Re: portupgrade overview

it was said: >I've used portupgrade for a while without really knowing much >about it. I suppose thats a benefit. >However, when it comes to really controlling the portupgrade >processes, I find the man page of minimal use. > >Thats becuase the man pages seem to be written for someone who >alrea

Re: portupgrade wrecked gnome!!! ~>8-(

On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 20:58:50 -0800 "Karl Agee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Here is my tale of woe. > > Freebsd 4.11-stable. I upgraded my ports using portupgrade -arR after > cvsuping and make fetchindex and portsdb -u. Things worked, so I went > out and did portupgrade. > > But my gnome-2.8.

Re: portupgrade wrecked gnome!!! ~>8-(

On Thursday 03 March 2005 08:58 pm, Karl Agee wrote: > Here is my tale of woe. > > Freebsd 4.11-stable. I upgraded my ports using portupgrade -arR > after cvsuping and make fetchindex and portsdb -u. Things worked, so > I went out and did portupgrade. > > But my gnome-2.8.2 install is hosed. It

Re: Portupgrade - Ruby error

On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 03:25:20PM -0500, Haulmark, Chris wrote: > Having problems using Portupgrade utilities because of Ruby. > > > It started last Friday and I waited for the weekend just in case the > cvs tree will get updated with a possible fix. /usr/ports/UPDATING (and wrap your lines at

Re: portupgrade failure

On stardate Sat, 8 Jan 2005, the wise Joshua Lokken entered: You may be able to make this problem go away by doing: # cd /usr/ports # make fetchindex Yes, this did the trick. I should have read /usr/ports/UPDATING though, because the answer was in it... Thanks for the answers. Marco -- Minnie Mou

Re: portupgrade failure

Marco Beishuizen wrote: Hi, I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the following error: [EMAIL PROTECTED]># portupgrade firefox Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..^Cfailed to generate INDEX! index generation error /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_rub

Re: portupgrade failure

On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 06:29:51PM +0100, Marco Beishuizen wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the > following error: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]># portupgrade firefox > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..^Cfailed > to gener

Re: portupgrade failure

On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 18:29:51 +0100 (CET), Marco Beishuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I tried to upgrade firefox with portupgrade, but it fails with the > following error: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]># portupgrade firefox > Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..^

Re: portupgrade system destruction?

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:04:02PM +, Andrew Sinclair wrote: Portupgrade makes a mess at the best of times. A recursive portupgrade is not so clever about dependencies, particually on a live system. On occasion, it even seems to tamper with core libraries which is what

Re: portupgrade system destruction?

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 04:04:02PM +, Andrew Sinclair wrote: > Portupgrade makes a mess at the best of times. A recursive portupgrade > is not so clever about dependencies, particually on a live system. On > occasion, it even seems to tamper with core libraries which is what > would have oc

Re: portupgrade dialogs...

On Tuesday 04 January 2005 12:21, Daniel Bye wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Christian Tischler wrote: > > Hi, > > when I run portupgrade to get my server up to date (CVS of > > 4.9-Release), everything works fine and smooth, until any of the ports > > pops up an dialog and asks

Re: portupgrade dialogs...

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Christian Tischler wrote: > Hi, > when I run portupgrade to get my server up to date (CVS of > 4.9-Release), everything works fine and smooth, until any of the ports > pops up an dialog and asks me what I want to compile in (e.g. cups > asking me about

Re: portupgrade dialogs...

Thanks for the quick answers. christian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: portupgrade dialogs...

On Tuesday 04 January 2005 03:24 am, Christian Tischler wrote: > Hi, > when I run portupgrade to get my server up to date (CVS of > 4.9-Release), everything works fine and smooth, until any of the > ports pops up an dialog and asks me what I want to compile in (e.g. > cups asking me about what dri

Re: portupgrade dialogs...

On Tue, Jan 04, 2005 at 12:24:43PM +0100, Christian Tischler wrote: > Hi, > when I run portupgrade to get my server up to date (CVS of > 4.9-Release), everything works fine and smooth, until any of the ports > pops up an dialog and asks me what I want to compile in (e.g. cups > asking me about

Re: portupgrade system destruction?

