On 28.05.2014 18:10, Dirk Engling wrote:
> set during poudriere builds. Default options for some graphic related
> ports like graphics/gd unfortunally litter all my jails with their libX*
> dependencies.
For those graphics libraries, the dependency to libX11 is only required
to support the XPM ima
According to David Chisnall on Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:27:23PM +0100:
> Yes. If you want to have the graphical versions of everything on the server,
> then there's nothing stopping you from using the default package repository.
> THe use case for the proposed no-X repo is installing a headless
On 2 Jun 2014, at 16:12, Ollivier Robert wrote:
> According to David Chisnall on Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:19:41AM +0100:
>> We can probably do a bit better by looking at the complete dependency graph
>> and removing any ports that have unconditional dependencies on X. For a
>> headless server,
According to David Chisnall on Thu, May 29, 2014 at 10:19:41AM +0100:
> We can probably do a bit better by looking at the complete dependency graph
> and removing any ports that have unconditional dependencies on X. For a
> headless server, there's no reason to build any of the kde-* or gnome-*
On 29 May 2014, at 23:06, Andreas Nilsson wrote:
> Having a "parent" set would be nice, yes. I maintain two repos for several
> FreeBSD-versions. Being able to pull some of the deps from packages instead
> of blindingly building would be nice.
Yes, for a lot of cases you only want to build a sma
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Allan Jude wrote:
> On 2014-05-29 08:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> >
> >> On May 29, 2014, at 4:19, David Chisnall wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> >>>
> >>> As for skipping unneeded ports the best I can do is '-a' or "Build it
> a
On 2014-05-29 08:42, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>
>> On May 29, 2014, at 4:19, David Chisnall wrote:
>>
>>> On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>>
>>> As for skipping unneeded ports the best I can do is '-a' or "Build it all".
>>> If a port is only needed for WITH_X11 then an IGNORE should
> On May 29, 2014, at 4:19, David Chisnall wrote:
>
>> On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>
>> As for skipping unneeded ports the best I can do is '-a' or "Build it all".
>> If a port is only needed for WITH_X11 then an IGNORE should be added to it
>> when WITHOUT_X11 is set to pr
On 29 May 2014, at 02:23, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> As for skipping unneeded ports the best I can do is '-a' or "Build it all".
> If a port is only needed for WITH_X11 then an IGNORE should be added to it
> when WITHOUT_X11 is set to prevent wasting time on it.
We can probably do a bit better by lo
On 2014-05-28 16:44, David Chisnall wrote:
On 28 May 2014, at 17:10, Dirk Engling wrote:
I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official
repo suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with
There aren't currently any plans, but we're now bringing online the
infr
On 28 May 2014, at 17:10, Dirk Engling wrote:
> I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official repo
> suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with
There aren't currently any plans, but we're now bringing online the
infrastructure for supporting multiple packag
On 28 May 2014, at 18:10, Dirk Engling wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official repo
> suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with
>
> WITHOUT_QT4=true
> WITHOUT_X11=true
>
> set during poudriere builds. Default options for some g
Hey,
I wonder if there is or there are any plans to provide an official repo
suitable for a typical non-desktop-installation, i.e. with
WITHOUT_QT4=true
WITHOUT_X11=true
set during poudriere builds. Default options for some graphic related
ports like graphics/gd unfortunally litter all my j
13 matches
Mail list logo
