Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 30/05/23 00:26, Ivan Quitschal wrote: On Mon, 29 May 2023, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Mon, 29 May 2023 21:05:42 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: On 28/05/23 20:45, Guido Falsi wrote: It may well be something broke... but I'm just wanting to be double sure it's against a consistent package set. If

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 30/05/23 00:18, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Mon, 29 May 2023 21:05:42 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: On 28/05/23 20:45, Guido Falsi wrote: It may well be something broke... but I'm just wanting to be double sure it's against a consistent package set. If something broke, then I can't help. I see, I

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On Mon, 29 May 2023, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: On Mon, 29 May 2023 21:05:42 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: On 28/05/23 20:45, Guido Falsi wrote: It may well be something broke... but I'm just wanting to be double sure it's against a consistent package set. If something broke, then I can't help. I

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On Mon, 29 May 2023 21:05:42 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote: > On 28/05/23 20:45, Guido Falsi wrote: > > >> It may well be something broke... but I'm just wanting to be double > >> sure it's against a consistent package set. If something broke, then I > >> can't help. > > > > I see, I did not unders

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 28/05/23 20:45, Guido Falsi wrote: It may well be something broke... but I'm just wanting to be double sure it's against a consistent package set. If something broke, then I can't help. I see, I did not understand what you meant at first. What I posted was the result of a simple "pkg upgr

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 28/05/23 18:22, Warner Losh wrote: On Sun, May 28, 2023, 9:20 AM Guido Falsi > wrote: On 28/05/23 16:41, Warner Losh wrote: > Sill questions.  Did you update only some of your packages? You really > need to update them all at the same time to hav

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 27/05/2023 09:31, Guido Falsi wrote: I'm seeing a strange issue with xfwm4 on my laptop How much memory, how much VRAM? running head (commit 5804b7ab378d6207130bd1685c931da6a4e76e55), using pkgbase, everything build on poudriere. I have filed an issue upstream with a description and some

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On Sun, May 28, 2023, 9:20 AM Guido Falsi wrote: > On 28/05/23 16:41, Warner Losh wrote: > > Sill questions. Did you update only some of your packages? You really > > need to update them all at the same time to have them be compatible. > > Some projects have a fast moving abi they don't keep com

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 28/05/23 16:41, Warner Losh wrote: Sill questions.  Did you update only some of your packages? You really need to update them all at the same time to have them be compatible. Some projects have a fast moving abi they don't keep compatible very well. I'm running FreeBSD head here, using pk

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

Sill questions. Did you update only some of your packages? You really need to update them all at the same time to have them be compatible. Some projects have a fast moving abi they don't keep compatible very well. Warner

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 28/05/23 16:03, Alastair Hogge wrote: Hello Guido, On 2023-05-28 12:44, Guido Falsi wrote: On 28/05/23 00:42, Alastair Hogge wrote: Hello, Is there some way to test your X session with minimum components, and slowly adding whatever XFCE does? Maybe I was not perfectly clear. Xorg works

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

Hello Guido, On 2023-05-28 12:44, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 28/05/23 00:42, Alastair Hogge wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Is there some way to test your X session with minimum components, and slowly >> adding whatever XFCE does? > > Maybe I was not perfectly clear. Xorg works fine, I already tested with

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 28/05/23 00:42, Alastair Hogge wrote: Hello, Is there some way to test your X session with minimum components, and slowly adding whatever XFCE does? Maybe I was not perfectly clear. Xorg works fine, I already tested with another window manager. The only thing that changed is that I upda

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

Hello, Is there some way to test your X session with minimum components, and slowly adding whatever XFCE does? I would switch from using a X Display Manager, and launch X from the login vty using startx (if not already ), with a minimum .xinitrc. I would find out what is needed to get a minima

Re: Help request: strange issue with xfce xfwm4 on AMD hardware, running head

On 27/05/23 10:31, Guido Falsi wrote: Hi, I'm seeing a strange issue with xfwm4 on my laptop running head (commit 5804b7ab378d6207130bd1685c931da6a4e76e55), using pkgbase, everything build on poudriere. I have filed an issue upstream with a description and some finding: https://gitlab.xfce.