Moved to freebsd-questions by Andrew Sinclair. Eric Anderson wrote: I have a few dedicated servers at a hosting company (about 3 hours drive time away). On one of the systems I ran a 'portupgrade -arR' this morning, and then disconnected (I ran it in a screen session). About an hour later, I rea

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Saturday 01 January 2005 04:30 am, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable > > future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly > > updating ports. > > Am I to understand correctly that portmana

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On 28 Dec Michael C. Shultz wrote: > Portmanager only addresses that one issue and for the forseeable > future that is where all the focus will be, only on correctly updating > ports. Am I to understand correctly that portmanager _always_ updates ALL the old ports? A 'pormanager -u sylpheed' is n

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Tuesday 28 December 2004 10:03 am, you wrote: > Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would > be happy to help with testing. portmanager only handles packages in that it builds back up packages of each port it updates, these packages are correctly build for your speci

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

Does portmanager handle packages? If not any plans to do so? I would be happy to help with testing. On Sat, 25 Dec 2004, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > Portupgrade has one serious flaw in my opinion and that is running > > > something like pkgdb -F damages the port installation database as > >

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Saturday 25 December 2004 12:29, Jay O'Brien wrote: > > >>But it is there, so it will stay. > > > I doesn't *have* to stay, though: > > 1) Add 'WITHOUT_X11="YES"' to /etc/make.conf . > 2) Use You can use 'pkg_info -rR xorg-[whatever]' to see which ports depend > on

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

On Saturday 25 December 2004 12:29, Jay O'Brien wrote: > But it is there, so it will stay. I doesn't *have* to stay, though: 1) Add 'WITHOUT_X11="YES"' to /etc/make.conf . 2) Use You can use 'pkg_info -rR xorg-[whatever]' to see which ports depend on a each of the X.org ports. For each "depend

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

I looked at pkgtools.conf, and I don't see a way to do what I want there. My goal here is to make it *easy* for somebody to update the installed ports on a machine. Even if we could use MAKE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf to try and do this that does not solve the problem I am seeing. (There is a bigger

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:41:04PM -0600, Chris wrote: Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want. Er..the thread started with a question from a user who *knows about -P and uses it*, but doesn't want portupgrade to fetch packages in a specific situation. Kris Again, from the m

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 07:38:10PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote: > I think a fair number of people would like to see it. > > It would make it Lots Easier for people to upgrade their systems. > > There are packages where it makes lots of sense to use the prebuilt ones. > > Now that I think the only

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:41:04PM -0600, Chris wrote: > >Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want. > >>Er..the thread started with a question from a user who *knows about -P > >>and uses it*, but doesn't want portupgrade to fetch packages in a > >>specific situation. > >> > >>Kris > > > > > >

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

Chris wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote: Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want. I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt packages for a

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

I think a fair number of people would like to see it. It would make it Lots Easier for people to upgrade their systems. There are packages where it makes lots of sense to use the prebuilt ones. Now that I think the only feature I want is for it to "don't fetch if there is a Makefile.local" I'll

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote: Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want. I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt packages for any package th

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 09:22:04PM -0600, Chris wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote: > > > >>Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want. > >> > >>I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt > >>packages for any packag

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote: Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want. I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as a Makefile.local file means I wa

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 06:53:09PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want. > > I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt > packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as > a Makefile.local file means I want to buil

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

Neither -x nor HOLD_PKGS is what I want. I *want* to upgrade the software, I just do not want to FETCH prebuilt packages for any package that has a Makefile.local file in the tree, as a Makefile.local file means I want to build that package with local changes. H -- On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:36:1

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:36:12PM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Yes, but that means I have to remember to build and package the ports > first, before I do anything else, and that implies I have to handle any > changed prerequisite packages as well. I thought that's what you were asking for. > If

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

Yes, but that means I have to remember to build and package the ports first, before I do anything else, and that implies I have to handle any changed prerequisite packages as well. If a way can be found to say "Do not fetch these packages" then this will become a much easier process. H -- >> Is t

