Re: S/390 port status

Go! Go! Go! s390 is the only other truly interesting architecture besides i386. Poul-Henning In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Serguei Tzukanov" writes: >Reaches mount root prompt in emulator. > >More info is on http://tzukanov.narod.ru/freebsd390/ > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

> As far as I know, Grub is one of the best bootloaders around. It supports > IBM JFS (OS/2 and Linux version), ReiserFS, Ext3, Ext2FS, and UFS. > it does not do PXE. danny To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

Chan Tur Wei writes: > So unless someone specifically sets the active partition, the 1st FreeBSD > one, usually -stable, will get loaded. Since boot1+boot2 is loaded by the > partition boot boot0, or the standard DOS boot (or, even MS's multi boot > selector), the above may cause the 2nd Fre

S/390 port status

Reaches mount root prompt in emulator. More info is on http://tzukanov.narod.ru/freebsd390/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: FreeBSD problem: $50 reward.

What form are you using for the drive in the BIOS--LBA or Large? Trying forcing it to Large (sometime "LG") write down the geometry determined by the BIOS, and enter it with fdisk using during the install. This should work. :) jmc On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 18:25, Lucky Green wrote: > Fifty bucks

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

Chan Tur Wei writes: > > I'm not sure how booting with lilo will work (never played with it). > > Instead, I dug around a bit previously, and I found that boot1.s reads: > # > # If we are on a hard drive, then load the MBR and look for the first > # FreeBSD slice. We use the fake partit

FreeBSD problem: $50 reward.

Fifty bucks to the person that is first to help me solve this problem. I have a brand new Asus A7V333 motherboard with the latest BIOS version 1007. I am trying to install FreeBSD 4.6 via floppies onto a brand new Western Digital WD1200AB 120GB IDE drive. I have installed FreeBSD many times befor

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:13:26 -0400 (EDT) > From: Andrew Gallatin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Cyrille Lefevre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: dual booting current/stable on x86? > > > Cyrille Lefevre writes: > > On Sun, Jun 3

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

: x86 bootloaders terrify me, so I have not tried grub. Does grub : understand reiserfs? --- Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes. If you had ever worked with the source to LILO it would terrify you > too. As far as I know, Grub is one of the best bootloaders around. It supports IBM JFS

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

At 6:05 PM -0400 7/1/02, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > >Why so many applications go to the trouble to disable Nagle's >algorithm is beyond me. I suspect the socket option has too >seductive of a name. I suspect someone had a specific case where Nagle's algorithm causes a real problem. They turn on

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

Kip Macy writes: > > > > > > > x86 bootloaders terrify me, so I have not tried grub. Does grub > > understand reiserfs? > > Yes. If you had ever worked with the source to LILO it would terrify you too. Lilo is what initially terrified me.. ;-) Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to [E

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

On Jul 01, at 03:34 PM, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Then use Dillon's patches, instead of just turning it off. Your > anecdotal experience with "works better" is just that -- anecdotal. > It doesn't hold for the general case. > > I guess the problem is that the patches are not committed to the > v

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

> > > x86 bootloaders terrify me, so I have not tried grub. Does grub > understand reiserfs? Yes. If you had ever worked with the source to LILO it would terrify you too. -Kip To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

Doug Barton wrote: > > Then use Dillon's patches, instead of just turning it off. > > Dillon's patches were committed, by Dillon. :) My systems still work > better with newreno off than with it on. > > > Your anecdotal experience with "works better" is just that -- anecdotal. > > It doesn't hold

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: > > > I guess you missed the part where I said that FreeBSD had bugs, and > > > Matt Dillon posted patches? > > > > Nope. I think you missed the part where I said I was talking about > > reality, not theory. :) The reality is, it's br

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

Doug Barton wrote: > > I guess you missed the part where I said that FreeBSD had bugs, and > > Matt Dillon posted patches? > > Nope. I think you missed the part where I said I was talking about > reality, not theory. :) The reality is, it's broken now, and in my > experience, turning it off make

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

Cyrille Lefevre writes: > On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:23:22PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > How do I dual boot -current and -stable from different slices on the > > same IDE disk? (and linux too.) > > > > When I tell lilo to boot "hde3", I get the -stable boot2 and > > /boot/load

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

> > Yes, I can attest to this an I belive it is actually the case on both > -current and -releng4 that disabling newreno improves TCP performance. > > I belive running an X11 application or scp(1) over a wavelan is a very > good test-bed for this issue. > > -- > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX

panic: ffs_clusteralloc: map mismatch

Hello, I have a machine running 4.6-RELEASE-p1 and it is panicing every day or so... It had the same problem on 4.4-RELEASE and 4.5-RELEASE. Does anybody have any ideas what might be causing this? It is a Dell PowerEdge 6350 with a PERC2/QC RAID controller and 1GB of memory. The server also h