Re: Help wanted: volunteer yourselves in .github/CODEOWNERS

On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 05:25:03AM +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > They are enthusiastic FreeBSD users and potential future committers, > and should be treated as such! The same goes for non-committers and phabricator, IMHO. mcl

Re: Help wanted: volunteer yourselves in .github/CODEOWNERS

Alan Somers writes: > Strangers are submitting pull requests to our Github mirror, [...] The are not "strangers". They are enthusiastic FreeBSD users and potential future committers, and should be treated as such! -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 p...@freebsd.

Re: Help wanted: volunteer yourselves in .github/CODEOWNERS

On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 8:17 PM Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 31/05/2021 9:13 am, Alan Somers wrote: > > Strangers are submitting pull requests to our Github mirror, but we > rarely > > pay attention. I just added a .github/CODEOWNERS file to our repo to > > automatically assign reviewers to PRs. I

Re: Help wanted: volunteer yourselves in .github/CODEOWNERS

On 31/05/2021 9:13 am, Alan Somers wrote: Strangers are submitting pull requests to our Github mirror, but we rarely pay attention. I just added a .github/CODEOWNERS file to our repo to automatically assign reviewers to PRs. I based it off of the contents of the current MAINTAINERS file. But i

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 08:43:53 +0300 Toomas Soome wrote: > > On 27 Aug 2019, at 08:08, Warner Losh wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 5:32 PM Rebecca Cran > > wrote: > >> On 8/26/19 5:22 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> > >>> > >>> the other thing is the weird Lenovo handli

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:34:21 +0300 Toomas Soome schrieb: > > On 21 Aug 2019, at 22:30, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:14:46 +0300 > > Toomas Soome mailto:tso...@me.co

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:29:29 + greg@unrelenting.technology schrieb: > August 22, 2019 12:23 AM, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:58:24 -0500 > > Karl Denninger schrieb: > > > >> I would see if you can get REFIND loaded and

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

> On Aug 26, 2019, at 11:43 PM, Toomas Soome wrote: > > For me it is still confusing if this is path versus upper-lower capital > chars. > > If that vendor is using suggestion from UEFI Spec 2.7A section 3.5.1.1 (page > 91), then the file name should also end with .EFI. (and yes, I know, th

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

> On 27 Aug 2019, at 08:08, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 5:32 PM Rebecca Cran > wrote: > >> On 8/26/19 5:22 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: >> >>> >>> the other thing is the weird Lenovo handling of the UEFI vars. The only >> way to >>> boot the E540 (after

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

On 2019-08-26 23:08, Warner Losh wrote: > > That's the first machine I've seen where you have to set the name like > that... there is a larger story here and we are getting incomplete reports > because it doesn't quite make sense yet... > > But there are enough reasons not to do that by default. Fo

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

On Mon, Aug 26, 2019, 5:32 PM Rebecca Cran wrote: > On 8/26/19 5:22 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > the other thing is the weird Lenovo handling of the UEFI vars. The only > way to > > boot the E540 (after(!) disabling _BEARSSL in src.conf and rebuilding > > everything) was to set the loader's n

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

On 8/26/19 5:22 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: the other thing is the weird Lenovo handling of the UEFI vars. The only way to boot the E540 (after(!) disabling _BEARSSL in src.conf and rebuilding everything) was to set the loader's name to EFI/BOOT/BOOTx64.efi. Setting the variable to contain EFI/BOOT/

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 08:58:55 +0300 Toomas Soome wrote: > > On 22 Aug 2019, at 06:04, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:29:29 + > > greg@unrelenting.technology schrieb: > > > >> August 22, 2019 12:23 AM, "O. Hart

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

> On 22 Aug 2019, at 06:04, O. Hartmann wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:29:29 + > greg@unrelenting.technology schrieb: > >> August 22, 2019 12:23 AM, "O. Hartmann" wrote: >> >>> Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:58:24 -0500 >>> Karl Denninger

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

August 22, 2019 12:23 AM, "O. Hartmann" wrote: > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:58:24 -0500 > Karl Denninger schrieb: > >> I would see if you can get REFIND loaded and use that. I have a Lenovo >> X1 Carbon Gen 6 and that's the answer I used, as it allows multi-boot >> (e.g. Win10 and FreeBSD) easily.

