What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no one
serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install KDE,
GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly solocionables, for
example I had to modify REFRESH to true, but also to get out other
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but
almost no one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I
tried also install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors,
commonly solocionables, for example I had to modify
El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com escribió:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no
one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install
KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
El 30-10-2011, a las 19:55, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com escribi?:
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no one serves me, I've only been able
to install firefox, I tried also install
happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost
no one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also
install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly
solocionables, for example I had to modify REFRESH to true, but also
to get out other errors
On Sun, 30 Oct 2011 18:19:16 -0300, Zantgo wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports,
but almost no one serves me, I've only been able to install
firefox, I tried also install KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have
been many errors, commonly solocionables, for example I had
On Sun, Oct 30, 2011 at 5:19 PM, Zantgo zan...@gmail.com wrote:
What happens is that I tried to install things on the ports, but almost no
one serves me, I've only been able to install firefox, I tried also install
KDE, GNOME and KFCE, but I have been many errors, commonly solocionables
and optimize to your needs then use the
ports system. FBSD is so cool that it doesn't matter if you install
one way or the other and you can use almost all methods
interchangeably.
A managament tool (such as portmaster or portupgrade) helps
to keep an eye on dependencies when using the many possible
Sounds like a well-thought out backup strategy. I've started to use your
methods here, and I'm building ports I need at the same time, but the
wireless here is not password protected so is incredibly slow as there are
lots of leaches on the system. But while I'm plodding along, I have a few
more
I have several machines installed in my temporary location and only my
laptop gets the internet through wireless. So far I've been building ports
on the other machines by rsync'ing the distfiles from the laptop as I need
them (all machines have the same FreeBSD 8.2 installed).
The problem comes
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Peter Kryszkiewicz
tundra2b...@gmail.com wrote:
I have several machines installed in my temporary location and only my
laptop gets the internet through wireless. So far I've been building ports
on the other machines by rsync'ing the distfiles from the laptop
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:39 PM, Peter Kryszkiewicz
tundra2b...@gmail.com wrote:
I have several machines installed in my temporary location and only my
laptop gets the internet through wireless. So far I've been building ports
on the other machines by rsync'ing the distfiles from the laptop
the config dialogs. The configuration option to save
those logs is in the portmaster man page.
NetBSD pkgsrc, which has been ported to other mostly (quasi-)Unix
OSes as well, has a better way: putting options in /etc/mk.conf : not
to say NetBSD pkgsrc is better than FreeBSD ports system, just
On 10/24/2011 01:57, Thomas Mueller wrote:
So would portmaster give me a similar log file without conio and stdio going
to war with each other?
To the extent that I understand your question, I think portmaster can
help. Why don't you install it, read the man page, and give it a try.
Doug
is better than FreeBSD ports system, just that they
have a good idea in this aspect.
Tom
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
On 23/10/2011 10:48, Thomas Mueller wrote:
NetBSD pkgsrc, which has been ported to other mostly (quasi-)Unix
OSes as well, has a better way: putting options in /etc/mk.conf : not
to say NetBSD pkgsrc is better than FreeBSD ports system, just that
they have a good idea in this aspect
been ported to other mostly (quasi-)Unix
OSes as well, has a better way: putting options in /etc/mk.conf : not
to say NetBSD pkgsrc is better than FreeBSD ports system, just that
they have a good idea in this aspect.
You might want to look at ports-mgmt/portconf. In many ways the OPTIONS
dialog
Hi,
Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during update,
i have some auto update scripts which when prompted will run through
updates, but occassionally i forget which will require user input and
this leads to dialog running ( often @ 100%) until i notice.
Obviously
On 10/21/11 9:53 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input during
update,
i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
What
Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
during update, i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
What you're doing is irresponsible, and potentially
On 10/21/11 11:14 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
during update, i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
What
On 2011/10/21 11:21, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 10/21/11 11:14 AM, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
during update, i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Paul Macdonald wrote:
Can i programmatically tell if user input is required?
It might require reinventing the logic used by the ports system
Makefiles. Or maybe there's a way to run make config-recursive but get
dialog to immediately cancel any config screens
Hi, Is there a way to tell which ports might require dialog input
during update, i have some auto update scripts
Stop doing this.
Your update scripts do not read /usr/ports/UPDATING.
Your update scripts do not read package changelogs.
What you're doing is irresponsible
Not exactly an answer to your question, but I use the batch flag to bypass
configuration menus. If you have one or two ports you do not install with
default settings, you can go back and install manually.
