Re: Time for a firefox-56 port?

2017-11-25 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/23/2017 20:11, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > I've just installed the latest version of firefox and confirmed that > it breaks both of the addons that make firefox bearable for me > (firemacs, https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/firemacs/ > and It's All Text!, >

pkg lock doesn't work if a dependency wants an upgrade

2016-03-05 Thread Adam McDougall
What can I do to help diagnose this? I have setup an isolated test system where I can easily return it to a pre-upgraded state. I don't remember pkg printing a list of locked packages in the past so my faith in proper operation was increased but I was tricked. It looks like pkg upgraded postfix

Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files

2015-06-02 Thread Adam McDougall
build log. -r On (06/02/15 11:01), Adam McDougall wrote: It still didn't work. Cannot load /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so into server: /usr/local/libexec/apache22/mod_ssl.so: Undefined symbol get_dh2048 Additionally I'm concerned about the validity of renaming small primes

Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files

2015-06-02 Thread Adam McDougall
stuff. -r On (06/02/15 15:02), Adam McDougall wrote: Thank you for the tip and the explanation. I found out what was causing the difference. With libressl, the openssl gendh command no longer accepts -rand because it assumes your random has sufficient quality to start with: http

Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files

2015-06-02 Thread Adam McDougall
. https://people.freebsd.org/~zi/patch-modules_ssl_ssl__engine__dh.c You can then build the build as usual after running a 'make clean' -r On (06/01/15 14:47), Bryan Drewery wrote: On 5/31/2015 8:29 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change

Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files

2015-05-31 Thread Adam McDougall
Is anyone else getting this issue? I had to revert the change on my systems. Thanks. ---BeginMessage--- On 05/20/2015 22:13, Ryan Steinmetz wrote: Author: zi Date: Thu May 21 02:13:07 2015 New Revision: 386904 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/386904 Log: - Generate new DH

Re: 10/stable virtualbox-ose crashes

2015-05-29 Thread Adam McDougall
On 05/29/2015 13:38, Kevin Oberman wrote: On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Russell L. Carter rcar...@pinyon.org wrote: Hi, kldload vboxsrv crashes recent 10/stables. Last known working kernel/module pair is from May 5th. Not sure what is the optimal next step, suggestions welcome.

Re: poudriere dying in ftp/curl configure

2015-04-29 Thread Adam McDougall
On 4/29/2015 5:01 AM, Russell L. Carter wrote: On 04/29/15 07:28, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 2015/04/29 15:26, Russell L. Carter wrote: I'd love to have a look at the config.log, but this is running under poudriere, which seems to clean up after errors. I tried ^Z right after curl fails, and

Re: How to set unsupported port build options in make.conf with poudriere?

2015-04-22 Thread Adam McDougall
On 4/22/2015 7:50 AM, Mark Costlow wrote: I'm using poudriere on FreeBSD 10.1. I need to set --enable-drac when building mail/milter-greylist. There is no corresponding option in the milter-greylist port. In the past, I used portconf to achieve this: mail/milter-greylist:

Re: LibreSSL infects ports, causes problems

2015-04-09 Thread Adam McDougall
On 04/09/2015 11:53, Christian Weisgerber wrote: Baptiste Daroussin: Some how you have mixed up things between base openssl and libressl, when starting to activate libressl if you are using ports only you have to be extra careful, (same goes with ncurses or ports openssl) just installing

Re: svn commit: r381041 - head/textproc/p5-HTML-FormatExternal

2015-03-12 Thread Adam McDougall
On 03/11/2015 17:51, Matthew Seaman wrote: Author: matthew Date: Wed Mar 11 21:51:49 2015 New Revision: 381041 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/381041 QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r381041/ Log: Drop the dependency on p5-Encode. This is bundled with perl,

Re: pkgng deviates from defaults?

2015-03-09 Thread Adam McDougall
On 03/09/2015 08:23, Carsten Jensen wrote: On 03/08/2015 02:41 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 01:46:28PM +0100, Carsten Jensen wrote: It seems that pkgng deviates from installing the defaults. one of the culprits seems to be phpMyAdmin, as trying to upgrade this only

Re: pkgng deviates from defaults?

