From: The Doctor via freebsd-ports
Subject: [jes...@cisco.com: [Clamav-devel] ClamAV?? blog: ClamAV 0.103.0
release candidate]
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 16:35:28 -0600
> heads up!
Folloing is patch to update security/clamav to 0.103.0-rc.
Please keep in mind that 0.103.0 is still rele
heads up!
- Forwarded message from "Joel Esler (jesler)" -
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2020 21:57:23 +
From: "Joel Esler (jesler)"
To: ClamAV users ML ,
"clamav-de...@lists.clamav.net" ,
"clamav-annou...@lists.clamav.net"
Subject: [Cla
rom: "Joel Esler (jesler)"
To: ClamAV users ML , ClamAV Development
, "clamav-annou...@lists.clamav.net"
Subject: [Clamav-announce] ClamAV? blog: ClamAV 0.102.4 security patch
released
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3
Heads up!
- Forwarded message from "Joel Esler (jesler)" -
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2020 19:32:35 +
From: "Joel Esler (jesler)"
To: ClamAV users ML , ClamAV Development
, "clamav-annou...@lists.clamav.net"
Subject: [Clamav-announce] ClamAV?
Hello Michael,
Thank you for bug report and patch. I confirmed your patch fixes the
problem with 12.1-RELEASE.
From: Michael Grimm
Subject: latest Makefile breaks compilation of security/clamav if base is
lacking sendmail
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2020 15:37:13 +0200
> I managed to get compilat
Hi,
I am running 12.1-STABLE (r362940), ports head (541271) and compile all my
ports with poudriere-devel
My /etc/src.conf contains …
WITHOUT_SENDMAIL=yes
… thus I do not have /usr/lib/libmilter.so in base.
The recent modification of security/clamav/Makefile breaks my setup (again [1
Heads up security/clamav team.
- Forwarded message from "Joel Esler (jesler)" -
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 17:29:00 +
From: "Joel Esler (jesler)"
To: "clamav-annou...@lists.clamav.net" ,
"clamav-us...@lists.clamav.net" ,
"cla
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 07:43:17PM +0200, Florian Smeets via freebsd-ports
wrote:
> On 7. Aug 2019, at 04:02, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
> >
> > On 7/08/2019 7:57 am, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> >> Wehen Will clamav be updated?
> >> I understand there is a
On 7. Aug 2019, at 04:02, Kubilay Kocak wrote:
>
> On 7/08/2019 7:57 am, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
>> Wehen Will clamav be updated?
>> I understand there is a security issue?
>
> The best / most effective method to report/request security releases or
> u
On 7/08/2019 7:57 am, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
Wehen Will clamav be updated?
I understand there is a security issue?
The best / most effective method to report/request security releases or
updates is in Bugzilla, I've created one for the ClamAV 0.101.3 version
(security) update
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 09:52:28AM +1000, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
> On 7/08/2019 7:57 am, The Doctor via freebsd-ports wrote:
> > Wehen Will clamav be updated?
> >
> > I understand there is a security issue?
> >
> Thank-you for sharing the issue. I usual
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 at 10:33, The Doctor via freebsd-ports
wrote:
>
> Wehen Will clamav be updated?
>
> I understand there is a security issue?
The correct thing to do is to politely ask the maintainer as to the
state of the port, and request an update. Alternatively, you can
su
Wehen Will clamav be updated?
I understand there is a security issue?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doctor@@nl2k.ab.ca
Yahweh, Queen & country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
https://www.empire.kred/ROOTNK?t=94a1f39b Look at Psalm
bmilter, your patch
will be an appropriate one.
I am thinking about a more "future safe" solution for security/clamav-milter:
#) add an OPTION to security/clamav-milter's Makefile whether to use
libmilter from base or ports
#) make the default to use port mail/libmilter
#)
From: Michael Grimm
Subject: Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch
included)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 23:11:09 +0100
> Thank you very, very much, your patch works in my case (lacking sendmail in
> base).
