Hi Andrew,
Nice name :)
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
--snip--
I've verified the same timeout behavior with Outlook Express and Thunderbird.
Using Thunderbird, I was able to check different settings too. The settings
should be to use authentication on the smtp server using SSL. Someone,
Hi,
Thanks again everyone for the pointers with Outlook and my fellow church
parishoners. I'm hoping for some more pointers. Using tcpdump I'm fairly
certain that the initial SYN packets from the clients are never reaching the
server. I'll need to test one more time to be sure (I wasn't
Le Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:35:17 -0600,
Andrew Falanga [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hi,
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are
able to receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently
configured for POP3 (I use dovecot).
At home I tried to send mail to
On Thursday 31 July 2008 02:35, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able
to receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for
POP3 (I use dovecot).
At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail
Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to
receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3
(I use dovecot).
At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using
the church
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Andrew Falanga
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that
folks are able to
receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently
configured for POP3
(I use dovecot).
On Thursday 31 July 2008 03:31:36 Barry Byrne wrote:
Andrew:
I've seen a similar problem from time to time with Outlook 2003 clients.
For seemingly no reason whatsoever, they give a timeout sending mail.
Googling the error code throws up many with the same error and no solution
that I've
Hi,
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to
receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3
(I use dovecot).
At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine using
the church e-mail server and was
At 07:35 PM 7/30/2008, Andrew Falanga wrote:
Hi,
I run a mail server for my church. Today I was called that folks are able to
receive, but not send their mail. They are all currently configured for POP3
(I use dovecot).
At home I tried to send mail to two different e-mail accounts of mine
Do I need to have a *_enable=YES line in my rc.conf in order to start my
courier-imap-pop3 and courier-imap-imap servers? Or do I have to enable
inetd?
I have been pulling my hair out for weeks trying to setup my first mail
server using how toos from high5.net and workaround.org.
I have tried to
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 10:48 -0800, Joshua Lewis wrote:
Do I need to have a *_enable=YES line in my rc.conf in order to start my
courier-imap-pop3 and courier-imap-imap servers? Or do I have to enable
inetd?
Yup. The full set, if you include the secure versions too is:
-;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Risdon
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Mail Server
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 10:48 -0800
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Risdon
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD Mail Server
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 10:48 -0800, Joshua Lewis wrote:
Do I need to have a *_enable=YES line in my rc.conf in order
What if there is a problem starting one of the servers? Should I look at
/var/dmesg ? Or is there a different log to look at?
Thank you,
Joshua Lewis
Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 10:48 -0800, Joshua Lewis wrote:
Do I need to have a *_enable=YES line in my rc.conf in order to start
my
Sorry one last question. Should I put all of my *_enable in /etc/rc.conf?
Isn't there another one in /usr/local/etc/ ? I thought I saw two placeses
to add the enable lines. Is one better then the other?
Thank you,
Joshua Lewis
Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 10:48 -0800, Joshua Lewis
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 11:59 -0800, Joshua Lewis wrote:
What if there is a problem starting one of the servers? Should I look at
/var/dmesg ? Or is there a different log to look at?
/var/log/maillog
and sometimes
/var/log/messages
Peter.
Thank you,
Joshua Lewis
Peter Risdon
On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 12:02 -0800, Joshua Lewis wrote:
Sorry one last question. Should I put all of my *_enable in /etc/rc.conf?
Yup.
Isn't there another one in /usr/local/etc/ ? I thought I saw two placeses
to add the enable lines. Is one better then the other?
No, it must be /etc/rc.conf
JL Sorry one last question. Should I put all of my *_enable in /etc/rc.conf?
JL Isn't there another one in /usr/local/etc/ ? I thought I saw two placeses
JL to add the enable lines. Is one better then the other?
JL Thank you,
JL Joshua Lewis
-
-;-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Peter Risdon
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:38 AM
To: Robert Kim, EVDO-Coverage, Verizon Agent
Cc: 'List Free Bsd'
Subject: RE: FreeBSD Mail Server
On Thu
On Feb 17, 2005, at 12:48 PM, Joshua Lewis wrote:
Do I need to have a *_enable=YES line in my rc.conf in order to
start my
courier-imap-pop3 and courier-imap-imap servers? Or do I have to enable
inetd?