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

On Sunday 26 December 2004 03:04 am, Harlan Stenn wrote: > I have a couple of ports where I am using a Makefile.local to > provide some customizations for the local environment (I think > they are for postfix+SASL, and apache2+the experimental modules, > but I could be mistaken) where "stock" prebu

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

On Sun, Dec 26, 2004 at 01:04:51AM -0800, Harlan Stenn wrote: > Is there a way to tell portupgrade that it should not *fetch* prebuilt ports > for these two packages? If the packages are already there I'm fine having > them installed (as it means they were built using the Makefile.local values >

Re: portupgrade -P and local changes

On Sunday 26 December 2004 09:04, Harlan Stenn wrote: > I have a couple of ports where I am using a Makefile.local to provide some > customizations for the local environment (I think they are for > postfix+SASL, and apache2+the experimental modules, but I could be > mistaken) where "stock" prebuilt

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

On Sat, 25 Dec 2004 11:58:03 -0800, Jay O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [snip] I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times You dont need the -N switch, it's only used for new port installations, not upgrades. Using it carelessly is a bit dangerous, you may find youself install

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

RW wrote: > On Friday 24 December 2004 21:54, Jay O'Brien wrote: > >>Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM. >> >>This is my first experience using portupgrade. >> >>I ran cvsup successfully for ports-all. I ran pkg_version -v. >>It showed a total of 28 ports, 20 needed updat

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

On Friday 24 December 2004 21:54, Jay O'Brien wrote: > Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM. > > This is my first experience using portupgrade. > > I ran cvsup successfully for ports-all. I ran pkg_version -v. > It showed a total of 28 ports, 20 needed updating. Of those, >

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

Frank Staals wrote: > Jay O'Brien wrote: > > >>albi wrote: >> >> >> >> >>>Jay O'Brien wrote: >>> >>>hi, >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM. >>> >>>- cut for brevity >>> >>> >>> >>> -I didn't install xorg. Wh

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Saturday 25 December 2004 04:53 am, Peter Schuller wrote: > > Right now portmanager is upgrading kdelibs and I'm still using it. > > The only problem that might occur is between the > > deinstall/reinstall steps I'll be missing the libraries for about a > > minute, when this happens I just wait

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 01:54:04PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: > > >>I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times >>to fetch X11R6.8.1-src1.tar.gz, each time taking over an hour, >>and when the file failed, it failed showing a checksum mismatch. > > >>I t

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

Jay O'Brien wrote: albi wrote: Jay O'Brien wrote: hi, Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM. - cut for brevity -I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present? a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86 So

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

albi wrote: > Jay O'Brien wrote: > > hi, > > >>Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM. > > - cut for brevity > >>-I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present? > > > a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86 > So X is install

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

> Right now portmanager is upgrading kdelibs and I'm still using it. The > only problem that might occur is between the deinstall/reinstall steps > I'll be missing the libraries for about a minute, when this happens I > just wait untill its finished reinstalling then continue. > Here is a recap

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Friday 24 December 2004 03:52 pm, Peter Schuller wrote: > > That is indeed the case with portmanager. Sometimes it is a waste > > of time to rebuild everthing when a dependency changes, and > > sometimes it is the right thing to do, portmanager assumes it is > > always the right thing to do. One

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

> That is indeed the case with portmanager. Sometimes it is a waste > of time to rebuild everthing when a dependency changes, and sometimes > it is the right thing to do, portmanager assumes it is always the right > thing to do. One way this has proved to be a benefit is I've never > had to run th

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 01:54:04PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: > I ran portupgrade -a -N -vu -rR, and it tried several times > to fetch X11R6.8.1-src1.tar.gz, each time taking over an hour, > and when the file failed, it failed showing a checksum mismatch. > I tried it again today, and it was ab

Re: portupgrade time, xorg ports

Jay O'Brien wrote: hi, Running FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 #0, i386 P3-667MHz, 512MB RAM. - cut for brevity -I didn't install xorg. Why are the 16 xorg ports present? a fresh FreeBSD 5.3 has xorg by default instead of XFree86 ___ freebsd-questions

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Friday 24 December 2004 07:54 am, RW wrote: > On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > > > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > > On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > > > >>I'm running 5.3 RELEASE