>
> mike> poudriere bulk -j stable -C securit
Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> From: Michael Grimm
>> If I do set the option to create the milter interface (sp?) in
>> security/clamav I do run into the same error "Cannot find libmilter".
>
> Thank you for replay. Then please try following patch. With it
> se
From: Michael Grimm
Subject: Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch
included)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 22:20:04 +0100
> If I do set the option to create the milter interface (sp?) in
> security/clamav I do run into the same error "Cannot find libmilter".
&
rst mail.
No need to be sorry, really.
> Then I have another question. Does build of security/clamav, master
> port of security/clamav-milter, also fail on your environment?
If I do set the option to create the milter interface (sp?) in security/clamav
I do run into the same error "Canno
From: Michael Grimm
Subject: Re: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch
included)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 21:47:50 +0100
> See my last mail. I do not have sendmail compiled for base, thus I am lacking
> libmilter.so.X in my poudriere jail.
> Yes, that is non-defau
Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
> And build of security/clamav-milter succeeded with all cases.
>
> Do you use any non-default setting about clamav-milter itself or any
> of its dependencies?
See my last mail. I do not have sendmail compiled for base, thus I am lacking
libmilter.so.X in
Hello Michael.
From: Michael Grimm
Subject: security/clamav-milter fails to compile (preliminary patch included)
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:14:11 +0100
> after upgrading from STABLE-11 to STABLE-12 security/clamav-milter failed to
> compile:
>
> configure: error: Cannot fi
> /usr/local/poudriere/jails/12amd64/usr/lib32/libmilter.so
> /usr/local/poudriere/jails/12amd64/usr/lib32/libmilter.so.6
See, that is what I was describing. You do have sendmail installed in base, and
thus, the libmilter library will make it into your poudriere build jail, and
security/clam
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 20:23:39 +0100, Michael Grimm stated:
>Carmel NY wrote:
>> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated:
>>> Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>>>> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to
>&
Carmel NY wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated:
>> Michael Grimm wrote:
>>> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to
>>> compile the clamav-libmilter port no libmilter.so can be found by
>>> config
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:13:51 +0100, Michael Grimm stated:
>Michael Grimm wrote:
>
>> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to
>> compile the clamav-libmilter port no libmilter.so can be found by
>> configure (see error message abov
Michael Grimm wrote:
> I am using poudriere to build my ports. Within a poudriere jail used to
> compile the clamav-libmilter port no libmilter.so can be found by configure
> (see error message above) unless you tellclamav-libmilter's Makefile to
> depend on it and thus
Carmel NY wrote:
> On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:14:11 +0100, Michael Grimm stated:
>> after upgrading from STABLE-11 to STABLE-12 security/clamav-milter failed to
>> compile:
>>
>> configure: error: Cannot find libmilter
>> ===> Script "configu
On Sat, 22 Dec 2018 17:14:11 +0100, Michael Grimm stated:
>Hi,
>
>after upgrading from STABLE-11 to STABLE-12 security/clamav-milter failed to
>compile:
>
> configure: error: Cannot find libmilter
> ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
>
Hi,
after upgrading from STABLE-11 to STABLE-12 security/clamav-milter failed to
compile:
configure: error: Cannot find libmilter
===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to y...@utahime.org [maintainer] and attach
the
Perfect! Thanks for the replies and the clarification, guys!
On 12/11/18 11:21 AM, Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 11.12.18 um 18:51 schrieb Janky Jay, III:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
>>
>> clamav-0.101.0_2
Am 11.12.18 um 18:51 schrieb Janky Jay, III:
> Hi All,
>
> After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
>
> clamav-0.101.0_2 < needs updating (index has 0.100.2,1)
>
> The version that is claiming to be the latest
Hello Janky.
From: "Janky Jay, III"
Subject: ClamAV Port Version Regression?,ClamAV Port Version Regression?
