PM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
+> This can quickly turn into a bikeshed, but suggest ones. We're
looking for
+> good benchmarks. [...]
Look at:
http://www.web-polygraph.org
It provides tests for www-cache/proxy stuff.
We can test many
Guys, this problem has already been identified. I posted a
patch last night to cvs-all@ that fixes this, although it's
still not totally correct so I haven't committed it yet.
Scott
Craig Boston wrote:
On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 21:48, Terry Lambert wrote:
Lars Eggert wrote:
Poul-Henning Kamp wr
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
At 1:27 PM +0200 2/27/03, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> : RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v
> : Working file: GENERIC
> : description:
> :
> : revision 1.296
> : date: 2001/01/14 10:11:10; author: jhb; state: Exp; lines: +2 -2
> :
Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 09:14:13PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I plan to commit
http://phk.freebsd.dk/patch/cdevsw.patch
one of the first days of the week.
Basically, it changes cdevsw initializations to use C99 sparse
format, and thereby eliminates 859 lines of
Maxime Henrion wrote:
walt wrote:
My mini 'disaster' of earlier today was caused by the nvidia kernel
module being autoloaded at boot, which causes an immediate kernel panic.
The newest kernel seems fine until I try to load the module manually,
at which time I still get the kernel panic even after
On Aug 23, 2010, at 9:04 AM, Gabor Kovesdan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> there are some consequences that we can see from the grep case. Here I'd like
> to add a summary, which raises some questions. All comments are welcome.
>
> 1, When grep entered -CURRENT and bugs were found I immediately got kind
On Aug 24, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Danilo Baio wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a DELL PERC 6/i controller and I can't find the problem.
> The system was running and lost disk access with this messages on console:
> "mfi0: COMMAND 0xff80005d1770 TIMEOUT AFTER 6178 SECONDS"
> ...
> http://img806.imagesh
There's no reason not to include . I'm a little reluctant to have
it depend on the static MAXCPU definition, though. What happens when you
mix-and match userland and kernel and they no longer agree on the definition of
MAXCPU? I suggest creating a sysctl that exports the kernel's definition o
On Oct 18, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>> On 16 October 2010 02:18, Sergey Kandaurov wrote:
>>>
>
>Check with LSI before you commit that; you might not understand
> the overall nuances of that value.
In all fairness, w
If the loader can't detect acpi, the kernel can't either.
Scott
On Nov 10, 2010, at 9:01 AM, David Rhodus wrote:
> What are the chances the detection fails and one still needs to disable ACPI
> and can't because it's not showing as a option ?
>
> Thanks,
> David Rhodus
>
> On Nov 8, 2010, at
Just got the following from a 'make release BUILDNAME=5.1-CURRENT
CHROOTDIR=/usr/release CVSROOT=/usr/ncvs NOPORTS= NODOC= ". My
world was up to date to within a day. The full log is at
http://people.freebsd.org/~scottl/current-release-i386.log.gz. Note
that while this is an SMP machine, -j was
Lawrence Farr wrote:
I have a Supermicro SuperServer 6013P-8, with:
ahd0: port
0x4000-0x40ff,0x4400-0x44ff mem 0xfc30-0xfc301fff irq 5 at device 2.0 on
pci3
aic7902: Ultra320 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, PCI-X 101-133Mhz, 512 SCBs
ahd1: port
0x4800-0x48ff,0x4c00-0x4cff mem 0xfc302000-0xfc303ff
Stephane Raimbault wrote:
Hi Thanks for your response,
I do not have PAE enabled... I've been hesitant of turning it on, I'm not
sure if it's too stable, I noticed that the asr driver is in the nodriver
list in the PAE kernel config file and I use the asr driver for my Adaptec
2015S raid card. If
Try disabling ACPI.
Scott
Adam Kranzel wrote:
Hi...
I updated my system last night with make world/make kernel/mergemaster, and
the new kernel doesn't seem to work.
It sits there for a while at "Waiting for SCSI devices to settle" and then
gives the following message.
ahc0: Timedout SCB alrea
John-Mark Gurney wrote:
Lukas Ertl wrote this message on Sun, Jul 27, 2003 at 16:43 +0200:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003, Mark Blackman wrote:
Perhaps it's a USB bug. There seems to be some correspondence between
the use of the USB Speedtouch ADSL modem and the out-of-control
devbuf allocations.
I'm too
Bruce Cran wrote:
There appears to be a breakage of 'rerelease' - that is, 'release' works, but
'rerelease' fails in telnetd. After fixing the Makefile for the gcc -Os
build, the build failed in /usr/src/contrib/telnet/telnetd/authenc.c and ext.h.
I have since verified that the 'release' succeed
Is anyone willing to fix this? The warning is bogus as it's quite
obvious that the variable is being initialized. Strange that it doesn't
show up on other platforms.
Scott
Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2003-08-02 04:00:07 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for alpha/alpha
TB --- 2003-08-02 04:00:07 -
Anyone know what is up with this? I'm not getting it on my LINT builds.
Scott
Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2003-08-02 06:21:10 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for i386/i386
TB --- 2003-08-02 06:21:10 - checking out the source tree
TB --- cd /home/des/tinderbox/CURRENT/i386/i386
TB --- /usr/bin/cvs -
Jon Kuster wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 06:42, Scott Long wrote:
I know what the problem is and I'm working on a patch right now.
Scott
Excellent. I'll be happy to test it if needed.
