Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-17 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kris Kennaway writes: : Well, these are both 686-class machines so it doesn't strictly apply : to what we were talking about. The build machine is a 686, but the targets are {486,586 and 686}. The laptop is a 586... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-17 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 11:58:50PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes: > : Peter Jeremy wrote: > : > [1] I don't think there's a lot of `build once, install on lots of > : > different hardware', though I could be wrong. > : > : Most certainly wrong fo

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-16 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wes Peters writes: : Peter Jeremy wrote: : > [1] I don't think there's a lot of `build once, install on lots of : > different hardware', though I could be wrong. : : Most certainly wrong for those using FreeBSD for embedded devices. I, : for instance, build on

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-16 Thread Wes Peters
Peter Jeremy wrote: > > [1] I don't think there's a lot of `build once, install on lots of > different hardware', though I could be wrong. Most certainly wrong for those using FreeBSD for embedded devices. I, for instance, build on nice, fast Athlons, then install in devices ranging from

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-16 Thread Randell Jesup
Jim Bloom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >I do plenty of build once and run on multiple machines. My biggest >machine is a PII 40MHZ where I compile the world and kernels for a 486 >laptop and P-60 Router/Firewall. I would not really want to compile the >world on these slower machines over nfs.

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-16 Thread Jim Bloom
I do plenty of build once and run on multiple machines. My biggest machine is a PII 40MHZ where I compile the world and kernels for a 486 laptop and P-60 Router/Firewall. I would not really want to compile the world on these slower machines over nfs. For my case, I guess I could rebuild only th

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-15 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Feb 16, 2001 at 03:57:57PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote: > I'm sure something similar would be possible with FreeBSD, but I don't > have the expertise to actually implement it. I'm less certain how > much of a win this would be in the general scheme of things: Apart > from special cases (li

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-15 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2001-Feb-11 13:02:43 -0800, Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010211 12:52] wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> > Is it possible to have multiple ASM cores and use the appropriate >> > routines? Or must

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:28:02PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Updated patch now available at the same location. Changes: > > * Document the MACHINE_CPU types which are currently used Actually, it occurs to me that this will be useful for ports as well. Currently some of them have nonstandard

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 01:02:43PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010211 12:52] wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > > > Looks awesome, someone complained that Linux was able to maintain > > > an order of magnitu

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-11 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010211 12:52] wrote: > On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > > > Looks awesome, someone complained that Linux was able to maintain > > an order of magnitude more SSL connections than FreeBSD, since you > > say this gives us a 3-5x

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Feb 11, 2001 at 12:47:07PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > Looks awesome, someone complained that Linux was able to maintain > an order of magnitude more SSL connections than FreeBSD, since you > say this gives us a 3-5x speed up, I'd really like to see it committed > and ported to -stab

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-11 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010211 12:32] wrote: > Updated patch now available at the same location. Changes: > > * Document the MACHINE_CPU types which are currently used > > * Make NOPERL mutually exclusive with OpenSSL ASM and document it > > * Teach make(1) about MACHINE_CPU and pr

Re: OpenSSL ASM patch

2001-02-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
Updated patch now available at the same location. Changes: * Document the MACHINE_CPU types which are currently used * Make NOPERL mutually exclusive with OpenSSL ASM and document it * Teach make(1) about MACHINE_CPU and provide sensible defaults for i386 and alpha. http://www.freebsd.org/~k