On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 04:18:38PM -0400, Bosko Milekic wrote:
Interesting. How would you have a key bound sequence in mutt set off
the script on the message, though? For instance, if I do a ctrl+B, how
would you ensure that the Right Thing happens, without modifying mutt
code?
On 30 Jun, Julian Elischer wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Charles Sprickman wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote:
do you have 2 machines you can link together?
Oh yes. But I know nothing about remote gdb.
it's not that difficult..
have the source and compile
Hi,
cause of the resolver bug I cvsuped to RELENG_4_5 and wanted to rebuild
world.
Unfortunately I get some strange linker messages:
cc -fpic -DPIC -O -pipe -march=k6 -I. -I/usr/src/lib/libipsec -DIPSEC_DEBUG
-DIPSEC -DINET6 -I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include -c
The ASUS A7N266-E motherboard has the nVidia 420D chipset. Of course,
ASUS and nVidia will not provide datasheets...
This is not a production machine...
# uname -a
FreeBSD asus 4.6-STABLE FreeBSD 4.6-STABLE #0: Mon Jun 17 13:15:02 PDT 2002 \
root@asus:/usr/src/sys/compile/ASUS i386
I
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Len Conrad wrote:
Sorry, hackers, I posted this twice in -questions and got no response.
If the problem is newreno, can somebody say how to up just that piece for
4.4 so as to be as non-disruptive, non-dice-rolling as
On Monday, July 1, 2002, at 12:00 , D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
Could you explain what newreno is, in a nutshell, the upshots of using
it,
and what the ramifications of turning it off are?
http://www.google.com/search?q=tcp+new+reno
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
You can turn off newreno with the sysctl. I put this in /etc/sysctl.conf
on my machines:
net.inet.tcp.newreno=0
Could you explain what newreno is, in a nutshell, the upshots of using it,
and what the ramifications of turning it off are?
I'm running FreeBSD
On Jul 01, at 09:56 AM, Terry Lambert wrote:
D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
You can turn off newreno with the sysctl. I put this in /etc/sysctl.conf
on my machines:
net.inet.tcp.newreno=0
Could you explain what newreno is, in a nutshell, the upshots of using it,
and what the
D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
If you turn it off, you rat all your firends out in the Prisoner's
Dilemma.
Congestion control protocols only work if everyone participates.
All Reno TCP implementations include TCP Fast Retransmit and Fast
Recovery algorithms [RFC2581]...
[SNIP]
D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
I'm guessing that the suggestion to turn it off (the original thread) is
valid enough, as all machines referred to were on the same network, else
why wouldn't the above still hold true? Or is it a matter of FTP and/or
SMTP (specifically, sendmail) not playing nice with
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
I'm guessing that the suggestion to turn it off (the original thread) is
valid enough, as all machines referred to were on the same network, else
why wouldn't the above still hold true? Or is it a matter of FTP and/or
SMTP
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us
who have observed the situation in the real world have noticed that even
on a homogenous network (all with newreno enabled) performance is still
worse than
Are you looking to buy
property on
Costa Del
Sol
Costa Sol Real Estate
Agents
have hundreds of
Villas,
Apartments, Town houses, New developments and Country
houses
All for Saleright
NOW
Please click
on theview now button below and find the property of your
dreams
.
VIEW NOW!
Costa Sol Real
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:23:22PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
How do I dual boot -current and -stable from different slices on the
same IDE disk? (and linux too.)
When I tell lilo to boot hde3, I get the -stable boot2 and
/boot/loader from hde2 (ad4s2a). I can then monkey around
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us
who have observed the situation in the real world have noticed that even
on a homogenous network (all with
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Barton writ
es:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us
who have observed the situation in the real world have noticed
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Yes, I can attest to this an I belive it is actually the case on both
-current and -releng4 that disabling newreno improves TCP performance.
I belive running an X11 application or scp(1) over a wavelan is a very
good test-bed for this issue.
Wireless breaks a lot
On Jul 01, at 01:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Doug Barton wrote:
The problem is that Terry has described the theory, whereas many of us
who have observed the situation in the real world have noticed
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Sierchio writes:
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Yes, I can attest to this an I belive it is actually the case on both
-current and -releng4 that disabling newreno improves TCP performance.