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:51:43 -0700
> After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
>
> clamav-0.101.0_2 < nee
Hi All,
After a portsnap to pull ${latest), I'm seeing the following:
clamav-0.101.0_2 < needs updating (index has 0.100.2,1)
The version that is claiming to be the latest appears to be a version
regression. Am I wrong here? I checked the ClamAV s
Rerunning testport in my poudriere 11.1 jail for clamav, I get the following:
gmake check-TESTS
gmake[3]: Entering directory
'/wrkdirs/usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.100.0/unit_tests'
gmake[4]: Entering directory
'/wrkdirs/usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.100.0/unit_tests'
PASS
The full log is at:
http://home.lerctr.org:/data/p111-S-amd64-host-ports/2018-04-14_20h32m16s/logs/clamav-0.100.0_1.log
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: l...@lerctr.org
US Mail: 5708 Sabbia Drive, Round Rock, TX
I tried to upgrade clamav to 0.100.0_1 and it fails during tests.
If you disable the tests it will build and install but clamscan dumps core.
Here is output of build with tests enabled:
FAIL: check_clamav
PASS: check_freshclam.sh
PASS: check_sigtool.sh
SKIP: check_unit_vg.sh
FAIL
On 2017-06-26 13:26, Carmel NY wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:37:29 +0200, Marko Njezic stated:
On 2017-06-25 18:16, Carmel NY wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated:
From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It
determines if there are updates
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 11:37:29 +0200, Marko Njezic stated:
>On 2017-06-25 18:16, Carmel NY wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated:
>>
>>> From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It
>>> determines if there are up
On 2017-06-25 18:16, Carmel NY wrote:
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated:
From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It
determines if there are updates or whether you have checked recently,
so that you do not inadvertently dos the signature servers
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 17:17:44 +0200, Martin Waschbüsch stated:
>From what I can see, the clamav-unofficial-sigs port works. It
>determines if there are updates or whether you have checked recently,
>so that you do not inadvertently dos the signature servers. What is
>NOT working
> Am 25.06.2017 um 12:24 schrieb Carmel NY <carmel...@outlook.com>:
>
> I recently installed clamav-unofficial-sigs via the ports system. The
> port version is quite old,v5.3.2, while the current version is v5.6.2.
> In any case, I am receiving the following error message
I recently installed clamav-unofficial-sigs via the ports system. The
port version is quite old,v5.3.2, while the current version is v5.6.2.
In any case, I am receiving the following error message repeatedly:
Jun 24 15:45:00 ERROR: clamscan binary (clamscan_bin) not found
This is the full log
On Sun, 25 Jun 2017 09:49:09 +0200, Kurt Jaeger stated:
>Hi!
>
>> The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a
>> newer version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are
>> there any plans to update the port?
>
>Have you t
Hi!
> The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a newer
> version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are there
> any plans to update the port?
Have you tried to provide a patch ? It's structure changed a little
bit, so it does not simply
The port version of "clamav-unofficial-sigs" is 5.3.2; however a newer
version 5.6.2 is available. The port version is quite old. Are there
any plans to update the port?
--
Carmel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.f
Is fixed now, thanks for the report.
On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 09:14:52AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Someone/something messed up the ports tree:
>
> [00:00:22] >> Error: security/clamav depends on nonexistent origin
> 'devel/llvm36'; Please contact maintainer of the port t
Someone/something messed up the ports tree:
[00:00:22] >> Error: security/clamav depends on nonexistent origin
'devel/llvm36'; Please contact maintainer of the port to fix this. [00:00:22]
>> Error: security/clamav-milter depends on nonexistent origin
'devel/llvm36'; Pl
Hi!
> On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:30:25 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated:
>
> >Hmm. Let's see. A bug that may allow the defeat of a security
> >mechanism and allow a black-hat to do bad stuff before the bug con
> >even be looked at. Why would anyone have an issue with that? I mean,
> >don't we all want
On Mon, 21 Mar 2016 14:30:25 -0700, Kevin Oberman stated:
>Hmm. Let's see. A bug that may allow the defeat of a security
>mechanism and allow a black-hat to do bad stuff before the bug con
>even be looked at. Why would anyone have an issue with that? I mean,
>don't we all want more zero-day
On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Carmel <carmel...@outlook.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:42:54 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated:
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >> >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them
> >> >upstream:
> >>
Hi!