2015-03-09 Thread Adam McDougall
On 03/09/2015 15:05, Carsten Jensen wrote: On 09-03-2015 17:34, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Adam McDougall mcdou...@egr.msu.edu wrote: On 03/09/2015 08:23, Carsten Jensen wrote: On 03/08/2015 02:41 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Sun, Mar 08, 2015 at 01:46:28PM

Re: resuming poudriere bulk

2014-11-11 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/11/2014 16:52, Russell L. Carter wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/11/14 10:06, Russell L. Carter wrote: Hi, I am curious what is the best way to recover/restart an interrupted poudriere bulk build. The man page is not helpful here. So I had another

Re: new dependency for emacs-nox11

2014-11-07 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/07/2014 09:25, Vick Khera wrote: Emacs 24.4 update in ports pulls in a new dependency: desktop-file-utils. This in turn pulls in a big swath of additional packages including python, perl, pcre, glib. I cannot figure out what this utility is supposed to do, as all it refers to is make a

Re: Apache does not respect value in DEFAULT_VERSIONS

2014-09-09 Thread Adam McDougall
On 09/09/2014 08:52, Andreas Nilsson wrote: Hello, I've been going through my package building setup recently, and noticed that apache default version has changed. Since I need apache-2.2 for one module I added apache=2.2 to DEFAULT_VERSIONS in make.conf, but to no avail. I still get

Re: poudriere and DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES

2014-09-03 Thread Adam McDougall
On 09/02/2014 23:09, Russell L. Carter wrote: On 09/02/14 04:05, Alex Dupre wrote: Russell L. Carter ha scritto: However, what I would like to learn is if poudriere is able to understand DISABLE_VULNERABILITIES=YES, and if so, how to enable it. I'm not asking a political question here,

Re: Building subversion-1.8.10 under poudriere

2014-08-27 Thread Adam McDougall
On 08/27/2014 09:09, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: On 2014-08-27 14:41, Dimitry Andric wrote: This is a problem in the devel/apr1 port. It checks for modf(), finds it in libc, then assumes isnan() also comes from libc. However, that does not work for static linking. Please apply the attached

Re: auditing port options and following default option value changes

2014-08-27 Thread Adam McDougall
On 08/27/2014 21:12, Don Lewis wrote: I'm pretty much ready to throw in the towel on upgrading ports in place with portupgrade and I'm planning on switching to poudriere. As part of this conversion, I'd like to figure out what ports have non-default options and which options are set to

Re: [CFT] SSP Package Repository available

2014-08-20 Thread Adam McDougall
On 08/20/2014 13:20, Mark Martinec wrote: 2014-08-20 18:34 Bryan Drewery wrote: On 9/21/2013 5:49 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: Ports now support enabling Stack Protector [1] support on FreeBSD 10 i386 and amd64, and older releases on amd64 only currently. Support may be added for earlier i386

Re: Cacti staged and migration issue (was Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion)

2014-08-18 Thread Adam McDougall
On 08/15/2014 14:16, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Consequently, I have no idea how to set the owner/group on those directories in stagedir. As can be seen, with some help I was able to find a solution. I also changed the patches to shebangfixes 8-} But: There's a real issue coming up in

Re: pkg: cached package size mismatch, cannot continue

2014-08-04 Thread Adam McDougall
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:32:55AM -0700, Craig Rodrigues wrote: Hi, I install pkg-1.3.4 on my system. I did this: pkg clean -a (I verified that /var/cache/pkg was empty) # pkg install automake Updating repository catalogue FreeBSD repository is up-to-date All

Re: more problems after last upgrade(s) pkg

2014-08-01 Thread Adam McDougall
On 08/01/2014 09:27, Alex Keda wrote: first: srv7# pkg -v 1.3.3 srv7# uname -a FreeBSD srv7.host-food.ru 9.2-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p8 #0: Mon Jun 9 20:12:11 MSK 2014 t...@srv7.host-food.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HOST-FOOD amd64 srv7# srv7# pkg install -fy ap22-mod_geoip2

Re: Problems with portupgrade (maybe due to pkg-1.3) and gnutls3

2014-07-24 Thread Adam McDougall
On 07/24/2014 18:43, Kevin Oberman wrote: Today I attempted to upgrade a bunch of ports with 'portmaster -a'. It failed when it kept trying to install gnutls when I already had gnults3 installed. Turns out that the man pages conflict. But, why was it trying to install gnutls? I am baffled.

Re: Repair pkgng

2014-04-09 Thread Adam McDougall
On 04/09/2014 06:58, John Marino wrote: On 4/9/2014 12:38, Melvyn Sopacua wrote: Hi, On Tue, 8 Apr 2014, Kevin Oberman wrote: /var/db/pkg/libyaml-0.1.6/distfiles ... No, once you run pkgng, these files are in /var/db/pkg. The only files in /var/db/ports are options files. Ah, my bad.