On Oct 20, 2011 9:54 PM, Paul Macdonald p...@ifdnrg.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a way to tell
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011, Galati, Michael wrote:
Unfortunately, there's no good way of upgrading packages on FreeBSD
(that I'm aware of, at least). My solution (crude as it may be) has
been to remove all the packages and reinstall.
There's pkg_upgrade from sysutils/bsdadminscripts.
tried to mount the ports tree on this machine to the other machines
(machine mfc for instance) with:
#mfc cd /usr
#mfc mount_nfs vbear:/usr/ports ports
and then installing the needed port on mfc. What happens is that the working
directories and the entire local ports tree gets written
I have several machines networked using NFS mounts or SSH and scp. Only one
machine has internet connectivity - a laptop (machine vbear) with a wireless
card (I'm in a temporary location for a few weeks and only wireless is
available here).
I tried to mount the ports tree on this machine
On 09/25/11 10:08, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:24+0200, Andrei Brezan wrote:
On 23/09/2011 23:31, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Good Day
Trying to build /usr/ports/security/nessus on FreeBSD 9-beta2 with ports
updated via - portsnap fetch update - completed 09/22/2011
On Monday 26 September 2011, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Still no joy trying to build from source via ports or installing the
binary from tenable.com on FreeBSD 9. nessusd is installed but
errors out with 'libz.so.5 not found. I have;
$ ls -l /lib/libz.*
-r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 90328 Sep
On 09/26/11 06:43, Mike Clarke wrote:
On Monday 26 September 2011, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Still no joy trying to build from source via ports or installing the
binary from tenable.com on FreeBSD 9. nessusd is installed but
errors out with 'libz.so.5 not found. I have;
$ ls -l /lib/libz
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 23:24+0200, Andrei Brezan wrote:
On 23/09/2011 23:31, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Good Day
Trying to build /usr/ports/security/nessus on FreeBSD 9-beta2 with ports
updated via - portsnap fetch update - completed 09/22/2011. The result from
#make;
=== Applying
On 23/09/2011 23:31, Michael D. Norwick wrote:
Good Day
Trying to build /usr/ports/security/nessus on FreeBSD 9-beta2 with
ports updated via - portsnap fetch update - completed 09/22/2011. The
result from #make;
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for nessus-libraries-2.2.9_1
=== nessus
Good Day
Trying to build /usr/ports/security/nessus on FreeBSD 9-beta2 with ports
updated via - portsnap fetch update - completed 09/22/2011. The result
from #make;
=== Applying FreeBSD patches for nessus-libraries-2.2.9_1
=== nessus-libraries-2.2.9_1 depends on executable: bison - found
On 20/09/2011 05:33, Jason C. Wells wrote:
I noticed only recently that there are now packages on FTP in a folder
called packages-8-stable. I am not sure how often these are built. I
expect that the entire ports tree is built much like it is during a
release, except at some later point
On 09/20/11 01:23, Matthew Seaman wrote:
'Latest' packages are built for each updated port + OS version +
architecture combination whenever resources are available on the build
cluster. Typically that implies a delay of a few days or a week or so
after the update hits the ports CVS. Yes
Hi,
I'm running RELENG_8_2 and I've been using packages instead of ports for
most things, because they're so much quicker. But certain packages aren't
compiled the way I need them to be-- postfix had no TLS or SASL support,
for example, so I built it from the port.
However
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Brandon Kuczenski wrote:
I'm concerned that, if I have some packages built from ports and some
installed from the release, that the system will become unstable if things
get too out of sync.
I'd like to say it doesn't matter, but ...
If you are using packages from
On 09/19/11 13:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Brandon Kuczenski wrote:
I'm concerned that, if I have some packages built from ports and some
installed from the release, that the system will become unstable if
things get too out of sync.
I noticed only recently
On 09/19/11 13:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011, Brandon Kuczenski wrote:
I'm concerned that, if I have some packages built from ports and some
installed from the release, that the system will become unstable if
things get too out of sync.
Doh, I just read the handbook.
http
Is there any way to get portmaster to reinstall every port in the *EXACT*
same order they where installed in, preferably with out any knowledge of
what ports where installed after the current one was the reason for
asking is many times it seems that subtle incompatibilities solely due
on this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up.
Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed
or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace
back and find out what packages I need to nerf.
I've run cutleaves and portmaster to show ports that have
related) that I don't
need on this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up.
Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed
or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace
back and find out what packages I need to nerf.
Look at the file
a fair number of packaged (mostly X11 related) that I don't
need on this headless server so I'd like to tidy them up.
