At 14:38 31/05/2007, Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software Guru
On Jun 5, 2007, at 4:39 PM, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 14:38 31/05/2007, Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robert Huff
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 5:39 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The worst error message in history belongs to... BIND9!
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has
Hello!
I've long wondered where this error message comes from:
hostname nor servname provided, or not known
So I grepped my FreeBSD source code and found out it actually belongs to BIND9.
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Any chance you can change it? Perhaps
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software Guru
Meditation Number
Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software Guru
Meditation Number
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 02:53:44PM +0200, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
Robert Huff wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
On Thu, 31 May 2007 08:38:41 -0400
Robert Huff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Kyrre_Nyg=E5rd?= writes:
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software Guru
On 5/31/07, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or how about favourite most useless man page entry:
The notion of errors is ill defined.
Come to think of it, that last one is almost poetic, isn't it? In a Zen
sort of way. Anyone recall which manpage it's from?
grep
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software Guru
Meditation Number
very long string of hex digits
On 5/31/07, Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/31/07, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or how about favourite most useless man page entry:
The notion of errors is ill defined.
Come to think of it, that last one is almost poetic, isn't it? In a Zen
sort of way. Anyone
On Thu, 31 May 2007 06:56:51 -0700
George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Favourite worst written error message in history:
Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue.
I have always loved this one!! Who made that up!?
Rico
___
It has to be the worst written error message in history.
Not even close. I commend to you the Amiga's BSOD:
Software Guru
Meditation Number
very long string of hex digits
On Thu, 31 May 2007 12:02:26 -0400
Bob Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/31/07, George [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Or how about favourite most useless man page entry:
The notion of errors is ill defined.
Come to think of it, that last one is almost poetic, isn't it?
Favourite worst written error message in history:
Keyboard not found. Press F1 to continue.
I have always loved this one!! Who made that up!?
Someone at IBM. That's what the original IBM PC, PC-AT, and
(presumably) PC-XT displayed if the keyboard was dead or not
plugged in.
It was
On Tuesday 10 April 2007 22:09:54 Kimi Ostro wrote:
Without seeing config, cant really help or maybe better on the BIND
mailing list?
no, you were correct. i actually fixed it a couple days ago, but it did in
fact boil down to an error in my config file. as i migrated from one one
server to
On 08/04/07, Jonathan Horne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i was setting up bind9 today in 2 jails. 1 jails is the master, and the
other
the slave. i am reloading 2 machines that were previously physical
machines,
into these jails. the master went fine, both internal and external views
work
i was setting up bind9 today in 2 jails. 1 jails is the master, and the other
the slave. i am reloading 2 machines that were previously physical machines,
into these jails. the master went fine, both internal and external views
work as expected.
setting up the slave, was not so smooth. i
Hi,
I have installed Bind9 before I could know that Bind is included in Base System
in FreBSD 6.2.
My NOOB understanding tells me that the Bind that has been installed by me is
not jailed whereas the Base Bind was jailed one.
Is there any go back possible for me to Base Bind without
/2007, dharam paul wrote:
Hi,
I have installed Bind9 before I could know that Bind is included in Base
System in FreBSD 6.2.
My NOOB understanding tells me that the Bind that has been installed by me
is not jailed whereas the Base Bind was jailed one.
Is there any go back possible for me to Base
not be getting the
correct named.conf.
-Derek
At 11:40 AM 1/14/2007, Reko Turja wrote:
- Original Message - From: Nate Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:39 PM
Subject: BIND9 Syntax?
Dear All,
I've been having
Dear All,
I've been having trouble with BIND(version 9.3.2-P1), and I'm not sure
where the problem is. When I try to use nslookup, it spits out:
server 127.0.0.1
Default server: 127.0.0.1
Address: 127.0.0.1#53
blue.home.lan
Server: 127.0.0.1
Address:127.0.0.1#53
** server
- Original Message -
From: Nate Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:39 PM
Subject: BIND9 Syntax?
Dear All,
I've been having trouble with BIND(version 9.3.2-P1), and I'm not
sure
where the problem is. When I try to use nslookup
Message - From: Nate Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2007 6:39 PM
Subject: BIND9 Syntax?