Re: Libiconv confusion on 10.0-RELEASE

2014-03-20 Thread Adam McDougall
On 03/20/2014 14:54, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: Thanks on feedback to all. Meanwhile I've read a lot about iconv and to be honest, things are becoming even less clear. I am having not enough experience with FreeBSD to completely judge the situation. But obviously replacement of the ports

Re: Issues with Poudriere builing packages depending on Perl

2014-03-03 Thread Adam McDougall
On 03/03/2014 07:44, Big Lebowski wrote: Hi, I am trying to build bunch on packages in Poudriere on 10-R for 10-R and 9.2-R. The packages are building fine, but for some reason at least one of them builds with two different perl versions, 5.16 and 5.18. I would like to get all my packages

Re: Why would a port use its own existence as an excuse to fail install?

2014-02-15 Thread Adam McDougall
On 02/15/2014 22:31, David Wolfskill wrote: Silly me -- I thought today might be a good day to upgrade X.org on my laptop to the NEW_XORG. Laptop is running: FreeBSD g1-251.catwhisker.org 9.2-STABLE FreeBSD 9.2-STABLE #670 r261880M/261884:902506: Fri Feb 14 04:50:27 PST 2014

Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC5 AMD64 pkg upgrade fail by gcc/gcc46

2014-01-10 Thread Adam McDougall
On 01/10/2014 10:02, CeDeROM wrote: # uname -a FreeBSD hexagon 10.0-RC5 FreeBSD 10.0-RC5 #0 r260430: Wed Jan 8 05:10:04 UTC 2014 r...@snap.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # pkg delete -f gcc46 ... # pkg upgrade Updating repository catalogue Upgrades have been

Re: php55-extensions build pulling in php5 (aka php54)

2013-11-18 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/17/2013 16:06, Mark Costlow wrote: I'm trying to use poudriere to build a set of PHP 5.5 packages. This on a fresh 9.2 system with no PHP ports previously installed (and the builds happen in a poudriere jail anyway). Building php55 works fine. But when I add php55-extensions, something

Re: pkgng: How do I upgrade a single package?

2013-11-03 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/03/2013 15:19, Darren Pilgrim wrote: Now that we have a repo, I want to start using binary packages for the numerous dependencies I have to install on pretty much every system: autotools, ca_root_nss, cmake-modules, gettext, glib, libtool, m4, etc. But `pkg upgrade` only asks me to

Re: portmaster refuses to use pkgng with local packages

2013-10-27 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/27/13 10:57, Axel Rau wrote: I just converted to pkg and created a local build jail, which provides packages on a directory, which is mounted readonly by other jails. portmaster won't register with pkgng on the other jails: [somehost:/var/packages] root# pkg info pkg pkg-1.1.4_8

Re: pkgng behaviour change (upgrade -f and version)

2013-07-19 Thread Adam McDougall
On 07/04/13 04:16, bw.mail.lists wrote: I'm not sure when it happened, I think since latest pkgng upgrade, version 1.1.3, but pkgng now acts differently in at least two cases. 1. pkg upgrade -f What happens: - /root # pkg upgrade -f Updating repository catalogue New

Re: [HEADSUP] New make config UI

2013-03-19 Thread Adam McDougall
On 03/19/13 06:31, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:20:43AM +0100, David Demelier wrote: 2013/3/19 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org Thanks a lot for that work to all contributors. I will try this evening and see how awesome it is :-). One questions I have: - Does the

recent port upgrades causing missing libraries

2012-12-11 Thread Adam McDougall
I used poudriere to build pkgng packages from the latest round of port updates since the freeze. I know in the commit message for xcb-util it bumped some other ports, but it seems like not enough to make poudriere reinstall enough packages to make things work. The pcre upgrade also caused some

Re: recent port upgrades causing missing libraries

2012-12-11 Thread Adam McDougall
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 02:57:14PM -0600, Bryan Drewery wrote: On 12/11/2012 9:03 AM, Adam McDougall wrote: I used poudriere to build pkgng packages from the latest round of port updates since the freeze. I know in the commit message for xcb-util it bumped some other ports

Re: pkgng woes

2012-11-09 Thread Adam McDougall
Answering this in-line as a user of pkgng and binary packages: On 11/9/2012 4:53 AM, Beeblebrox wrote: Pkgng, as a concept may be great, but it's not really working - at least for me: 1. pkg2ng conversion does not do a complete job and I have about half of my ports in purgatory or a

pkg doesn't deal with perl minor upgrade? Re: svn commit: r306959 - in head: . lang/perl5.16

2012-11-05 Thread Adam McDougall
What is the recommended procedure to deal with perl modules after a perl minor version upgrade like this? poudriere rebuilt all my perl modules when perl went to 5.16.2 but none of them get pulled down by pkg, just perl itself. perl-after-upgrade doesn't see any packages installed. I spot

Re: pkg doesn't deal with perl minor upgrade? Re: svn commit: r306959 - in head: . lang/perl5.16

2012-11-05 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/05/12 09:40, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 08:48:09AM -0500, Adam McDougall wrote: What is the recommended procedure to deal with perl modules after a perl minor version upgrade like this? poudriere rebuilt all my perl modules when perl went to 5.16.2 but none of them

Where is best place to log pkg bugs?

