On Fri, 22 Sep 2000, Takaya Ogawa wrote:
> Attached patch adds back the HLT in i386 UP case and
> seems to fix my problem, although I'm totally
> unfamiliar with SMP nor alpha.
This has the race bug that was fixed in rev.1.88 of swtch.s.
I use the folowing fix. It also fixes the loss of page c
My system fans always stay on... but again this is not in a laptop .. it
is on my regular pc...
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best NT upgrade|
| Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 |
|
I don't have it enabled... I am not even on my laptop with
-CURRENT... this is on my regular PC... and I'm taking my thermal readings
by banging around on some memory addys through /dev/io with a little hack
of a program I wrote as a windowmaker dockapp for this purpose...
=
> : >> If I remember from a discussion with John Baldwin, the reason we
> : >> don't do this (yet) is that HLT only wakes up when you take an
> : >> interrupt, and there are cases where we can't guarantee that we'll
> : >> take an interrupt in order to get us out of the HLT.
> : >
> : >I thought t
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tony Finch writes:
: Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: >Mike Smith writes:
: >>
: >> If I remember from a discussion with John Baldwin, the reason we
: >> don't do this (yet) is that HLT only wakes up when you take an
: >> interrupt, and there are cases where
Warner Losh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mike Smith writes:
>>
>> If I remember from a discussion with John Baldwin, the reason we
>> don't do this (yet) is that HLT only wakes up when you take an
>> interrupt, and there are cases where we can't guarantee that we'll
>> take an interrupt in order to
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
> : If I remember from a discussion with John Baldwin, the reason we don't do
> : this (yet) is that HLT only wakes up when you take an interrupt, and
> : there are cases where we can't guarantee that we'll take an interrupt in
> : order to ge
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mike Smith writes:
: If I remember from a discussion with John Baldwin, the reason we don't do
: this (yet) is that HLT only wakes up when you take an interrupt, and
: there are cases where we can't guarantee that we'll take an interrupt in
: order to get us out o
> My laptop does seem to run *MUCH* warmer than before as well. It runs
> hot to begin with, but with the latest kernels it runs really hot. It
> used to get this hot only when I compiled -j 4. I don't have ACPI
> enabled and am using UP kernel. There really needs to be a HLT in the
> idle loo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kenneth Wayne
Culver writes:
: I can second this... on my PC the cpu used to run around about 84 degrees
: F with the case at 80 degrees F, now the cpu runs at about 91-93 degrees F
: while the case runs at 80 degrees F.
My laptop does seem to run *MUCH* warmer tha
> I can second this... on my PC the cpu used to run around about 84 degrees
> F with the case at 80 degrees F, now the cpu runs at about 91-93 degrees F
> while the case runs at 80 degrees F.
While you're tinkering with SMPng, be VERY SURE that you do not have acpi
enabled (ie. make sure it's no
I can second this... on my PC the cpu used to run around about 84 degrees
F with the case at 80 degrees F, now the cpu runs at about 91-93 degrees F
while the case runs at 80 degrees F.
=
| Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The
Hi.
After new idle_proc() committed to the tree, my laptop
become very hot as if under heavy cpu load even when
cpu is actually 95%~ idle.
If I understand collectly, idle_proc() doesn't contain
any HLT instruction in i386 UP case which former
idle() had.
Attached patch adds back the HLT in i38
13 matches
Mail list logo
