RE: route problem

Hi, Hope you have rebooted after enabling the gateway, but you can check this with " sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding " :) So far from the server side it looks OK for me, but what are you pinging actually? How is done the configuration of the target device? This sounds like a pure routing problem,

Re: route problem

On 2013-05-20 5:01 pm, Pol Hallen wrote: If you don't mind could you post the output of ifconfig from both boxes? server1: re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8209b ether 70:71:bc:94:c3:6d inet 192.168.1.250 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 in

Re: route problem

> If you don't mind could you post the output of ifconfig from both boxes? server1: re0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 options=8209b ether 70:71:bc:94:c3:6d inet 192.168.1.250 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 inet6 fe80::7271:bcff:fe94:c36d%re0 prefixlen

Re: route problem

On 2013-05-20 4:19 pm, Pol Hallen wrote: Try: route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.250 does not run :-( Pol Interesting. I had a similar issue I got around with a similar route addition, though I was going from a LAN PC through my server that was running openvpn out to a remotely connected c

Re: route problem

> Try: > route add 192.168.1.0/24 192.168.2.250 does not run :-( Pol ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: route problem

On 2013-05-20 3:58 pm, Pol Hallen wrote: Hi folks! On my lan I've: server1 re0 - 192.168.1.250 xl0 - 192.168.2.250 default192.168.1.212 UGS 0 189re0 127.0.0.1 link#8 UH 0 18lo0 192.168.1.0/24 link#1 U

Re: route BGP

Hi, On 22/03/2013 12:28 PM, just man man wrote: do you have configuration routing BGP in freebsd ? thank you I use quagga, because that's what I have been using for the last 10 years. http://www.freshports.org/net/quagga-re/ http://www.freshports.org/net/quagga/ You might also like to try O

Re: route issue

Yavuz Ma?lak wrote: > Hello > > > On freebsd8.2 when i run netstat -rn i see below; > > # netstat -rn | grep -r "127.0.0.1" > 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UHS 0 1462933lo0 > > As flag i think that it should be UH but on my server as above; > > How can i fix it ?

Re: route

If I understand your problem, you have three pc's that you would like to be able to route between. For your 192.168.1.33 box to be able to talk to your 10.0.0.15 box, it needs to have an ip address on the 10.0.0 subnet. This could be accomplished by adding an alias in the rc.conf, ifconfig_lnc0_

RE: route

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:owner-freebsd- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Miguel Alcántara > Sent: Friday, 13 April 2007 5:55 AM > To: faqfreebsd > Subject: route > > hello all the people, i want to configure a freebsd 6.2 as a router, in > rc.conf added this

Re: Route #3 - USB 802.11 a/b/g

On 10/8/06, Jim Stapleton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 10/8/06, Sam Leffler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim Stapleton wrote: > > On 10/7/06, Lars Engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 06, 2006 at 07:22:50PM -0400, Jim Stapleton wrote: > >> > OK, that's interesting, I tried, that, a

Re: route malfunction wrong info

On 6/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I'm running Freebsd 6.1RC-1. Can anyone tell me if this is a bug or not? -Vlan137 is up -I issue a route get subnet from valn137 and I see the route exists -I issue an ifconfig vlan137 down -I then issue route get (subnet on the downed

Re: route how to?

> I'd like to add route to my computer so one ip would be forwarded to > "/dev/null". Turn firewall one. Drop all packets from that IP. :) -- unzip ; strip ; touch ; grep ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; fsck ; umount ; sleep ___ freebsd-question

Re: route how to?

> On 11 Nov 2005 12:29:00 -0500, Lowell Gilbert > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Perttu Laine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> I usually do this kind of thing with a firewall, but the routing table >> is a good way too. >> >> "man route" will explain everything you need to do. >> > > I asked bec

Re: route how to?

On 11 Nov 2005 12:29:00 -0500, Lowell Gilbert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Perttu Laine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I'd like to add route to my computer so one ip would be forwarded to > > "/dev/null". So all other connections would work normally, but > connection to > > for example 192.16

Re: route how to?

On Nov 11, 2005, at 12:15 PM, Perttu Laine wrote: I'd like to add route to my computer so one ip would be forwarded to "/dev/null". So all other connections would work normally, but connection to for example 192.168.10.1 would not work. How can this be done? And I propab

Re: route how to?