> >> >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542
> >>
> >> For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an
> >> access that report:
> >>
> >> You are not authorized to access bug #11542.
> >Ye
Hi!
> >Yes. It seems clamav bugzilla is restrictive and I can not change
> >that, as submitter of that bug.
>
> Now that makes about "ZERO" sense. Why would you (meaning clamav) want
> to hide bug information? Dumbest thing I ever saw (almost).
There are seve
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 16:42:54 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated:
>Hi!
>
>> >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them
>> >upstream:
>> >
>> >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542
>>
>> For whatever reason, I k
Hi!
> >The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them
> >upstream:
> >
> >https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542
>
> For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an
> access that report:
>
> You are not
On Sun, 20 Mar 2016 12:44:02 +0100, Kurt Jaeger stated:
>The make check of clamav exposes some issues, I've reported them
>upstream:
>
>https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11542
For whatever reason, I keep getting this error message when I try an
access that
Hi!
> >Do you have LLVM Enable JIT Bytecode compiler (bundled LLVM) enabled
> >when you do build clamav ? If so try building without that.
> >If I try to build with that enabled on amd64 current, the tests fail,
> >without that enabled everything works fine
>
&g
On Sat, 19 Mar 2016 16:07:25 -0700, Manfred Antar stated:
>Do you have LLVM Enable JIT Bytecode compiler (bundled LLVM) enabled
>when you do build clamav ? If so try building without that.
>If I try to build with that enabled on amd64 current, the tests fail,
>without that enable
is. Can you please
>> explain?
>
> It appears to be a problem with versions of LLVM greater than "3.6.2".
> Freshclam crashes with this message:
>
> Received signal: wake up
> ClamAV update process started at Sat Mar 19 17:24:14 2016
> main.cvd is up to date (version: 5
.
Freshclam crashes with this message:
Received signal: wake up
ClamAV update process started at Sat Mar 19 17:24:14 2016
main.cvd is up to date (version: 57, sigs: 4218790, f-level: 60, builder:
amishhammer)
daily.cld is up to date (version: 21467, sigs: 83892, f-level: 63, builder:
amishhamme
w
>>>>> suggestions, but they were not for this OS.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oddly enough, recompiling with gcc-4.8 works :-(
>>>
>>> So, this is a "clang" problem? If I knew exactly what the problem
>>> was, I would file a b
recompiling with gcc-4.8 works :-(
>>
>> So, this is a "clang" problem? If I knew exactly what the problem
>> was, I would file a bug report with them.
>
>What is the actual bug? Apparently the clamav site is being
>>>
>>> Is there anyway to correct it on a FreeBSD machine? I saw a few
>>> suggestions, but they were not for this OS.
>>>
>>
>> Oddly enough, recompiling with gcc-4.8 works :-(
>
> So, this is a "clang" problem? If I knew exactly what the
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 13:32:01 -0400, Michael Butler stated:
>On 03/18/16 13:17, Carmel wrote:
>> I have been bitten by this bug:
>> https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11309
>>
>> Is there anyway to correct it on a FreeBSD machine? I saw a few
>> suggestions, but they were not for this
I have been bitten by this bug:
https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11309
Is there anyway to correct it on a FreeBSD machine? I saw a few
suggestions, but they were not for this OS.
--
Carmel
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On 03/18/16 13:17, Carmel wrote:
> I have been bitten by this bug:
> https://bugzilla.clamav.net/show_bug.cgi?id=11309
>
> Is there anyway to correct it on a FreeBSD machine? I saw a few
> suggestions, but they were not for this OS.
>
Oddly enough, recompiling with gcc-4.8 works :-(
hisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
and out of the 293 packages attempted, I had 2 failures; one of
those was security/clamav-0.99 (updating from -0.98.7); last part
of the log shows:
...
===> Returning to build o
Dear port maintainer,
Can you tell me when the ClamAV 0.99 version will be released?
