Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
ok, after another round of private mails I got it; I had been living
with jail patches for too long; the jls output (without -v) should be
on one line and not on two. That wasn't intended. Unfortunately noone
had
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
Hi,
ok, after another round of private mails I got it; I had been living
with jail patches for too long; the jls output (without -v) should be
on one line and not on two. That wasn't intended. Unfortunately noone
had complained the months before..
On Sun, 14 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
Hi,
ok, after another round of private mails I got it; I had been living
with jail patches for too long; the jls output (without -v) should be
on one line and not on two. That wasn't intended. Unfortunately noone
had complained the months before..
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
Hi,
Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new
functionality?
The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the
Philipp Wuensche cryx-free...@h3q.com writes:
Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and
breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail.
It is uneasy to parse too.
jls | tail +3 | while read line ; do
set $line
if [ $# = 3 ] ; then
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
Hi,
Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and
breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail.
This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use
single-IPv4 jails as before there should be
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
Hi,
Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and
breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail.
This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use
single-IPv4 jails
I patched my jls to output the list of jails in XML CSV format. makes
things alot nicer to script with. Might be worth doing for everyone.
- Andrew
___
freebsd-jail@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-jail
On Fri, 5 Dec 2008, Peter Jeremy wrote:
Hi,
On 2008-Dec-02 21:00:23 -0500, alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT
Yes.
is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE
There are two ways. The first is:
1) Checkout a copy of the HEAD
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 21:00 -0500, alexus wrote:
as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT
The trick is to bribe the right people to get it RFP'd into 7.2R. :)
~BAS
--
Brian A. Seklecki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Collaborative Fusion, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new
functionality?
The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the
latter.
--
Brian A. Seklecki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Collaborative Fusion, Inc.
On 2008-Dec-02 21:00:23 -0500, alexus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT
Yes.
is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE
There are two ways. The first is:
1) Checkout a copy of the HEAD src tree via your chosen source tracker
as far as I understood HEAD is 8.0-CURRENT
is there a way for us to start using it before 8.0 hits -RELEASE which
according to freebsd.org will be in june 2009, which we all know how
accured their schedule is, so, my guess is very well Q4 of 2009 (if we
lucky), I somehow was under impression (and
Hi,
as you may have already noticed multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails have hit
HEAD. See commit message attached.
The bad news first: expect an update on the rc script to make the
more obscure rc features like configuring IPs on interfaces when
starting jails and giving a possible netmask work with
Am 01.12.2008 um 10:41 schrieb Bjoern A. Zeeb:
as you may have already noticed multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails have hit
HEAD. See commit message attached.
Thank you and everyone who worked so hard on this for so long!
I shall proceed to put this into production this year, if I find the
time
Quoting Bjoern A. Zeeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] (from Mon, 1
Dec 2008 09:41:46 + (UTC)):
Hi,
as you may have already noticed multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails have hit
HEAD. See commit message attached.
Will this introduce changes how multicast is handled in jails, or is
it the same behavior as
16 matches
Mail list logo