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 15:58:24 -0500 Karl Denninger schrieb: > BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:34:21 +0300 > > Toomas Soome schrieb: > > > > >> On 21 Aug 2019, at 22:30, O. Hartmann wrote: > > >>

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

> On 22 Aug 2019, at 00:07, Clay Daniels Jr. wrote: > > I would agree with Karl & Steffen about using rEFInd. It really gives you a > lot more control of your computers boot. Take a look at Rod Smith's pages: > http://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/ > > I use it to triple boot Windows 10, MX Linux,

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

I would agree with Karl & Steffen about using rEFInd. It really gives you a lot more control of your computers boot. Take a look at Rod Smith's pages: http://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/ I use it to triple boot Windows 10, MX Linux, and FreeBSD. Clay On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:59 PM Karl Denninger

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:34:21 +0300 > Toomas Soome schrieb: > > >> On 21 Aug 2019, at 22:30, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA256 > >> > >> Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:14:46 +0300 > >> Toomas Soome mailto:

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 2:50 PM O. Hartmann wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:34:21 +0300 > Toomas Soome schrieb: > > > > On 21 Aug 2019, at 22:30, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > >

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:34:21 +0300 Toomas Soome schrieb: > > On 21 Aug 2019, at 22:30, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:14:46 +0300 > > Toomas Soome mailto:tso...@me.co

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:34:21 +0300 Toomas Soome schrieb: > > On 21 Aug 2019, at 22:30, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

O. Hartmann wrote in <20190821145234.6fe455b4@freyja>: |I ran into serious trouble booting several boxes off UEFI. On modern \ |hardware, |the ESP is around 200 - 300 MB in size and usually I install |/efi/freebsd/loader.efi, loader.efi taken from /boot/loader.efi. On \ |some older |hardware,

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:14:46 +0300 Toomas Soome schrieb: > If you drop into efi shell, can you start efi/boot/bootx64.efi manually? you > should have > fs0: or like for ESP. > > rgds, > toomas Hello, I can't even stop to gain access to the shel

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

> On 21 Aug 2019, at 22:30, O. Hartmann wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Am Wed, 21 Aug 2019 22:14:46 +0300 > Toomas Soome mailto:tso...@me.com>> schrieb: > >> If you drop into efi shell, can you start efi/boot/bootx64.efi manually? you >> should have >> fs0:

Re: HELP: UEFI/ZFS Boot failure: Ignoring Boot000A: Only one DP found

If you drop into efi shell, can you start efi/boot/bootx64.efi manually? you should have fs0: or like for ESP. rgds, toomas > On 21 Aug 2019, at 20:58, O. Hartmann wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > I ran into serious trouble booting several boxes off UEFI. On mo

Re: Help USB keyboard trouble

The result of my new research: In Frenzy (livecd on FreeBSD 6.1), the keyboard works fine. In the system console(current), when connecting to my problem keyboard, the output is working, and keyboard input is not. And after disabling the keyboard input does not work. 09.05.2018 14:08, Hans Petter S

Re: Help USB keyboard trouble

On 06/15/18 08:45, Alex V. Petrov wrote: Hans Petter! What can you say about my problem? Hi, I didn't have time to look into this. --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsu

Re: Help USB keyboard trouble

Hans Petter! What can you say about my problem? 09.05.2018 18:31, Alex V. Petrov пишет: > 09.05.2018 14:08, Hans Petter Selasky пишет: >> On 05/09/18 05:52, Alex V. Petrov wrote: >>> The new USB-keyboard "Qumo Dragon War Mechanicus K11" continues to print >>> "A" when connected, as if the "a" key

Re: Help USB keyboard trouble

09.05.2018 14:08, Hans Petter Selasky пишет: > On 05/09/18 05:52, Alex V. Petrov wrote: >> The new USB-keyboard "Qumo Dragon War Mechanicus K11" continues to print >> "A" when connected, as if the "a" key is pressed. >> But in Windows and Linux keyboard work normaly. >> >> In log: >> >> May  9 10:4