Recently got a message when updating, saying:
Local version: 0.98.7 Recommended version: 0.99
thanks,
Jos Chrispijn
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https
Dear port maintainer,
Just ran into an update issue with the ClamAV port:
--- cut ---
../libclamav/others.h:317: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'clcb_file_props'
../libclamav/others.h:388: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'clcb_file_props
I already filed:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195182
On 2014-11-19 14:40, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Just ran into an update issue with the ClamAV port:
--- cut ---
../libclamav/others.h:317: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before
Hi!
Just ran into an update issue with the ClamAV port:
--- cut ---
../libclamav/others.h:317: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'clcb_file_props'
Can you deinstall the old before before building the new ?
This sometimes happens with ports (they dont build
:
Dear port maintainer,
Just ran into an update issue with the ClamAV port:
--- cut ---
../libclamav/others.h:317: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'clcb_file_props'
../libclamav/others.h:388: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list
before 'clcb_file_props
that (and don't want to get into a situation where it's
not on the system).
Feel free to try and report back, and also add yourself to the CC list
on the PR.
BR,
Jos Chrispijn
On 2014-11-19 14:40, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Dear port maintainer,
Just ran into an update issue with the ClamAV port
Larry Rosenman wrote on 19-11-2014:
On 2014-11-19 14:49, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Larry Rosenman wrote on 19-11-2014:
I already filed:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195182
Thanks. Should I wait for an update or should I do a deinstall and
reinstall to see if Kurt's suggestion
to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following
error on every start of ClamAV:
# service clamav-clamd start
Starting clamav_clamd.
LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen libclamunrar_iface: file not
found - unrar support unavailable
ClamAV, however, seems to work correctly
, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de
wrote:
After the upgrade to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following
error on every start of ClamAV:
# service clamav-clamd start
Starting clamav_clamd.
LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen libclamunrar_iface: file
, May 15, 2014 04:23:28 PM Shawn Webb wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de
wrote:
After the upgrade to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following
error on every start of ClamAV:
# service clamav-clamd start
Starting clamav_clamd
On 05/13/14 11:55, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:03:50 -0300, Renato Botelho stated:
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 04:35:11 PM Jerry wrote:
FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE
I am unable to update to clamav-0.98.3. It terminates with the
following error message:
clamd.c:335:59: warning: format
On Tuesday, May 13, 2014 05:55:04 AM Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:03:50 -0300, Renato Botelho stated:
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 04:35:11 PM Jerry wrote:
FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE
I am unable to update to clamav-0.98.3. It terminates with the
following error message
After the upgrade to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following error on
every start of ClamAV:
# service clamav-clamd start
Starting clamav_clamd.
LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen libclamunrar_iface: file not found -
unrar support unavailable
ClamAV, however, seems to work correctly
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de wrote:
After the upgrade to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following error on
every start of ClamAV:
# service clamav-clamd start
Starting clamav_clamd.
LibClamAV Warning: Cannot dlopen libclamunrar_iface: file not found
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de wrote:
Am Thu, 15 May 2014 16:23:28 -0400
schrieb Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de
wrote:
After the upgrade to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following error
Am Thu, 15 May 2014 16:23:28 -0400
schrieb Shawn Webb latt...@gmail.com:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de
wrote:
After the upgrade to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following error
on every start of ClamAV:
# service clamav-clamd start
Starting
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 04:23:28 PM Shawn Webb wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de wrote:
After the upgrade to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following error on
every start of ClamAV:
# service clamav-clamd start
Starting clamav_clamd.
LibClamAV
On Thu, 15 May 2014 07:33:01 -0400, Renato Botelho stated:
Do you remember what was the version you had installed when tried to
build the new version? I'm still trying to reproduce the issue to be able
It was the latest version available before this new one was released.