Dear All,
I've been having trouble with BIND(version 9.3.2-P1), and I'm not sure
where the problem is. When I try to use nslookup, it spits out:
server
the trouble im having is, that my slave (5.5-p3) will not transfer the zone
from the master (6.1-p4). my /var/log/messages is filled with these:
Sep 7 21:50:24 fbsd55-2 named[1847]: exiting
Sep 7 21:50:26 fbsd55-2 named[1924]: starting BIND 9.3.2 -t /var/named -u bind
Sep 7 21:50:26 fbsd55-2
i have 2 servers im working with for a test im doing with bind9. a 6.1-p4,
and a 5.5-p3. both have bind9-9.3.2.1 from ports, without replace base
version checked. both are responding correctly for general lookups of hosts
out on the internet, even based on the querying clients ip vs the acl
freebsd neophyte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
as for pulling from the FTP server. what i wanted to say was that i
booted from a CD, but used an FTP server as my install medium. as for
cvsup, i used the following: /usr/share/examples/cvsup/stable-supfile.
as for the existing source tree, i used
freebsd neophyte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i'm following the following tutorial to create bind9 under a jail:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/09/04/jails.html
in doing so, i'm getting the following error:
---
# make world DESTDIR=/usr/jail/bind9
On 8/30/06, Lowell Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
freebsd neophyte [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...snip...
---
# make world DESTDIR=/usr/jail/bind9
--
Building an up-to-date make(1
i'm following the following tutorial to create bind9 under a jail:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/09/04/jails.html
in doing so, i'm getting the following error:
---
# make world DESTDIR=/usr/jail/bind9
Hello!
My friend, who hosts most of my stuff, is using djbdns. Probably for security
and simplicity.
Anyway I thought I'd do the same. But I'm having serious difficulties finding a
user-friendly howto.
I've basically picked stuff from here and there and put them together.
Would this be what
On Thursday 29 December 2005 10:55, Kristian Vaaf wrote:
Hello!
My friend, who hosts most of my stuff, is using djbdns. Probably for
security and simplicity.
1) BIND 9 is a whole different animal from BIND =8, with many fewer
vulnerabilities.
2) In this case, simplicity means staggering
Kristian Vaaf wrote:
Hello!
My friend, who hosts most of my stuff, is using djbdns. Probably for security
and simplicity.
Anyway I thought I'd do the same. But I'm having serious difficulties finding a
user-friendly howto.
I've basically picked stuff from here and there and put them
Hello Everyone,
I spent the weekend scouring the newsgroups and Googling looking for
a howto on setting up Bind9 (in a jail), ISC-DHCPD, and Dynamic DNS updates
from Windows clients.
Does anyone know of a good HOWTO on this?
Thanks!
Brian E. Conklin, MCP+I, MCSE
Director
On Mon, 2005-11-21 at 18:41, Brian E. Conklin wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I spent the weekend scouring the newsgroups and Googling looking for
a howto on setting up Bind9 (in a jail), ISC-DHCPD, and Dynamic DNS updates
from Windows clients.
Does anyone know of a good HOWTO
with the latest ports-update
Sendmail-8.13.5
host+BIND9
#
# /etc/namedb/localhost.rev (entry)
#
_domainkey IN TXT g=; k=rsa; t=y; p=MHwwDQYJK
#
# /var/log/maillog
#
dk-filter[683]: Sendmail DomainKeys Filter v0.3.0 starting (args: -l -p
local:/var/run/dk-filter -P /var/run/dk-filter.pid -d
On Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:55:33 +0100, Hanno Krusken [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Sendmail + dk-milter + sid-filter setup with DNS+BIND9
Wrote these words of wisdom:
Hi all,
need help to setup DNS for mai domain.
I would like to get dk-milter to sign all my outgoing mail to be DNS confirm
The single dns I am running resolves...eventually. I have not set up a
secondary name server (caching) but I plan to.
Our proxy server is querying my one-and-only dns but often queries time out.