Re: Help USB keyboard trouble

On 05/09/18 05:52, Alex V. Petrov wrote: The new USB-keyboard "Qumo Dragon War Mechanicus K11" continues to print "A" when connected, as if the "a" key is pressed. But in Windows and Linux keyboard work normaly. In log: May 9 10:43:38 alex kernel: ugen2.3: at usbus2 May 9 10:43:38 alex kerne

Re: [Help] Linux low level data structures < - > FreeBSD low level data structures

Hi Mark, Mandriva was a really god hint. Let's see how it goes: https://issues.openmandriva.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2176 --HPS ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any

Re: [Help] Linux low level data structures < - > FreeBSD low level data structures

Hans Petter Selasky hps at selasky.org write on Sun Jun 4 16:09:25 UTC 2017: > I recently found a > piece of code in a header file, which works with GCC and causes a > panic() when compiled with clang. I reported it to one of the Linux > kernel team members and they didn't care about it. Even i

Re: [Help] Linux low level data structures < - > FreeBSD low level data structures

On 4/6/17 7:07 pm, blubee blubeeme wrote: Hello Is there anyone on either of these lists that have experience with both linux low level data structures and their equivalents on FreeBSD? For instance the linux header file: which includes the header file: Then looking at that file: You

Re: [Help] Linux low level data structures < - > FreeBSD low level data structures

＠Hans I've noticed these things about Linux. A lot of stuff relies on knowing the internals of the data structures instead of working with the API but I don't want to start all that stuff up. The goal is to lift up FreeBSD w/o tearing down Linux and as u know needing to be glued to the Linux data

Re: [Help] Linux low level data structures < - > FreeBSD low level data structures

Hi Owen, The most comprehensive open-source wrappers for Linux kernel APIs in the FreeBSD kernel is found at: https://github.com/FreeBSDDesktop/freebsd-base-graphics/tree/drm-next/sys/compat/linuxkpi The most comprehensive open-source wrappers for Linux kernel APIs in FreeBSD user-space is f

Re: [Help] Linux low level data structures < - > FreeBSD low level data structures

Hi Julian My goals are to port the Linux graphics stack over to FreeBSD w/o relying too heavily on the linuxkpi stuff. That's cool for a lot of use cases but it just seems a bit too brittle. It is a very large I understand the task will not be easy but I am willing to do the work, even from scrat

Re: Help

On 12/12/16 23:08, Lewis ingraham wrote: Hi FreeBSD Current Team, I need help with a few things: 1. I tried getting help from all kinds of irc chats but still no dice. 2. I cannot get my soundcard to work on FreeBSD. It is the Soundblaster Z(SB1500, SB1502) with the CA0132 codec. I really LO

Re: Help

On 12/13/16 05:08, Lewis ingraham wrote: 4. Another potential problem with usb drive detection as well. Usb ports work just fine in something like windows and linux but not FreeBSD. Can you show dmesg of failed enumerations? Did you try to set some device quirks? --HPS __

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

Am Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:37:52 + Gary Palmer schrieb: > On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 06:11:22PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Am Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:29:26 -0700 > > Ian Lepore schrieb: > > > > > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 16:29 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:52:44 + >

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 06:11:22PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:29:26 -0700 > Ian Lepore schrieb: > > > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 16:29 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:52:44 + > > > RW wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:16:24 +0100 > > > >

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

Am Thu, 18 Feb 2016 11:20:20 -0500 Lowell Gilbert schrieb: > Allan Jude writes: > > > On 2016-02-18 10:29, O. Hartmann wrote: > > >> I'm now down to a small C routine utilizing crypt(3). But this is not what > >> I > >> intend to have, since I want to use tools from the FBSD base system. >

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

Am Thu, 18 Feb 2016 10:54:27 -0500 Allan Jude schrieb: > On 2016-02-18 10:29, O. Hartmann wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:52:44 + > > RW wrote: > > > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:16:24 +0100 > >> O. Hartmann wrote: > >> > >>> Hello out there, > >>> > >>> I run into a problem and digging

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

On 2016-02-18 11:29, Ian Lepore wrote: On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 16:29 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:52:44 + RW wrote: On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:16:24 +0100 O. Hartmann wrote: Hello out there, I run into a problem and digging for a solution didn't work out. Problem: I need

