://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25520353.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
Freeco wrote:
Maybe i made some cabling loop, becauce my internet stoped to work. In the
beginning everything was ok, but after some time when all 3 pc's who was
connected to switch it stopped to work. Why?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC
How to change the interfaces to not to be on same physical subnet?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25504647.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd
How to change the interfaces to not to be on same physical subnet?
Hummm, subnet is virtual, it is not physical.
To have interface on different phisical network, plug your interfaces
to different switchwes that are not interconnected one to the other.
To have a different subnet used on
What does it look like?
ISP---Hub---My Gateway---Switch--Pc
Or
ISPMy Gateway---Switch-Hub-Pc
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25507235.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
In the beginning when gateway starts the web page opens, but after that no
one web doesn't open. The same is in first 5min ping reach my ISP gateway,
but then it's gone. Same from my gateway with ping.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25507722
Freeco wrote:
What does it look like?
ISP---Hub---My Gateway---Switch--Pc
Or
ISPMy Gateway---Switch-Hub-Pc
...are you sure that by accident that you don't have the following
*physical* setup?
---
| Gateway |
---
|
Steve Bertrand wrote:
[ snip ]
Freeco, let us know how things are connected physically. Your best bet
would be:
|-pc
|
ISP---Gateway-Switch-pc
|
: 192.168.1.2
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25508442.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Freeco wrote:
So it means that i will need 2 more NIC's in my gateway?
|-pc
|
ISP---Gateway-Switch-pc
|
|_pc
Why all pc's can't be in
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25509501.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Steve Bertrand wrote:
map fxp0 192.168.0.0/24 - 0/32
Aside from that, are you sure that this entry shouldn't be:
map rl0 192.168.0.0/24 - 0/32
? Again, I don't know ipnat, but to me, in the fxp0 entry, it looks like
you are trying to map the 192 space coming INTO fxp0 (which in your
Freeco wrote:
Steve Bertrand wrote:
|-pc
|
ISP-Switch---Gateway--Switchpc
| \ |
| \ |_pc
| \
server1 server2
: 255.255.255.128 (SAME IN rc.conf ON FREEBSD)
Gateway: 192.168.1.2
Dns: x.x.88.17
Dns: 192.168.1.2
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25510433.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Freeco wrote:
Steve wrote:
In the diagram above, you need two NICs in the gateway. One goes to the
ISP, and the other 192.168.1.2 goes to the switch. The rest of the
computers also plug into the switch. If all of the devices have
192.168.1.x, they are all in the same subnet.
If the 2 pc's
that there is some sort of
cabling mishap.
P.S. Sorry for my poor english
You don't have to be. You're doing just fine!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25510716.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
fxp0 is integrated NIC. In this NIC connects a cable from ISP. rl0 is PCI NIC
the cable connets to switch with all other 3 pc's.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25510880.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Freeco wrote:
- What is connected to the switch in your room?
There is connected ISP cable from my home switch and 3 pc's
So, like this:
down the street
|
|
home switch---neighbor
|
|
cable
cables was connected.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25511903.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Freeco wrote:
Thanks man!
Everything works when i connected a cable directly to the gateway. Till this
there was two cables connected because inet cable was too short.
I kind of figured something along those lines.
But i want
my gateway to bring to another room so i'll need to connect 2
Freeco wrote:
Thanks man!
Everything works when i connected a cable directly to the gateway. Till this
there was two cables connected because inet cable was too short. But i want
my gateway to bring to another room so i'll need to connect 2 cables and
inet will doesn't work again?
I
Ok, thanks for advice about switch. You really helped me so much. Now i'll
get with my ipf and nat rules.
What ports u recomend to keep open and how to block gateway ping?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25512314.html
Sent from the freebsd
Freeco wrote:
Ok, thanks for advice about switch. You really helped me so much. Now i'll
get with my ipf and nat rules.
I'm glad I could help. So many people here and on other lists have
helped me significantly over the years, so I try to give back whenever I
can/have time.
What ports u
After some time, when all 3 pc's was connected to switch inet lost. I
couldn't open any web page. I didn;t try to ping anything.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25513318.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
My gateway gave me a message: gateway kernel: arp: x.x.88.17 is on fxp0 but
got reply from 00:0c:42:11:15:a8 on rl0
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25513518.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Freeco wrote:
My gateway gave me a message: gateway kernel: arp: x.x.88.17 is on fxp0 but
got reply from 00:0c:42:11:15:a8 on rl0
That MAC address is that of a Mikrotic router.
I suspect that you've created a cabling loop of some sort again.
Steve
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME
- 192.168.1.2 (rl0 private)
pc IP - 192.168.1.x (private)
where's the problem?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/IPF%2C-NAT-or-NIC-tp25491958p25491958.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd
On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:27:45AM -0700, Freeco typed:
I'm new in BSD, I installed FreeBSD 7.2 and want to use as gateway with IPF
and NAT. I have 2 NIC's fxp0 and rl0. When i booted up my pc i got a message
gateway kernel: arp xxx.xxx.88.17 is on fxp0 but got reply from rl0. My
28 matches
Mail list logo