Is there a way to optimize the performance of the dns? The same box handles
httpd, postfix, and
Jerod Prothe wrote:
The single dns I am running resolves...eventually. I have not set up a
secondary name server (caching) but I plan to. Our proxy server is querying
my one-and-only dns but often queries time out. Is there a way to optimize
the performance of the dns?
Why, yes. Use the
I had read where the bind9 implementation of IPv6 was a bit flaky, so I found
that tip and am trying it. Doesn't seem to change things though.
Henrik Lidström wrote:
Jerod Prothe wrote:
The single dns I am running resolves...eventually. I have not set up
a secondary name server (caching
notify-source :) I must have been blind.
Sorry,
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Knipe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2005 12:09 PM
Subject: bind9 issue?
Hi,
I'm not on the bind9 mailing lists, hopefully someone can help me out
here
Hi,
I'm not on the bind9 mailing lists, hopefully someone can help me out here,
or as I suspect, perhaps just fill in a bug report
My server has a primary IP, with various aliases:
x.x.x.136 (Primary)
x.x.x.131 (Alias)
named.conf:
options {
listen-on port 53 { x.x.x.131; };
query
Hi.
As I can see there is a directory for dynamic updates:
/var/named/etc/namedb/dynamic.
But files with dynamic updates still placed next to zones files
(/var/named/etc/namedb/master).
I've looked for an option for it in documentation but failed.
So, how can I use
OK, here we go ...
I'm going to attempt setting up BIND9 for the first time, and I don't
have a lot of experience with DNS. My setup is a LAN behind a router
using NAT on an ADSL connection with a dynamic IP on its interface
assigned by my ISP. I'm not interested in setting up an authoritative
Joshua Tinnin wrote:
[ ... ]
Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com)
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@64.173.27.15 with plain)
by smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2005 11:26:08 -
Well, I don't own smogmonster.com (when I first picked it, nobody did,
but now someone does),
On Sat 30 Apr 05 13:57, Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joshua Tinnin wrote:
[ ... ]
Received: from unknown (HELO smogmonster.com)
([EMAIL PROTECTED]@64.173.27.15 with plain)
by smtp811.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 30 Apr 2005 11:26:08
-
Well, I don't own
On Sat 30 Apr 05 20:58, Joshua Tinnin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have been meaning to get Greg Leahey's book as well, but
maybe I'll wait for the next edition, because he recently said he'd
be updating it.
'Scuze me, that should be Lehey, of course ...
- jt
On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 05:57:50PM -0700, Pat Maddox wrote:
The named process is always in the kserel state. I've got no idea
what that is, and all I can find on Google is that programs hang in
that state. So I don't know what to do. There's no output, I can't
find any logs, there's just no
, there's just no way for me to tell what's wrong.
On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 15:59:46 -0800, Thomas Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you might want to add named_enable=YES in your /etc/rc.conf
check out the following tutorial on setting up Bind9
http://www.section6.net/help/bind.php
Hope
-
From: Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything
The named process is always in the kserel state. I've got no idea
what that is, and all I can find on Google is that programs hang
Subject: Re: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything
The named process is always in the kserel state. I've got no idea
what that is, and all I can find on Google is that programs hang in
that state. So I don't know what to do. There's no output, I can't
find any logs, there's just no way for me
I installed BIND9 from the ports earlier, edited the config files a
bit, but I can't get it to run at all. When I type named, or
/etc/rc.d/named start, there's no output at all, and then I find that
named isn't running. I've tried this again with the default install
as well, without touching
you might want to add named_enable=YES in your /etc/rc.conf
check out the following tutorial on setting up Bind9
http://www.section6.net/help/bind.php
Hope this helps..
T
- Original Message -
From: Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, January 29
I believe the executable for the default install of BIND 8 is
/usr/sbin/named Try ./namedthat should start it up.
From: Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: BIND9 doesn't seem to do anything
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16
to add named_enable=YES in your /etc/rc.conf
check out the following tutorial on setting up Bind9
http://www.section6.net/help/bind.php
Hope this helps..
