Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports

On Fri, 13 Jul 2018 05:32:17 +0200 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > > For a start, use ports@. If ports@ gets too much hadoop-related > > posts, you can always ask postmaster@ to add a list, like > > freebsd-hadoop@ or something similar. > > > >

Re: Hadoop-ecosystem ports

On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 22:21:59 +0200 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > I will be working on making Hadoop a first class citizen on FreeBSD. Thanks, that sounds helpful, as that is a large group of applications. > This will include bumping the existing ports for Hadoop, HBase, Oozie, > Spark (probably

Re: Any way to prevent do-extract chmod and chown?

On Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:05:59 +0200 "Mathieu Arnold" said On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 01:43:41PM -0400, Joseph Ward wrote: > Thank you.  I found that to be the case; even though changing the > "do-extract" target successfully staged the files and directories with > the original permissions, pkg

Re: make[1]: cannot open Makefile for new custom port

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 14:36:05 -0400 "Joseph Ward" said Hi all, I'm attempting to make my first port which is attempting to literally unpack a tgz into the correct location.  I'm wanting a port, as I want this to be versioned and upgradable on all my systems via pkg (as well as to handle

Re: icedtea-web broken after removal of libxul

On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 03:41:35 +0200 "Walter Schwarzenfeld" said After remove of libxul, icedtea-web does not configure configure: error: Package requirements (mozilla-plugin) were not met: Package 'mozilla-plugin', required by 'virtual:world', not found After a (weak) try with make

Re: Of Git and M$

On Tue, 19 Jun 2018 07:13:35 -0700 (PDT) "Roger Marquis" said Anonymous (Carmel NY) wrote: >> of course microsoft bought it to steal software more efficiently. > > Steal what? It is already freely available. This is just more FUD spread by > people who fail to comprehend the actual logistics

Re: Of Git and M$

On Sat, 16 Jun 2018 00:26:36 +1000 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said A related discussion reminded me of this: how would Microsoft's purchase of GitHub affect future development? After all, they'll get to call the shots...[*] The only good thing that came out of M$ is their RTF document format

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On Fri, 25 May 2018 12:05:40 +0200 "Jan Bramkamp" <cr...@rlwinm.de> said On 25.05.18 09:29, Bernhard Fröhlich wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:24 AM, Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: >> On Thu, 24 May 2018 22:16:42 +0200 "Bernhard Froehlich&qu

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On Thu, 24 May 2018 19:39:22 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" <ja...@zx2c4.com> said Hi Chris, On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:38 PM, Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > I should have no trouble introducing Wireguard to the ports system today. I'm not a native fluent spea

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 15:39:39 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" <johal...@gmail.com> said On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:25 PM Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 15:02:10 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" <johal...@gmail.com> > said > >

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 15:02:10 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" <johal...@gmail.com> said On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 2:57 PM Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 10:03:47 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" <johal...@gmail.com> > said > &

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 10:03:47 +0100 "Johannes Lundberg" said On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:27 AM Bob Eager wrote: > On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:08:17 +0100 > Johannes Lundberg wrote: > > > In addition to that it would be nice (if it's not

Re: Pause pkg install messages

On Thu, 24 May 2018 15:39:54 +0700 "Eugene Grosbein" said On 24.05.2018 15:08, Johannes Lundberg wrote: > Hi > > The first thing me and probably many other do after install is > pkg install xxx yyy zzz > from console (meaning no scrollback buffer). > > With xorg and

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:15:28 +0200 "Bernhard Fröhlich" said On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 3:06 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > We now have a release, so the full instructions for the packages are: > > 1. wireguard-tools, providing wg(8) and wg-quick(8) > Runtime

Re: WireGuard for FreeBSD

On Mon, 21 May 2018 23:35:45 +0200 "Jason A. Donenfeld" said [cross-posted to the WireGuard mailing list] Hello FreeBSD Ports List, I'm the author of WireGuard [1], a secure network tunnel protocol [2] and a set of implementations of it. It was originally designed for the

Re: FreeBSD Palemoon branding violation

On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 15:37:54 +0100 "Andreas Andersson" said So, moonchild (that's his actual name (or tilltalsnamn in swedish) ) might own the trademark. But atleast Swedish trademark laws

Re: Avoiding "make clean" when changing pkg-plist and other files?