--
Jerry
Am Thu, 15 May 2014 18:33:36 -0400
schrieb Renato Botelho ga...@freebsd.org:
On Thursday, May 15, 2014 04:23:28 PM Shawn Webb wrote:
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de
wrote:
After the upgrade to clamav-0.98.3_2 I am obtaining following
error on every start
On Mon, 12 May 2014 11:03:50 -0300, Renato Botelho stated:
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 04:35:11 PM Jerry wrote:
FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE
I am unable to update to clamav-0.98.3. It terminates with the
following error message:
clamd.c:335:59: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned int
On Thursday, May 08, 2014 04:35:11 PM Jerry wrote:
FreeBSD 10.0-RELEASE
I am unable to update to clamav-0.98.3. It terminates with the following
error message:
clamd.c:335:59: warning: format specifies type 'unsigned int' but the
argument has type 'off_t' (aka 'long') [-Wformat] logg(#Log
On Sun, 24 Nov 2013, Dewayne Geraghty wrote:
Thanks to Gerald for addressing this issue per
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk?sortby=dateview=log
clamav now builds.
Thanks for the confirmation. And sorry for the temporary breakage.
Gerald
, 22 Nov 2013 20:46:56 -0500
[Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 81 packages found - done]
** Port marked as IGNORE: security/clamav:
Unknown version of GCC specified (USE_GCC=any)
--- Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
- security/clamav (marked as IGNORE
# portupgrade -va
--- Session started at: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 20:46:56 -0500
[Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 81 packages found - done]
** Port marked as IGNORE: security/clamav:
Unknown version of GCC specified (USE_GCC=any)
--- Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped
as IGNORE: security/clamav:
Unknown version of GCC specified (USE_GCC=any)
--- Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
- security/clamav (marked as IGNORE)
--- Packages processed: 0 done, 1 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed
--- Session ended at: Fri, 22 Nov
from pkg(8) ... - 81 packages found - done]
** Port marked as IGNORE: security/clamav:
Unknown version of GCC specified (USE_GCC=any)
--- Listing the results (+:done / -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
- security/clamav (marked as IGNORE)
--- Packages processed: 0 done, 1
Hello, not sure if anybody has mentioned this yet but in
/usr/local/etc/amavisd.conf in the ClamAV section
/var/run/clamav/clamd.sock.sock should be /var/run/clamav/clamd.sock
otherwise Amavis will not be able to start.
# ### http://www.clamav.net/
['ClamAV-clamd',
\ask_daemon, [CONTSCAN
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 10:17:11 -0800
Tay t...@taypop.com wrote:
Hello, not sure if anybody has mentioned this yet but in
/usr/local/etc/amavisd.conf in the ClamAV section
/var/run/clamav/clamd.sock.sock should be
/var/run/clamav/clamd.sock otherwise Amavis will not be able to
start
Issue solved with processing port update clamav-0.97.3_1
BR,
Jos Chrispijn
Jos Chrispijn:
Just updated my ports, got an unexpected error:
= Attempting to fetch
http://waix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/clamav/clamav/0.97.3/clamav-0.97.3.tar.gz
fetch:
http://waix.dl.sourceforge.net/project
Any ideas? :)
--
Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go
Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
## Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org):
Any ideas? :)
Looks as if the official distfile really has 45793398 bytes. At least
that's what I'm getting from from Sourceforge, and it's signed with the
usual (i.e. used for previous releases) gpg key.
Perhaps the clamav team rerolled their tarball
Just updated my ports, got an unexpected error:
= Attempting to fetch
http://waix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/clamav/clamav/0.97.3/clamav-0.97.3.tar.gz
fetch:
http://waix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/clamav/clamav/0.97.3/clamav-0.97.3.tar.gz:
size mismatch: expected 45793424, actual 45793398
Jos Chrispijn schreef:
Just updated my ports, got an unexpected error:
= Attempting to fetch
http://waix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/clamav/clamav/0.97.3/clamav-0.97.3.tar.gz
fetch:
http://waix.dl.sourceforge.net/project/clamav/clamav/0.97.3/clamav-0.97.3.tar.gz:
size mismatch: expected
Johan Hendriks:
But why is there a mismatch.?? Why is the version on the net different
than the first tarball send to the port maintainer.
Call me paranoia, but i do not trust this so i wait till things get
cleared. :D
So true; I will wait for clearing as well.
Thanks for explaining; I found
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