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

Am Thu, 18 Feb 2016 09:29:26 -0700 Ian Lepore schrieb: > On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 16:29 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:52:44 + > > RW wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:16:24 +0100 > > > O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > > > Hello out there, > > > > > > > > I run in

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

Lowell Gilbert wrote on 02/18/2016 17:20: Allan Jude writes: On 2016-02-18 10:29, O. Hartmann wrote: I'm now down to a small C routine utilizing crypt(3). But this is not what I intend to have, since I want to use tools from the FBSD base system. [...] I have wanted to bring something l

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

On Thu, 2016-02-18 at 16:29 +0100, O. Hartmann wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:52:44 + > RW wrote: > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:16:24 +0100 > > O. Hartmann wrote: > > > > > Hello out there, > > > > > > I run into a problem and digging for a solution didn't work out. > > > > > > Problem: I

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

Allan Jude writes: > On 2016-02-18 10:29, O. Hartmann wrote: >> I'm now down to a small C routine utilizing crypt(3). But this is not what I >> intend to have, since I want to use tools from the FBSD base system. >> >> I build images of a small appliance in a secure isolated environment via >>

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

On 2016-02-18 10:29, O. Hartmann wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:52:44 + > RW wrote: > >> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:16:24 +0100 >> O. Hartmann wrote: >> >>> Hello out there, >>> >>> I run into a problem and digging for a solution didn't work out. >>> >>> Problem: I need a string that reflects th

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:52:44 + RW wrote: > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:16:24 +0100 > O. Hartmann wrote: > > > Hello out there, > > > > I run into a problem and digging for a solution didn't work out. > > > > Problem: I need a string that reflects the hashed password for the > > usage with > >

Re: HELP: Howtwo create a passwd-suitable hash for usage with psswd -H 0?

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 14:16:24 +0100 O. Hartmann wrote: > Hello out there, > > I run into a problem and digging for a solution didn't work out. > > Problem: I need a string that reflects the hashed password for the > usage with > > passwd -H 0 Did you mean -h? > I think the procedure is using

Re: HELP! libelf.so: no such file or directory

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 21:23:56 -0800 Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 12/1/2015 9:03 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:51:04 -0800 > > Bryan Drewery wrote: > > > >> On 12/1/2015 2:46 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >>> On 12/1/2015 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Tue, 1 Dec 2015 2

Re: HELP! libelf.so: no such file or directory

On 12/1/2015 9:03 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:51:04 -0800 > Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> On 12/1/2015 2:46 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> On 12/1/2015 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: Am Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:31:45 +0100 "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > > Just a few mome

Re: HELP! libelf.so: no such file or directory

On Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:51:04 -0800 Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 12/1/2015 2:46 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > > On 12/1/2015 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > >> Am Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:31:45 +0100 > >> "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > >> > >>> > >>> Just a few moments ago, I installed via buildworld/buildkernel

Re: HELP! libelf.so: no such file or directory

On 12/1/2015 2:46 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 12/1/2015 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: >> Am Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:31:45 +0100 >> "O. Hartmann" schrieb: >> >>> >>> Just a few moments ago, I installed via buildworld/buildkernel a new >>> CURRENT, then did >>> "make delete-old-libs" and by that, libelf

Re: HELP! libelf.so: no such file or directory

On 12/1/2015 2:38 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:31:45 +0100 > "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > >> >> Just a few moments ago, I installed via buildworld/buildkernel a new >> CURRENT, then did >> "make delete-old-libs" and by that, libelf.so.2 got killed! >> >> After that, I'm unable to b

Re: HELP! libelf.so: no such file or directory

On 12/1/2015 2:31 PM, O. Hartmann wrote: > > Just a few moments ago, I installed via buildworld/buildkernel a new CURRENT, > then did > "make delete-old-libs" and by that, libelf.so.2 got killed! > > After that, I'm unable to build any world to salvage the problem! Moments > later, I did > the