Is there a way of finding out what date/order ports have been installed
or is the output that is sent over ssh logged anywhere so I can trace
back and find out what packages I need
On 04/09/2011 12:09, Richard Collyer wrote:
Just incase anyone else reads this for a solution I think the cd
/usr/ports/packages line near the bottom was a typo and should have been
/var/db/pkg
Yes. Dammit. One of these days I'll perfect the art of writing down
exactly what I want to say
-9.11' is corrupt
This prevents 'portmaster -a' from working at all, and 'portupgrade -a'
will not detect changes to those ports whose info is corrupt. Neither
does portversion report on those ports (it acts like they aren't
installed).
I've found that the problem can be corrected by going
Conrad J. Sabatier conr...@cox.net wrote:
Having been away from FreeBSD for a while, I'm still catching up with
all the changes that took place while I was on hiatus, so bear with me
here. :-)
Trying to construct the ports' README.html files with:
cd /usr/ports
make readmes
Much
Hi,
I have been using Jails and EzJail for a while now and everything
works perfectly except for make search in the ports collection insisde
a jail.
Otherwise the ports provided by the basejail works perfectly but I get
this error when I try make search:
The search target requires INDEX-8
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Jails and EzJail for a while now and everything
works perfectly except for make search in the ports collection insisde
a jail.
Never mind. It's a specific couple of jails that doesn't work and I
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:05:14AM -0400, Alejandro Imass thus spake:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
Hi,
I have been using Jails and EzJail for a while now and everything
works perfectly except for make search in the ports collection insisde
a jail
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Jason Helfman jhelf...@e-e.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 11:05:14AM -0400, Alejandro Imass thus spake:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 10:15 AM, Alejandro Imass a...@p2ee.org wrote:
[...]
Never mind. It's a specific couple of jails that doesn't work and I
never
On Mon, 8 Aug 2011 22:35:35 -0500
Conrad J. Sabatier wrote:
Having been away from FreeBSD for a while, I'm still catching up with
all the changes that took place while I was on hiatus, so bear with me
here. :-)
Trying to construct the ports' README.html files with:
cd /usr/ports
make
Having been away from FreeBSD for a while, I'm still catching up with
all the changes that took place while I was on hiatus, so bear with me
here. :-)
Trying to construct the ports' README.html files with:
cd /usr/ports
make readmes
Much to my surprise, this only creates README.html at the top
.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up to date.
=== New version available: gtk-2.24.5_1
=== 537 total installed ports
=== 1 has a new version available
ran
# portmaster -a
Always (yes, always) check /usr/ports/UPDATING before throwing any
automatic
update
snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up to date.
=== New version available: gtk-2.24.5_1
=== 537 total installed ports
=== 1 has a new version available
ran
# portmaster -a
* removed to save space **
ual-x11.c
portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up to date.
=== New version available: gtk-2.24.5_1
=== 537 total installed ports
=== 1 has a new version available
ran
# portmaster -a
Always (yes, always
# .
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up to date.
=== New version available: gtk-2.24.5_1
=== 537 total installed
them. Encountered a problem with gtk :
/* Commands run */
quadcore# .
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up
with gtk :
/* Commands run */
quadcore# .
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found.
Fetching snapshot tag from portsnap5.FreeBSD.org... done.
Latest snapshot on server matches what we already have.
No updates needed.
Ports tree is already up to date.
=== New
Hi all,
Not sure if this is the right spot to ask, but it seems to be
particularly pertaining to FreeBSD installations. So here I am.
I'm trying to install qmail-tls. The installation is successful - almost
right out of the ports. Now I'm trying configure qmail such that only
TLS auth
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 10:29 PM, Antonio Olivares
olivares14...@gmail.com wrote:
@All
I have solved the problem with TeTeX. I had to remove symlinks to
files created by texlive manually and reinstall the ports one at a
time and I am back. Sorry for the noise.
BTW,
I figured out that I
Dear folks,
I have successfully updated most ports, but having problems with mplayer:
/usr/local/live/BasicUsageEnvironment/libBasicUsageEnvironment.a
-L/usr/local/lib -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr/local/lib
-liconv -lncurses -lpng -lz -ljpeg -lungif -lcdda_interface
On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Antonio Olivares
olivares14...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear folks,
I have successfully updated most ports, but having problems with mplayer:
/usr/local/live/BasicUsageEnvironment/libBasicUsageEnvironment.a
-L/usr/local/lib -rpath=/usr/lib:/usr
/* removed not needed */
test -r /usr/local/info//dir || install -o root -g wheel -m 444
./../dir /usr/local/info/
install: /usr/local/info//dir: No such file or directory
gmake[2]: *** [install-data] Error 71
gmake[2]: Leaving directory
`/usr/ports/print/teTeX-base/work/tetex-src-3.0/texk/kpathsea
@All
I have solved the problem with TeTeX. I had to remove symlinks to
files created by texlive manually and reinstall the ports one at a
time and I am back. Sorry for the noise.