On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 19:02:35 -0700 "Kirk Coombs" said Hello, I’m working on building my very first port (for the server component from https://www.urbackup.org/ ). Since this my first attempt at porting, I have ended up iterating a lot

Re: using security/openssl in a port

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 17:16:30 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said On 1/5/18 5:09 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 05.01.2018 09:44, Matthew Luckie wrote: > >> My main worry is that I could not find a single port that apparently >> depends on security/openssl. I'm worried that its

Re: using security/openssl in a port

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:44:31 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" <m...@luckie.org.nz> said On 01/05/18 15:37, Chris H wrote: > On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" <m...@luckie.org.nz> said > >> Hi, >> >> I maintain a port that ha

Re: using security/openssl in a port

On Fri, 5 Jan 2018 15:11:00 +1300 "Matthew Luckie" said Hi, I maintain a port that has a new release which requires openssl 1.0.2 to build. FreeBSD 10.3 and 10.4 both have openssl 1.0.1, and 11 onwards have 1.0.2. Is there a magic way to have this port depend on ports

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:29:40 +0100 "Michael Gmelin" <free...@grem.de> said > On 20. Dec 2017, at 18:50, Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:13:43 + <freebsd-ports-ow...@freebsd.org> said > > On Wed, 20 Dec 201

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 17:13:43 + <freebsd-ports-ow...@freebsd.org> said On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 16:23:59 + "Johannes Lundberg" <johal...@gmail.com> said On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:20:20 +

Re: Vote: making wayland=on default

On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:20:20 + "Johannes Lundberg" said Hi I want to suggest that we enable wayland by default. In current state having some parts of wayland in ports is basically useless the end-users themselves re-build gtk30 and mesa-libs with wayland enabled.

Re: Patches for a slave port

On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 01:17:29 -0800 <portmas...@bsdforge.com> said On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:16:39 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" <rkober...@gmail.com> said > On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Dec 201

Re: Patches for a slave port

On Sat, 16 Dec 2017 00:16:39 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" <rkober...@gmail.com> said On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 7:19 AM, Chris H <portmas...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:53:38 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" <rkober...@gmail.com> > said > >

Re: Patches for a slave port

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 20:53:38 -0800 "Kevin Oberman" said I am attempting to submit a fix for a slave port, multimedia/avidemux_plugins. All of the patches are in the master port, avidemux. So I make all of the fixes and run "make makepatch". All of the patches are generated

Re: Linux ports tutorial? WPS Office

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 17:59:34 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" <p...@freebsd.org> said On 12/14/17 17:07, Chris H wrote: > On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:15:35 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" <p...@freebsd.org> said >> On 12/13/17 22:31, blubee blubeeme wrote: >>>

Re: Linux ports tutorial? WPS Office

On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 09:15:35 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" <p...@freebsd.org> said On 12/13/17 22:31, blubee blubeeme wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 11:17 AM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@freebsd.org <mailto:p...@freebsd.org>> wrote: Hello; On 13/12/2017 21:11, Chris H wrote:

Re: Linux ports tutorial? WPS Office

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 19:56:24 -0500 "Pedro Giffuni" said On 12/10/17 14:55, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 11.12.2017 2:22, Pedro Giffuni пишет: >> Hello guys; >> >> I would like to attempt a port for WPS Office (AKA Kingsoft Office): >> >> http://wps-community.org/ >> >> Are there

Re: lang/python2 and 3 uninstallable on CURRENT @r326056

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:19:52 +0100 "Walter Schwarzenfeld" said python27 Makefile: .if !exists(/usr/bin/ypcat) || defined(WITHOUT_NIS)     @${REINPLACE_CMD} -e 's/disabled_module_list =[^]]*/&, "nis"/' \     ${WRKSRC}/setup.py .endif you can try

Re: lang/python2 and 3 uninstallable on CURRENT @r326056

On Wed, 13 Dec 2017 21:38:35 +0100 "Walter Schwarzenfeld" said There https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186192 is a better way WITHOUT_NIS=yes in /etc/make.conf Spot on, Walter! I was just going to indicate that I figured that out. Thank you!

Why can't I build Python without nis -- yp(8)?!?

Hello all, I just finished a fresh install of CURRENT, followed by a build/install of world/kernel. I'm now building up all of my ports base. But can't get Python to install -- *any version*, apparently because I don't have/use nis ( yp(8) ). WTF? Since when does Python *require* yp/nis, and

lang/python2 and 3 uninstallable on CURRENT @r326056

Hello all, Just performed a fresh install of 12 @r326056 followed by a build/install of world/kernel. All went pretty much as expected. But as I now start building/installing all my needed ports. I find everything is fine except Python, or anything that requires it. No matter which version I

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 09:23:55 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > > With transparency, I mean: > > - reverse dns is set > > - scan from the same IP all the time > They don't. For the sake of argument, I'll name showdan; they use (off > the top of my head) some 9 to 12 addresses.