T
- Original Message -
From: Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Saturday, January 29
-0800, Thomas Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you might want to add named_enable=YES in your /etc/rc.conf
check out the following tutorial on setting up Bind9
http://www.section6.net/help/bind.php
Hope this helps..
T
- Original Message -
From: Pat Maddox [EMAIL PROTECTED
I have cvs'd and built world and now I want to use the native bind9 to run DNS.
I am very familiar with chrooting named, but for some reason I cannot get
this going
If I use ISC's bind 9 built from scratch, it will chroot just fine.
Does anyone have a sample named.conf for chrooting
On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 02:23:54PM -0600, J.D. Bronson wrote:
I have cvs'd and built world and now I want to use the native bind9 to run
DNS.
I am very familiar with chrooting named, but for some reason I cannot get
this going
If I use ISC's bind 9 built from scratch, it will chroot
At 06:58 PM 1/16/2005, you wrote:
Take a look at the new knobs in /etc/defaults/rc.conf for controlling
the supplied BIND9.
The rc scripts do a really good job of setting it all up for you.
I got it working...its different than I am used to with the raw ISC source
compile...
Since named starts
Hi All!
Question...
OS - FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE
I installed (from source) and configured bind-9.2.1 and i have this trouble:
# nslookup ftp.my.com
Server: myserv.local
Address: 192.168.0.1
Name:ftp.my.com
Address: 192.168.0.1
But!!!:
# ping ftp.my.com
ping: cannot resolve ftp.my.com:
that seems to be BIND9
specific:
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1d49): In function `.L166':
: undefined reference to `res_ninit'
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1db5): In function `.L166':
: undefined reference to `res_nmkquery'
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1de7): In function `.L166':
: undefined
today!) with an error that seems to be
BIND9 specific:
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1d49): In function `.L166':
: undefined reference to `res_ninit'
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1db5): In function `.L166':
: undefined reference to `res_nmkquery'
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1de7): In function `.L166
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 03:26:26PM +0100, O. Hartmann wrote:
Dear Sirs.
Compiling PHP 5.0.3 from PHP.NET, PHP 5.0.2 from ./ports collection and
PHP5-SNAP from php.net fail in compiling in FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE
(cvsupdated and rebuilt today!) with an error that seems to be BIND9
specific
to be BIND9
specific:
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1d49): In function `.L166':
: undefined reference to `res_ninit'
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1db5): In function `.L166':
: undefined reference to `res_nmkquery'
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1de7): In function `.L166':
: undefined reference to `res_nsend'
ext
Dear Sirs.
Compiling PHP 5.0.3 from PHP.NET, PHP 5.0.2 from ./ports collection and
PHP5-SNAP from php.net fail in compiling in FreeBSD 5.3-STABLE
(cvsupdated and rebuilt today!) with an error that seems to be BIND9
specific:
ext/standard/dns.lo(.text+0x1d49): In function `.L166':
: undefined
Hello,
I'm trying to set up an rndc key for bind9 on a 5.3 box. I have
generated the key with dnssec-keygen but when i run rndc bind hangs. I've
read the handbook, i want to make a 5.3 master dns server for two domains, i
will not be doing any transfers, if anyone has a howto on this please
dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to set up an rndc key for bind9 on a 5.3 box. I have
generated the key with dnssec-keygen but when i run rndc bind hangs. I've
read the handbook, i want to make a 5.3 master dns server for two domains,
i will not be doing any transfers, if anyone has a howto
Gerard Samuel wrote:
Im getting a bunch of these in the logs -
Nov 10 10:30:48 gatekeeper named[312]: dumping master file:
master/tmp-SLtSQEmBBK: open: permission denied
So I figured a filesystem permissions problem. I chowned
Thanks for any info that you may provide...
Im confused. I've
Erik Norgaard wrote:
Gerard Samuel wrote:
Im getting a bunch of these in the logs -
Nov 10 10:30:48 gatekeeper named[312]: dumping master file:
master/tmp-SLtSQEmBBK: open: permission denied
So I figured a filesystem permissions problem. I chowned
Thanks for any info that you may provide...