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 09:02:30 -0800, Jay O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > RW wrote: > > > On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > >>On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > >> > >>>Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >>> > On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:0

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

RW wrote: > On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > >>On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: >> >>>Michael C. Shultz wrote: >>> On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: >I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a port

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Friday 24 December 2004 07:38, Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > > On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > > >>I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup. > > >>Following

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Thursday 23 December 2004 11:16 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > Michael C. Shultz wrote: > > On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > >>I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup. > >>Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at > >>http://www.onlamp.com/

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

Michael C. Shultz wrote: > On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > >>I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup. >>Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at >>http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1 >>I installed po

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Thursday 23 December 2004 10:01 pm, Jay O'Brien wrote: > I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup. > Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1 > I installed portupgrade and then ran portsdb

Re: portupgrade vs. portmanager

On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 10:01:58PM -0800, Jay O'Brien wrote: > I'm running 5.3 RELEASE and trying to learn. I did a ports cvsup. > Following the Dru Lavigne article on portupgrade at > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2003/08/28/FreeBSD_Basics.html?page=1 > I installed portupgrade and then ran por

Re: portupgrade perl and openwebmail

On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 09:10:36 +0100, thomas leveille wrote > > > > also is this make switch suppesed to be provided when building perl or > > when building openwebmail - which port please? > > > > You need to build perl with this switch, according to the commit > history : > > "Update to 5.8.1.

Re: portupgrade perl and openwebmail

If you have just gone from a < 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current 5.8.5, you are probably running into the following: (From the Openwebmail README file at http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt ) > If you are using FreeBSD and your perl is compiled from port, > then please note

Re: portupgrade perl and openwebmail

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Lapo Nustrini wrote: If you have just gone from a < 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current 5.8.5, you are probably running into the following: (From the Openwebmail README file at http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt ) If you are using FreeBSD and your perl i

Re: portupgrade perl and openwebmail

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Lapo Nustrini wrote: If you have just gone from a < 5.8.1 version of Perl to the current 5.8.5, you are probably running into the following: (From the Openwebmail README file at http://www.openwebmail.org/openwebmail/doc/readme.txt ) If you are using FreeBSD and your perl i

Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions

On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:54 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:33:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote: > > On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote: > > > On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > What command-line are you using? > >

Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 05:33:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote: > On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote: > > On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > What command-line are you using? > > > > Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving th

Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions

On Thursday 02 December 2004 05:23 pm, David Syphers wrote: > On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > What command-line are you using? > > Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u option > to portupgrade, and I can understand why it can't do that w

Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions

On Thursday 02 December 2004 03:13 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > What command-line are you using? Oops, sorry for the noise. I just realized that I was giving the -u option to portupgrade, and I can understand why it can't do that without building the port. Doing it without -u works fine. -David

Re: portupgrade, packages, and same versions

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 12:01:50PM -0800, David Syphers wrote: > I just upgraded to 5-STABLE from an older version of 5, and wanted to rebuild > all my ports because of the ABI compatability breakage just before 5-RELEASE. > I ran across behavior in portupgrade that I don't understand - if I forc

Re: portupgrade and index

"dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current ports. > I've lately switched to make fetchindex vs. portsdb -uU which goes much > faster. My problem is whenever i do a make search for a port the index.5 > file is regenerated and that takes an

Re: portupgrade and index

On Tuesday 30 November 2004 05:58, Kent Stewart wrote: > On Monday 29 November 2004 09:40 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:27:47PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > On

Re: portupgrade and index

On Monday 29 November 2004 09:40 pm, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:27:47PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote: > > > > Hello, > >

Re: portupgrade and index

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 11:27:47PM -0600, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote: > > > Hello, > > > I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current > >

Re: portupgrade and index

On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 19:57:34 -0800, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote: > > Hello, > > I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current > > ports. > > I've lately switched to make fetchindex vs. portsdb -uU which goe

Re: portupgrade and index

On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 10:48:29PM -0500, dave wrote: > Hello, > I've got a box that runs portupgrade to keep the most current ports. > I've lately switched to make fetchindex vs. portsdb -uU which goes much > faster. My problem is whenever i do a make search for a port the index.5 > file is re