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:59:04 +0100 "Guido Falsi" <m...@madpilot.net> said On 12/09/2017 01:34, Chris H wrote: > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:16:54 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" > <d...@horsfall.org> said > >> On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: &

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 08:54:26 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" <d...@horsfall.org> said On Mon, 11 Dec 2017, Chris H wrote: > pf(4) has dropped any/all communication from the showdan "project" > *long* ago for all the systems I'm responsible for, and along with

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:45:11 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > Let me attempt to make my point another way (and stay closer to topic). > A user is able to accomplish more from sendmail in base, than with any > other MX port in base alone. [list of sendmail features shortend for

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:46:55 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > If you, as an administrator of a/your system(s), see no problem with > (port) scanners, and take no action to thwart such activity. You are > more than likely to encounter trouble(s) down the road. Right,

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 19:36:49 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > if the majority of people install their systems via packages, that makes for > a fairly common FreeBSD base across all users. Why would a system installed via packaged be more homogenous than one installed as base,

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 08:39:02 -0800 <portmas...@bsdforge.com> said On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:10:32 + "Matt Smith" <matt.x...@gmail.com> said > On Dec 10 14:58, Chris H wrote: >>OK I'm puzzled a bit. FreeBSD' motto has always been: >>FreeBSD >>The pow

Re: What is the preferred MASTER_SITES for python port?

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 20:46:43 +0300 "Sergey Akhmatov" said Hello. Suppose I want to port some python package that exists in the Python Package Index (PyPI) and has it's source code available on some official website or github. Is there any policy or recommended practice

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 16:42:57 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" <li...@opsec.eu> said Hi! > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 02:58:29PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > > > OK I'm puzzled a bit. FreeBSD' motto has always been: > > > FreeBSD > > > The power to serve! > >

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:10:32 + "Matt Smith" <matt.x...@gmail.com> said On Dec 10 14:58, Chris H wrote: >OK I'm puzzled a bit. FreeBSD' motto has always been: >FreeBSD >The power to serve! > >but many of the proposed, and recent changes/removals end up mor

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 11:49:06 +0100 "Lars Engels" <lars.eng...@0x20.net> said On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 02:58:29PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > OK I'm puzzled a bit. FreeBSD' motto has always been: > FreeBSD > The power to serve! > > but many of the proposed, and rece

Re: License and adopting software

On Mon, 11 Dec 2017 12:24:53 +0800 "blubee blubeeme" said On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:21 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote: > On 11 December 2017 at 17:17, blubee blubeeme wrote: > > I like some old software that's <= GPL2 but it seems like

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:54:54 -0700 "Adam Weinberger" <ad...@adamw.org> said > On 8 Dec, 2017, at 20:11, Chris H <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" <li...@opsec.eu> said > >> Hi! >>

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sun, 10 Dec 2017 14:49:02 -0700 "Adam Weinberger" said > On 10 Dec, 2017, at 10:11, Steve Kargl > wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 01:21:13PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> Hence the current sendmail in base is neither fish nor fowl:

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:25:17 +0100 "Matthieu Volat" said On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 14:18:28 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Fri, Dec 08, 2017 at 02:13:09PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > Quoting Baptiste Daroussin (from Thu, 7 Dec

Re: Flavors support of portupgrade

On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:20:47 + "Ben Woods" said On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 at 5:18 pm, Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote: > Hello. > > Poudriere and synth already support flavors. As for portmaster, Stefan > Esser (s...@freebsd.org) said he is working now. Then what

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 15:12:12 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2017-December/018712.html Well, I saw no reason to subscribe to freebsd-arch (I'm on enough lists as it is)... Are there

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 02:59:28 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > > replace it with dma(1). > Hmm. This does not come as good news to me. I've been working on an antispam > system that targets the use of

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Fri, 8 Dec 2017 17:25:22 -0800 said On Sat, Dec 09, 2017 at 10:16:54AM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > > replace it with dma(1). > > There

Re: Procmail Vulnerabilities check

On Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:16:54 +1100 (EST) "Dave Horsfall" said On Fri, 8 Dec 2017, Steve Kargl wrote: > First, there is movement afoot to remove sendmail from FreeBSD and > replace it with dma(1). There is? Is there anything else that they're going to spring on us? (I'm