I belive running an X11 application or scp(1) over a wavelan is a very
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, D J Hawkey Jr wrote:
Guys, guys... Take 'er easy.
All I asked is what it is, what it does, and the ramifications. Thank you
both for enlightening me. Really. No sarcasm.
I actually wasn't being sarcastic... You've wandered into a briar patch
of long standing though, so
Hello,
I have a machine running 4.6-RELEASE-p1 and it is panicing every day or
so... It had the same problem on 4.4-RELEASE and 4.5-RELEASE. Does
anybody have any ideas what might be causing this? It is a Dell PowerEdge
6350 with a PERC2/QC RAID controller and 1GB of memory. The server also
Yes, I can attest to this an I belive it is actually the case on both
-current and -releng4 that disabling newreno improves TCP performance.
I belive running an X11 application or scp(1) over a wavelan is a very
good test-bed for this issue.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since
Cyrille Lefevre writes:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 09:23:22PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
How do I dual boot -current and -stable from different slices on the
same IDE disk? (and linux too.)
When I tell lilo to boot hde3, I get the -stable boot2 and
/boot/loader from hde2
Doug Barton wrote:
I guess you missed the part where I said that FreeBSD had bugs, and
Matt Dillon posted patches?
Nope. I think you missed the part where I said I was talking about
reality, not theory. :) The reality is, it's broken now, and in my
experience, turning it off makes the
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
I guess you missed the part where I said that FreeBSD had bugs, and
Matt Dillon posted patches?
Nope. I think you missed the part where I said I was talking about
reality, not theory. :) The reality is, it's broken now,
Doug Barton wrote:
Then use Dillon's patches, instead of just turning it off.
Dillon's patches were committed, by Dillon. :) My systems still work
better with newreno off than with it on.
Your anecdotal experience with works better is just that -- anecdotal.
It doesn't hold for the
x86 bootloaders terrify me, so I have not tried grub. Does grub
understand reiserfs?
Yes. If you had ever worked with the source to LILO it would terrify you too.
-Kip
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in
On Jul 01, at 03:34 PM, Terry Lambert wrote:
Then use Dillon's patches, instead of just turning it off. Your
anecdotal experience with works better is just that -- anecdotal.
It doesn't hold for the general case.
I guess the problem is that the patches are not committed to the
version
: x86 bootloaders terrify me, so I have not tried grub. Does grub
: understand reiserfs?
--- Kip Macy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes. If you had ever worked with the source to LILO it would terrify you
too.
As far as I know, Grub is one of the best bootloaders around. It supports
IBM JFS
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 18:13:26 -0400 (EDT)
From: Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Cyrille Lefevre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: dual booting current/stable on x86?
Cyrille Lefevre writes:
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at
Fifty bucks to the person that is first to help me solve this problem.
I have a brand new Asus A7V333 motherboard with the latest BIOS version
1007. I am trying to install FreeBSD 4.6 via floppies onto a brand new
Western Digital WD1200AB 120GB IDE drive. I have installed FreeBSD many
times
Chan Tur Wei writes:
I'm not sure how booting with lilo will work (never played with it).
Instead, I dug around a bit previously, and I found that boot1.s reads:
#
# If we are on a hard drive, then load the MBR and look for the first
# FreeBSD slice. We use the fake partition
What form are you using for the drive in the BIOS--LBA or Large? Trying
forcing it to Large (sometime LG) write down the geometry determined
by the BIOS, and enter it with fdisk using during the install. This
should work. :)
jmc
On Mon, 2002-07-01 at 18:25, Lucky Green wrote:
Fifty bucks to
Reaches mount root prompt in emulator.
More info is on http://tzukanov.narod.ru/freebsd390/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Chan Tur Wei writes:
So unless someone specifically sets the active partition, the 1st FreeBSD
one, usually -stable, will get loaded. Since boot1+boot2 is loaded by the
partition boot boot0, or the standard DOS boot (or, even MS's multi boot
selector), the above may cause the 2nd
35 matches
Mail list logo