Re: Portupgrade apache2 on 5.3-RELEASE

On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 05:50:26AM -0600, Mike Loiterman wrote: > I'm running 5.3-RELEASE with a cvsup a few minutes old. > > I'm trying to upgrade my apache-2.0.49 port via portupgrade. > > This is the error I get: > [05:30:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED]: /usr/local/etc]# portupgrade apache > ** Port mar

Re: Portupgrade seg. fault

Michael Shafae wrote: Hi, I have a FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 system which I have installed portupgrade--20040701_3, ruby-1.8.2.p2_1, and ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2. Previously upgrading ports were effortless with portupgrade. Today, I first CVSUP'ed the ports tree, read /usr/ports/CHANGES and ran `make

Re: Portupgrade seg. fault

On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 01:29:18PM -0800, Michael Shafae wrote: > > Hi, > > I have a FreeBSD 4.10-RELEASE-p2 system which I have installed > portupgrade--20040701_3, ruby-1.8.2.p2_1, and ruby18-bdb1-0.2.2. > > Previously upgrading ports were effortless with portupgrade. Today, I > first CVSU

Re: portupgrade open-motif doesn't work

On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:45:03PM +0100, Webtech wrote: > ===> open-motif-2.2.3 has known vulnerabilities: > >> xpm -- image decoding vulnerabilities. > Reference: > > >> Please update your ports tree and try

Re: portupgrade problem

On Tuesday 16 November 2004 11:50 am, Brian W. wrote: > I've been having this problem for about a week now. I've already > deinstalled and reinstalled the ruby, rubybdb and portupgrade ports, what > else can I look at? The below process takes at least an hour, its a > k62-450. The no such user

Re: portupgrade open-motif doesn't work

On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 04:45:03PM +0100, Webtech wrote: > Hi, > > I need to upgrade open-motif from 2.2.2_2 to 2.2.3 but when I make the > upgrade, I've got : > > zzz# portupgrade -ri open-motif-2.2.2_2 > ---> Session started at: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:40:18 +0100 > ---> Upgrade of x11-toolkits/

Re: portupgrade problem in freebsd 4.10

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok thanks for the detail response. I guess my confusion came from several places - the handbook explicity gives an example where you can refuse ports that aren't relevant to your environment (i refuse several such as japanese, chinese)... Hmm. I wonder if we should c

Re: portupgrade problem in freebsd 4.10

Ok thanks for the detail response. I guess my confusion came from several places - the handbook explicity gives an example where you can refuse ports that aren't relevant to your environment (i refuse several such as japanese, chinese)... Can you explain (if you know off hand) why make fetchinde

Re: portupgrade problem in freebsd 4.10

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Things worked fine until last upgrade (this morning). Now I get the following errors: pc1# !?upgr portupgrade -ra Updating the ports index ... Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait..tkscanfax-1.02: "/usr/ports/japanese/tk80" non-existent -- dependency list incomplete

Re: portupgrade core dump fix?

Lowell Gilbert wrote: "dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: New install of a 5.2.1 system, ports tree cvsupped to the latest. I was wondering if the problem with pkgdb core dumping with portupgrade is still occurring? If so, is there another port maintence tool equivalent? I was really not happy w

Re: portupgrade core dump fix?

"dave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > New install of a 5.2.1 system, ports tree cvsupped to the latest. I was > wondering if the problem with pkgdb core dumping with portupgrade is still > occurring? If so, is there another port maintence tool equivalent? I was > really not happy when the porti

Re: portupgrade core dump fix?

On Monday 01 November 2004 08:36 pm, dave wrote: > Hello, > New install of a 5.2.1 system, ports tree cvsupped to the latest. I was > wondering if the problem with pkgdb core dumping with portupgrade is still > occurring? If so, is there another port maintence tool equivalent? I was > really no

Re: portupgrade core dump fix?