Re: Updating ports that use FLAVOR with portmaster

On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 15:14:11 -0600 "Paul Schmehl" said --On December 8, 2017 at 12:49:44 PM -0800 Freddie Cash wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:31 PM, Paul Schmehl > wrote: > > > > How do you do this? I have a

Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

On Thu, 7 Dec 2017 14:33:08 +0100 "Lars Engels" said On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 02:14:44PM +0100, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Sometimes I want to add some port which was not built with poudriere > directly compiling it on the target laptops and now, ofc, this > compilation is

# FLAVORLESS tag?

As I take inventory before embarking on "flavoring" those ports I maintain that can be flavored. I wanted to make my life simpler, and in an effort to do so, began tagging those that couldn't be flavored (no options, etc...) with # FLAVORLESS This made it trivial for future searches to weed out

Re: Flavors *COMPLETELY* break the port system (synth and poudriere are useless)

On Wed, 6 Dec 2017 15:40:27 -0800 "Mel Pilgrim" said On 12/5/2017 2:25 PM, Baho Utot wrote: > Thank you for taking a perfectly good system and breaking it as well as > making it unusable, unstable.  You just don't know of all the countless > hours spent after

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 13:48:12 -0600 "Mark Linimon" <lini...@lonesome.com> said On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:42:27AM -0800, Chris H wrote: > IMHO it might be a good idea to make a legacy branch, in the ports > tree before gutting the pre-NG stuff. Good lord, people. The

Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster

On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 03:33:10 -0800 "David Wolfskill" said On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 08:35:55AM +0100, Stefan Esser wrote: > ... > I'm working on FLAVOR support in portmaster. My version did already build > all updated ports, the FLAVOR parameter is passed to build

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sun, 3 Dec 2017 22:04:15 + "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>" <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> said On Sunday, December 3, 2017 3:46 PM, Chris H stated: > On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:53:58 + "FreeBSD Ports ML" > po...@freebsd.org> said > > On Saturday,

RE: Welcome flavors! portmaster now dead? synth?

On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 11:53:58 + "FreeBSD Ports ML" said On Saturday, December 2, 2017 5:40 AM, Stari Karp stated: > On Sat, 2017-12-02 at 01:12 +, Ben Woods wrote: > > Hi Carmel, > > > > My understanding is that poudriere is the only package building system >

Re: Exporting phone list to a fritz router (.xml) & android phone app.

On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 00:01:20 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" <j...@berklix.com> said "Chris H" wrote: > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:42:14 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" <j...@berklix.com> said > > > Hi ports@ people > > Any reccomendations of ports

Re: can I get a 'mentor' who can guide me on the topic of python module ports?

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 10:56:45 -0800 <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> said On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:56:12 -0800 <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> said > On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:31:56 +0800 "Julian Elischer" <jul...@freebsd.org> > said > > > On 28/11/17 11:09 pm, Chris H

Re: can I get a 'mentor' who can guide me on the topic of python module ports?

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:56:12 -0800 <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> said On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:31:56 +0800 "Julian Elischer" <jul...@freebsd.org> said > On 28/11/17 11:09 pm, Chris H wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:29:10 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" <li...@opsec

Re: can I get a 'mentor' who can guide me on the topic of python module ports?

On Wed, 29 Nov 2017 00:31:56 +0800 "Julian Elischer" <jul...@freebsd.org> said On 28/11/17 11:09 pm, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:29:10 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" <li...@opsec.eu> said > >> Hi! >> >> > >> I have a requirement

Re: can I get a 'mentor' who can guide me on the topic of python module ports?

On Tue, 28 Nov 2017 07:29:10 +0100 "Kurt Jaeger" said Hi! > >> I have a requirement from $JOB to install some software (the python > >> based Azure SDK actually) [...] > > I suggest you put your initial version up somewhere and > > then start ask questions here. > > > > It

Re: Exporting phone list to a fritz router (.xml) & android phone app.

On Mon, 27 Nov 2017 22:42:14 +0100 "Julian H. Stacey" said Hi ports@ people Any reccomendations of ports/ that may manage phone & address booke, & import/export to Fritz Routers & Android phone app ? Should I be using a stack of vCards format as a common intermediary to edit

Re: Dependencies satisfied, build stops anyway.

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 23:01:52 -0800 "bob prohaska" <f...@www.zefox.net> said On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 09:23:56PM -0800, Chris H wrote: > I think you might have been better off going with the suggested > cd /offending/port > make deinstall > make reinstall >

Re: Dependencies satisfied, build stops anyway.