2012-11-02 Thread Adam McDougall
The mailing lists don't seem to be a good place to send bugs and get attention, and I've found a few that I want to report and have in a bug system somewhere. Should I use gnats? Thanks. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: Where is best place to log pkg bugs?

2012-11-02 Thread Adam McDougall
On 11/2/2012 9:56 PM, Eitan Adler wrote: On 2 November 2012 21:53, Adam McDougall mcdou...@egr.msu.edu wrote: The mailing lists don't seem to be a good place to send bugs and get attention, and I've found a few that I want to report and have in a bug system somewhere. Should I use gnats? yes

pkg install order dependency problem

2012-10-17 Thread Adam McDougall
Short version: If you make a pkg repo with poudriere that includes java/diablo-jdk16 and tell pkg to install it, it knows pkgconf is a dep of xproto but it installs it in the wrong order so it fails. diablo-jdk16 is not on pkgbeta so I cannot test with that repo. I realize there are other jdk

Re: svn commit: r305926 - head/ports-mgmt/poudriere

2012-10-17 Thread Adam McDougall
I upgraded poudriere to 2.2 and started a build using: poudriere bulk -D -f /root/pkg-webold -j 90amd64-webold I noticed by the lack of deleting stale... and the high number of packages it was going to build that it was intending to rebuild all packages in the list. I don't seem to have a

Re: How to check out ports

2012-10-02 Thread Adam McDougall
On 10/2/2012 10:54 PM, Paul Schmehl wrote: How do I handle this? firnsy-barnyard2-v2-1.10-0-g2f5d496.tar.gz Is the string at the end (g2f5d496) auto-generated? If so, that's another problem. I guess something like this? Sheesh. What a PITA. PORTNAME= barnyard2-v2 PORTVERSION=

Re: ports/157868: mail/mailman: Possible problem with MAIL_GID

2011-06-27 Thread Adam McDougall
On 06/20/11 07:00, Chris Rees wrote: On 20 June 2011 11:10, Guido Falsim...@madpilot.net wrote: On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 10:30:58AM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: On 20 June 2011 10:22, Guido Falsim...@madpilot.net wrote: On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 12:57:47PM +, Chris Rees wrote: Today I

Re: portupgrade failure

2009-12-17 Thread Adam McDougall
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:21:02AM +0100, Jimmy Renner wrote: Quoting Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:13:36PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: The maintainer, ruby@, is aware of this; a check of the PR database shows multiple open PRs, none critical but many

Re: MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE (some more ports)

2009-06-07 Thread Adam McDougall
David Naylor wrote: On Saturday 06 June 2009 22:56:47 Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 18:05:14 +0200 David Naylor naylor.b.da...@gmail.com wrote: P.S. Is anyone interested in a list of ports that do not compile under tmpfs? Me. The following are on my

Re: Proposal: mechanism for local patches

2008-12-03 Thread Adam McDougall
RW wrote: On Tue, 2 Dec 2008 21:07:43 +0300 Dmitry Marakasov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not aware of any mechanism for this. But I agree that it's really needed. Before (in cvsup times) we could just place patches under files/ and be happy, but now when more people use portsnap we need

Re: portupgrade 'dovecot' failed

2008-09-09 Thread Adam McDougall
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 01:23:01AM +0400, Alex Keda wrote: --- Backing up the old version --- Uninstalling the old version --- Deinstalling 'dovecot-1.1.2_1' Dovecot is still running. Shall I stop it? [y]? ... --- Restoring the old version Dovecot has reserved the groupname

Re: x11/xterm-227 does not like FreeBSD

2007-07-26 Thread Adam McDougall
I noticed this too but it was followed by an upgrade to 228 which seems to fix it On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:11:18PM -0700, Chris Timmons wrote: Greetings, When I upgraded to x11/xterm-227, I noticed that rows and columns as reported to the terminal device by xterm were set to 0:

Re: Uggg!

2007-06-01 Thread Adam McDougall
On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 02:15:48AM -0700, Ade Lovett wrote: On Jun 01, 2007, at 01:33 , Kris Kennaway wrote: Download the packages from the FTP site and either reinstall them or extract the +CONTENTS. This will work best if you don't have local make.conf customizations, otherwise