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > Guys, guys... Take 'er easy. > > All I asked is what it is, what it does, and the ramifications. Thank you > both for enlightening me. Really. No sarcasm. I actually wasn't being sarcastic... You've wandered into a briar patch of long standing though,

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Sierchio writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Yes, I can attest to this an I belive it is actually the case on both >> -current and -releng4 that disabling newreno improves TCP performance. >> >> I belive running an X11 application or scp(1) over a wavela

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

On Jul 01, at 01:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us > > > > who have observed the situation in the real wor

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Yes, I can attest to this an I belive it is actually the case on both > -current and -releng4 that disabling newreno improves TCP performance. > > I belive running an X11 application or scp(1) over a wavelan is a very > good test-bed for this issue. Wireless breaks a

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton writ es: >On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > >> Mike Silbersack wrote: >> > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote: >> > > The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us >> > > who have observed the situation in the real wo

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > > > The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us > > > who have observed the situation in the real world have noticed that even > > > on a homogenous network (a

Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?

On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:23:22PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > How do I dual boot -current and -stable from different slices on the > same IDE disk? (and linux too.) > > When I tell lilo to boot "hde3", I get the -stable boot2 and > /boot/loader from "hde2" (ad4s2a). I can then monkey ar

Property in Costa del Sol!

Are you looking to buy property on Costa Del Sol Costa Sol Real Estate Agents have hundreds of Villas, Apartments, Town houses, New developments and Country houses All for  Saleright NOW Please click on the view now button below and find the property of your dreams . VIEW NOW! Costa Sol Rea

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > > The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us > > who have observed the situation in the real world have noticed that even > > on a homogenous network (all with newreno enabled) performance is still > > wo

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote: > D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > > > I'm guessing that the suggestion to turn it off (the original thread) is > > valid enough, as all machines referred to were on the same network, else > > why wouldn't the above still hold true? Or is it a matter of FTP and/or >

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > I'm guessing that the suggestion to turn it off (the original thread) is > valid enough, as all machines referred to were on the same network, else > why wouldn't the above still hold true? Or is it a matter of FTP and/or > SMTP (specifically, sendmail) not playing nice wit

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > > If you turn it off, you rat all your firends out in the Prisoner's > > Dilemma. > > > > Congestion control protocols only work if everyone participates. > > > >All "Reno TCP" implementations include TCP Fast Retransmit and Fast > >Recovery algorithms [RFC2581]... >

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

On Jul 01, at 09:56 AM, Terry Lambert wrote: > > D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > > > You can turn off newreno with the sysctl. I put this in /etc/sysctl.conf > > > on my machines: > > > > > > net.inet.tcp.newreno=0 > > > > Could you explain what newreno is, in a nutshell, the upshots of using it, > > and

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > > You can turn off newreno with the sysctl. I put this in /etc/sysctl.conf > > on my machines: > > > > net.inet.tcp.newreno=0 > > Could you explain what newreno is, in a nutshell, the upshots of using it, > and what the ramifications of turning it off are? > > I'm running

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 12:00 , D J Hawkey Jr wrote: > Could you explain what newreno is, in a nutshell, the upshots of using > it, > and what the ramifications of turning it off are? http://www.google.com/search?q=tcp+new+reno To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubsc

Re: ftp and mail much slower into fbsd 4.4 vs and old BSDi

In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Len Conrad wrote: >> >> Sorry, hackers, I posted this twice in -questions and got no response. >> >> If the problem is newreno, can somebody say how to up just that piece for >> 4.4 so as to be as non-disruptive, non-dice-rollin

Re: AS99127F Hardware Monitor

The ASUS A7N266-E motherboard has the nVidia 420D chipset. Of course, ASUS and nVidia will not provide datasheets... This is not a production machine... # uname -a FreeBSD asus 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 17 13:15:02 PDT 2002 \ root@asus:/usr/src/sys/compile/ASUS i386 I a

Strange linker messages on 4.5 buildworld

Hi, cause of the resolver bug I cvsuped to RELENG_4_5 and wanted to rebuild world. Unfortunately I get some strange linker messages: cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -march=k6 -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libipsec -DIPSEC_DEBUG -DIPSEC -DINET6 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c /usr/src/l

Re: getting a coredump before boot device found

On 30 Jun, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Charles Sprickman wrote: > >> On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: >> > do you have 2 machines you can link together? >> >> Oh yes. But I know nothing about remote gdb. > > it's not that difficult.. > > have the source and

Re: Some small projects for mutt(1)

On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 04:18:38PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote: > > > Interesting. How would you have a key bound sequence in mutt set off > the script on the message, though? For instance, if I do a "ctrl+B", how > would you ensure that the Right Thing happens, without modifying mutt > code?