gt; >
> > > > Transfer of 'Petite Fleur' failed. Error opening
> > > > '/mnt/ipod/iPod_Control/Music/F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing
> > > > (Permission denied).
> > > >
> > > > The file, in this case Petite Fleur, show
this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't
> be
> > > written to the Nano. This obviously looks like a permissions problem,
> > > but I can't figure out its cause.
> >
> > Look at the permissions on that file, and the directory containing
r of 'Petite Fleur' failed. Error opening
> > '/mnt/ipod/iPod_Control/Music/F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing
> > (Permission denied).
> >
> > The file, in this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't be
> > written to the Nano. This obvi
ed. Error opening
> '/mnt/ipod/iPod_Control/Music/F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing
> (Permission denied).
>
> The file, in this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't be
> written to the Nano. This obviously looks like a permissions problem,
> but I can'
F00/gtkpod795096.mp3' for writing
(Permission denied).
The file, in this case Petite Fleur, shows up in gtkpod, but it can't be
written to the Nano. This obviously looks like a permissions problem,
but I can't figure out its cause.
TIA,
---Rem
__
Well, thanks to Valintin, I did figure out how to change the umask
for
pure-ftpd. So now uploaded files have the permissions I wanted,
even if
they are not needed.
Be careful with what you've done. If you changed the umask on the
ftpd
as a whole, then suddenly unrelated users are going to
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 10:23:53AM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
>
> On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Jeremy Hooks wrote:
>
4. however, after upload, the file has the ownership A:B (i.e,
owned by
>> A, group B) with permissions -rw-r--r--. So B does not have permission
>> to
>> delete the file
On Oct 7, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Jeremy Hooks wrote:
4. however, after upload, the file has the ownership A:B (i.e,
owned by
A, group B) with permissions -rw-r--r--. So B does not have
permission to
delete the file.
-rw-r--r-- 1 user_a user_b 154879 Oct 7 08:40 data_file.csv
Hi John.
Co
rote:
> The following permissions problem has me stumped:
>
> 1. User A uploads a file (using ftp) to the server, into a directory called
> 'data' owned by user B. Permissions on directory set to allow this, like
> this:
>drwxrwxr-x 2 user_b user_b 512 Oct 7
On Tue, Oct 07, 2008 at 08:54:36AM -0400, John Almberg wrote:
> The following permissions problem has me stumped:
>
> 1. User A uploads a file (using ftp) to the server, into a directory
> called 'data' owned by user B. Permissions on directory set to allow
> this, li
Hello mr. John,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 2:54 PM, John Almberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The following permissions problem has me stumped:
>
> 1. User A uploads a file (using ftp) to the server, into a directory called
> 'data' owned by user B. Permissions on direc
The following permissions problem has me stumped:
1. User A uploads a file (using ftp) to the server, into a directory
called 'data' owned by user B. Permissions on directory set to allow
this, like this:
drwxrwxr-x 2 user_b user_b 512 Oct 7 08:40 data
2. A cron j
addressed to
questions@, hence I've cc'd this reply there.
Another couple of points; if you're using the digest, snip the
previous stuff, we've seen it already. Also set an appropriate subject
field for your question.
As for your question, I think you are trying to configur
Nathanael Jean-Francois wrote:
Hi all,
I've run into the little snag with default acl
permissions, the issue was brought up in this thread
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=18504532207&w=2
but there was no reply to it and my digging so far
hasn't turned up anything substanti
Hi all,
I've run into the little snag with default acl
permissions, the issue was brought up in this thread
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=freebsd-questions&m=18504532207&w=2
but there was no reply to it and my digging so far
hasn't turned up anything substantial. If anyone knows
of a solution
btw: I just verified that my umask is 022. Which is what you stated it
should be set to.
And those ports still installed some directories with 700 permissions.
later
Michael
On Wed, 2004-04-14 at 21:11, Michael E. Mercer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I got a new machine that is blazingly fast.
> I also in
On Mon, Oct 06, 2003 at 08:58:02AM -0500, Redmond Militante typed:
> hi all
>
> i'm trying to do a 'push' rsync operation to mirror the contents of my websites root
> directory on one machine over to a remote machine. rsync is installed on both
> machines. the command i'm using to rsync is
>
hi all
i'm trying to do a 'push' rsync operation to mirror the contents of my websites root
directory on one machine over to a remote machine. rsync is installed on both
machines. the command i'm using to rsync is
rsync -e ssh -avz --exclude "/phpSysInfo" --exclude "/webalizer" --exclude
"/p
On Sun, 05 Oct 2003 04:53:13 +1000 Ekrem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> probably wrote:
> I had done chmod 777 /dev/lpt0, at one time, also did
> chown daemon:daemon /dev/lpt0, in both cases I was able to print OK.
>
> BUTTT, whenever I reboot FreeBSD, the permissions for /dev/lpt0 are
> reset back to the o
Hello All,
I'm trying to set up printing on my FreeBSD 5.1-Release using LPRng
but having problems. Hoping someone can help out here.
When I do a
$ checkpc -f, I get:
Warning - lp: cannot open lp device '/dev/lpt0' - Permission denied
The lpd is being run by user 'daemon' while ls -l /dev/lpt0
Daniel Bye wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:49:17PM -0600, Seth Hieronymus wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a problem. When upgrading my openssh-portable, it fails to install
> > when it tries to "chmod 0700 /var/empty", which gives the error message:
> > Operation not permitted. The permis
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:49:17PM -0600, Seth Hieronymus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem. When upgrading my openssh-portable, it fails to install
> when it tries to "chmod 0700 /var/empty", which gives the error message:
> Operation not permitted. The permissions on /var/empty are 0555. W
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 12:49:17PM -0600, Seth Hieronymus wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem. When upgrading my openssh-portable, it fails to install
> when it tries to "chmod 0700 /var/empty", which gives the error message:
> Operation not permitted. The permissions on /var/empty are 0555.
Hello,
I have a problem. When upgrading my openssh-portable, it fails to install
when it tries to "chmod 0700 /var/empty", which gives the error message:
Operation not permitted. The permissions on /var/empty are 0555. When I
tried to "rm -rf /var/empty", it fails with the same error message.
24 matches
Mail list logo
