On 02/17/2012 10:22, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:35:05PM +, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Public flogging seems to be more enjoyable than a private email to the
developer, the maintainer, and a committer.
I know we are all a little frustrated with some of the local commits,
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 03:59:37PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Where I think reasonable minds can differ are (appropriate) responses of
the form, This was not done properly, here is how it can/should be done
(better). IMO those should *always* be public in order to help others
who are paying
On 02/18/2012 19:03, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 03:59:37PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
Where I think reasonable minds can differ are (appropriate) responses of
the form, This was not done properly, here is how it can/should be done
(better). IMO those should *always* be public
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:35:05PM +, Michael Scheidell wrote:
Public flogging seems to be more enjoyable than a private email to the
developer, the maintainer, and a committer.
I know we are all a little frustrated with some of the local commits, but
remember:
praise in public,
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:22:38PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Also, if everyone starts using [redports], isn't the backlog going to
become huge?
We're working on getting more hardware.
Having something become too successful is a problem we should be happy
to have :)
mcl
On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely
recommend it.
On 02/14/12 08:40, b. f. wrote:
On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can
On 12.02.2012 22:43, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely
recommend it.
Yes,
Is there any reguirement that a ports committer needs
to test their intended commit prior to pulling the
trigger?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/print/ghostscript9/Makefile
Committed 75 minutes ago.
laptop:root[202] cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9
laptop:root[203] make
In file
On 12 Feb 2012 19:39, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
Is there any reguirement that a ports committer needs
to test their intended commit prior to pulling the
trigger?
Could this not have gone directly to the 'offending' developer?
Chris
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:03:28PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Feb 2012 19:39, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
Is there any reguirement that a ports committer needs
to test their intended commit prior to pulling the
trigger?
Could this not have gone directly
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty belief that this is the first occurence
of this type of issue?
So instead of proper report to the port's maintainer (including description of
your environment, possibly full build log, etc), possibly with a CC here,
On 02/12/2012 01:39 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
Is there any reguirement that a ports committer needs
to test their intended commit prior to pulling the
trigger?
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/print/ghostscript9/Makefile
You should report which version of FreeBSD you are using. It
To: Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees
utis...@gmail.com
Sent: Sun, Feb 12, 2012 20:28:23 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: Please test your commits
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:27:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty belief that this is the first occurence
of this type of issue?
So instead of proper report to the port's maintainer (including description of
your
On 12 Feb 2012 20:41, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:27:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty belief that this is the first occurence
of this type of issue?
So
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:44:11PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Feb 2012 20:41, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:27:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty belief
On 02/12/2012 02:41 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:27:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty belief that this is the first occurence
of this type of issue?
So instead of proper report to the port's
on 12/02/2012 22:41 Steve Kargl said the following:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:27:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty belief that this is the first occurence
of this type of issue?
So instead of proper report to the
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 20:35:05 +
Michael Scheidell articulated:
Public flogging seems to be more enjoyable than a private email to
the developer, the maintainer, and a committer.
But I suppose it beats doing a backup of your envirement first.
I put it right up there with Top Posting
On 12 Feb 2012 20:45, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:44:11PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Feb 2012 20:41, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:27:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on
on 12/02/2012 22:45 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 02:41 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:27:25PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 22:16 Steve Kargl said the following:
You seem to have the faulty belief that this is the first occurence
of
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:52:56PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Feb 2012 20:45, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
laptop:root[252] uname -a
FreeBSD laptop 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r230975M: Sat Feb 4
09:03:27 PST 2012
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
You should report which version of FreeBSD you are using. It might have
tested OK for the committer, but not for you.
I'm watching a tinderbox run right now and it seems to fail on i386
only; amd64 looks ok.
I just sent a full log to
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely recommend it.
Yes, but it is not without its problems. I tried testing math/sage on
redports.org. It reported an error building the dependency math/atlas,
which built fine on mine
On 02/12/2012 03:17 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 08:52:56PM +, Chris Rees wrote:
On 12 Feb 2012 20:45, Steve Kargls...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
laptop:root[252] uname -a
FreeBSD laptop 10.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r230975M: Sat Feb 4
09:03:27 PST
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely recommend it.
Yes, but it is not without its problems. I tried testing math/sage on
redports.org. It reported an
on 12/02/2012 23:17 Steve Kargl said the following:
Empirical evidence suggests that ghostscript9 developers are using
a newer version of the autotools.
laptop:root[262] find . -name configure | xargs grep -i freebsd\[1 | more
./lcms/configure:freebsd[123].*) objformat=aout ;;
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:32:52PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
But, the 2nd issue with too many arguments in a function call is
clearly evident on amd64 because I justed test that on FreeBSD 10.
Yes. But the issue isn't whether someone else was correct in why the
port might or
On 02/12/2012 03:33 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 12/02/2012 23:22 Stephen Montgomery-Smith said the following:
On 02/12/2012 03:15 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Today I became another user of redports.org. I can definitely recommend it.
Yes, but it is not without its problems. I tried testing
On 12 Feb 2012 21:37, Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu
wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 03:32:52PM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
But, the 2nd issue with too many arguments in a function call is
clearly evident on amd64 because I justed test that on FreeBSD 10.
Yes.
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012 21:48:57 +0100 (CET)
Jimmy Olgeni articulated:
On Sun, 12 Feb 2012, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
You should report which version of FreeBSD you are using. It might
have tested OK for the committer, but not for you.
I'm watching a tinderbox run right now and it
32 matches
Mail list logo