Gerard Samuel wrote:
Erik Norgaard wrote:
Gerard Samuel wrote:
Im getting a bunch of these in the logs -
Nov 10 10:30:48 gatekeeper named[312]: dumping master file:
master/tmp-SLtSQEmBBK: open: permission denied
So I figured a filesystem permissions problem. I chowned
Thanks for any info that
Hi,
I had a working BIND9 running but needed to restart after updating the
zone file with the following command:
# /usr/local/sbin/named -g -u bind -t /var/named -c /etc/named.conf
But this failed:
Nov 10 12:23:58.110 starting BIND 9.2.3 -g -u bind -t /var/named -c
/etc/named.conf
Nov 10 12:23
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 12:29:59 +0100, Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I had a working BIND9 running but needed to restart after updating the
zone file with the following command:
# /usr/local/sbin/named -g -u bind -t /var/named -c /etc/named.conf
But this failed:
Shouldn't
Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
Shouldn't you be using the command named -g bind -u bind -t /var/named ?
No, that's bind8. On bind9 '-u bind' sets user _and_ group. -g is
foreground to catch the output.
Erik
--
Ph: +34.666334818 web: www.locolomo.org
S/MIME
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004 13:29:23 +0100, Erik Norgaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
Shouldn't you be using the command named -g bind -u bind -t /var/named
?
No, that's bind8. On bind9 '-u bind' sets user _and_ group. -g is
foreground to catch the output.
Oops my
Nelis Lamprecht wrote:
Oops my bad. The only other explanation I can think of then is that
the path for the pid file may be specified incorrectly in your
named.conf in relation to your chroot ?
I thought that too. First, I had no path specified in named.conf,
defaults to /var/run/named.pid -
goes back to root:wheel.
Im currently using BIND9 only for the LAN (cacheing dns).
Thanks for any info that you may provide...
/etc/rc.conf
--
named_enable=YES
named_chrootdir=/var/named
/var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf
--
options {
directory /etc/namedb;
pid-file/var
Erik Norgaard wrote:
Mystery deepens...?
Problem solved, yet mystery deepens as to why this happened:
I first tried to reinstall bind9 to check that some file had not been
messed up by installation of something else. Didn't change a thing.
Then I moved my old chroot dir and created a new one
rebooted, the directory goes back to root:wheel.
Im currently using BIND9 only for the LAN (cacheing dns).
Thanks for any info that you may provide...
Im confused. I've read the named and rc.conf man pages, and didn't find out
why named is behaving as it is.
I've tried adding
Greetings,
I'm planning to install 5.3 Release today and setup
Bind 9 on a server. my question is:
Can anyone confirm my thoughts that running Bind 9 in
multiple views to handle External and Internal queries
is more efficient (in terms of system resources) than
of running two instances of Bind
Hello,
Today I transfer my domain from bind8 to bind9. It works ok, except ndc.
I read bind9 administrator manual. But there is always about rndc.
because bind is by default chrooted (which is great) ndc report an error
ndc: error: ctl_client: evConnect(fd 3): No such file or directory
On Sat, Oct 16, 2004 at 12:55:22PM +0200, Uro Gruber wrote:
Hello,
Today I transfer my domain from bind8 to bind9. It works ok, except ndc.
I read bind9 administrator manual. But there is always about rndc.
because bind is by default chrooted (which is great) ndc report an error
I have set up bind 9.2.3 on 4.10. I followed the instructions for setting
up random as per the instructions at the end of the bind install.
the instructions say to add the rndc-key in my namd.conf. I was wondering
if that is a good idea? Doesn't this file get quarried by people on the
Internet.
- Original Message -
From: Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 10:44 PM
Subject: random device settings on bind9
I have set up bind 9.2.3 on 4.10. I followed the instructions for
setting
up random as per the instructions at the end
Joshua Lewis wrote:
I have set up bind 9.2.3 on 4.10. I followed the instructions for setting
up random as per the instructions at the end of the bind install.
the instructions say to add the rndc-key in my namd.conf. I was wondering
if that is a good idea? Doesn't this file get quarried by people
borg writes:
Correction for what I posted earlier:
Bind now resides in /usr/ports/dns
It's still hardcoded in my memory the location on my
old 4.x server which was /usr/ports/net :)
Are you aware of /usr/ports/MOVED?