Re: HELP! libelf.so: no such file or directory

Am Tue, 1 Dec 2015 23:31:45 +0100 "O. Hartmann" schrieb: > > Just a few moments ago, I installed via buildworld/buildkernel a new CURRENT, > then did > "make delete-old-libs" and by that, libelf.so.2 got killed! > > After that, I'm unable to build any world to salvage the problem! Moments > l

Re: help with sandybridge/ivybridge hwpmc NUMA DRAM counters

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:24:55AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:24:06AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > On 23 April 2015 at 00:22, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:20:14AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > > > >> Yeah, on stable/10. But

Re: help with sandybridge/ivybridge hwpmc NUMA DRAM counters

On 23 April 2015 at 00:22, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:20:14AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> Yeah, on stable/10. But on -HEAD it's different. There's two entries - >> one for d3_01 and one for d3_03. > > What CPU model? CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2650 v2 @ 2.60GHz (

Re: help with sandybridge/ivybridge hwpmc NUMA DRAM counters

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:24:06AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 23 April 2015 at 00:22, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:20:14AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > > >> Yeah, on stable/10. But on -HEAD it's different. There's two entries - > >> one for d3_01 and one for d3_

Re: help with sandybridge/ivybridge hwpmc NUMA DRAM counters

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:20:14AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Yeah, on stable/10. But on -HEAD it's different. There's two entries - > one for d3_01 and one for d3_03. What CPU model? ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.o

Re: help with sandybridge/ivybridge hwpmc NUMA DRAM counters

Yeah, on stable/10. But on -HEAD it's different. There's two entries - one for d3_01 and one for d3_03. -adrian ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "fre

Re: help with sandybridge/ivybridge hwpmc NUMA DRAM counters

On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:38:22PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi all, > > I'm having a spot of problem trying to get the local/remote dram > counters working on the NUMA sandybridge and ivybridge systems here. > > Things work fine using intel-pcm, but those same counters don't work with > hwp

Re: Help fixing clang 3.4

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 07:43:54AM +0100, Antoine Brodin wrote: > On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > Can someone point to where I disable clang from > > issuing an error and aborting on an unknown option? > > > > % cd /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 > > % make > > > > cc ...

Re: Help fixing clang 3.4

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Steve Kargl wrote: > Can someone point to where I disable clang from > issuing an error and aborting on an unknown option? > > % cd /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 > % make > > cc -shared -O2 -pipe -march=opteron -fno-strict-aliasing > build/temp.freebsd-11.0-CURR

Re: Help fixing clang 3.4

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 06:24:07PM -0800, hiren panchasara wrote: > On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > Can someone point to where I disable clang from > > issuing an error and aborting on an unknown option? > > > > % cd /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 > > % make > > > > cc .

Re: Help fixing clang 3.4

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Steve Kargl wrote: > Can someone point to where I disable clang from > issuing an error and aborting on an unknown option? > > % cd /usr/ports/databases/py-sqlite3 > % make > > cc -shared -O2 -pipe -march=opteron -fno-strict-aliasing > build/temp.freebsd-11.0-CURR

Re: HELP WANTED: Figure out why svnlite build is sometimes not reproducible

Colin Percival wrote this message on Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 14:03 -0700: > Doing freebsd-update builds, I've now had two instances where /usr/bin/svnlite > has built inexplicably differently -- changes scattered all over the binary. > This is a problem for freebsd-update because it means that at some

Re: HELP WANTED: Figure out why svnlite build is sometimes not reproducible

Hi Colin, Den 27/10/2013 kl. 22.03 skrev Colin Percival : > Hi all, > > Doing freebsd-update builds, I've now had two instances where /usr/bin/svnlite > has built inexplicably differently -- changes scattered all over the binary. Which kind of changes? Are you aware of the -D flag to ar(1) (wip

Re: HELP WANTED: Figure out why svnlite build is sometimes not reproducible

On 10/27/13 14:52, Erik Cederstrand wrote: > Den 27/10/2013 kl. 22.03 skrev Colin Percival : >> Doing freebsd-update builds, I've now had two instances where >> /usr/bin/svnlite >> has built inexplicably differently -- changes scattered all over the binary. > > Which kind of changes? Are you awar