Jon
Attached is an untested patch. Please let me know if it solves the
problem
Scott
In
Petri Helenius wrote:
I'm not aware of any registers in the standard PCI config space that
will tell you the speed of the bus. Some PCI devices will make that
information available, but not in a standard way. The BIOS of some
higher-end systems might also tell you this information.
How about the
Doug White wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
Is there way to view PCI / PCI-X configuration with bus-width and clock
values when FreeBSD has already booted?
If you know where in PCI config space to look you could use pciconf to
query it. Can't say I've heard of PCI speed negoti
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:42:06AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
I know what the problem is and I'm working on a patch right now.
I have the same problem with amd(4) and this commit to busdma_machdep.c.
Cheers,
Attached is an untested patch for amd(4). Please let me know
I know what the problem is and I'm working on a patch right now.
Scott
Jon Kuster wrote:
On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 05:00, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 11:08:33PM -0700, Jon Kuster wrote:
If there's anything you'd like me to type at the "db>" prompt, just ask
and I'll send the outp
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: On 14-Aug-2003 Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
: > On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 02:10:19AM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
: >> Luoqi Chen wrote:
: > [...]
: >> >On the othe
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Andreas Klemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Wed, Aug 13, 2003 at 02:34:38PM +0200, Soeren Schmidt wrote:
: >
: > Upgraded laptop from 5.1 to -current was as usual a bad idea, this
: > time the xl driver broke (and wi is still use
Mark Sergeant wrote:
Hi All,
When trying to compile a kernel for my 8 cpu DELL 8450's I recieve an
extremly puzzling error, I get a bunch of errors when compiling a kernel
that has the following options in it...
options WITNESS
options NETSMB
options NETSMBCRYPTO
options LI
y ? I've got a 5.1-RELEASE machine running with the same
kernel config & 2 cpu's without any problem so I can only think that
it's something to do with more than 2 cpu's.
Cheers,
Mark
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 17:55, Mark Sergeant wrote:
On Tue, 2003-08-19 at 17:47, Scott Long
Since HTT can lead to performance degradation in some (many?) cases,
the second logical CPU's are halted by default. They are enabled,
however, in order for interrupt routing to work right. Work is ongoing
to make an HTT-aware scheduler, and make the enabling of the logical
cores optional.
Scott
Hi,
This is a known problem that showed up late in the 5.1 release cycle.
I declined to allow the fix in as it was also somewhat disruptive.
Updating to 5.1-CURRENT should make the problem go away. In any case
it's fairly harmless as it happens after the disks have been synced.
Scott
Matt Dainty
Hi,
You're not the first to report this. Please try reverting
/sys/dev/aac/aac.c to rev 1.73 and let me know if it helps.
Scott
Chip Norkus wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a Dell Poweredge 2650 which I recently installed 5.1-R on. That
worked fine, and so I did a cvsup to get to 5.1-C as of about no
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 11:43:25PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
scottl 2003/08/31 23:43:25 PDT
FreeBSD src repository
Modified files:
.Makefile.inc1
Log:
Clarify the numbering of some of the build stages.
Revision ChangesPath
1.389
David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:00:17AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
|-+---+-+|
| | | | Productionable |
| | | | support fo
David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 10:00:17AM -0400, Robert Watson wrote:
|-+---+-+|
| | | | Productionable |
| | | | support fo
Scott M. Likens wrote:
I have a question related to FreeBSD Serial console,
I am aware you can use -Dh for both internal and serial, but is it
possible to see the 'kernel' "boot" messages sent on both the serial and
the console?
It was a question that was asked to me by a client, and after
researc
Aaron Wohl wrote:
My notes on getting a serial console at 115200
-must be com1
-com1 must be at port 0x3F8 irq 4
-in bios set the port and irq as above
-in bios set serial redirection to com1
-in bios set baud rate 115200
-in bios set RTS/CTS flow control
-edit (or create) /etc/make.conf to add th
karound to investigate is USB
keyboards.
Scott
Nicole wrote:
*SIGH*
No what I want is NO serial console. DO NOT FOR ANY REASON turn off/not resp
ond to the keyboard port
Nicole
On 01-Sep-03 Unnamed Administration sources reported Scott Long said :
Aaron Wohl wrote:
My notes on getting a serial
Doug White wrote:
Hey folks,
It looks like we may need to rethink the way swap is mounted at boot time
if we want crashdumps to work.
Recently(?), a change was made so you can no longer open a swap partition
read/write after it is activated with swapon(8). In the current boot
sequence, swap is mo
John Birrell wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 05:29:09PM -0600, Scott Long wrote:
At one time I was working on patches to the loader to make the console
speed configurable. At the time, at least, I didn't see any evidence
that the settings were stored in the boot0 block, but maybe I was
Doug Barton wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Nicole wrote:
In my 5.1 system I see this in my .hints file. So I assume I edit it
there or do I treat it like a defaults file and import and change in
in my config file?
I didn't say anything about your hints file. You need to edit your
kernel config file,
Scott Long wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Nicole wrote:
In my 5.1 system I see this in my .hints file. So I assume I edit it
there or do I treat it like a defaults file and import and change in
in my config file?
I didn't say anything about your hints file. You need to edit
Doug Barton wrote:
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Hmm, that was an unfortunate side effect.
Heh, well, stuff happens. I think your idea of opening swap exclusive is
probably a good one, but it will require some gymnastics to accomodate
it. One thing that'd really help is an option
All,
I'd like to give a status report for 4.x and 5.x for the developers and
users who didn't attend the DevSummit this past weekend.
4.9:
The 4.9 release is likely going to be pushed back for a few weeks while
the recent instability reports are tracked down. The target goal is two
weeks, but h
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