Robert Huff
On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 21:53:28 -0700 (PDT), borg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been having been having some issues with BIND
that have been
driving me up the wall. I believe I may have located
the problem. I
believe I had both BIND8 and BIND9
I have been having been having some issues with BIND that have been
driving me up the wall. I believe I may have located the problem. I
believe I had both BIND8 and BIND9 installed on the same system. So I am
reinstalling from the ports collection and overwriting BIND8 completely.
I wish to avoid
Joshua Lewis wrote:
I have been having been having some issues with BIND that have been
driving me up the wall. I believe I may have located the problem. I
believe I had both BIND8 and BIND9 installed on the same system. So I am
reinstalling from the ports collection and overwriting BIND8
--- Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been having been having some issues with BIND
that have been
driving me up the wall. I believe I may have located
the problem. I
believe I had both BIND8 and BIND9 installed on the
same system. So I am
reinstalling from the ports collection
--- borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's a very common confusion. Usually after
installing Bind9 from the ports named -v gives you
the 8.x version. A fast and dirty method to override
the old Bind8 with Bind9 tools and file:
cd /usr/ports/net/bind9
snip
Correction for what I posted earlier
read the /usr/ports/dns/bind9 Makefile and use the 'PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9'
option to make.
make PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9=yes install clean
In rc.conf
--
named_enable=YES
named_program=/usr/local/sbin/named
named_flags=-c /usr/local/etc/namedb/named.conf -u bind
and you can also put
The OP could just wait a few weeks and upgrade to one of the 5.3 BETAs
-- or wait a month and a half and upgrade to 5.3-RELEASE, where BIND9
will be the default resolver in the system.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2004 at 04:14:03AM -0400, Michael Sharp wrote:
read the /usr/ports/dns/bind9 Makefile and use
On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 22:36:54 -0700, Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
How to I totaly replace Bind8x on my 5.2.1 system?
I run BIND 9 chroot on a 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 system. I installed it from
ports (/usr/ports/dns/bind9).
Basically, to replace the base BIND 8 installation, you need
and understand how to do it for all of my
programs. Especially what the difference is between jailing and chrooting
Thank you,
Joshua Lewis
Michael Sharp
read the /usr/ports/dns/bind9 Makefile and use the
'PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9'
option to make.
make PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9=yes install
a dependancy a problem. But I just ran cvsup no
more then an hour ago. Is there something I am missing?
Thanks for any help
Thank you,
Joshua Lewis
Michael Sharp
read the /usr/ports/dns/bind9 Makefile and use the
'PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9'
option to make.
make PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9=yes
understand that it says a dependancy a problem. But I just ran cvsup no
more then an hour ago. Is there something I am missing?
Thanks for any help
Thank you,
Joshua Lewis
Michael Sharp
read the /usr/ports/dns/bind9 Makefile and use the
'PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9'
option to make.
make
the proper
conf file, with a new random key, and appropriate file
permissions.
I guess I really need a bind9 on FreeBSD doc. That can answer all my
questions. I can't find anything that suites my needs on ISC.ORG. Has
anyone come across a well written bind9 doc?
I purchased the Complete
How to I totaly replace Bind8x on my 5.2.1 system?
Is there a command to run to replace bind8 durring install?
Do I need to make changes to my startup files?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
+++ stan [freebsd] [30-01-04 14:31 -0500]:
| On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 04:52:12PM -, Edmund Craske wrote:
| There's something wrong with the rc.conf stuff for named if you install the bind9
port over the base bind8 (by doing a make
| -DPORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9 install clean in dns/bind9
What's involed in using bind9, instead of the default bind 8. I have made
the port, but it seems that I probably need to somehow delete the existing
bind8, right?
I see the entry in /etc/defaults/mak.conf that instructs the buld process
to not build it, but I already did a make world before
101 - 200 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