BTW,
I figured out that I needed /usr/ports/print/latex-pgf/ for the
diffyqs.tar.gz (Differential Equations Book
Can somebody recommend a vrml viewer from ports,
other than www/openvrml?
--
Anton Shterenlikht
Room 2.6, Queen's Building
Mech Eng Dept
Bristol University
University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK
Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944
Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423
-' is omitted from the ports. And it is about the
security.
But this requires /usr/ports to be writable by the non-root user and
creates a security risk. This cannot be overcome by limiting the
installation to root only because you can no longer be sure that the
source or installation scripts
/tarball-expanded-0.x.y
# make install
That important 'su -' is omitted from the ports. And it is about the
security.
But this requires /usr/ports to be writable by the non-root user and
creates a security risk. This cannot be overcome by limiting the
installation to root only
Oh freebsd-questions want you buy me a mersedes benz?
I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
How can I tell the ports system that it should su ( switch user ) before to
build the dependencies?
Can portupgrade handle this?
Dependencies should be installed from a root user.
Thank you
On 7/21/11 12:02 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Oh freebsd-questions want you buy me a mersedes benz?
What the f... ?
I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
That is possible but exceedingly highly inconvenient.
What is the reason for doing that ?
I can not come up with a scenario
On Thu, July 21, 2011 6:02 am, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
How can I tell the ports system that it should su ( switch user ) before
to
build the dependencies?
Can portupgrade handle this?
Dependencies should be installed from a root user
Oh freebsd-questions want you buy me a mersedes benz?
2011/07/21 16:53:58 +0200 Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DF What the f... ?
favorite song lyrics, np.
DF I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
DF
DF That is possible but exceedingly highly
You'll never silence the voice of the voiceless, freebsd-questions!
2011/07/21 11:04:57 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DS I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
DS How can I tell the ports system that it should su ( switch user ) before
DS
On 7/21/11 5:19 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Oh freebsd-questions want you buy me a mersedes benz?
2011/07/21 16:53:58 +0200 Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DF I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
DF
DF That is possible but exceedingly highly
...@my.gd = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DF
DF DF I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
DF DF
DF DF That is possible but exceedingly highly inconvenient.
DF DF What is the reason for doing that ?
DF
DF Security. Because of the limitations the non-root user can have.
DF
?
DF 2011/07/21 16:53:58 +0200 Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DF
DF DF I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
DF DF
DF DF That is possible but exceedingly highly inconvenient.
DF DF What is the reason for doing that ?
DF
DF Security
On Thu, July 21, 2011 11:30 am, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You'll never silence the voice of the voiceless, freebsd-questions!
2011/07/21 11:04:57 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DS I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
DS How can I tell
ports from not a root user.
DF DF DF
DF DF DF That is possible but exceedingly highly inconvenient.
DF DF DF What is the reason for doing that ?
DF DF
DF DF Security. Because of the limitations the non-root user can have.
DF DF This should decrease the probability of the bad port
of the voiceless, freebsd-questions!
DS 2011/07/21 11:04:57 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To
DS freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DS DS I'd like to build my ports from not a root user.
DS DS How can I tell the ports system that it should su ( switch
user )
DS before
DS DS to
DS DS
On Thu, July 21, 2011 2:26 pm, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Oh Daniel want you buy me a mersedes benz?
2011/07/21 14:01:04 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DS Ok, then I've already answered your question several emails ago. The
DS ports system will do
ago. The
DS ports system will do this automatically with a simple 'make', 'make
DS install', or 'make depends; make install'. And you said you knew
about
No it doesn't.
'all' target includes 'depends' target.
'depends' target includes performing 'make install' on the dependencies
which
I'd
Oh freebsd-questions want you buy me a mersedes benz?
2011/07/21 19:39:45 +0100 Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk = To Daniel Staal :
BC to use portmaster (ports-mgmt/portmaster): it has a PM_SU_CMD which is
Cool. Tried it but couldn't make it to update the only one port, and not to
update its
On 21 Jul 2011, at 21:40, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org wrote:
Oh freebsd-questions want you buy me a mersedes benz?