On Monday 01 November 2004 08:36 pm, dave wrote: > Hello, > New install of a 5.2.1 system, ports tree cvsupped to the latest. > I was wondering if the problem with pkgdb core dumping with > portupgrade is still occurring? If so, is there another port > maintence tool equivalent? I was really no

Re: portupgrade and pkgtools.conf

On Thu, 28 October, 2004 10:55 am, Uros said: > Hello! > > I'm trying to update subversion from ports and I have > WITH parameters in my pkgtools.conf > > 'devel/subversion' => [ > 'WITHOUT_NEON=1', > 'WITH_APACHE2_APR=1', > 'WITH_BERKELEYDB=42' >

Re: portupgrade and pkgtools.conf

* Uros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [1054 10:54]: > Hello! > > I'm trying to update subversion from ports and I have > WITH parameters in my pkgtools.conf > > 'devel/subversion' => [ > 'WITHOUT_NEON=1', > 'WITH_APACHE2_APR=1', > 'WITH_BERKELEYDB=42' >

Re: portupgrade and pkgtools.conf

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 11:55:06 +0200, Uros <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to update subversion from ports and I have > WITH parameters in my pkgtools.conf > > 'devel/subversion' => [ > 'WITHOUT_NEON=1', > 'WITH_APACHE2_APR=1', > 'W

Re: portupgrade recovery procedure ?

oops, nevermind that one. i forgot to read the manpage before i posted. On Saturday 16 October 2004 17:09, h wrote: > hi all, > > my old laptop has been upgrading ports overnight but all updates > failed because portupgrade was bork and couldn't deinstall any old port. > > i now fixed it, but how

Re: portupgrade (pkgdb) question (2nd try)

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004 14:52:57 -0400 "Bobb Shires" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (dang webmail thing mangled my message. Sorry. Trying again) > > pkgdb -F is asking me a question I don't understand. > What should I do here? > > === [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root/supfiles 24 -> # pkgdb -F > ---> Checkin

Re: portupgrade (pkgdb) question (2nd try)

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 02:52:57PM -0400, Bobb Shires wrote: > (dang webmail thing mangled my message. Sorry. Trying again) > > pkgdb -F is asking me a question I don't understand. > What should I do here? > > === [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root/supfiles 24 -> # pkgdb -F > ---> Checking the package re

Re: portupgrade problem

On Mon, 11 Oct 2004, Matthew Seaman wrote: On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:05:17PM +0100, Vince Hoffman wrote: Hi all, Got a port upgrade problem here, ruby is dumping core during a portsdb -uU (and thus any time it tries to update the portsdb. <> any suggestions welcome Gawd. Not this *again*

Re: portupgrade problem

On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 04:05:17PM +0100, Vince Hoffman wrote: > Hi all, > Got a port upgrade problem here, ruby is dumping core during a > portsdb -uU (and thus any time it tries to update the portsdb. > only noticed it today but i did upgrade ruby recently so i tried following > the emerg

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

riginal Message- From: Matthew Seaman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Mire, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: Matt Navarre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thu Oct 07 12:41:17 2004 Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem? On Thu, Oct 0

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 10:45:46AM -0500, Mire, John wrote: > I'm still getting this error after a cvsup+buildworld, a make fetchindex and > I have deleted /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db and rebuilt it, what's the patch?: > > test# uname -v > FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE-p11 #12: Wed Oct 6 17:13:13 CDT 2004 > [EM

RE: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

] On Behalf Of > Matthew Seaman > Sent: Sunday, September 26, 2004 4:14 AM > To: Matt Navarre > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem? > > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:14:18PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > > On Saturday 25 September

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 06:14:18PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > > It could be a problem with the DBDriver. You could try this: > > Edit /root/.cs... > > and add > > PORTS_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash > > PKG_DBDRIVER=bdb1_hash > Doesn't the DBDR

Re: Portupgrade problem, possible pkgdb problem?

On Saturday 25 September 2004 05:13, Alex de Kruijff wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2004 at 04:18:47PM -0700, Matt Navarre wrote: > > On Saturday 25 September 2004 02:35, Matt Navarre wrote: > > > I'm trying to upgrade gnucash, but portupgrade is choking: > > > <*snip*> > > > > > > It looks like the pkgd

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >