Is there some regular interval at which new ports are processed by the
FreeBSD team? I submitted a port (for a very minor utility) 3/20/2008
but it is still not in the tree. I'm not complaining in the slightest -
the folks who do this work are volunteering their time, and I get/respect
that.
Tim Daneliuk wrote:
Is there some regular interval at which new ports are processed by the
FreeBSD team? I submitted a port (for a very minor utility) 3/20/2008
but it is still not in the tree. I'm not complaining in the slightest -
the folks who do this work are volunteering their time, and I
FB 6i first setup freetds in /usr/local/freetds
and use its tsql to test connect ms sql server, it is ok.
setup php5-extensions,,and click mssql(option)
i find it use another freetds,,,but not show me error information. setup is
complete.
i can find mssql support with phpinfo.
so i use
Charlie Sorsby wrote:
Charlie Sorsby wrote:
[ ... ]
PS It would be really helpful if each port/package at freebsd.org
had an indication whether it requires the latest and greatest
version of freeBSD. Put another way, it would be nice to know the
oldest version of freeBSD it will work with.
On Friday 24 June 2005 19:36, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Sam Ip wrote:
I'm trying out FreeBSD for the first time for use at work. However,
there is a corporate firewall and hence ftp traffic doesn't get
through. I can access http sites. So if a selling point of FreeBSD is
its ports collection
Sam Ip wrote:
I'm trying out FreeBSD for the first time for use at work. However,
there is a corporate firewall and hence ftp traffic doesn't get
through. I can access http sites. So if a selling point of FreeBSD is
its ports collection
1. Can you do a CVSup to update your ports via http?
On Friday 24 June 2005 01:01 pm, Sam Ip wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying out FreeBSD for the first time for use at work. However,
there is a corporate firewall and hence ftp traffic doesn't get
through. I can access http sites. So if a selling point of FreeBSD
is its ports collection
1. Can you do
Tom Moyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm using FreeBSD 5-STABLE installed from 5.4-RC1 and then cvsup'd to
5-STABLE on Friday.
Maybe I'm just doing something wrong, but I noticed that when I did
pkgdb -F or portsdb -Uu, it seemed to complain about build
dependancies missing for packages
I'm using FreeBSD 5-STABLE installed from 5.4-RC1 and then cvsup'd to
5-STABLE on Friday.
Maybe I'm just doing something wrong, but I noticed that when I did
pkgdb -F or portsdb -Uu, it seemed to complain about build
dependancies missing for packages that I installed from packages. I
assumed
Ian Moore writes:
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:50, Matt Rechkemmer wrote:
Final question :-), is there anyway to determine if a base package is out
of date? Or is just wise to leave the base alone and upgrade when a new
release comes along.
You should at least update your system when
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 17:50, Matt Rechkemmer wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
These are probably RTFM questions, but I didn't seem to find a mention of
the base system packages in the UPGRADING document. So how would one
update a base package, check it out
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 09:45:07AM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Um, no, as the original poster pointed out, ssh is part of the base
system, and normally you don't need the port.
Upgrading the base system *is* the best approach. It *doesn't*
normally require updating to the latest
This is somewhat of a dumb question, but I'm a bit confused about the
differences between ports, packages and what is currently on the system.
Let's [hypothetically] say I have a FreeBSD 5.3 system. I use the ports
system on things I want to compile and packages when I'm lazy :-).
I keep track
a patch would be issued for the source.
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 01:57:48 -0700, Matt Rechkemmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is somewhat of a dumb question, but I'm a bit confused about the
differences between ports, packages and what is currently on the system.
Let's [hypothetically] say I have
How would I upgrade just one package part of the core like that? Or multiple
ones for that matter. Can you use the ports/packages system? Or do you have
to do an entire system upgrade (i.e. 4.10 to 4.11).
I'd say, given that ssh is part of the ports
(/usr/ports/security/ssh), you could ust
--
Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area
http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How would I upgrade just one package part of the core like that? Or multiple
ones for that matter. Can you use the ports/packages system? Or do you have
to do an entire system upgrade (i.e. 4.10 to 4.11).
I'd say, given that ssh is part of the
-
From: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pierre LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 5:16 PM
Subject: Re: Question about ports
Pierre LeBlanc wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to the port collection and updating ports with CVSup
Pierre LeBlanc wrote:
Hello,
I'm new to the port collection and updating ports with CVSup but I managed to
update the ports of my FreeBSD 4.10 system using CVSup.
Now, I want to upgrade Perl to version 5.6 and I notice there is a perl5 port
in the list I`ve seen on:
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 12:04, Payne wrote:
Hi,
I am want to install postnuke but when-ever I go to do make under
/usr/port/www/postnuke, it wants to install mod_php4 again, I don't want
to have to reinstall ports everytime I add something new.
Thanks,
Payne
Does postnuke require a
I am want to install postnuke but when-ever I go to do make under
/usr/port/www/postnuke, it wants to install mod_php4 again, I don't want
to have to reinstall ports everytime I add something new.
I recently installed PHPNuke and have some observations that might be
relevant to your situation.
Given PHPNuke's security track record, I would say that this is sound
advice. I would suggest going from the latest source as well.
Chris
Matt Staroscik wrote:
I am want to install postnuke but when-ever I go to do make under
/usr/port/www/postnuke, it wants to install mod_php4 again, I don't
Did you try
make install FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes clean
See
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=portsapropos=0sektion=0manpath=FreeBSD+5.1-RELEASE+and+Portsformat=html
Many people don't know to use the =yes for FORCE_PKG_REGISTER.
After you get Postnuke installed you may have to make these
Hi,
I am want to install postnuke but when-ever I go to do make under
/usr/port/www/postnuke, it wants to install mod_php4 again, I don't want
to have to reinstall ports everytime I add something new.
Thanks,
Payne
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello :)
I have 2 questions concerning the ports.
1. I need to apply a patch to a port so my modem could work with
mgetty+sendfax; how do I do that ? Do I have to edit the Makefile or
pass options to the make command ?
2. Can I have a port
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello :)
I have 2 questions concerning the ports.
1. I need to apply a patch to a port so my modem could work with
mgetty+sendfax; how do I do that ? Do I have to edit the Makefile or
pass options to the make command ?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:25, you wrote:
Just to give you an example.
a) If I want to have the FreeBSD php4-port is able to work with
thttpd, I have to update the lang/php4/Makefile and
lang/php4/bsd.php.mk to recognize a new flag for the port
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:25, you wrote:
[...]
In fact I wanted to try adding an option in mgetty, like:
if WITH_USR=yes, then patch the mgetty source
This usually went this way, even if I don't want to prevent you from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:51, Jens Rehsack wrote:
This usually went this way, even if I don't want to prevent you from
asking the ports maintainer to accept/commit your patch. Usually you
create the patch against mgetty, send this patch to the
Antoine Jacoutot wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 15 July 2003 12:51, Jens Rehsack wrote:
This usually went this way, even if I don't want to prevent you from
asking the ports maintainer to accept/commit your patch. Usually you
create the patch against mgetty, send
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 01:42:31PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Why are ports sometimes released, when
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ?
Lots of different reasons, the most likely one being that they
compiled file on the committers box.
mike
--
Mike Meyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ?
Lots of different reasons, the most likely one being that they
compiled file on the committers box.
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 12:39:13PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ?
Lots of different reasons, the most
In the last episode (Mar 02), Cliff Sarginson said:
Why are ports sometimes released, when they are uncompileable ?
More details please.
--
Dan Nelson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
35 matches
Mail list logo