2011/07/21 19:39:45 +0100 Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk = To Daniel Staal :
BC to use portmaster (ports-mgmt/portmaster): it has a PM_SU_CMD which is
Cool. Tried
' from to handle the dependencies.
That is, to read the output of the 'make list-dependencies' or something like
that.
Shutting up but for those reading list archives: ports has the built-in 'su'
feature for 'make install' to be done right after the 'make all'.
73! Peter pgp: A0E26627 (4A42 6841 2871
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:07:41 +0200
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 21 Jul 2011, at 21:40, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org
wrote:
Cool. Tried it but couldn't make it to update the only one port,
and not to update its dependencies.
That's kinda the point of portupgrade, takes care of
On 21 Jul 2011, at 23:56, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 23:07:41 +0200
Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 21 Jul 2011, at 21:40, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org
wrote:
Cool. Tried it but couldn't make it to update the only one port,
and not to update its
) from /usr/ports/textproc/flex.
When I flex --version, I still get the old version of flex (2.5.4).
Is there some other place I need to set the path to flex?
Respectfully,
Jeff.
Jeff Hamann, PhD
PO Box 1421
Corvallis, Oregon 97339-1421
541-754-2457
jeff.hamann[at]forestinformatics[dot]com
http
.
I installed the latest port (flex-2.5.35_4) from /usr/ports/textproc/flex.
When I flex --version, I still get the old version of flex (2.5.4).
Is there some other place I need to set the path to flex?
flex appears to be in my base system: /usr/bin/flex, and not coming from
any port. Since
Hello,
I generally use the CPAN shell mainly to get the latest version of
CPAN modules but for modules that use XS I usually prefer using the
port. Ports also seem to have pretty good versions of everything and I
use these 2 mechanisms interchangeably.
Anyway, my question is really to learn more
Can confirm that this problem still exists.
same log as described.
latex-cjk-4.8.2_4
# be compatible with Debian
find: /usr/ports/print/latex-cjk/work/ccmap: No such file or directory
rgrds
Rafal
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Hi everyone,
I'm posting this to the bug and to freebsd-questions in case anyone can
help me out with advice on how to investigate further.
This is in regards to:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158374
I'm not sure if I jumped the gun on submitting the PR because the fix
only
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Dennis Glatting wrote:
I have a requirement where I need to archive ports used across twenty hosts
for a year or more. I've decided to do this using Squid and to take advantage
of Squid's cache when updating common ports across those hosts.
(BTW, at another site I
On 6/27/11 4:52 AM, Dennis Glatting wrote:
I have a requirement where I need to archive ports used across twenty
hosts for a year or more. I've decided to do this using Squid and to
take advantage of Squid's cache when updating common ports across those
hosts.
(BTW, at another site I used
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/27/11 4:52 AM, Dennis Glatting wrote:
I have a requirement where I need to archive ports used across twenty
hosts for a year or more. I've decided to do this using Squid and to
take advantage of Squid's cache when updating common ports across
On 6/27/11 4:27 PM, Dennis Glatting wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/27/11 4:52 AM, Dennis Glatting wrote:
I have a requirement where I need to archive ports used across twenty
hosts for a year or more. I've decided to do this using Squid and to
take advantage
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/27/11 4:27 PM, Dennis Glatting wrote:
On Mon, 27 Jun 2011, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 6/27/11 4:52 AM, Dennis Glatting wrote:
I have a requirement where I need to archive ports used across twenty
hosts for a year or more. I've decided
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 20:52:09 -0600 (MDT)
Dennis Glatting wrote:
I need is a method to embed into make.conf a proxy specification
for fetch. Setting the environment variable HTTP_PROXY from the login
shell /is not/ preferred because the account is used by different
administrators, I don't what
I have a requirement where I need to archive ports used across twenty
hosts for a year or more. I've decided to do this using Squid and to take
advantage of Squid's cache when updating common ports across those hosts.
(BTW, at another site I used rsync to sync /usr/ports/distfiles across
Today I updated some relative ports with enlightenment like ecore-*. When
starting X, the screen turn to console after enlightenment splash screen
show. The error is Enlightenment cannot initialize the FDO desktop system.
Perhaps you are out of memory?
out of memory is impossible. I try to reboot
the content of ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CTM/ . That
should be sufficient, right?
Yoy can receive all of src*, ports, cvs by ctm
You can receive ctm by mail, all from @freebsd.org mail lists
Cheers,
Julian
--
Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com
501 - 600 of 6354 matches
Mail list logo