Perttu Laine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'd like to add route to my computer so one ip would be forwarded to > "/dev/null". So all other connections would work normally, but connection to > for example 192.168.10.1 would not work. How can this > be done? And I propably nee

Re: route question

Jeff Maxwell wrote: I added a route to my rc.conf now I get this message. The route that I added seems to work, but Cron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> /usr/libexec/save-entropy route: not found The route that I added seems to work, but the syntax must be wrong. this is what I added: defaultrouter="10

Re: route question

On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 06:30:43 -0400 Jeff Maxwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I added a route to my rc.conf now I get this message. The route that -- cut -- > route add -net 10.10.30.0 10.10.10.3 the static_routes section in rc.conf's manualpage might be what you need -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: l

Re: route entries after ICMP redirect

Uwe Doering wrote: This has been fixed in CVS in MAIN (rev. 1.52) and MFC'ed to RELENG_4 (rev. 1.37.2.5) and RELENG_5 (rev. 1.51.4.2) a couple of weeks ago: Oh, thank you! And thanks to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Sem. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing

Re: route entries after ICMP redirect

Sergey Matveychuk wrote: I've got some problem with route entries that was created after ICMP redirect messages. They are never expired. Our default gateway (it's a HP switch) send ICMP redirect messages if it see a short path to destination. It's makes it not so overloaded. But pathes sometime

Re: route entries after ICMP redirect

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If you want to handle this in a more clever way than a cron job you could write a small daemon which reads routing messages and does "the right thing" for whatever your situation is. I've explore a code and found I can do quite easy addition for dynamic routes - fill an ex

Re: route entries after ICMP redirect

At Sun, 10 Apr 2005 15:14:59 +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > I've got some problem with route entries that was created after ICMP > redirect messages. They are never expired. > > Our default gateway (it's a HP switch) send ICMP redirect messages if it > see a short path to destination. It's

Re: route entries after ICMP redirect

Sergey Matveychuk wrote: I've got some problem with route entries that was created after ICMP redirect messages. They are never expired. Our default gateway (it's a HP switch) send ICMP redirect messages if it see a short path to destination. It's makes it not so overloaded. But pathes sometime

Re: route vmnet1 host server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 11 October 2004 21:04, dick hoogendijk wrote: > On 11 Oct Christian Hiris wrote: > > In the Ethernet Adapters configuration dialog select > >Connection Type: --> Custom > >Vmnet:--> /dev/vmnet1 > > In your next message yo

Re: route vmnet1 host server

On 11 Oct Christian Hiris wrote: > In the Ethernet Adapters configuration dialog select >Connection Type: --> Custom >Vmnet:--> /dev/vmnet1 In your next message you explain about the support for ¨bridge¨ on freebsd. However, I don´t have vmware3 setup like this. I chose HostO

Re: route vmnet1 host server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 11 October 2004 16:37, Christian Hiris wrote: > On Monday 11 October 2004 12:27, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > The above information says it all, I guess. I was confused, because the > > vmware3 ports speaks of no support for bridging. This must

Re: route vmnet1 host server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 11 October 2004 12:27, dick hoogendijk wrote: > > The above information says it all, I guess. I was confused, because the > vmware3 ports speaks of no support for bridging. This must be some other > kind of bridging ;-) As you tell me, this

Re: route vmnet1 host server

On 11 Oct Christian Hiris wrote: > The easiest solution is to assign a free ip-address of your localnet > (192.168.11.nnn) to your win-guest. Try to avoid a setup of two > subnets on one physical NIC. > > As /dev/vmnet1 acts as bridge it's ip-address isn't relevant. There is > only the req

Re: route vmnet1 host server

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 10 October 2004 18:02, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > I installed vmware3 on my fbsd-4.1 box. This machine has one > ethernetcard and is a part of my local network (192.168.11.22) > > The situation: > > Server -- internet (217.122.132.217) - eth0 >

Re: route

Angus Rodinson (Angose) wrote: [ ... ] 192.168.0.10 = dial up and router with natd 192.16.0.2 = client side with FreeBS i have an idea that is something like route add 192.168.0.2 192.168.0.10 I think you're asking how to set up a route by hand, so try: ifconfig _if_ inet 192.168.0

Re: route settings in rc.conf - question, with details.

Thank you very much for that help - unfortunately Igot the wrong information and stated the problem slightly incorrect. In reality, the rc.conf in question is: defaultrouter="10.10.10.1" ifconfig_fxp0="inet 10.10.10.2 netmask 255.255.255.0" ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 20.20.20.2 netmask 255.25

Re: route settings in rc.conf - question, with details.

From: "Firsto Lasto" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Hi, > > I have a system with IPs assigned from 192.168.0.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24 > > Right now I have this in my rc.conf: > > defaultrouter="10.10.10.10" > ifconfig_fxp0="inet 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0" > ifconfig_fxp0_alias0="inet 192.168.0.2 n