Re: HELP: New Port: devel/pocl: A portable OpenCL library with LLVM backend

On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 10:57:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > Hello. > I tried to create a "port", see the Makefile attached I created already. > For further informations and your convenience, look at this website: > Please stop cross posting to freebsd-current when you have some issue that clea

Re: Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)

On Thu, 2012-09-06 at 13:14 +0200, O. Hartmann wrote: > I tried to add > > RUN_DEPENDS= > ${LOCALBASE}/lib/libatomic_ops.a:${PORTSDIR}/devel/libatomic_ops > > to my provided Makefile, but this doesn't install the port > devel/libatomic_ops. > This is weird and inconsistent. I follow exact the ste

Re: Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)

On 09/06/12 12:16, Matthieu Volat wrote: > On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:45:49 +0200 > "O. Hartmann" wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> FreeBSD has fallen back far behind the standards of modern scientific >> computing and I dsperately look for solutions having OpenCL support on >> FreeBSD anyway. >> >> I stumble

Re: Help. Porting "FreeOCL" fails (atomic_ops.h missing, CLANG++ libc++ issues ...)

On 09/06/12 12:16, Matthieu Volat wrote: > On Wed, 05 Sep 2012 16:45:49 +0200 > "O. Hartmann" wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> FreeBSD has fallen back far behind the standards of modern scientific >> computing and I dsperately look for solutions having OpenCL support on >> FreeBSD anyway. >> >> I stumble

Re: OpenLDAP/SASL2 problem in FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT WAS: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

Am 08/18/12 22:31, schrieb Adam McDougall: > On 8/18/2012 4:07 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: >> My setups on all boxes using OpenLDAP, the port >> net/opendldap24-client/server has security/cyrus-sasl2 enabled. >> I use nsswitch and nascd. >> >> The problem: >> I can not anymore install or reinstall (usin

Re: OpenLDAP/SASL2 problem in FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT WAS: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

On 8/18/2012 4:07 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: My setups on all boxes using OpenLDAP, the port net/opendldap24-client/server has security/cyrus-sasl2 enabled. I use nsswitch and nascd. The problem: I can not anymore install or reinstall (using portmaster, patched for pkgng) the ports security/cyrus-s

OpenLDAP/SASL2 problem in FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT WAS: Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

As I reported in my previous help request, I discovered on ALL(!) of my FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT box a very strange problem. Attached, you'll find /etc/src.conf - which might give hints what I'm doing wrong. Another issue might be pkg(ng), I changed to that recently (a week ago), but had no problems

Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

Am 08/16/12 21:44, schrieb Garrett Cooper: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Hartmann, O. > wrote: >> >> I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. > > ... > >> On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sasl2 >> got corrupted by "install" and/or "mtree" dumping cor

Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 09:44:40AM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > >> An installation failed due to pkg(ng) was missing libarchive.so via > > > > There is pkg-static for recovering in this type of situation. > > Oh ... I'm new to pkg(ng). > No worries. It is a nice thing to know about, since afte

Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

On 08/16/12 17:44, Glen Barber wrote: > On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: >> >> I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. >> >> On several boxes, FreeBSD 9.1-PRE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (build of >> CURRENT sources from yesterday, r239295 Wed August 15 17:04:51 CEST

Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. ... > On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sasl2 > got corrupted by "install" and/or "mtree" dumping core and signalling > SIGNAL 11. Booting into multiuser mode

Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 11:33 AM, O. Hartmann wrote: > I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. Please don't cross-post / double-post. Thanks, -Garrett ___ freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/fre

Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

On 8/16/2012 10:33 AM, Hartmann, O. wrote: > I tried to find rescue images and a rescue DVD of a snap shot server, > but there is no way to crawl through the informations on the web pages > towards a snapshot. All folders end up in 2011 and highly outdated > (www.freebsd.org, I didn't look at mirro

Re: HELP! core dumps: install, mtree, et cetera all of the sudden after portmaster security/cyrus-sasl2

On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 05:33:20PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote: > > I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation. > > On several boxes, FreeBSD 9.1-PRE and FreeBSD 10-CURRENT (build of > CURRENT sources from yesterday, r239295 Wed August 15 17:04:51 CEST 2012 > amd64, I had to recompile all requi

  1   2   3   >