On Wed, 22 Nov 2017 21:12:28 -0800 "bob prohaska" said On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:32:53PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Stale ports SHOULD not be an issue. Normally old ports are updated > automatically. It is important that your ports tree is consistent and, > usually

Re: Suggestion: USES=autoplist

On Tue, 21 Nov 2017 21:04:22 -0800 said While trying to update math/vtk, I found that its plist is very complex, with many optional files, some files depending on multiple port options. But it is a well-behaved project, and it only installs the correct file set. It is much

Re: Package database problems

On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:26:33 + Carmel NY wrote > On Thu, 16 Nov 2017 13:37:02 -0600, Paul Schmehl stated: > > >Is there a way to force a port install regardless of conflicts? > > This is untried. Using synth, you could create a file with a listing of all > your

Re: Makefile RUN_DEPENDS=option

On Wed, 15 Nov 2017 22:40:18 +0100 Mathieu Arnold <m...@freebsd.org> wrote > Le 15/11/2017 à 01:20, Chris H a écrit : > > On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:15:39 -0700 Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote > > > >>> On 14 Nov, 2017, at 14:05, Ernie Luzar <l

Re: Makefile RUN_DEPENDS=option

On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 14:15:39 -0700 Adam Weinberger wrote > > On 14 Nov, 2017, at 14:05, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > > > Have a simple port that needs wget to work. > > > > I want RUN_DEPENDS to first check if wget is already installed, IE: is the > > running

Re: Firefox became much slower

On Tue, 7 Nov 2017 20:33:05 -0500 roberth...@rcn.com wrote > Chris H writes: > > > FWIW Firefox has always leaked memory like water through a sieve. > > As a result, no matter how many resources I have on any given > > system. I can't leave FF open for any le

Re: Firefox became much slower

On Wed, 08 Nov 2017 01:26:51 +0100 Jan Beich <jbe...@freebsd.org> wrote > "Chris H" <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> writes: > > > On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:20:26 +0100 "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" <dr.kl...@gmx.at> > > wrote > > >> Am Mittwoch,

Re: Firefox became much slower

On Wed, 8 Nov 2017 09:16:29 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall <d...@horsfall.org> wrote > On Tue, 7 Nov 2017, Chris H wrote: > > > FWIW Firefox has always leaked memory like water through a sieve. As a > > result, no matter how many resources I have on any given system. I

Re: Firefox became much slower

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 20:20:26 +0100 "Dr. Nikolaus Klepp" wrote > Am Mittwoch, 1. November 2017 schrieb Gleb Popov: > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > >

Re: Firefox became much slower

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 21:54:21 +0300 Gleb Popov <6year...@gmail.com> wrote > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 7:12 PM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 1, 2017 at 8:15 AM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > > > > On 01/11/2017 14:18, Stefan Esser wrote: > > > > uMatrix has

Re: Firefox became much slower

On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 07:20:26 -0700 Steve Kargl wrote > On Wed, Nov 01, 2017 at 09:07:11AM +0300, Gleb Popov wrote: > > > > I'm using Firefox on quite ancient machine (amd64, though) and after > > updating from firefox-56.0.1_3 to 56.0.2_3,1 it has become much

Re: requesting policy for Apache module installation (LoadModule manipulation)

On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 02:16:37 +0200 Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz> wrote > Hello, > I would like to ask some changes in how Apache modules are installed. > There are many maintainers and many different sources for Apache > modules. Some modules are installing sample files, some are modifying

Re: [RFC] less patches: control the PATH

On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 15:24:04 +0200 Guido Falsi wrote > On 10/06/2017 15:11, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a patch to add a new feature I am willing to get for a while: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D12603 > > > A user can control which binary will be

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Fri, 6 Oct 2017 18:46:08 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall <d...@horsfall.org> wrote > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Chris H wrote: > > >> I'll second that.-- George (old fart w/50 years software experience) > > > > WooHoo! another greybeard! I'm at ~50yrs myself! > &

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, 05 Oct 2017 15:37:08 -0700 "Chris H" wrote > > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote ---8<---8<--- > > > Seem a reasonable request? If [found] so, I'll solicit for qualified > > > individuals to work with me on it in a ne

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 19:59:51 -0400 George Mitchell wrote > On 10/05/17 18:13, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> [...] > >> Seem a reasonable request? If [found] so, I'll solicit for qualified > >> individuals to work with me on it in a new thread. > >> > >> Thanks for your time,

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:59:31 + Grzegorz Junka <li...@gjunka.com> wrote > On 05/10/2017 22:15, Chris H wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:27:19 + Grzegorz Junka <li...@gjunka.com> wrote > > > >> On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote: > >>

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 16:13:36 -0600 Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote > > On 5 Oct, 2017, at 15:53, Chris H <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote > > >

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 22:05:05 + Grzegorz Junka <li...@gjunka.com> wrote > On 05/10/2017 21:53, Chris H wrote: > > On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger <ad...@adamw.org> wrote > > > >>> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl <s...