Josh,
It's usually a good idea to read through the start up script in
/usr/local/etc/rc.d to
I have located what I feel is a very complete document on Building a
Stable Secure FreeBSD Mail server (That happens to be the name of the Doc
too. Go figure)
I am not sure what the age of this document is. In the document it reads:
I like to change the default algorithm used when encrypting
Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have located what I feel is a very complete document on Building a
Stable Secure FreeBSD Mail server (That happens to be the name of the Doc
too. Go figure)
I am not sure what the age of this document is. In the document it reads:
I like to change
On Saturday 26 June 2004 03:07 am, Joshua Lewis wrote:
I have located what I feel is a very complete document on Building a
Stable Secure FreeBSD Mail server (That happens to be the name of the Doc
too. Go figure)
Perhaps you might like to share the location of this document with the list
complete document on Building a
Stable Secure FreeBSD Mail server (That happens to be the name of the Doc
too. Go figure)
Perhaps you might like to share the location of this document with the
list?
--
Best regards,
Chris
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD
On Saturday 26 June 2004 09:43 am, Joey Mingrone wrote:
A little googling turned up:
http://gene.wins.uva.nl/~jmsteggi/Creating_a_Stable_Secure_FreeBSD_Mailserv
er.pdf
Ahh yes - this IS a good doc. I have had it for a few months. I was hoping
that it might have been an updated version. None
Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 26 June 2004 09:43 am, Joey Mingrone wrote:
A little googling turned up:
http://gene.wins.uva.nl/~jmsteggi/Creating_a_Stable_Secure_FreeBSD_Mailserv
er.pdf
Ahh yes - this IS a good doc. I have had it for a few months. I was hoping
that it
On Sat, 26 Jun 2004 02:07:13 -0600, Joshua Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
...
I like to change the default algorithm used when encrypting a user's
password to the blowfish algorithm, as it provides the highest security
at the greatest speed.
Is this an accurate statement? My current
The MTA is PostFix
http://bsdhound.com/downloads/Creating_a_Stable_Secure_FreeBSD_Mailserver.pdf
Document date is 10/17/2003
So it is not to old. So far it is pretty accurate.
Thank you,
Joshua Lewis
dave
Hi,
What mail server was this doc dealing with and can you give me the
--On Thursday, September 25, 2003 09:39:12 +0200 Armand Passelac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ On Wed, 24 Sep, 2003 at 15:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ]
What do you think of Clam so far?
I'm interested in checking something out
It's a good and free product.
It seems to work well.
But it's
or if ur using postfix, u can use mks_vir. u can get it at
http://linux.mks.com.pl
or if sendmail, i personally like mailscanner from mailscanner.info
\jett
--On Thursday, September 25, 2003 09:39:12 +0200 Armand Passelac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ On Wed, 24 Sep, 2003 at 15:58,
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 03:39 AM, Armand Passelac wrote:
[ ... ]
In the community, the Vexira Antivirus seems to have a very very good
reputation : http://www.centralcommand.com/vexira_mailarmor_linux.html
You can see this article for a good anti-virus list :
What do you think of Clam so far?
I'm interested in checking something out
On Mon, 22 Sep 2003 14:08:52 +0200
Armand Passelac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ On Fri, 19 Sep, 2003 at 11:35, Dan Pelleg wrote:
]
RJ45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I Tryed to search an economic
[ On Fri, 19 Sep, 2003 at 11:35, Dan Pelleg wrote: ]
RJ45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello,
I Tryed to search an economic antivirus for freebsd mailserver.
Anyone has comments on Vexira antivirus ?
anyone tryed it ?
It looks quit economic
How about Clam AntiVirus?
Hello,
I Tryed to search an economic antivirus for freebsd mailserver.
Anyone has comments on Vexira antivirus ?
anyone tryed it ?
It looks quit economic
thanks
Rick
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Friday 19 September 2003 07:45 am, RJ45 wrote:
Hello,
I Tryed to search an economic antivirus for freebsd mailserver.
Anyone has comments on Vexira antivirus ?
anyone tryed it ?
It looks quit economic
thanks
Rick
I'd like to add on to this question:
Has anyone run the Linux Desktop
Hello RJ45,
Friday, September 19, 2003, 7:45:25 AM, you wrote:
R I Tryed to search an economic antivirus for freebsd mailserver. Anyone
R has comments on Vexira antivirus ? anyone tryed it ? It looks quit
R economic
I know several mail admins who use it and love it, although personally I
have
36 matches
Mail list logo