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 20:27:19 + Grzegorz Junka wrote > On 05/10/2017 19:54, Baho Utot wrote: > > > > > > On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > > >> Here's my take on that. > >> > >> The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders > >> 2 years ago

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 15:54:32 -0400 Baho Utot wrote > On 10/04/17 16:39, Ernie Luzar wrote: > > > Here's my take on that. > > > > The future direction has already been decided by the FreeBSD leaders 2 > > years ago with their development of a better pkg system. > > >

Re: portmaster, portupgrade, etc

On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:52:51 -0600 Adam Weinberger wrote > > On 5 Oct, 2017, at 10:28, Steve Kargl > > wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2017 at 09:31:41AM -0600, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >>> On 5 Oct, 2017, at 9:25, Steve Kargl

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Mon, 02 Oct 2017 09:44:26 -0700 "Chris H" <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> wrote > On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:28:49 +0100 Matt Smith <matt.x...@gmail.com> wrote > > > On Oct 02 09:07, Carmel NY wrote: > > >On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated:

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 10:28:49 +0100 Matt Smith wrote > On Oct 02 09:07, Carmel NY wrote: > >On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 23:49:14 +0100, Matthew Seaman stated: > > > >>On 01/10/2017 11:34, Carmel NY wrote: > >>> 1. Does it determine out-of-date update packages automatically or does >

Re: Status of portupgrade and portmaster?

On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:38:36 + Carmel NY wrote > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 09:00:02 +, Thomas Mueller stated: > > >Excerpt from Jan Beich: > > > >> Why did portupgrade skip rebuilding print/harfbuzz-icu before building > >> editors/libreoffice? The dependency trees of

Re: [HEADUP] FLAVORS landing.

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017 21:24:22 +0800 Julian Elischer wrote > On 27/9/17 8:17 pm, Stefan Esser wrote: > > Am 27.09.17 um 13:52 schrieb Julian Elischer: > >> On 27/9/17 4:20 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote: > >> > >> Before this gets too far down the road I would like to suggest that we

Re: [HEADUP] FLAVORS landing.

On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 16:10:59 +0200 Mathieu Arnold wrote > Le 26/09/2017 à 16:05, Mathieu Arnold a écrit : > > Hi, > > > > **Do not commit FLAVORS to any ports, a hook will prevent it, that being > > said, do try it and test what can be done.** > > > > To test this feature in

Re: pkg and packages

On Wed, 03 May 2017 08:03:36 -0400 wrote > After doing a general pkg upgrade on my server-of-all-work, I > discovered after some research that the Big Grey Background I was > left with was due to pkg having deleted, but not replaced, xfce4 > desktop. > > Trying to install

Re: os of system fetching port source

On Mon, 03 Apr 2017 17:04:46 -0400 qjail1 wrote > Ed Maste wrote: > > >> On 19 February 2017 at 10:06, qjail1 wrote: > >> My port has it's source hosted on sourceforge.net. That site has function > >> that shows the count of times the port

Re: Cannot build x11/libX11 in poudriere addendum: x11/xcb-util, too

Apologies for the top post. But I think your answer is here: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=218208 HTH --Chris On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 21:06:08 +0200 "O. Hartmann" wrote > Am Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:13:13 +0200 > Miroslav Lachman <000.f...@quip.cz>

Re: ELF binary type "3" not known.

On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 22:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Don Lewis <truck...@freebsd.org> wrote > On 20 Mar, Chris H wrote: > > I'm not sure which of the two lists I'm directing > > this to is the best/correct one. So I picked both. > > > > To the point; I received this message

Re: ELF binary type "3" not known.

On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 13:14:56 +0800 Kevin Lo <ke...@freebsd.org> wrote > On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 09:11:44PM -0700, Chris H wrote: > > > > On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 20:56:05 -0700 "Chris H" <bsd-li...@bsdforge.com> wrote > > > > &g

  1   2   3   4   >